Attack Surface: Memory Corruption in C Extension
- Description: Vulnerabilities like buffer overflows, use-after-free, and double-free errors in Phalcon's C code.
- cPhalcon Contribution: Phalcon, being a C extension, is directly susceptible to these low-level memory management errors. This is the core distinction from pure PHP code.
- Example: A user provides an extremely long string as input to a Phalcon form field, exceeding the allocated buffer size in a C function within Phalcon itself handling that field, leading to a buffer overflow.
- Impact: Arbitrary code execution, denial of service (application crashes), potential information disclosure (reading arbitrary memory).
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers:
- Perform rigorous code reviews of the Phalcon C source code (if accessible/feasible), focusing on memory management. This is crucial for a C extension.
- Utilize memory safety tools (Valgrind, AddressSanitizer) during development and testing of Phalcon itself.
- Conduct extensive fuzz testing of all Phalcon components, especially those handling user input, targeting the C code directly.
- Ensure proper use of safe string handling functions and memory allocation/deallocation within the C code.
- Users/Administrators:
- Keep Phalcon updated to the latest stable release. Security patches are frequently included, and this is the primary mitigation for end-users.
- Monitor Phalcon's security advisories and apply updates promptly.
- Developers:
Attack Surface: ORM Injection (C Implementation Flaws)
- Description: Exploiting subtle flaws within Phalcon's C-based ORM implementation to bypass its SQL injection prevention mechanisms.
- cPhalcon Contribution: The vulnerability must reside in the C code of the ORM, not in the developer's PHP code using the ORM. This is a key distinction.
- Example: A newly discovered edge case in the C code that handles a specific, rarely-used database feature (e.g., a particular type of join or subquery) allows for SQL injection, even when the developer is using parameterized queries correctly in their PHP code. The flaw is within Phalcon's C implementation of the query builder.
- Impact: SQL injection (data exfiltration, modification, deletion, database server compromise).
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers: (Limited direct mitigation, as this is a Phalcon core issue)
- While developers should always validate input, this vulnerability is in Phalcon's C code, so developer-side validation is a secondary defense.
- Report any suspected ORM vulnerabilities to the Phalcon team immediately.
- Users/Administrators:
- Keep Phalcon updated to the latest stable release. This is the primary mitigation.
- Monitor database logs for suspicious queries (as a secondary defense).
- Developers: (Limited direct mitigation, as this is a Phalcon core issue)
Attack Surface: Volt Template Engine Vulnerabilities (C Parsing/Escaping)
- Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the C implementation of the Volt template engine's parsing or escaping logic.
- cPhalcon Contribution: The vulnerability must be in Volt's C code, not in how the developer uses Volt in their templates.
- Example: A flaw in the C code that parses Volt template directives allows an attacker to inject malicious code, even if the developer is using Volt's escaping functions correctly in their PHP code. The vulnerability is within Phalcon's C implementation of Volt.
- Impact: Cross-site scripting (XSS), potentially code injection (if Volt's C code allows for execution of arbitrary PHP code in certain contexts).
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers: (Limited direct mitigation, as this is a Phalcon core issue)
- While developers should always validate input and use escaping functions, this vulnerability is in Phalcon's C code.
- Report any suspected Volt vulnerabilities to the Phalcon team immediately.
- Users/Administrators:
- Keep Phalcon updated to the latest stable release. This is the primary mitigation.
- Developers: (Limited direct mitigation, as this is a Phalcon core issue)
Attack Surface: Security Component Weaknesses (C Implementation)
- Description: Flaws in the C implementation of Phalcon's security component (e.g., password hashing, CSRF protection, encryption).
- cPhalcon Contribution: The vulnerability must reside in the C code of the security component.
- Example: A weakness is discovered in Phalcon's C implementation of a specific cryptographic algorithm, allowing an attacker to compromise security features. The flaw is within Phalcon's C implementation.
- Impact: Compromise of user accounts, unauthorized actions (due to CSRF bypass), data breaches.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers: (Limited direct mitigation)
- Report any suspected security component vulnerabilities.
- Users/Administrators:
- Keep Phalcon updated to the latest stable release. This is the primary mitigation.
- Developers: (Limited direct mitigation)
Attack Surface: Dependency Injection Container Misconfiguration
- Description: Injecting malicious service through DI container.
- cPhalcon Contribution: Phalcon is using DI container, which can be misconfigured.
- Example: Attacker is able to override
security
service with own implementation. - Impact: Code execution, data leak.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Developers:
- Validate configuration.
- Don't allow to override services from user input.
- Use strict types.
- Users/Administrators:
- Keep Phalcon updated.
- Developers: