Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
65 lines (56 loc) · 9.78 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

65 lines (56 loc) · 9.78 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for librespeed/speedtest

Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting and Request Throttling (Speedtest Specific)

Description:

  1. Identify Speed Test Initiation Points: Pinpoint the exact client-side actions or server-side endpoints that trigger a speed test. This could be a button click, JavaScript function call, or a specific API endpoint.
  2. Implement Rate Limiting for Speed Tests: Configure rate limiting specifically for these speed test initiation points. This is separate from general application rate limiting and focuses on controlling the frequency of speed tests.
  3. Define Speed Test Rate Limits: Set limits on how often a user or IP address can start a speed test within a given timeframe. Consider factors like server capacity and desired user experience. For example, limit to one speed test per minute per IP address.
  4. Implement Throttling for Speed Test Resources: If server-side resources are heavily utilized during speed tests (e.g., file servers for download tests), implement throttling to manage resource consumption and prevent overload during concurrent tests.
  5. Monitor Speed Test Traffic: Track speed test initiation rates and resource usage to fine-tune rate limits and throttling settings.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Speedtest-Specific Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks - High Severity: Attackers can intentionally trigger numerous speed tests to overwhelm server resources, specifically targeting the speed test functionality to cause disruption.
    • Resource Exhaustion due to Legitimate but Excessive Speed Tests - Medium Severity: Even legitimate users might unintentionally or intentionally initiate too many speed tests, leading to server performance degradation or unavailability for other users.
  • Impact:
    • Speedtest-Specific DoS Attacks: Significantly reduces risk. Rate limiting specifically for speed tests prevents attackers from easily overloading the server by repeatedly initiating tests.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Moderately reduces risk. Limits the impact of excessive speed test usage on server resources, ensuring better performance for all users.
  • Currently Implemented: General rate limiting might be in place for the application, but speedtest-specific rate limiting is likely missing. The application might not differentiate between regular requests and speed test initiation requests.
  • Missing Implementation: Needs to be implemented specifically for speed test initiation points. This requires identifying these points and configuring rate limiting rules that apply only to speed test requests, independent of general application rate limits.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Information Disclosure in Speed Test Parameters

Description:

  1. Review Speed Test Configuration: Examine how Librespeed is configured and what parameters are exposed in the client-side code or during server-client communication for speed tests.
  2. Abstract Server Endpoints: Instead of directly exposing internal server IP addresses or specific file paths for test servers, use abstracted endpoints or domain names. This hides internal infrastructure details.
  3. Limit Parameter Exposure: Minimize the amount of technical or potentially sensitive information revealed in speed test parameters. Avoid exposing details about network topology, internal server names, or specific configurations that are not essential for the test itself.
  4. Use Generic Error Messages: When errors occur during speed tests, provide generic error messages to the client that do not reveal specific server-side details or potential vulnerabilities.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Information Disclosure - Low to Medium Severity: Exposing internal server details or network information in speed test parameters can aid attackers in reconnaissance and planning targeted attacks.
    • Internal Network Mapping - Low Severity: Revealing server IPs or network ranges can help attackers map internal network infrastructure.
  • Impact:
    • Information Disclosure: Moderately reduces risk. Minimizing information exposure makes it harder for attackers to gather intelligence about the application's infrastructure.
    • Internal Network Mapping: Slightly reduces risk. Makes internal network mapping slightly more difficult for external attackers.
  • Currently Implemented: Likely not actively considered or implemented. The default Librespeed configuration might expose more information than necessary.
  • Missing Implementation: Requires reviewing the Librespeed configuration and client-side code to identify exposed parameters and implement measures to abstract endpoints and minimize information disclosure. This might involve configuration changes in Librespeed or modifications to how it's integrated into the application.

Mitigation Strategy: Ensure Integrity of Speed Test Environment (If Critical Results Needed)

Description:

  1. Server-Side Result Validation (If Applicable): If speed test results are critical for your application (e.g., for service level agreements or network monitoring), implement server-side validation of the results reported by the client-side Librespeed.
  2. Secure Communication Channels: Ensure secure communication (HTTPS) between the client-side Librespeed and any server-side components involved in the speed test process to prevent tampering during data transmission.
  3. Logging and Auditing of Test Processes: Implement logging and auditing of speed test initiation, execution, and results on the server-side. This provides a record of tests and can help detect anomalies or potential manipulation attempts.
  4. Consider Signed Results (Advanced): For highly critical scenarios, explore methods to digitally sign speed test results on the server-side to guarantee their authenticity and integrity. This would require server-side components to process and sign the results before they are considered authoritative.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Manipulation of Speed Test Results - Medium to High Severity (If results are critical): Attackers or malicious users might attempt to manipulate speed test results to falsely represent network performance or gain unauthorized benefits if results are used for critical decisions.
    • Data Integrity Issues - Medium Severity: Without integrity checks, there's a risk of data corruption or unintentional modification of speed test results during transmission or storage.
  • Impact:
    • Manipulation of Speed Test Results: Significantly reduces risk (if implemented robustly). Server-side validation and result signing make it much harder to tamper with speed test outcomes.
    • Data Integrity Issues: Moderately reduces risk. Secure communication and logging improve data integrity during the speed test process.
  • Currently Implemented: Unlikely to be implemented unless the application has specific requirements for highly reliable and verifiable speed test results. Standard Librespeed usage often relies on client-side reporting.
  • Missing Implementation: Needs to be implemented if the integrity of speed test results is crucial. This requires developing server-side components to validate, log, and potentially sign speed test results, and modifying the Librespeed integration to work with these server-side components.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing (Speedtest Focused)

Description:

  1. Include Speedtest in Scope: When planning security audits and penetration testing, explicitly include the Librespeed speed test functionality within the scope of the assessment.
  2. Focus on Speedtest-Specific Threats: Direct the audit and testing efforts to specifically examine vulnerabilities and threats related to the speed test functionality, such as DoS attacks targeting speed tests, information disclosure in test parameters, and potential manipulation of test results.
  3. Simulate Speedtest-Related Attacks: During penetration testing, simulate attack scenarios that are specific to speed tests, like attempting to flood the server with speed test requests, manipulating client-side code to alter results, or exploiting any server-side components involved in speed tests.
  4. Review Speedtest Configuration and Integration: Audit the configuration of Librespeed and its integration with the application to identify any misconfigurations or weaknesses that could be exploited.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Undiscovered Speedtest-Specific Vulnerabilities - Variable Severity: Regular audits and testing can uncover vulnerabilities that might be missed through standard development practices, including those specific to the speed test implementation.
  • Impact:
    • Undiscovered Speedtest-Specific Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk over time. Regular security assessments help proactively identify and address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.
  • Currently Implemented: General security audits and penetration testing might be performed for the application, but specific focus on the Librespeed speed test component is likely missing.
  • Missing Implementation: Requires explicitly including the Librespeed speed test functionality in the scope of security audits and penetration testing plans. This ensures that security assessments specifically address the unique risks associated with the speed test feature.