Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
158 lines (125 loc) · 15.7 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

158 lines (125 loc) · 15.7 KB

Okay, let's dive into a deep security analysis of Phabricator based on your excellent design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Phabricator's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and provide actionable mitigation strategies. This analysis aims to improve the overall security posture of a Phabricator deployment, focusing on the application itself and its typical deployment configuration. We will pay particular attention to the unique aspects of Phabricator as a self-hosted, code-centric collaboration platform.

  • Scope:

    • The core Phabricator application (as represented by the GitHub repository).
    • The typical deployment model (Docker Compose on a single VM, as described in the design review).
    • Interactions with external systems (Email Server, VCS).
    • The build process (as inferred from the repository).
    • Authentication, Authorization, Input Validation, and other key security controls.
    • Data flow and storage.
    • Exclusion: We will not be performing a full penetration test or source code audit. We are relying on the design review, documentation, and publicly available information.

  • Methodology:

    1. Component Decomposition: Break down Phabricator into its key components (as identified in the C4 diagrams).
    2. Threat Modeling: For each component, identify potential threats based on its function, data flow, and interactions. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and common attack patterns.
    3. Vulnerability Analysis: Assess the likelihood and impact of each identified threat, considering existing security controls.
    4. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies for identified vulnerabilities, tailored to Phabricator's architecture and deployment model.
    5. Data Flow Analysis: Trace the flow of sensitive data (source code, credentials, user data) through the system to identify potential exposure points.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's analyze each component from the C4 Container diagram, considering the deployment context:

  • Web Application (PHP)

    • Threats:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Malicious scripts injected into web pages viewed by other users. Phabricator's extensive use of forms and user-generated content makes this a significant concern.
      • SQL Injection: Exploiting vulnerabilities in database queries to gain unauthorized access to data or execute arbitrary commands.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Tricking a user into performing actions they did not intend.
      • Authentication Bypass: Circumventing authentication mechanisms to gain unauthorized access.
      • Session Hijacking: Stealing a user's session to impersonate them.
      • File Inclusion Vulnerabilities (LFI/RFI): Exploiting PHP's file inclusion mechanisms to execute malicious code.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the web application with requests, making it unavailable.
      • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR): Accessing objects (e.g., files, database records) without proper authorization checks.
      • Exposure of Sensitive Information in Error Messages: Revealing details about the system's internal workings.
      • Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards: Redirecting users to malicious sites.

    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Phabricator):

      • Rigorous Input Validation and Output Encoding: Phabricator must use a consistent and robust approach to input validation and output encoding. Examine the Aphront framework (Phabricator's UI framework) for its handling of user input and output. Ensure that all user-supplied data is treated as untrusted. Prioritize parameterized queries (or a secure ORM) for all database interactions.
      • Strengthen CSRF Protection: Verify that Phabricator's CSRF protection (likely using AphrontRequest::validateCSRF()) is applied consistently to all state-changing actions. Look for any exceptions or bypasses.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to limit the sources from which the browser can load resources (scripts, stylesheets, images, etc.). This is a crucial defense against XSS. Phabricator's CSP should be carefully crafted to allow necessary functionality while blocking potentially malicious sources.
      • HTTP Security Headers: Ensure that Phabricator sets appropriate HTTP security headers, including Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
      • Secure Session Management: Use secure cookies (HTTPOnly, Secure flags), generate strong session IDs, and implement proper session timeout mechanisms. Review Phabricator's session handling code (likely in AphrontSession) for potential weaknesses.
      • Regular Expression Review: Phabricator likely uses regular expressions for input validation and other tasks. Carefully review these regular expressions for potential ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) vulnerabilities.
      • Error Handling: Implement a custom error handler that displays generic error messages to users while logging detailed error information for administrators. Avoid revealing sensitive information in error messages.
      • Phabricator Configuration Review: Thoroughly review all Phabricator configuration options related to security (e.g., authentication methods, allowed file types, etc.). Ensure that the configuration is as secure as possible. Pay close attention to settings related to "remarkup" (Phabricator's markup language) as it's a potential vector for XSS.
      • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF (as recommended in the design review) to provide an additional layer of defense against common web attacks. Configure the WAF with rules specific to Phabricator, if available.

  • Database (MySQL)

    • Threats:

      • SQL Injection: (As mentioned above, this is a major threat).
      • Unauthorized Access: Direct access to the database by unauthorized users or applications.
      • Data Breach: Extraction of sensitive data from the database.
      • Data Corruption: Malicious or accidental modification or deletion of data.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the database with requests.

    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Phabricator):

      • Principle of Least Privilege: The database user account used by Phabricator should have only the necessary permissions to access and modify the Phabricator database. It should not have administrative privileges on the database server.
      • Database Firewall: Consider using a database firewall to restrict access to the database based on IP address, user, and query patterns.
      • Encryption at Rest: Enable encryption at rest for the database to protect data in case of physical theft or unauthorized access to the database files. This is a configuration option for MySQL.
      • Regular Backups: Implement a robust backup and recovery strategy for the database. Test the recovery process regularly.
      • Audit Logging: Enable MySQL's audit logging capabilities to track database activity and identify potential security incidents.
      • Secure Connection: Enforce SSL/TLS encryption for all connections to the database. This protects data in transit between the web application and the database.
      • Monitor for Slow Queries: Slow queries can be an indicator of a DoS attack or a poorly optimized application. Monitor for slow queries and optimize them as needed.

  • Task Queue

    • Threats:

      • Code Injection: If the task queue processes user-supplied data, there's a risk of code injection.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the task queue with tasks, preventing legitimate tasks from being processed.
      • Data Leakage: If tasks handle sensitive data, there's a risk of data leakage if the task queue is compromised.

    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Phabricator):

      • Input Validation: Strictly validate all data processed by the task queue. Treat all input as untrusted, even if it originates from the database.
      • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to prevent the task queue from being overwhelmed.
      • Secure Communication: Ensure that the task queue communicates securely with the database and other components.
      • Monitor Queue Length: Monitor the length of the task queue to detect potential DoS attacks or performance issues.
      • Review Task Handlers: Carefully review the code that handles tasks in the queue (likely in the PhabricatorWorker classes) for potential security vulnerabilities.

  • Command Line Interface (CLI)

    • Threats:

      • Unauthorized Access: If the CLI is accessible remotely (e.g., via SSH), there's a risk of unauthorized access.
      • Privilege Escalation: Exploiting vulnerabilities in CLI tools to gain elevated privileges.
      • Arbitrary Command Execution: If CLI tools accept user-supplied input, there's a risk of arbitrary command execution.

    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Phabricator):

      • Secure SSH Configuration: If the CLI is accessed via SSH, ensure that SSH is configured securely (e.g., disable password authentication, use strong keys, restrict access to authorized users).
      • Principle of Least Privilege: Run CLI tools with the minimum necessary privileges.
      • Input Validation: Carefully validate all input to CLI tools.
      • Review CLI Tool Code: Review the code for Phabricator's CLI tools (in the scripts/ directory and elsewhere) for potential security vulnerabilities.

  • External Systems (Email Server, VCS)

    • Threats:

      • Email Spoofing: Sending emails that appear to come from Phabricator but are actually from a malicious source.
      • Compromised VCS Credentials: Unauthorized access to the version control system.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: Intercepting communication between Phabricator and external systems.

    • Mitigation Strategies (Specific to Phabricator):

      • Secure Email Configuration: Configure Phabricator to use a secure email server with TLS encryption. Use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to prevent email spoofing.
      • Secure VCS Integration: Use secure protocols (e.g., HTTPS, SSH) to communicate with the version control system. Store VCS credentials securely (e.g., using Phabricator's credential management system). Regularly rotate credentials.
      • TLS for All External Communication: Enforce TLS encryption for all communication between Phabricator and external systems.

3. Data Flow Analysis

  • Source Code:

    • Flows from Developers -> VCS -> Phabricator (Web Application) -> Database.
    • Exposure Points: VCS, Web Application (during code review), Database.
    • Mitigation: Strong VCS security, secure code review practices (within Phabricator), database encryption.

  • Credentials (User Passwords, API Keys, VCS Credentials):

    • Flows from Users/Administrators -> Web Application -> Database (for user passwords) or Configuration Files (for API keys, VCS credentials).
    • Exposure Points: Web Application (during authentication), Database, Configuration Files.
    • Mitigation: Strong password hashing (bcrypt), secure storage of API keys and VCS credentials (using Phabricator's credential management system, if available, or environment variables), encryption at rest for the database.

  • User Data (Usernames, Emails, Profile Information):

    • Flows from Users -> Web Application -> Database.
    • Exposure Points: Web Application, Database.
    • Mitigation: Input validation, output encoding, database encryption, access control.

4. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary and Prioritization)

Here's a prioritized list of actionable mitigation strategies, combining the recommendations from above:

  • High Priority:

    1. Implement a Strict Content Security Policy (CSP): This is the most critical defense against XSS, a major threat to Phabricator.
    2. Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Require MFA for all users, especially administrators.
    3. Database Security: Enforce TLS for database connections, enable encryption at rest, and ensure the Phabricator database user has the least privilege necessary.
    4. Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy and configure a WAF with rules tailored to Phabricator.
    5. Input Validation and Output Encoding Review: Thoroughly review Phabricator's input validation and output encoding mechanisms, focusing on the Aphront framework and "remarkup" handling.
    6. Secure Session Management: Verify secure cookie settings (HTTPOnly, Secure), strong session ID generation, and proper session timeouts.

  • Medium Priority:

    1. Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests of the Phabricator installation.
    2. Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Implement an SCA tool to identify and manage vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies.
    3. Audit Logging: Enable and regularly review comprehensive audit logs for both the web application and the database.
    4. Secure SSH Configuration: If the CLI is accessed via SSH, ensure a secure SSH configuration.
    5. Secure Email and VCS Configuration: Use secure protocols and authentication mechanisms for communication with external systems.

  • Low Priority:

    1. CI/CD Pipeline Improvements: Implement a more robust CI/CD pipeline with integrated security testing (SAST, DAST).
    2. Regular Expression Review: Review regular expressions for potential ReDoS vulnerabilities.
    3. Database Firewall: Consider implementing a database firewall.

5. Addressing Assumptions and Questions

  • Threat Model: While Phabricator likely has an internal threat model, it's not publicly documented. This analysis assumes a standard threat model that considers common web application vulnerabilities and threats specific to a code collaboration platform.
  • Incident Handling: Phabricator's specific incident handling procedures are not publicly available. Organizations deploying Phabricator should develop their own incident response plan.
  • Hardening Configuration: Phabricator provides some configuration recommendations, but a comprehensive hardening guide is not readily available. This analysis provides specific configuration recommendations based on best practices.
  • CI/CD Pipeline: The lack of a formalized CI/CD pipeline is a significant gap. Implementing one would greatly improve the security of the build process.
  • Penetration Testing: The frequency and scope of Phabricator's internal penetration testing are unknown. Regular penetration testing is strongly recommended for any organization deploying Phabricator.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of Phabricator's security considerations. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, organizations can significantly improve the security posture of their Phabricator deployments and protect their valuable code and data. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and regular reviews and updates are essential.