Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
89 lines (80 loc) · 6.05 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

89 lines (80 loc) · 6.05 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for phalcon/cphalcon

Objective: Gain RCE or Significant Data Exfiltration via Phalcon Vulnerabilities

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Gain RCE or Significant Data Exfiltration via Phalcon Vulnerabilities

└── 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Phalcon's C Code (Most Likely Attack Vector) ├── 1.1 Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK] │ ├── 1.1.1 Buffer Overflows [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 1.1.1.1 Identify vulnerable functions in Phalcon's C code (e.g., string handling, array manipulation, input parsing). │ │ │ └── 1.1.1.1.1 Craft malicious input that triggers a buffer overflow, overwriting adjacent memory. │ │ │ └── 1.1.1.1.1.1 Control the overwritten memory to redirect execution flow (e.g., overwrite return address, function pointers). │ │ │ └── 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 Achieve RCE by jumping to attacker-controlled shellcode. [CRITICAL] │ │ └── 1.1.1.2 Fuzz Phalcon's API endpoints and internal functions with malformed data to discover buffer overflows. [HIGH RISK] │ │ └── 1.1.1.2.1 Automate fuzzing using tools like AFL++, libFuzzer, or custom scripts targeting specific Phalcon components. │ ├── 1.1.2 Use-After-Free [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 1.1.2.1 Identify scenarios where Phalcon objects are prematurely freed but later accessed. │ │ │ └── 1.1.2.1.1 Craft input or sequences of operations that trigger premature object deallocation. │ │ │ └── 1.1.2.1.1.1 Exploit the dangling pointer to read or write arbitrary memory. │ │ │ └── 1.1.2.1.1.1.1 Achieve RCE or data exfiltration by controlling the memory pointed to by the dangling pointer. [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1 Buffer Overflows

  • Description: Buffer overflows occur when a program attempts to write data beyond the allocated size of a buffer. In Phalcon's C code, this could happen in functions that handle strings, arrays, or user-supplied input without proper bounds checking.
  • Attack Steps:
    • 1.1.1.1 Identify vulnerable functions: The attacker analyzes Phalcon's C source code to find functions that are susceptible to buffer overflows. This requires expertise in C programming and security auditing.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: High
      • Skill Level: Advanced/Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium/Hard
    • 1.1.1.1.1 Craft malicious input: The attacker creates specially crafted input (e.g., an overly long string) that, when processed by the vulnerable function, overwrites adjacent memory.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: High
      • Skill Level: Advanced/Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium/Hard
    • 1.1.1.1.1.1 Control overwritten memory: The attacker carefully designs the malicious input to overwrite specific memory locations, such as the return address on the stack or function pointers, to redirect program execution.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: High
      • Skill Level: Advanced/Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium/Hard
    • 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 Achieve RCE [CRITICAL]: By controlling the program's execution flow, the attacker can jump to attacker-controlled code (shellcode) injected into memory, achieving Remote Code Execution (RCE).
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: High
      • Skill Level: Advanced/Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium/Hard
  • Fuzzing Path (1.1.1.2):
    • Description: Fuzzing is an automated technique for finding vulnerabilities by providing a program with a large amount of invalid, unexpected, or random data.
    • 1.1.1.2.1 Automate fuzzing: The attacker uses fuzzing tools (AFL++, libFuzzer, etc.) to automatically generate and send malformed input to Phalcon's API endpoints and internal functions.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Intermediate/Advanced
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.2 Use-After-Free

  • Description: Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program attempts to use memory that has already been freed. This can happen if Phalcon objects are prematurely deallocated but pointers to those objects are still used.
  • Attack Steps:
    • 1.1.2.1 Identify scenarios: The attacker analyzes Phalcon's code to find situations where objects might be freed prematurely and their memory accessed later. This requires a deep understanding of Phalcon's object lifecycle management.
      • Likelihood: Low/Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: Very High
      • Skill Level: Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard/Very Hard
    • 1.1.2.1.1 Craft input/operations: The attacker crafts input or a sequence of operations that triggers the premature deallocation of a Phalcon object.
      • Likelihood: Low/Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: Very High
      • Skill Level: Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard/Very Hard
    • 1.1.2.1.1.1 Exploit dangling pointer: The attacker exploits the dangling pointer (a pointer to freed memory) to read or write arbitrary memory locations.
      • Likelihood: Low/Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: Very High
      • Skill Level: Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard/Very Hard
    • 1.1.2.1.1.1.1 Achieve RCE or data exfiltration [CRITICAL]: By controlling the memory pointed to by the dangling pointer, the attacker can achieve RCE or exfiltrate sensitive data.
      • Likelihood: Low/Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: Very High
      • Skill Level: Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard/Very Hard