Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
80 lines (70 loc) · 8.47 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

80 lines (70 loc) · 8.47 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for slimphp/slim

Objective: Compromise Slim Application

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Slim Application [CRITICAL NODE: Attacker Goal] ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Slim Framework Vulnerabilities │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE: Exploit Known Slim Framework Vulnerabilities] │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE: Identify Outdated Slim Version] │ │ │ └── Reconnaissance: Application Version Disclosure │ │ │ └── [CRITICAL NODE: Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Identified Version] │ │ │ └── Research: Search public vulnerability databases │ │ │ └── Action: Attempt to exploit known vulnerabilities (RCE, XSS, etc.) ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Slim Misconfiguration & Insecure Usage │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE: Missing Input Validation in Route Handlers] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └── Analyze: Examine route handler code for input validation │ │ └── Exploit: Exploit common web vulnerabilities (SQL Injection, XSS, Command Injection, Path Traversal) │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE: Insecure Middleware Configuration] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE: Missing Security Middleware] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Analyze: Check middleware stack for security middleware │ │ │ └── Exploit: Exploit missing security middleware vulnerabilities (CORS bypass, CSRF, Brute-force, Security Headers) │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE: Insecure File Handling] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├── Path Traversal via File Paths in Routes/Parameters │ │ │ └── Analyze: Examine routes and handlers for file paths │ │ │ └── Exploit: Manipulate file paths for Path Traversal │ │ ├── [CRITICAL NODE: Unrestricted File Uploads] [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └── Analyze: Identify file upload functionalities │ │ │ └── Exploit: Upload malicious files (web shells)

Attack Tree Path: [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Slim Framework Vulnerabilities

  • [CRITICAL NODE: Exploit Known Slim Framework Vulnerabilities]:
    • Attack Vector: Targeting known security vulnerabilities in the Slim Framework itself.
    • Breakdown:
      • [CRITICAL NODE: Identify Outdated Slim Version]:
        • Attackers first identify the version of Slim being used by the application. This is reconnaissance.
        • Techniques: Checking HTTP headers, error pages (if debug mode is on), publicly accessible code repositories, or using fingerprinting tools.
      • [CRITICAL NODE: Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Identified Version]:
        • Once an outdated version is identified, attackers research public vulnerability databases (CVE, NVD, framework-specific security advisories) for known vulnerabilities affecting that specific version.
        • Vulnerabilities: These could include Remote Code Execution (RCE), Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), SQL Injection (less likely in core Slim, but possible if related to database interaction within Slim's context), or other security flaws.
        • Impact: Successful exploitation can lead to critical consequences, including full application compromise, data breaches, server takeover, and denial of service.

Attack Tree Path: [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Slim Misconfiguration & Insecure Usage

  • [CRITICAL NODE: Missing Input Validation in Route Handlers] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

    • Attack Vector: Exploiting the lack of proper input validation and sanitization in the application's route handlers (the code that processes requests for specific routes defined in Slim).
    • Breakdown:
      • Vulnerability: Developers often fail to adequately validate and sanitize user inputs received through requests (GET/POST parameters, headers, etc.) within their Slim route handlers.
      • Exploitable Vulnerabilities: This omission directly leads to common web application vulnerabilities:
        • SQL Injection: If user input is directly used in database queries without proper sanitization, attackers can inject malicious SQL code to manipulate the database.
        • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): If user input is reflected in web pages without proper encoding, attackers can inject malicious scripts that execute in users' browsers.
        • Command Injection: If user input is used to construct system commands without proper sanitization, attackers can inject malicious commands to execute arbitrary code on the server.
        • Path Traversal: If user input is used to construct file paths without proper validation, attackers can access files outside the intended directory.
      • Impact: These vulnerabilities can have critical impacts, ranging from data breaches and unauthorized access to full server compromise and Remote Code Execution. This is a high-likelihood and high-impact path because it relies on common developer errors rather than framework-specific flaws.

  • [CRITICAL NODE: Insecure Middleware Configuration] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

    • Attack Vector: Exploiting misconfigurations or omissions in the middleware stack of the Slim application, particularly related to security middleware.
    • Breakdown:
      • [CRITICAL NODE: Missing Security Middleware] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Vulnerability: Developers may fail to implement essential security middleware in their Slim application. Slim is minimal and doesn't enforce security middleware by default, making it developer's responsibility.
        • Missing Middleware Examples & Exploitable Vulnerabilities:
          • CORS Middleware: Absence can lead to Cross-Origin Resource Sharing bypass, allowing malicious websites to access sensitive data from the application.
          • CSRF Protection Middleware: Absence can lead to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks, allowing attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users.
          • Rate Limiting Middleware: Absence can lead to brute-force attacks, denial of service, and resource exhaustion.
          • Security Headers Middleware: Absence of headers like HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, Content-Security-Policy can leave the application vulnerable to various attacks (Man-in-the-Middle, Clickjacking, XSS, etc.).
        • Impact: Missing security middleware weakens the application's overall security posture and makes it vulnerable to a range of attacks, potentially leading to data breaches, account compromise, and other security incidents.

  • [CRITICAL NODE: Insecure File Handling] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

    • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities related to how the Slim application handles files, especially in file upload and download functionalities.
    • Breakdown:
      • Path Traversal via File Paths in Routes/Parameters:
        • Vulnerability: If the application uses user-supplied input (e.g., in route parameters or query parameters) to construct file paths without proper sanitization, attackers can manipulate these paths to access files outside the intended directory.
        • Exploit: Attackers can craft requests with manipulated file paths (e.g., using ../ sequences) to access sensitive files on the server, such as configuration files, application code, or user data.
        • Impact: Information disclosure, potential code execution if attackers can access executable files or configuration files.
      • [CRITICAL NODE: Unrestricted File Uploads] [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
        • Vulnerability: If the application allows file uploads without proper validation and security controls, attackers can upload malicious files.
        • Exploit: Attackers can upload web shells (malicious scripts in languages like PHP) disguised as legitimate file types. If these uploaded files are placed within the web server's document root and are accessible, attackers can execute them by directly accessing their URL.
        • Impact: Critical - Remote Code Execution (RCE). Once a web shell is uploaded and executed, attackers gain full control over the web server, allowing them to execute arbitrary commands, steal data, and further compromise the system.