Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
25 lines (20 loc) · 3.85 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

25 lines (20 loc) · 3.85 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for ramsey/uuid

Attack Surface: Predictable UUID Generation (Version 1 & 3)

  • Description: Versions 1 and 3 UUIDs rely on predictable inputs (timestamps, MAC addresses, namespaces, names). If these inputs are guessable, the generated UUIDs become predictable, compromising security when UUIDs are used as identifiers.
    • How UUID Contributes to Attack Surface: Choosing to use Version 1 or 3 UUID generation methods, supported by ramsey/uuid, directly introduces predictability if the underlying input sources become known or predictable.
    • Example: An application uses Version 1 UUIDs for resource identifiers in URLs. An attacker analyzes exposed UUIDs, identifies the timestamp pattern, and predicts future UUIDs. This allows them to guess URLs for resources they shouldn't access, potentially leading to unauthorized data access or manipulation if authorization checks are insufficient.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to resources, data breaches, potential data manipulation.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Prioritize Version 4 UUIDs: Utilize Version 4 UUIDs provided by ramsey/uuid. These are randomly generated and significantly reduce predictability risks. Version 4 is the default and recommended choice for most security-sensitive applications.
      • Avoid Version 1 and 3 in Security Contexts: Do not employ Version 1 or 3 UUIDs where predictability can be exploited. If there's a need for these versions, carefully assess the predictability of input data and implement compensating controls.

Attack Surface: Misuse of UUIDs as Security Tokens

  • Description: Incorrectly using UUIDs generated by ramsey/uuid as cryptographically secure secrets or session tokens without proper security mechanisms creates a critical vulnerability. UUIDs are designed for unique identification, not as robust security tokens.
    • How UUID Contributes to Attack Surface: ramsey/uuid makes UUID generation easy, which might lead developers to mistakenly assume they are secure enough for authentication or authorization purposes. Directly using these UUIDs as security tokens bypasses the need for proper security token generation and management.
    • Example: A web application uses Version 4 UUIDs generated by ramsey/uuid directly as session identifiers in cookies, without implementing proper session management practices (like HTTP-only, Secure flags, session rotation, or proper storage). An attacker could potentially guess or brute-force session UUIDs (especially if the random number generation is weak or if there's enough time and attempts), or intercept them through network traffic if HTTPS is not enforced, gaining unauthorized access to user sessions.
    • Impact: Complete compromise of authentication and authorization, unauthorized access to user accounts, sensitive data, and application functionality.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Never use UUIDs as direct security tokens: Implement established and secure authentication and authorization mechanisms. Use UUIDs for their intended purpose: unique identification.
      • Employ dedicated security token mechanisms: Utilize robust session management with cryptographically secure session IDs, or standards like OAuth 2.0 or JWT for API authentication and authorization.
      • If UUIDs are used in security-related flows (with extreme caution and only when absolutely necessary, e.g., password reset tokens): Ensure they are used with strong accompanying security measures: short expiry times, rate limiting, HTTPS enforcement, proper validation, and consider using cryptographically stronger tokens instead.