Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
53 lines (44 loc) · 5.19 KB

File metadata and controls

53 lines (44 loc) · 5.19 KB

Threat Model Analysis for phalcon/cphalcon

  • Threat: Memory Corruption Exploitation

    • Description: An attacker crafts malicious input (e.g., unusually long strings, specially formatted data) designed to trigger a buffer overflow, use-after-free, or other memory corruption vulnerability within Phalcon's C code. The attacker might send this input through a web form, API endpoint, or any other input vector that Phalcon processes. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
    • Impact: Complete system compromise, allowing the attacker to steal data, install malware, or disrupt service. The attacker gains full control of the server process running Phalcon.
    • Affected cphalcon Component: Potentially any component that handles user input or external data. Most likely candidates include:
      • Phalcon\Mvc\Request (handling HTTP requests)
      • Phalcon\Filter (input sanitization, though ironically, a bug here could be exploited)
      • Phalcon\Db (database interaction, if raw SQL is mishandled – though this is more indirect)
      • Any component using Phalcon\Text for string manipulation.
      • Any custom C code integrated with Phalcon.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Update Phalcon: Immediately update to the latest stable Phalcon release. This is the primary defense.
      • Input Validation (Defense in Depth): Rigorously validate all user input in your application code, even if Phalcon is supposed to handle it. This reduces the chance of triggering a vulnerability. Use strict whitelists, not blacklists.
      • Fuzzing (Advanced): If resources allow, use fuzzing tools to test Phalcon's handling of various inputs.
      • Security-Enhanced PHP (SELinux/AppArmor): Use OS-level security to contain the damage if a compromise occurs.
      • Code Audit (Ideal, but often impractical): A security audit of the relevant Phalcon C code by a C security expert.
  • Threat: Dependency Vulnerability Exploitation

    • Description: An attacker identifies a known vulnerability in a C library that Phalcon depends on (e.g., a database driver, image processing library). The attacker then crafts an exploit specifically targeting that vulnerability, leveraging Phalcon's interaction with the vulnerable library. This is direct because Phalcon, as a C extension, links against these libraries.
    • Impact: Variable, depending on the vulnerable library. Could range from denial-of-service to arbitrary code execution. The impact is tied to the specific dependency, but the attack vector is through Phalcon.
    • Affected cphalcon Component: Indirectly affects Phalcon components that use the vulnerable dependency. For example:
      • Phalcon\Db if the database driver (e.g., libmysqlclient) is vulnerable.
      • Phalcon\Image if an image processing library (e.g., libgd) is vulnerable.
      • Any component using a vulnerable C library.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the dependency)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • System Updates: Keep the operating system and all its packages (including C libraries) up-to-date. Use a package manager (apt, yum, etc.) and ensure it's configured for automatic security updates.
      • Phalcon Updates: Update Phalcon itself, as new releases may bundle updated dependencies or mitigate known issues.
      • Vulnerability Scanning: Use vulnerability scanners that can detect outdated or vulnerable C libraries on your system.
      • Dependency Monitoring: Maintain a list of all C libraries used by Phalcon and your system, and monitor them for security advisories.
  • Threat: Misconfiguration of Phalcon's Security Component
    • Description: A developer misconfigures the Phalcon\Security component, for example, by using a weak password hashing algorithm, a predictable salt, or disabling CSRF protection. An attacker can exploit these misconfigurations to bypass security measures.
    • Impact: Compromised user accounts (weak hashing), successful CSRF attacks, or other security bypasses.
    • Affected cphalcon Component: Phalcon\Security
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Follow Documentation: Strictly adhere to Phalcon's documentation and best practices for configuring the Phalcon\Security component.
      • Strong Hashing: Use strong, recommended password hashing algorithms (e.g., bcrypt, Argon2).
      • Random Salts: Ensure random, unpredictable salts are used for password hashing.
      • Enable CSRF Protection: Enable and properly configure CSRF protection.
      • Regular Review: Regularly review the configuration of the Phalcon\Security component.