Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
32 lines (25 loc) · 4.66 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

32 lines (25 loc) · 4.66 KB

Threat Model Analysis for serbanghita/mobile-detect

Threat: User-Agent Spoofing (Impacting Security Decisions)

  • Threat: User-Agent Spoofing (Impacting Security Decisions)

    • Description: The attacker deliberately modifies their browser's User-Agent string to impersonate a different device, operating system, or browser. This is done to directly influence the output of mobile-detect's detection methods. The attacker's goal is to cause mobile-detect to return a false positive or false negative for a particular device/OS/browser check.
    • Impact: If mobile-detect's output is used directly in security-critical decisions (authentication, authorization, feature access), the attacker can bypass these controls. For example, if access to an administrative panel is granted based solely on mobile-detect identifying a "desktop" browser, spoofing a desktop User-Agent from a mobile device would grant unauthorized access.
    • Affected Component: All methods within the Mobile_Detect class that rely on parsing the User-Agent string are affected: is(), mobile(), tablet(), version(), and all specific device/OS/browser detection methods. The core logic of the library is being manipulated.
    • Risk Severity: High (because it directly impacts security decisions if the library is misused in this way).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Never Trust User-Agent for Security: This is the crucial mitigation. Do not use mobile-detect's output as the sole basis for any security-related decision. The User-Agent is client-controlled and untrustworthy.
      • Layered Security: Implement multiple, independent security checks. Combine User-Agent detection (for convenience, not security) with other factors like IP address reputation, multi-factor authentication, and behavioral analysis.
      • Input Validation (of Output): Validate the result of mobile-detect against a known-good list of supported devices/browsers if you are using it for feature toggling (but not for security).

Threat: Undiscovered Vulnerability in mobile-detect (Leading to RCE or Severe DoS)

  • Threat: Undiscovered Vulnerability in mobile-detect (Leading to RCE or Severe DoS)

    • Description: The attacker exploits a previously unknown vulnerability within the mobile-detect library's code. This vulnerability could be a buffer overflow, a code injection flaw, or a particularly severe Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability that allows for more than just CPU exhaustion. The attacker crafts a malicious User-Agent string (or potentially other input, if the vulnerability exists in a less-common code path) to trigger the vulnerability.
    • Impact:
      • Remote Code Execution (RCE): Although less likely in a library primarily focused on string parsing, a severe vulnerability could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server. This is the worst-case scenario.
      • Severe Denial of Service (DoS): A vulnerability could allow an attacker to completely crash the application or consume all server resources, making it unavailable to legitimate users. This goes beyond a simple ReDoS that slows things down; it would cause a complete outage.
    • Affected Component: Potentially any part of the Mobile_Detect class, depending on the nature of the vulnerability. This could be in the core parsing logic, the regular expression handling, or even less-frequently used methods.
    • Risk Severity: Critical (if RCE is possible) or High (for severe DoS).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Immediate Updates: Upon discovery of a vulnerability, update mobile-detect to the patched version immediately. This is the primary defense.
      • Security Monitoring: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases (e.g., CVE) for any reports related to mobile-detect or its dependencies.
      • Least Privilege: Ensure the application runs with the absolute minimum necessary privileges. This limits the damage an attacker can do even if they achieve RCE.
      • Web Application Firewall (WAF): A WAF might be able to detect and block some exploit attempts, even for unknown vulnerabilities, by recognizing common attack patterns. However, it's not a guaranteed solution.
      • Dependency Scanning: Use software composition analysis (SCA) tools to automatically scan your project's dependencies (including mobile-detect) for known vulnerabilities.