Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
225 lines (159 loc) · 15.9 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

225 lines (159 loc) · 15.9 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for phacility/phabricator

Objective: Gain Unauthorized Access and Control over Phabricator Application

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Gain Unauthorized Access and Control over Phabricator Application [CRITICAL NODE] - High Impact

└───[OR]─ Exploitation Vectors:

    ├─── 1. Exploit Phabricator Software Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] - Potential for High Impact
    │    ├───[OR]─ Vulnerability Types:
    │    │    ├─── 1.1. Code Injection Vulnerabilities (PHP) [CRITICAL NODE] - RCE Potential
    │    │    │    └───[Outcome]─ Remote Code Execution (RCE) on Phabricator Server [CRITICAL NODE] - Critical Impact
    │    │    ├─── 1.2. SQL Injection Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] - Data Breach Potential
    │    │    │    └───[Outcome]─ Data Breach, Data Manipulation, Authentication Bypass [CRITICAL NODE] - High Impact
    │    │    ├─── 1.4. Authentication and Authorization Bypass [HIGH-RISK PATH] - Full Access Potential
    │    │    │    └───[Outcome]─ Unauthorized Access to Phabricator, Privilege Escalation [CRITICAL NODE] - High Impact
    │    │    ├─── 1.6. Deserialization Vulnerabilities (PHP) [HIGH-RISK PATH] - RCE Potential
    │    │    │    └───[Outcome]─ Remote Code Execution (RCE) [CRITICAL NODE] - Critical Impact

    ├─── 3. Exploit Phabricator Configuration and Deployment Issues [HIGH-RISK PATH] - Initial Access & Configuration Compromise
    │    ├───[OR]─ Configuration/Deployment Weaknesses:
    │    │    ├─── 3.1. Insecure Default Configuration [HIGH-RISK PATH] - Easy Initial Access
    │    │    │    └───[Outcome]─ Initial Access, Configuration Compromise [CRITICAL NODE] - Medium-High Impact, Gateway to further attacks
    │    │    ├─── 3.3. Exposed Debug or Administrative Interfaces [HIGH-RISK PATH] - Direct Admin Access Risk
    │    │    │    └───[Outcome]─ Information Disclosure, Administrative Access, Configuration Compromise [CRITICAL NODE] - High Impact, Direct Control
    │    │    ├─── 3.4. Running Outdated and Unpatched Phabricator Version [HIGH-RISK PATH] - Easy Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities
    │    │    │    └───[Outcome]─ Exploitation of Software Vulnerabilities (Refer to Section 1), Application Compromise [CRITICAL NODE] - High Impact, Re-entry to Vulnerability Exploitation

    └─── 4. Social Engineering and Phishing (Phabricator Context) [MEDIUM-RISK PATH] - Human Factor Risk
         └───[OR]─ Social Engineering Vectors:
              └─── 4.3. Insider Threat (Malicious or Negligent Insider) [HIGH-RISK PATH] - Critical Impact Potential
                   └───[Outcome]─ Data Breach, Service Disruption, Application Compromise [CRITICAL NODE] - High-Critical Impact

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Phabricator Software Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Attackers target inherent weaknesses in Phabricator's code. This includes common web application vulnerabilities but specifically within the Phabricator codebase or custom extensions.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • High Impact: Successful exploitation can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE), Data Breaches, and complete system compromise.
    • Medium to High Likelihood (Collectively): While individual vulnerabilities might be low likelihood, the possibility of vulnerabilities in a complex codebase like Phabricator is always present. Outdated versions significantly increase likelihood.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regularly update Phabricator to the latest patched versions.
    • Conduct security audits and penetration testing.
    • Implement secure coding practices, especially for custom extensions.
    • Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF).
    • Implement robust input sanitization and output encoding.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Code Injection Vulnerabilities (PHP) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting flaws in input handling to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the Phabricator server. Common injection points can be Herald rules, Differential patches, or custom applications.
  • Why Critical:
    • Critical Impact: Leads to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict input validation and sanitization.
    • Secure coding practices to prevent injection flaws.
    • Regular code reviews and static analysis.

Attack Tree Path: Outcome: Remote Code Execution (RCE) on Phabricator Server [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: The result of successful code injection, allowing the attacker to execute commands on the server.
  • Why Critical:
    • Critical Impact: Full server compromise, data breach, service disruption, and potential for lateral movement within the network.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2. SQL Injection Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting flaws in database queries to inject malicious SQL code. This can bypass authentication, extract sensitive data, or modify database records.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • High Impact: Leads to Data Breaches, Data Manipulation, and Authentication Bypass.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use parameterized queries or prepared statements.
    • Input validation and sanitization for database inputs.
    • Database access control and least privilege.
    • Regular security audits and database monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: Outcome: Data Breach, Data Manipulation, Authentication Bypass [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: The consequences of successful SQL injection, leading to compromise of data and access controls.
  • Why Critical:
    • High Impact: Sensitive data exposure, loss of data integrity, and unauthorized access to the application.

Attack Tree Path: 1.4. Authentication and Authorization Bypass [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting weaknesses in Phabricator's authentication or authorization mechanisms to gain unauthorized access without proper credentials or bypass permission checks.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • High Impact: Allows unauthorized access to the Phabricator application and potential privilege escalation.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strong authentication mechanisms (Multi-Factor Authentication - MFA).
    • Regular security audits of authentication and authorization logic.
    • Principle of least privilege for access control.
    • Secure session management.

Attack Tree Path: Outcome: Unauthorized Access to Phabricator, Privilege Escalation [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: The result of bypassing authentication or authorization, granting unauthorized access and potentially higher privileges.
  • Why Critical:
    • High Impact: Full control over Phabricator resources and data, potential for further system compromise.

Attack Tree Path: 1.6. Deserialization Vulnerabilities (PHP) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting insecure deserialization of PHP objects. If Phabricator uses PHP serialization insecurely (e.g., in session handling or caching), attackers can craft malicious serialized objects to trigger code execution during unserialization.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • Critical Impact: Leads to Remote Code Execution (RCE).
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Avoid insecure PHP serialization if possible.
    • Use secure serialization methods if needed.
    • Input validation for serialized data.
    • Regular security audits focusing on serialization points.

Attack Tree Path: Outcome: Remote Code Execution (RCE) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: The result of successful deserialization exploitation, allowing arbitrary code execution on the server.
  • Why Critical:
    • Critical Impact: Full server compromise, similar to code injection outcomes.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit Phabricator Configuration and Deployment Issues [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities arising from misconfigurations or insecure deployment practices of the Phabricator application.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • High Impact: Can lead to initial access, administrative control, and exposure of sensitive information.
    • Medium to High Likelihood (Collectively): Configuration errors are common, especially in complex deployments.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure configuration hardening based on security best practices.
    • Regular security scans for misconfigurations.
    • Principle of least privilege at the system level.
    • Secure deployment practices (HTTPS, firewalls, access restrictions).
    • Configuration management tools for consistency.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1. Insecure Default Configuration [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting Phabricator instances deployed with default, insecure settings like weak default passwords or exposed debug endpoints.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • Medium-High Impact: Provides easy initial access and potential for configuration compromise.
    • Low-Medium Likelihood: Common in initial deployments if security hardening is overlooked.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Change all default passwords immediately.
    • Disable or secure debug endpoints.
    • Follow secure configuration guidelines during deployment.

Attack Tree Path: Outcome: Initial Access, Configuration Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: Gaining initial foothold into the Phabricator application due to insecure default settings.
  • Why Critical:
    • Medium-High Impact: Serves as a gateway for further, more damaging attacks.

Attack Tree Path: 3.3. Exposed Debug or Administrative Interfaces [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Unintentionally exposing debug or administrative interfaces to the public internet, allowing attackers to access sensitive information or gain administrative control.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • High Impact: Can lead to Information Disclosure and direct Administrative Access.
    • Low-Medium Likelihood: Deployment misconfigurations or forgetting to disable debug features can lead to this.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Ensure debug and admin interfaces are not publicly accessible.
    • Use network segmentation and firewalls to restrict access.
    • Regularly scan for exposed services.

Attack Tree Path: Outcome: Information Disclosure, Administrative Access, Configuration Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: Direct access to sensitive information and administrative functions due to exposed interfaces.
  • Why Critical:
    • High Impact: Full control over the Phabricator instance, potential for data breaches and service disruption.

Attack Tree Path: 3.4. Running Outdated and Unpatched Phabricator Version [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Using an outdated version of Phabricator with known, publicly disclosed vulnerabilities. Attackers can easily exploit these vulnerabilities using readily available exploit code.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • High Impact: Exploitation of known vulnerabilities can lead to RCE, data breaches, and full system compromise.
    • Medium Likelihood: Organizations sometimes lag in patching, especially for internal tools.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Maintain a regular patching schedule.
    • Use vulnerability scanners to detect outdated software.
    • Subscribe to Phabricator security announcements.

Attack Tree Path: Outcome: Exploitation of Software Vulnerabilities (Refer to Section 1), Application Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: Re-entry point to software vulnerability exploitation by using known vulnerabilities in outdated software.
  • Why Critical:
    • High Impact: Leads back to the outcomes of software vulnerability exploitation (RCE, Data Breach, etc.).

Attack Tree Path: 4. Social Engineering and Phishing (Phabricator Context) - Insider Threat [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting human trust and insider access to compromise the Phabricator application. This focuses specifically on insider threats, both malicious and negligent.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • High to Critical Impact: Insider actions can cause significant damage, including data breaches, service disruption, and sabotage.
    • Low to Medium Likelihood: While malicious insiders are less frequent, negligent insiders and human error are common.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Security awareness training for all users.
    • Insider threat program with monitoring and detection mechanisms.
    • Strong access controls and principle of least privilege.
    • Background checks (where appropriate and legal).
    • Incident response plan for insider threats.

Attack Tree Path: 4.3. Insider Threat (Malicious or Negligent Insider) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector Description: Exploiting legitimate access by insiders, either intentionally malicious or unintentionally negligent, to harm the Phabricator application.
  • Why High-Risk:
    • High-Critical Impact: Malicious insiders can cause catastrophic damage. Negligent insiders can lead to data breaches and misconfigurations.
    • Low to Medium Likelihood: Insider threat is less frequent than external attacks, but negligent actions are more common.

Attack Tree Path: Outcome: Data Breach, Service Disruption, Application Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector Description: The potential outcomes of insider actions, ranging from data breaches to complete system compromise.
  • Why Critical:
    • High-Critical Impact: Depending on the insider's actions, the impact can be severe, including significant data loss, service outages, and reputational damage.