- Description: An attacker manipulates route parameters or request data (query parameters, POST data) to directly modify application state or bypass intended logic. This is achieved by exploiting Slim's routing capabilities that can map request inputs directly to application components without sufficient validation.
- Impact: Data corruption, unauthorized modification of application state, bypass of business logic, potential privilege escalation.
- Affected Slim Component: Routing, Request Object
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement robust input validation for all route parameters and request data within your Slim application.
- Utilize input whitelisting to explicitly define allowed parameters and reject unexpected inputs in route handlers.
- Avoid directly binding request data to models or database operations without validation. Employ Data Transfer Objects (DTOs) or similar patterns to control data flow and enforce validation rules within your Slim application logic.
Threat: Route Parameter Injection
- Description: An attacker injects malicious code or commands into route parameters. If these parameters are used in backend operations within your Slim application, such as database queries, file system interactions, or external API calls, without proper sanitization, it can lead to vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Command Injection, or Path Traversal. Slim's routing mechanism can facilitate the delivery of these malicious parameters.
- Impact: Data breach through SQL Injection, server compromise and remote code execution through Command Injection, unauthorized file access or modification through Path Traversal, denial of service.
- Affected Slim Component: Routing, Request Object
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Always use parameterized queries or prepared statements when incorporating route parameters into database queries within your Slim application to prevent SQL Injection.
- Sanitize and escape route parameters before using them in file system operations, external API calls, or any context where injection is possible within your Slim application. Use context-appropriate escaping functions.
- Apply the principle of least privilege to limit the permissions of the application user or service account running your Slim application, reducing the potential damage from successful injection attacks.
Threat: Bypass of Security Middleware
- Description: An attacker can bypass security middleware (e.g., authentication, authorization, CSRF protection) if the middleware pipeline in Slim is incorrectly configured or ordered. This can occur due to misconfiguration within Slim's middleware setup, allowing unauthorized access to protected resources or actions defined in Slim routes.
- Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive data and functionalities, privilege escalation, circumvention of security policies defined within the Slim application, potential data manipulation or exfiltration.
- Affected Slim Component: Middleware
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Carefully define and verify the order of middleware execution within your Slim application. Ensure security-critical middleware is applied early in the middleware stack, before route handlers are executed.
- Ensure comprehensive middleware coverage by applying necessary security middleware to all relevant routes and endpoints within your Slim application that require protection.
- Thoroughly test middleware configurations in your Slim application to confirm that security policies are enforced as intended and that middleware cannot be easily bypassed through configuration errors or unexpected request flows.
- Description: An attacker can exploit vulnerabilities present in third-party middleware components used within a Slim application's middleware pipeline, or take advantage of misconfigurations in how these components are integrated with Slim. While the vulnerability might be in the third-party component, the threat is realized within the context of the Slim application's architecture.
- Impact: Impact varies widely depending on the vulnerability, ranging from information disclosure and denial of service to remote code execution and complete system compromise, all within the context of the Slim application.
- Affected Slim Component: Middleware, Third-party dependencies as used in Slim
- Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the specific vulnerability and middleware)
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Conduct regular security audits and reviews of all third-party middleware components used in your Slim application.
- Keep middleware dependencies up-to-date to patch known vulnerabilities. Utilize dependency management tools to track and update middleware versions used in your Slim project.
- Securely configure third-party middleware according to security best practices and vendor recommendations, ensuring proper integration and configuration within the Slim middleware pipeline. Avoid default or insecure configurations when using middleware with Slim.
- Adhere to the principle of least functionality by only using middleware components that are strictly necessary for your Slim application's functionality. Minimize the attack surface by avoiding unnecessary or overly complex middleware in your Slim setup.
- Description: If a template engine is used with Slim (e.g., Twig, Plates), and user-controlled input is directly embedded into templates without proper escaping or sanitization within a Slim application, an attacker can inject malicious template code. This leads to Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI), allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server hosting the Slim application.
- Impact: Remote code execution, complete server compromise hosting the Slim application, data breach, full control over the application and server infrastructure.
- Affected Slim Component: Template Rendering (if used, e.g., Twig, Plates) within Slim
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Always use context-aware output escaping provided by the template engine to prevent injection vulnerabilities in your Slim application's templates. Escape user-controlled input based on the context where it is being used (e.g., HTML, JavaScript, CSS).
- Utilize security features provided by the template engine, such as sandboxing or restricted template execution environments, if available when using template engines with Slim.
- Conduct thorough code reviews of templates in your Slim application to identify and mitigate potential SSTI vulnerabilities. Pay close attention to areas where user input is incorporated into templates.
- Description: The Slim Framework itself, like any software, might contain security vulnerabilities in its core code, routing logic, middleware implementation, or other components. If vulnerabilities exist and are not patched, attackers can exploit them to compromise applications built on Slim.
- Impact: Impact varies depending on the specific vulnerability, potentially including remote code execution, data breach, denial of service, or other forms of application compromise affecting Slim-based applications.
- Affected Slim Component: Core Framework, Routing, Middleware, Request Object, Response Object, Error Handling, etc. (depending on the specific vulnerability within Slim)
- Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the nature and exploitability of the vulnerability in Slim)
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Keep the Slim Framework updated to the latest stable version. Regularly check for and apply security patches and bug fixes released by the Slim project.
- Subscribe to security mailing lists or monitor security advisories related to the Slim Framework to stay informed about known vulnerabilities and recommended mitigations specific to Slim.
- Conduct periodic code audits of your application's usage of the Slim Framework to identify potential misconfigurations or insecure patterns that could be exploited in conjunction with framework vulnerabilities. This includes reviewing how your application uses routing, middleware, and other Slim framework features.