Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
206 lines (167 loc) · 155 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

206 lines (167 loc) · 155 KB

Matomo Security Analysis: Deep Dive

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of the Matomo web analytics platform. This includes identifying potential vulnerabilities, assessing the effectiveness of existing security controls, and providing actionable recommendations to enhance Matomo's security posture. The analysis will focus on key components, including the Tracking API, Reporting API, User Interface, Plugin architecture, and Database interactions, inferring architecture and data flow from the provided design review and publicly available information.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following aspects of Matomo:

  • Core Matomo Application: The PHP codebase, including the Tracking API, Reporting API, and User Interface.
  • Database Interactions: How Matomo interacts with the MySQL/MariaDB database.
  • Plugin Architecture: The security implications of Matomo's plugin system.
  • Deployment (Self-Hosted Docker): Security considerations specific to the Docker-based self-hosting deployment model.
  • Build Process: Security controls within the build and release pipeline.
  • Data Flows: How data moves between different components.

This analysis does not cover:

  • Matomo Cloud Infrastructure: The security of Matomo's cloud-hosted offering is outside the scope of this analysis.
  • Third-Party Server Infrastructure: The security of servers used for self-hosting (beyond the Docker configuration) is the responsibility of the user.
  • Specific Third-Party Plugins: Each plugin would require its own separate security analysis.

Methodology:

This analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Design Review Analysis: Thorough examination of the provided security design review document.
  2. Codebase Inference: Inferring architectural details, data flows, and security mechanisms based on the design review, Matomo's documentation, and general knowledge of PHP web applications.
  3. Threat Modeling: Identifying potential threats and attack vectors based on the identified components and data flows. We will use a combination of STRIDE and attack trees.
  4. Vulnerability Analysis: Assessing the likelihood and impact of potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Mitigation Recommendations: Providing specific, actionable recommendations to address identified vulnerabilities and improve Matomo's security posture.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component, focusing on potential threats and vulnerabilities:

2.1 Tracking API (PHP)

  • Function: Receives tracking data from websites via HTTPS requests. Processes and stores this data in the database.
  • Threats (STRIDE):
    • Spoofing: An attacker could send forged tracking data, polluting the analytics data.
    • Tampering: An attacker could modify tracking data in transit, leading to inaccurate data.
    • Repudiation: Difficult to prove who sent specific tracking data (if not properly authenticated).
    • Information Disclosure: Potential leakage of sensitive information in tracking requests (e.g., custom dimensions).
    • Denial of Service: High volume of requests could overwhelm the API, making it unavailable.
    • Elevation of Privilege: Vulnerabilities in the API could allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to data or system resources.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • SQL Injection: If input validation is flawed, attackers could inject malicious SQL code to access or modify data.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Although less likely in an API, reflected XSS could be possible if error messages or responses include unescaped user input.
    • XML External Entity (XXE) Injection: If the API processes XML data, XXE vulnerabilities could allow attackers to access local files or internal systems.
    • Insecure Deserialization: If the API deserializes user-provided data, attackers could exploit vulnerabilities in the deserialization process to execute arbitrary code.
    • Rate Limiting Bypass: If rate limiting is not properly implemented, attackers could bypass it to launch DoS attacks.
    • Business Logic Flaws: Flaws in the API's logic could allow attackers to bypass security checks or manipulate data in unexpected ways.

2.2 Reporting API (PHP)

  • Function: Provides data for the user interface and other reporting tools. Retrieves and aggregates data from the database.
  • Threats (STRIDE):
    • Spoofing: An attacker could impersonate a legitimate user to access data they shouldn't have.
    • Tampering: An attacker could modify API requests to retrieve or manipulate data.
    • Repudiation: Difficult to track who accessed specific data (if auditing is insufficient).
    • Information Disclosure: Potential leakage of sensitive data through API responses.
    • Denial of Service: Complex or resource-intensive API requests could be used to cause DoS.
    • Elevation of Privilege: Vulnerabilities in the API could allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to data or system resources.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • SQL Injection: Similar to the Tracking API, flawed input validation could lead to SQL injection.
    • Broken Access Control: Insufficient authorization checks could allow users to access data they shouldn't have.
    • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR): If the API uses predictable identifiers for data objects, attackers could access data by manipulating these identifiers.
    • Excessive Data Exposure: The API might return more data than necessary, potentially exposing sensitive information.
    • Mass Assignment: If not handled carefully, attackers might be able to modify data fields they shouldn't have access to.

2.3 User Interface (PHP, JavaScript)

  • Function: The web-based interface for users to interact with Matomo. Displays reports, allows configuration, provides user management.
  • Threats (STRIDE):
    • Spoofing: An attacker could create a fake Matomo login page to steal user credentials (phishing).
    • Tampering: An attacker could modify the UI in the user's browser (e.g., using a malicious browser extension).
    • Repudiation: Difficult to track user actions within the UI (if auditing is insufficient).
    • Information Disclosure: Potential leakage of sensitive data through the UI (e.g., in error messages, autocomplete).
    • Denial of Service: Attacks targeting the web server could make the UI unavailable.
    • Elevation of Privilege: Vulnerabilities in the UI could allow attackers to gain administrative access.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): The most significant threat to the UI. Stored XSS (injecting malicious scripts into the database) and Reflected XSS (injecting scripts through URL parameters or form inputs) are both possible.
    • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Attackers could trick users into performing actions they didn't intend to, such as changing settings or deleting data.
    • Session Hijacking: Attackers could steal user session cookies and impersonate them.
    • Clickjacking: Attackers could trick users into clicking on hidden elements to perform unintended actions.
    • Open Redirect: If Matomo uses redirects, attackers could manipulate them to redirect users to malicious websites.
    • Client-Side Logic Flaws: Vulnerabilities in the JavaScript code could be exploited to bypass security checks or manipulate data.

2.4 Plugins (PHP)

  • Function: Extend Matomo's functionality. Provide additional features (e.g., custom reports, integrations).
  • Threats (STRIDE): Plugins inherit all the threats of the other components (Tracking API, Reporting API, UI) depending on their functionality. They also introduce new threats:
    • Spoofing: A malicious plugin could impersonate a legitimate plugin.
    • Tampering: A compromised plugin could be modified to include malicious code.
    • Repudiation: Difficult to track actions performed by a plugin (if auditing is insufficient).
    • Information Disclosure: A plugin could leak sensitive data.
    • Denial of Service: A poorly written plugin could consume excessive resources, causing DoS.
    • Elevation of Privilege: A plugin could exploit vulnerabilities in Matomo's core to gain higher privileges.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • All vulnerabilities listed for other components are potentially present in plugins.
    • Insecure Plugin APIs: If plugins expose their own APIs, these APIs could be vulnerable.
    • Lack of Sandboxing: Plugins typically run with the same privileges as the Matomo core, meaning a vulnerability in a plugin can compromise the entire installation.
    • Unvalidated Updates: If plugin updates are not properly validated, attackers could distribute malicious updates.

2.5 Database (MySQL/MariaDB)

  • Function: Stores tracking data, configuration, and user information.
  • Threats (STRIDE):
    • Spoofing: An attacker could connect to the database with stolen credentials.
    • Tampering: An attacker could modify or delete data in the database.
    • Repudiation: Difficult to track database changes (if auditing is insufficient).
    • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to the database could expose all stored data.
    • Denial of Service: Resource exhaustion attacks could make the database unavailable.
    • Elevation of Privilege: Vulnerabilities in the database server could allow attackers to gain higher privileges.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    • SQL Injection: The primary threat to the database, stemming from vulnerabilities in the Tracking API or Reporting API.
    • Weak Database Credentials: Using default or easily guessable passwords.
    • Unpatched Database Server: Vulnerabilities in the MySQL/MariaDB software itself.
    • Insecure Database Configuration: Misconfigured database settings (e.g., exposed to the internet, unnecessary privileges).
    • Lack of Encryption at Rest: If the database is not encrypted, attackers who gain access to the server could read the data directly.

3. Inferred Architecture, Components, and Data Flow

Based on the design review and common web application patterns, we can infer the following:

Architecture:

  • Matomo follows a fairly standard Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, common for PHP applications.
  • The Model represents the data and interacts with the database.
  • The View is responsible for rendering the user interface.
  • The Controller handles user requests, interacts with the Model, and selects the appropriate View.
  • The Tracking API and Reporting API likely have separate controllers and models.
  • Plugins can interact with the core Matomo components through defined hooks and APIs.

Components:

  • Web Server (Apache/Nginx): Handles incoming HTTP requests and serves static files.
  • PHP-FPM (FastCGI Process Manager): Executes PHP code.
  • Database (MySQL/MariaDB): Stores data.
  • Matomo Core (PHP): Implements the core logic of the application.
  • Plugins (PHP): Extend Matomo's functionality.
  • JavaScript Libraries (e.g., jQuery, Vue.js): Used for front-end functionality.
  • Composer (PHP Dependency Manager): Manages third-party PHP libraries.

Data Flow (Tracking):

  1. Website Visitor: A user visits a website with the Matomo tracking code.
  2. Tracking Code (JavaScript): The JavaScript code executes in the visitor's browser and collects data about the visit.
  3. HTTPS Request: The tracking code sends an HTTPS request to the Matomo Tracking API.
  4. Tracking API (PHP): The API receives the request, validates the input, and processes the data.
  5. Database (MySQL/MariaDB): The API stores the tracking data in the database.

Data Flow (Reporting):

  1. User: A user logs in to the Matomo UI.
  2. UI (PHP, JavaScript): The UI makes requests to the Reporting API to retrieve data.
  3. Reporting API (PHP): The API receives the request, authenticates the user, authorizes the request, and queries the database.
  4. Database (MySQL/MariaDB): The database returns the requested data.
  5. Reporting API (PHP): The API processes the data and returns it to the UI.
  6. UI (PHP, JavaScript): The UI displays the data to the user.

4. Specific Security Considerations for Matomo

Based on the analysis, here are specific security considerations tailored to Matomo:

  • Anonymization of IP Addresses: Matomo should always be configured to anonymize IP addresses by default. This is crucial for privacy compliance (e.g., GDPR). The level of anonymization should be configurable, and users should be clearly informed about the implications of different anonymization settings.
  • Data Minimization: Matomo should only collect the data that is strictly necessary for analytics purposes. Users should be able to configure which data points are collected and disable unnecessary tracking features.
  • Secure Configuration Defaults: Matomo should ship with secure default settings. This includes:
    • Strong password policies.
    • Anonymized IP addresses.
    • Enabled CSRF protection.
    • Recommended HTTP security headers.
    • Disabled unnecessary features.
  • Plugin Security: The Matomo Marketplace should have a rigorous review process for new plugins. This should include:
    • Static analysis of plugin code.
    • Manual security reviews.
    • Requirements for plugin developers to follow secure coding practices.
    • A mechanism for reporting and addressing vulnerabilities in plugins.
    • Clear communication to users about the risks of using third-party plugins.
  • Regular Security Audits: Matomo should undergo regular security audits by independent security experts. These audits should cover the core application, the plugin architecture, and the build process.
  • Incident Response Plan: Matomo should have a well-defined incident response plan to handle security incidents effectively. This plan should include procedures for:
    • Detecting and reporting incidents.
    • Containing and eradicating threats.
    • Recovering from incidents.
    • Notifying affected users.
  • Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): 2FA should be strongly encouraged for all Matomo users, especially administrators.
  • Content Security Policy (CSP): Matomo should provide clear guidance on how to configure a strong CSP to mitigate XSS attacks. The default Matomo installation should include a basic CSP that can be customized by users.
  • HTTP Security Headers: Matomo should recommend and provide guidance on configuring various HTTP security headers, such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  • Database Security:
    • Use strong, unique passwords for the database user.
    • Restrict database access to only the necessary IP addresses.
    • Enable database encryption at rest, if possible.
    • Regularly back up the database.
    • Monitor database logs for suspicious activity.
    • Apply security updates to the database server promptly.
  • Secrets Management: Use environment variables or a dedicated secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault) to store sensitive information like database credentials, API keys, and other secrets. Never store secrets directly in the codebase or configuration files.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Here are specific, actionable mitigation strategies for the identified threats and vulnerabilities:

| Component | Vulnerability | Mitigation Strategy