Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation and Whitelisting (Reflection-Specific)
Description:
- Identify Reflection Input: Pinpoint all locations where data directly influences reflection operations using
phpDocumentor/reflection-common
. This includes any input used to construct class names, method names, property names, or type hints that are passed toreflection-common
functions or classes. - Define Reflection Whitelist: Create a strict, predefined list of allowed class names, method names, property names, and type hints that are permitted for reflection using
reflection-common
. This list should be as restrictive as possible. - Implement Whitelist Check: Before any
reflection-common
call, verify that the input (class name, method name, etc.) is present in the whitelist. Use strict comparison (e.g.,in_array()
). - Reject Non-Whitelisted Input: If the input is not in the whitelist, immediately reject the operation. Do not call any
reflection-common
functions. Throw an exception, log the attempt, and return a generic error. - Format Validation (Reflection Context): Even for whitelisted input, perform format validation specifically tailored to the expected input type. Use regular expressions or other validation methods to ensure the input conforms to valid PHP syntax for class names, method names, etc., before passing it to
reflection-common
.
Threats Mitigated:
- Code Injection (Indirect via Reflection): (Severity: Critical) - Prevents attackers from using
reflection-common
to instantiate arbitrary classes or trigger unexpected behavior by controlling class names, etc., passed to the library. - Information Disclosure (Reflection-Specific): (Severity: High) - Limits the scope of reflection performed by
reflection-common
to only authorized components, preventing leakage of internal details. - Denial of Service (Reflection-Induced): (Severity: Medium) - Reduces DoS risk by preventing
reflection-common
from being used to reflect on non-existent or excessively complex types, which could consume resources.
Impact:
- Code Injection: Risk significantly reduced (nearly eliminated with a correct whitelist).
- Information Disclosure: Risk significantly reduced, depending on whitelist comprehensiveness.
- Denial of Service: Risk moderately reduced.
Currently Implemented:
- Example: "No whitelisting is currently implemented for class names passed to
ReflectionClass
in theMetadataExtractor
component." - Example: "Partial format validation exists for method names used with
ReflectionMethod
, but it's not comprehensive and doesn't use a whitelist."
Missing Implementation:
- Example: "Whitelist for type hints used in
DocBlockFactory::createInstance()
is missing, allowing potentially malicious type hints to be processed." - Example: "Format validation for class names is missing before using
FqsenResolver
in theConfigurationParser
."
Mitigation Strategy: Contextual Access Control (Reflection-Specific)
Description:
- Identify
reflection-common
Usage: Locate all code points wherephpDocumentor/reflection-common
functions or classes are used. - Define Access Rules: For each usage point, determine the necessary permissions or context (user roles, authentication, etc.) required to allow that specific reflection operation.
- Implement Pre-Reflection Checks: Before calling any
reflection-common
function, implement checks to verify that the current context meets the defined access requirements. - Deny Unauthorized Reflection: If access is denied, prevent the
reflection-common
call. Throw an exception, log the attempt, and return a generic error. - Blacklist Sensitive Components (Reflection Context): Create a list of classes, methods, properties, or type patterns that should never be reflected upon using
reflection-common
, regardless of user permissions. Block these explicitly.
Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (Reflection-Specific): (Severity: High) - Prevents unauthorized access to sensitive information exposed through
reflection-common
, even with some input control. - Privilege Escalation (via Reflection): (Severity: High) - Prevents attackers from using
reflection-common
to bypass security and access restricted functionality.
Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Risk significantly reduced, depending on access control granularity.
- Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced.
Currently Implemented:
- Example: "No access control checks are performed before using
reflection-common
in theApiDocGenerator
." - Example: "Basic role-based checks exist before some reflection operations, but they are not consistently applied."
Missing Implementation:
- Example: "Access control is missing before using
DocBlockFactory
to parse docblocks, potentially allowing unauthorized access to docblock information." - Example: "No blacklist of sensitive components exists to prevent reflection on internal classes using
reflection-common
."
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Error Handling (Reflection-Specific)
Description:
- Wrap
reflection-common
Calls: Enclose all calls tophpDocumentor/reflection-common
functions and classes withintry...catch
blocks. - Catch Reflection Exceptions: Specifically catch exceptions that can be thrown by
reflection-common
, such as those related to invalid types or parsing errors. Consult thereflection-common
documentation for the specific exception types. - Secure Error Handling (Reflection Context):
- Never expose raw exception messages or stack traces from
reflection-common
to the user. - Log the error details securely, including the specific
reflection-common
function called, the input provided, and any relevant context. - Return a generic error message to the user.
- Never expose raw exception messages or stack traces from
Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (via Error Messages): (Severity: Medium) - Prevents sensitive information from being leaked through error messages generated by
reflection-common
.
Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Risk moderately reduced.
Currently Implemented:
- Example: "Some
try...catch
blocks are present aroundreflection-common
calls, but error messages are not always sanitized." - Example: "No specific exception handling for
reflection-common
errors is implemented in theTypeResolver
component."
Missing Implementation:
- Example: "Exceptions from
DocBlockFactory::createInstance()
are not caught, potentially exposing internal details to the user." - Example: "Error logging for
reflection-common
failures is inconsistent and doesn't always include sufficient context."