Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
122 lines (93 loc) · 12.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

122 lines (93 loc) · 12.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for slimphp/slim

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Middleware Configuration and Ordering (Slim-Specific)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Middleware Configuration and Ordering (Slim-Specific)

    • Description:

      1. Document Middleware Pipeline (Slim Context): Within your Slim application's middleware configuration file (often middleware.php or similar), clearly document the order of execution. Use comments to explain why each middleware is placed in its specific position, especially in relation to other middleware. Reference Slim's LIFO/FIFO behavior for requests/responses.
      2. Prioritize Security Middleware (Slim-Specific Order): Leverage Slim's middleware execution order. Ensure that security-related middleware (authentication, authorization, CSRF protection – if using a Slim-compatible library) are added to the application before any middleware that might handle user input or interact with potentially vulnerable parts of your application. This is crucial in Slim's architecture.
      3. Secure by Default (Custom Slim Middleware): When creating custom Slim middleware, design it to fail securely. For example, if your middleware handles authorization, it should, by default, deny access unless a specific condition is met to grant access. This aligns with Slim's philosophy of explicit configuration.
      4. Unit Test Middleware (Slim Request/Response): Write unit tests specifically for your custom Slim middleware. Use mock Request and Response objects (provided by Slim's testing utilities or a library like PHPUnit) to simulate different scenarios and verify that your middleware behaves as expected in isolation.
      5. Integration Test Middleware Interactions (Slim App Instance): Write integration tests that involve the full Slim application instance ($app). These tests should send requests through the entire middleware stack to ensure that all middleware components interact correctly and that security checks are not bypassed due to ordering issues. Use Slim's testing capabilities to simulate requests.
      6. Review Third-Party Slim Middleware: If using third-party middleware specifically designed for Slim, carefully review its source code and documentation. Pay close attention to how it interacts with Slim's request/response cycle and how it handles security concerns. Prioritize well-maintained and widely-used Slim middleware.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Authentication Bypass (Severity: Critical): Incorrect Slim middleware order allowing unauthenticated access.
      • Authorization Bypass (Severity: Critical): Incorrect Slim middleware order or flawed logic.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (Severity: High): Missing or improperly configured Slim-compatible CSRF middleware.
      • Injection Attacks (Severity: High to Critical): Input validation middleware placed too late in Slim's pipeline.

    • Impact:

      • Authentication/Authorization Bypass: Risk reduction: Very High (90-95%). Correct Slim middleware order is fundamental to preventing these.
      • CSRF: Risk reduction: High (80-90%). Proper Slim-compatible CSRF middleware is highly effective.
      • Injection Attacks: Risk reduction: Significant (70-80%). Early input validation within Slim's middleware pipeline is key.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Basic authentication middleware is added to the Slim app.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Comprehensive documentation within the middleware.php file.
      • Formal integration tests using the Slim app instance.
      • Security review of any third-party Slim-specific middleware.
      • CSRF protection middleware (Slim-compatible).

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Route Parameter Validation and Sanitization (Slim-Specific)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Strict Route Parameter Validation and Sanitization (Slim-Specific)

    • Description:

      1. Define Specific Routes (Slim Route Patterns): Use Slim's route pattern syntax precisely. Avoid overly broad patterns with excessive wildcards (*). Favor more specific patterns that match only the expected input format for each route parameter. This leverages Slim's routing capabilities to limit attack surface.
      2. Type Validation (Slim Route Handlers): Utilize PHP type hinting within your Slim route handler functions (the closures or callables you define for each route). This provides a basic level of type safety, although it's not a complete validation solution. Example: function (Request $request, Response $response, array $args) { ... }.
      3. Input Validation Library (Slim Request Object): Integrate a validation library (e.g., Respect/Validation) and use it within your Slim route handlers. Access route parameters using Slim's $request->getAttribute('parameter_name') or $args['parameter_name'] (depending on how you access route arguments) and then apply the validation rules. This ties validation directly to Slim's request handling.
      4. Sanitization (Slim Request/Response): After validation, sanitize the input within the route handler. Use appropriate PHP functions (e.g., filter_var) or methods from a sanitization library, making sure to choose the correct sanitization method based on the expected data type. This ensures that even if validation somehow fails, the data is still sanitized before being used.
      5. Regular Expression Review (Slim Route Patterns & Validation): If using regular expressions either in Slim's route patterns or within your validation logic, meticulously review them for ReDoS vulnerabilities. Use tools to test them with various inputs, including long and complex strings.
      6. Separate Data Access (Slim Route Handler Delegation): Avoid putting database queries or other sensitive operations directly inside your Slim route handlers. Instead, delegate these tasks to separate service classes or repositories. This separation of concerns makes it easier to manage input validation and sanitization consistently, and it's a good architectural practice within the Slim framework.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • SQL Injection (Severity: Critical): Unvalidated Slim route parameters used in SQL.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Severity: High): Unvalidated Slim route parameters in output.
      • Path Traversal (Severity: High): Unvalidated Slim route parameters used in file paths.
      • Remote Code Execution (RCE) (Severity: Critical): Unvalidated Slim route parameters in system calls.
      • Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) (Severity: Medium to High): Poorly designed regex in Slim routes or validation.

    • Impact:

      • SQL Injection/XSS/Path Traversal/RCE: Risk reduction: Very High (90-95%). Validation and sanitization within Slim's route handling are essential.
      • ReDoS: Risk reduction: High (80-90%). Careful regex review and testing are crucial.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Some basic type hinting in Slim route handler functions.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Consistent use of a validation library within Slim route handlers.
      • Sanitization of all route parameters within Slim route handlers.
      • Regular expression review for ReDoS (both in routes and validation).
      • Strict separation of data access from Slim route handler logic.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Error Handling (Slim-Specific)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Error Handling (Slim-Specific)

    • Description:

      1. Disable Debug Mode (Slim Settings): Ensure that Slim's debug setting (usually in your application's configuration file) is set to false in your production environment. This is a Slim-specific setting that controls the verbosity of error output.
      2. Custom Error Handler (Slim Error Handling): Implement a custom error handler within your Slim application. Use Slim's error handling mechanisms (e.g., $app->addErrorMiddleware()) to register your custom handler. This handler should catch all exceptions and errors.
      3. Log Errors Securely (Outside Slim's Response): Within your custom error handler, log detailed error information (including stack traces) to a secure location outside of what will be sent in the HTTP response. Use a logging library or system that ensures the logs are protected from unauthorized access.
      4. Generic Error Messages (Slim Response): In your custom error handler, craft a generic error message to be included in the HTTP response sent to the user. Do not include any details about the error itself. Use Slim's $response object to set the response body.
      5. Appropriate HTTP Status Codes (Slim Response): Use Slim's $response->withStatus() method to set the appropriate HTTP status code (e.g., 400, 401, 403, 500) in your custom error handler. This provides meaningful feedback to the client without revealing sensitive information.
      6. Regular Log Review: Regularly review error logs.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Information Disclosure (Severity: Medium to High): Slim's default error handling revealing sensitive information.
      • Reconnaissance (Severity: Low to Medium): Attackers using Slim error messages to learn about the application.

    • Impact:

      • Information Disclosure: Risk reduction: Very High (90-95%). Custom Slim error handling is crucial for preventing leaks.
      • Reconnaissance: Risk reduction: Moderate (60-70%). Generic error messages in Slim responses hinder attackers.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Default Slim error handling is currently in use.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Custom error handler registered with Slim's error middleware.
      • Secure logging of errors (outside of the Slim response).
      • Generic error messages set in the Slim response.
      • Consistent use of appropriate HTTP status codes via Slim's $response.
      • Debug mode is not explicitly disabled.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Dependency Injection Container Usage (Slim-Specific)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Dependency Injection Container Usage (Slim-Specific)

    • Description:

      1. Environment Variables (Outside Slim's Container): Store sensitive data (API keys, database credentials) in environment variables, not directly within Slim's dependency injection container configuration. This is a best practice that applies because Slim uses a container.
      2. Factories (Slim Container Configuration): When defining services within Slim's container that require sensitive data, use factories. The factory function should retrieve the sensitive data from environment variables and inject it into the service when it's created. This keeps the sensitive data out of the container's static configuration.
      3. Avoid Overly Permissive Services (Slim Container Definitions): When defining services in Slim's container, ensure they have only the minimum necessary permissions and access. Avoid creating services that have broad access to resources they don't need.
      4. Regular Review (Slim Container Config File): Regularly review your Slim application's container configuration file (often dependencies.php or similar) to ensure that no sensitive information is directly exposed and that services are defined securely.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Credential Exposure (Severity: Critical): Storing secrets directly in Slim's container configuration.
      • Privilege Escalation (Severity: High): Overly permissive service definitions within Slim's container.

    • Impact:

      • Credential Exposure: Risk reduction: Very High (95-99%). Environment variables and factories are essential.
      • Privilege Escalation: Risk reduction: High (80-90%). Careful service definitions in Slim's container are key.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Some sensitive data is stored directly in Slim's container configuration.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Consistent use of environment variables for all sensitive data accessed by services in Slim's container.
      • Factories for all services in Slim's container that require sensitive data.
      • Regular review of Slim's container configuration file.