Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
246 lines (209 loc) · 21.6 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

246 lines (209 loc) · 21.6 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the ownCloud core project based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the ownCloud core project's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies. This analysis aims to improve the overall security posture of the ownCloud core, focusing on preventing data breaches, unauthorized access, and other security incidents. We will focus on the core components, not third-party apps.

  • Scope: This analysis covers the core components of the ownCloud server as described in the design review, including:

    • Authentication mechanisms
    • Authorization and access control
    • File storage and retrieval
    • Data synchronization
    • Database interaction
    • Web server interaction
    • Input validation and output encoding
    • Session management
    • Build process security
    • Deployment security (focusing on the Docker deployment model)

    This analysis excludes third-party apps, external storage integrations (beyond the core mechanisms for interacting with them), and specific client-side security considerations (desktop/mobile apps). It also excludes detailed analysis of the LDAP/AD and SMTP integrations, focusing instead on how ownCloud interacts with them securely.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams, documentation, and general knowledge of PHP applications and web servers, we will infer the detailed architecture, component interactions, and data flow within the ownCloud core.
    2. Component Breakdown: We will analyze each key component identified in the scope, focusing on its security implications.
    3. Threat Modeling: For each component, we will identify potential threats using a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and known attack patterns against web applications and file storage systems.
    4. Vulnerability Identification: We will identify potential vulnerabilities based on the identified threats and common weaknesses in similar systems.
    5. Impact Assessment: We will assess the potential impact of each vulnerability on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
    6. Mitigation Strategies: We will propose specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies for each identified vulnerability, focusing on code-level changes, configuration adjustments, and security control enhancements. We will prioritize mitigations that are practical to implement within the ownCloud core.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each key component:

  • Authentication (User <-> Web Server <-> App Server):

    • Threats:
      • Spoofing: Attacker impersonates a legitimate user.
      • Information Disclosure: Leaking of usernames, password hashes, or session tokens.
      • Elevation of Privilege: Attacker gains administrative access.
      • Brute-Force/Credential Stuffing: Automated attacks to guess passwords.
      • Session Hijacking: Stealing a valid user session.
      • Phishing: Tricking users into revealing their credentials.
    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Weak password hashing algorithms (e.g., MD5, SHA1).
      • Lack of proper salt and iteration count in password hashing.
      • Vulnerable session management (predictable session IDs, lack of secure flag, lack of HttpOnly flag).
      • Insufficient brute-force protection (lack of rate limiting, account lockout).
      • Improper handling of password reset functionality (predictable tokens, email-based account recovery vulnerabilities).
      • Vulnerabilities in LDAP/AD integration (LDAP injection, insecure communication).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Enforce strong password policies: Minimum length, complexity requirements, and password expiration. Use a strong, adaptive hashing algorithm like Argon2id or bcrypt. Ensure sufficient salt length and iteration count.
      • Implement robust session management: Use a cryptographically secure random number generator for session IDs. Set the Secure and HttpOnly flags on session cookies. Implement session expiration and idle timeouts. Consider using a session management library that handles these aspects securely.
      • Strengthen brute-force protection: Implement IP-based and user-based rate limiting. Implement account lockout after a configurable number of failed login attempts. Consider CAPTCHA or other challenges.
      • Secure password reset: Use time-limited, cryptographically secure tokens for password resets. Send reset links via email, but do not include the token directly in the email body. Require confirmation of the user's email address before initiating a password reset.
      • Secure LDAP/AD integration: Use LDAPS (LDAP over TLS) for secure communication. Validate and sanitize all input to prevent LDAP injection attacks. Use prepared statements or parameterized queries for LDAP queries.
      • Mandatory 2FA for administrators: Enforce the use of two-factor authentication for all administrative accounts.
      • Audit logging: Log all authentication events (successes, failures, password resets).

  • Authorization (App Server <-> Database, App Server <-> File Storage):

    • Threats:
      • Elevation of Privilege: User gains access to files or folders they should not have access to.
      • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to file metadata or content.
      • Tampering: Unauthorized modification or deletion of files or folders.
    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Inconsistent or incorrect implementation of access control logic.
      • Bypass of access control checks (e.g., through path traversal vulnerabilities).
      • Improper handling of shared files and folders (e.g., over-permissive sharing).
      • Race conditions in access control checks.
      • Vulnerabilities in database queries (SQL injection leading to unauthorized data access).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Centralized authorization logic: Implement a single, well-defined authorization module that handles all access control checks. Avoid scattering authorization logic throughout the codebase.
      • Principle of least privilege: Grant users only the minimum necessary permissions.
      • Use parameterized queries or an ORM: Prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities by using parameterized queries or an Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) that handles escaping properly. Never construct SQL queries by concatenating user input.
      • Thorough input validation: Validate all file paths and filenames to prevent path traversal attacks. Use a whitelist approach to allow only known-good characters.
      • Secure sharing implementation: Carefully design and implement the sharing mechanism to prevent over-sharing and unauthorized access. Use unique, cryptographically secure tokens for sharing links. Implement granular permissions for shared resources (view-only, edit, etc.).
      • Address race conditions: Use appropriate locking mechanisms or transactional operations to prevent race conditions in access control checks.
      • Audit logging: Log all authorization decisions (access granted, access denied).

  • File Storage and Retrieval (App Server <-> File Storage):

    • Threats:
      • Information Disclosure: Unauthorized access to file content.
      • Tampering: Unauthorized modification or deletion of files.
      • Denial of Service: Attacks that prevent legitimate users from accessing files (e.g., filling up storage, deleting files).
    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Path traversal vulnerabilities.
      • Unrestricted file uploads (allowing upload of malicious files, e.g., web shells).
      • Improper file permissions on the file storage.
      • Lack of integrity checks on stored files.
      • Vulnerabilities in the interaction with external storage providers (e.g., S3 bucket misconfigurations).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict path validation: As mentioned above, rigorously validate all file paths to prevent path traversal. Use a whitelist approach and canonicalize paths before using them.
      • Secure file uploads:
        • Validate file types using a whitelist of allowed extensions and by checking the file's magic number (MIME type detection). Do not rely solely on the file extension.
        • Store uploaded files outside the web root to prevent direct execution of uploaded files.
        • Rename uploaded files to prevent naming collisions and potential exploits. Use a cryptographically secure random filename.
        • Limit file upload sizes to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
      • Proper file permissions: Ensure that the file storage is configured with appropriate permissions to prevent unauthorized access by other users or processes on the server.
      • File integrity checking: Implement a mechanism to detect unauthorized modifications to files. This could involve storing checksums (e.g., SHA-256) of files and periodically verifying them.
      • Secure external storage integration: Follow security best practices for each external storage provider (e.g., AWS S3, Dropbox). Use IAM roles and policies to grant ownCloud only the necessary permissions. Use secure communication (HTTPS).
      • Regular backups: Implement a robust backup and recovery strategy to protect against data loss.

  • Data Synchronization (User <-> Web Server <-> App Server <-> File Storage):

    • Threats:
      • Tampering: Modification of data during synchronization.
      • Information Disclosure: Interception of data during synchronization.
      • Denial of Service: Attacks that disrupt the synchronization process.
      • Replay Attacks: Capturing and replaying synchronization requests.
    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Insecure communication channels (lack of TLS).
      • Lack of data integrity checks during synchronization.
      • Vulnerabilities in the synchronization protocol.
      • Race conditions leading to data inconsistencies.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Enforce TLS: Use HTTPS (TLS 1.3 or higher) for all communication between clients and the server.
      • Data integrity checks: Use checksums or digital signatures to verify the integrity of data during synchronization.
      • Secure synchronization protocol: Carefully design and implement the synchronization protocol to prevent replay attacks and other vulnerabilities. Use sequence numbers or timestamps to prevent replay attacks.
      • Address race conditions: Use appropriate locking mechanisms or transactional operations to prevent race conditions during synchronization.

  • Database Interaction (App Server <-> Database):

    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection: Attacker injects malicious SQL code to gain unauthorized access to data or modify the database.
      • Information Disclosure: Leaking of database schema or data.
      • Denial of Service: Attacks that overload the database server.
    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Improperly constructed SQL queries (using string concatenation).
      • Lack of input validation.
      • Overly permissive database user permissions.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Parameterized queries/ORM: As mentioned previously, always use parameterized queries or an ORM to prevent SQL injection.
      • Input validation: Validate all user input before using it in database queries, even when using parameterized queries.
      • Principle of least privilege: Grant the database user used by ownCloud only the minimum necessary permissions. Do not use the database root user.
      • Database firewall: Consider using a database firewall to restrict access to the database server.
      • Regular database backups: Implement a robust backup and recovery strategy.

  • Web Server Interaction (User <-> Web Server):

    • Threats:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Attacker injects malicious JavaScript code into web pages viewed by other users.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Attacker tricks a user into performing actions they did not intend to perform.
      • Clickjacking: Attacker tricks a user into clicking on something different from what they think they are clicking on.
      • Denial of Service: Attacks that overload the web server.
    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Lack of proper output encoding (allowing XSS).
      • Missing or ineffective CSRF protection.
      • Missing or ineffective security headers (e.g., X-Frame-Options, Content-Security-Policy).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Output encoding: Properly encode all user-supplied data before displaying it in web pages. Use context-specific encoding (e.g., HTML encoding, JavaScript encoding, URL encoding). Use a templating engine that provides automatic output encoding.
      • CSRF protection: Implement CSRF protection using synchronizer tokens. Ensure that all state-changing requests (e.g., POST, PUT, DELETE) require a valid CSRF token.
      • Security headers: Implement the following security headers:
        • Content-Security-Policy (CSP): A powerful header to mitigate XSS and data injection attacks. Define a strict CSP that allows only trusted sources for scripts, styles, images, etc.
        • X-Frame-Options: Prevent clickjacking by setting this header to DENY or SAMEORIGIN.
        • X-Content-Type-Options: Set this header to nosniff to prevent MIME-sniffing vulnerabilities.
        • Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS): Enforce HTTPS connections.
        • X-XSS-Protection: Enable the browser's built-in XSS filter (although CSP is generally preferred).
      • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Consider deploying a WAF to protect against common web attacks.

  • Input Validation and Output Encoding (Throughout the Application):

    • This is a cross-cutting concern that applies to all components. Consistent and thorough input validation and output encoding are crucial for preventing a wide range of vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Centralized validation: Implement a centralized input validation library or framework.
      • Whitelist approach: Validate input against a whitelist of allowed values or patterns whenever possible.
      • Regular expressions: Use regular expressions to validate input formats, but be careful to avoid ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) vulnerabilities.
      • Context-specific output encoding: Use the appropriate encoding function for the context in which the data is being displayed (HTML, JavaScript, URL, etc.).

  • Session Management (User <-> Web Server <-> App Server):

    • Already covered in detail under Authentication.

  • Build Process Security:

    • Threats:
      • Dependency vulnerabilities: Introduction of vulnerabilities through compromised or outdated third-party libraries.
      • Compromised build server: Attacker gains control of the build server and injects malicious code into the release packages.
    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Lack of dependency vulnerability scanning.
      • Insecure build environment.
      • Lack of code signing.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Dependency vulnerability scanning: Integrate a dependency vulnerability scanner (e.g., OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk) into the CI/CD pipeline. Automatically scan for known vulnerabilities in dependencies and fail the build if vulnerabilities are found.
      • Secure build environment: Harden the build server and restrict access to it. Use a dedicated build user with limited privileges.
      • Code signing: Digitally sign release packages to ensure their authenticity and integrity. Users can verify the signature to ensure that the package has not been tampered with.
      • Reproducible builds: Strive for reproducible builds, where the same source code always produces the same binary output. This helps to ensure that the build process is deterministic and that no unexpected code is being introduced.

  • Deployment Security (Docker):

    • Threats:
      • Container escape: Attacker breaks out of a container and gains access to the host system.
      • Compromised container image: Attacker uses a malicious or vulnerable container image.
      • Insecure network configuration: Containers are exposed to unnecessary network traffic.
    • Vulnerabilities:
      • Running containers as root.
      • Using outdated or vulnerable base images.
      • Exposing unnecessary ports.
      • Lack of resource limits (CPU, memory).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Run containers as non-root: Create a dedicated user within the container and run the application as that user. Avoid running containers as root.
      • Use minimal base images: Use small, well-maintained base images (e.g., Alpine Linux) to reduce the attack surface.
      • Regularly update base images: Keep base images up-to-date to patch security vulnerabilities.
      • Scan container images for vulnerabilities: Use a container image scanner (e.g., Clair, Trivy) to scan for known vulnerabilities in container images.
      • Limit container resources: Set resource limits (CPU, memory) for containers to prevent denial-of-service attacks.
      • Use Docker security best practices: Follow Docker's security best practices, such as using Docker Content Trust, enabling AppArmor or SELinux, and using a secure registry.
      • Network segmentation: Use Docker networks to isolate containers from each other and from the host network. Only expose necessary ports.
      • Secrets management: Use a secrets management solution (e.g., Docker Secrets, HashiCorp Vault) to securely store and manage sensitive data (passwords, API keys). Do not store secrets in environment variables or in the container image.

3. & 4. (Covered in detail above)

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary and Prioritization)

The mitigation strategies outlined above are detailed and specific. Here's a summary with prioritization, focusing on the most critical and impactful actions:

High Priority (Implement Immediately):

  1. Parameterized Queries/ORM: Ensure all database interactions use parameterized queries or a secure ORM. This is the single most important mitigation against SQL injection.
  2. Strong Password Hashing: Use Argon2id or bcrypt with appropriate salt and iteration counts. Enforce strong password policies.
  3. Secure Session Management: Use cryptographically secure session IDs, set Secure and HttpOnly flags, and implement session expiration.
  4. CSRF Protection: Implement synchronizer token-based CSRF protection for all state-changing requests.
  5. Output Encoding: Implement context-specific output encoding to prevent XSS. Use a templating engine with automatic encoding.
  6. Input Validation: Implement strict input validation, using a whitelist approach where possible, and centralize validation logic.
  7. Dependency Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate a dependency vulnerability scanner into the CI/CD pipeline.
  8. Secure File Uploads: Validate file types (magic numbers), store files outside the web root, rename files, and limit upload sizes.
  9. TLS Enforcement: Enforce HTTPS for all communication.
  10. Docker Security: Run containers as non-root, use minimal base images, and scan images for vulnerabilities.

Medium Priority (Implement Soon):

  1. Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to mitigate XSS and data injection attacks.
  2. File Integrity Checking: Implement a mechanism to detect unauthorized file modifications.
  3. Secure LDAP/AD Integration: Use LDAPS and prevent LDAP injection.
  4. Secure Sharing Implementation: Use unique tokens and granular permissions for shared resources.
  5. 2FA for Administrators: Enforce two-factor authentication for all administrative accounts.
  6. Code Signing: Digitally sign release packages.
  7. Docker Network Segmentation: Isolate containers using Docker networks.
  8. Secrets Management: Use a dedicated secrets management solution.

Low Priority (Consider for Future Enhancements):

  1. Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF for additional protection.
  2. Reproducible Builds: Work towards achieving reproducible builds.
  3. Centralized Authorization Logic: Refactor to a single authorization module.
  4. Audit Logging: Comprehensive logging of security-relevant events.

This prioritized list provides a roadmap for improving the security of the ownCloud core project. By implementing these mitigations, ownCloud can significantly reduce its risk of data breaches, unauthorized access, and other security incidents. Continuous security testing (SAST, DAST, penetration testing) and participation in the bug bounty program are also essential for maintaining a strong security posture.