Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
225 lines (200 loc) · 25.9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

225 lines (200 loc) · 25.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for snipe/snipe-it

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)

1. Implement Robust Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
  • Description:
    1. Review Default Roles: Examine the default roles provided by Snipe-IT (e.g., Admin, Super Admin, User, etc.). Understand the permissions associated with each role within the Snipe-IT context.
    2. Define Custom Roles (If Needed): If the default roles don't precisely match organizational needs within Snipe-IT's functionality, create custom roles with specific permission sets. For example, a "Location Manager" role might be created with permissions limited to managing locations and assets within those locations in Snipe-IT.
    3. Assign Roles Based on Least Privilege: Assign users to roles that grant them only the minimum necessary permissions to perform their job functions within Snipe-IT. Avoid granting broad "Admin" or "Super Admin" roles unless absolutely required.
    4. Regularly Audit Roles and Permissions: Periodically review user roles and permissions within Snipe-IT (e.g., quarterly or annually). Ensure that users still have the appropriate level of access and that no unnecessary privileges have been granted over time (privilege creep) within the application.
    5. Utilize Snipe-IT's Permission Matrix: Leverage Snipe-IT's permission matrix within the admin settings to granularly control access to different modules and actions (e.g., create, read, update, delete assets, users, locations, etc.) within the application itself.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Data Access (High Severity): Without proper RBAC in Snipe-IT, users might access sensitive asset information, user details, or financial data they shouldn't within the application.
    • Data Modification or Deletion by Unauthorized Users (High Severity): Insufficient access control in Snipe-IT could allow users to modify or delete critical asset data, leading to data integrity issues and operational disruptions within the application.
    • Privilege Escalation (Medium Severity): Loosely defined roles in Snipe-IT can be exploited to gain higher privileges than intended within the application, potentially leading to broader system compromise of the Snipe-IT data and functions.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized Data Access: High Risk Reduction
    • Data Modification or Deletion by Unauthorized Users: High Risk Reduction
    • Privilege Escalation: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Snipe-IT has a built-in RBAC system implemented within its core application logic and database structure.
    • Administrators can configure roles and permissions through the Admin settings interface under "Settings" -> "Roles" in Snipe-IT.
    • User assignment to roles is managed through the "Users" section in Snipe-IT.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Proactive and regular auditing of roles and permissions within Snipe-IT is often a missing process within organizations using Snipe-IT. Organizations need to establish a schedule and procedure for reviewing and adjusting RBAC configurations in the application.
    • Integration with external Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems for centralized role management that directly integrates with Snipe-IT's RBAC might be missing in some deployments, especially larger enterprises.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Attachment Handling

2. Secure Attachment Handling

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Attachment Handling
  • Description:
    1. Restrict Allowed File Types: Configure Snipe-IT to only allow specific file types for attachments that are necessary for asset documentation (e.g., PDF, DOCX, XLSX, images) within Snipe-IT's settings if available. Block executable file types (e.g., EXE, BAT, SH, JS) and other potentially malicious file types through Snipe-IT's configuration or web server if Snipe-IT settings are insufficient.
    2. Implement Virus Scanning: Integrate a virus scanning solution (e.g., ClamAV, or a cloud-based scanning API) to scan all uploaded files for malware before they are stored if Snipe-IT offers plugin or extension capabilities, or consider custom code modification. This can be implemented at the web server level or within the Snipe-IT application code if customization is possible.
    3. Control Access to Attachments: Ensure that access to download or view attachments is controlled by the same RBAC system used for other Snipe-IT data. Users should only be able to access attachments related to assets they are authorized to view within Snipe-IT's access control framework.
    4. Secure Storage Location: Store attachments in a secure location on the server file system or in cloud storage. Ensure proper file system permissions or cloud storage access controls are in place to prevent unauthorized access to the stored files directly. While storage location security is broader, it's directly relevant to how Snipe-IT handles attachments.
    5. Regularly Review Attachment Usage: Periodically review the types of attachments being uploaded through Snipe-IT logs or monitoring and ensure they are legitimate and necessary. Investigate any unusual or suspicious file uploads within the context of Snipe-IT usage.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Malware Upload and Distribution (High Severity): Unrestricted file uploads in Snipe-IT can allow users to upload malware-infected files, potentially compromising the Snipe-IT server or other users who download these attachments through Snipe-IT.
    • Data Leakage through Attachments (Medium Severity): Sensitive information might be inadvertently or maliciously included in attachments and become accessible to unauthorized users if access controls are not properly implemented within Snipe-IT.
    • Storage Exhaustion (Low Severity): Allowing unrestricted file uploads, especially large files, can lead to storage exhaustion on the server hosting Snipe-IT.
  • Impact:
    • Malware Upload and Distribution: High Risk Reduction
    • Data Leakage through Attachments: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Storage Exhaustion: Low Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Snipe-IT allows file attachments for assets and other modules.
    • Basic file type restrictions might be configurable within Snipe-IT's settings (check current version documentation).
    • Access control to attachments is generally tied to the access control of the associated asset or module within Snipe-IT.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Built-in virus scanning for uploaded attachments is typically missing in standard Snipe-IT installations. This would require custom development or integration with external scanning services potentially through Snipe-IT's extensibility if available.
    • Granular control over allowed file types might be limited within Snipe-IT's settings and require configuration at the web server level or application code modification.
    • Proactive monitoring and review of uploaded attachments specifically within Snipe-IT usage patterns is often a missing process.

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Strong Password Policies

3. Enforce Strong Password Policies

  • Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Strong Password Policies
  • Description:
    1. Configure Password Complexity Requirements: Utilize Snipe-IT's password policy settings (typically found in Admin settings -> "Settings" -> "Password Settings" or similar) to enforce password complexity requirements for Snipe-IT user accounts. This should include:
      • Minimum password length (e.g., 12-16 characters or more).
      • Requirement for uppercase letters, lowercase letters, numbers, and special characters.
      • Prevention of using easily guessable passwords or common patterns.
    2. Enforce Password Expiration (Optional but Recommended): Consider enabling password expiration policies (e.g., password reset every 90 days) to further reduce the risk of compromised passwords being used long-term for Snipe-IT accounts.
    3. Password History: Enable password history to prevent users from reusing recently used passwords within Snipe-IT.
    4. Educate Users: Educate users about the importance of strong passwords and best practices for password creation and management specifically for their Snipe-IT accounts. Encourage the use of password managers.
    5. Regularly Review Password Policies: Periodically review and update password policies within Snipe-IT to ensure they remain effective against evolving password cracking techniques.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Brute-Force Attacks (High Severity): Weak passwords for Snipe-IT accounts are easily cracked through brute-force attacks, allowing attackers to gain unauthorized access to user accounts in Snipe-IT.
    • Password Guessing (High Severity): Simple or predictable passwords for Snipe-IT accounts can be easily guessed by attackers.
    • Credential Stuffing (High Severity): If users reuse weak passwords across multiple accounts, a breach at another service could compromise their Snipe-IT account through credential stuffing attacks if they use the same weak password for Snipe-IT.
  • Impact:
    • Brute-Force Attacks: High Risk Reduction
    • Password Guessing: High Risk Reduction
    • Credential Stuffing: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Snipe-IT typically provides built-in password policy settings within its administration interface. The specific features available may vary depending on the Snipe-IT version.
    • Password complexity requirements and potentially password expiration can usually be configured within Snipe-IT.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • The effectiveness of password policies depends on user compliance and education related to Snipe-IT accounts. Simply configuring policies is not enough; users need to understand and adhere to them for Snipe-IT.
    • Integration with external password complexity enforcement tools or centralized password management systems that directly integrate with Snipe-IT's password policy enforcement might be missing in standard Snipe-IT.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

4. Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
  • Description:
    1. Enable MFA in Snipe-IT Settings: Locate and enable MFA settings within Snipe-IT's administration interface (typically under "Settings" -> "Security" or "Authentication").
    2. Configure Supported MFA Methods: Choose and configure the MFA methods supported by Snipe-IT. This might include Time-Based One-Time Passwords (TOTP) via apps like Google Authenticator or Authy, or potentially other methods if supported by Snipe-IT or through plugins.
    3. Enforce MFA for All Users or High-Risk Roles: Enforce MFA for all Snipe-IT users, or at least for administrator accounts and users with access to sensitive data or critical functions within Snipe-IT.
    4. Provide User Guidance: Provide clear instructions and support to users on how to set up and use MFA for their Snipe-IT accounts.
    5. Regularly Review MFA Configuration: Periodically review the MFA configuration in Snipe-IT to ensure it is properly enabled and that supported methods are still secure and appropriate.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Account Takeover due to Password Compromise (Critical Severity): MFA significantly reduces the risk of account takeover even if a user's password is compromised through phishing, breaches, or weak passwords.
    • Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data (High Severity): MFA prevents unauthorized access to sensitive asset data and system configurations within Snipe-IT, even if an attacker has obtained valid credentials.
    • Insider Threats (Medium Severity): MFA can deter or prevent unauthorized access by malicious insiders who might have obtained legitimate credentials but lack the second factor.
  • Impact:
    • Account Takeover due to Password Compromise: Critical Risk Reduction
    • Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data: High Risk Reduction
    • Insider Threats: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Snipe-IT generally supports MFA. The specific methods and configuration options will depend on the Snipe-IT version.
    • MFA settings are typically found within the administration interface.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • MFA is often not enabled or enforced by default in Snipe-IT installations. Organizations need to proactively enable and configure it.
    • The range of MFA methods supported natively within Snipe-IT might be limited. Integration with more advanced MFA solutions might require custom development or plugins if available.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Session Management

5. Secure Session Management

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Session Management
  • Description:
    1. Configure Session Timeout: Review and configure Snipe-IT's session timeout settings (typically found in Admin settings -> "Settings" -> "Session" or "Security"). Reduce the session timeout to a reasonable duration that balances security and user convenience. Shorter timeouts reduce the window of opportunity for session hijacking.
    2. Ensure Secure Session Cookies: Verify that Snipe-IT is configured to use secure session cookies. Session cookies should have the HttpOnly and Secure flags set. HttpOnly prevents client-side JavaScript from accessing the cookie, mitigating XSS-based session hijacking. Secure ensures the cookie is only transmitted over HTTPS.
    3. Session Invalidation on Password Change: Configure Snipe-IT (if this feature is available or can be implemented through customization) to invalidate active sessions when a user changes their password. This prevents attackers who might have hijacked a session from continuing to use it after the password has been changed.
    4. Consider Session Regeneration: Explore if Snipe-IT automatically regenerates session IDs after successful login or privilege escalation. Session regeneration helps prevent session fixation attacks. If not built-in, consider implementing this through customization if feasible.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Session Hijacking (High Severity): Weak session management can allow attackers to hijack user sessions, gaining unauthorized access to Snipe-IT without needing credentials. This can occur through various methods like XSS, network sniffing (if HTTPS is not enforced), or session fixation.
    • Session Fixation (Medium Severity): Vulnerable session management can allow attackers to "fix" a user's session ID, forcing them to use a session ID controlled by the attacker, leading to account takeover.
  • Impact:
    • Session Hijacking: High Risk Reduction
    • Session Fixation: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Snipe-IT should implement session management using cookies.
    • Session timeout settings are likely configurable within the administration interface.
    • Use of HttpOnly and Secure flags for session cookies is a standard security practice and should be implemented by Snipe-IT.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Session invalidation on password change might not be a default feature and might require code customization.
    • Automatic session regeneration might not be explicitly implemented and could be a potential area for improvement.
    • Organizations often do not review and adjust the default session timeout settings, leaving them at potentially insecure values.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Snipe-IT and Dependencies Updated

6. Keep Snipe-IT and Dependencies Updated

  • Mitigation Strategy: Keep Snipe-IT and Dependencies Updated
  • Description:
    1. Monitor Snipe-IT Releases: Regularly monitor the official Snipe-IT GitHub repository, website, and community channels for new releases and security advisories.
    2. Establish Update Process: Define a process for testing and applying Snipe-IT updates in a timely manner. This should include testing updates in a staging environment before applying them to production.
    3. Update Snipe-IT Regularly: Apply Snipe-IT updates as soon as reasonably possible after they are released, especially security patches.
    4. Dependency Scanning and Updates: Use dependency scanning tools (e.g., tools that scan composer.json and package.json files) to identify vulnerable PHP packages and JavaScript libraries used by Snipe-IT. Update these dependencies to patched versions as needed.
    5. Subscribe to Security Mailing Lists/Feeds: Subscribe to security mailing lists or RSS feeds related to Laravel (the framework Snipe-IT is built on) and PHP to stay informed about general security vulnerabilities that might affect Snipe-IT.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (Critical Severity): Outdated software is vulnerable to known security flaws that attackers can exploit to gain unauthorized access, execute arbitrary code, or cause denial of service.
    • Data Breach due to Vulnerabilities (Critical Severity): Exploitable vulnerabilities in Snipe-IT or its dependencies can lead to data breaches and exfiltration of sensitive asset information.
    • System Compromise (High Severity): Successful exploitation of vulnerabilities can lead to complete system compromise, allowing attackers to control the Snipe-IT server and potentially pivot to other systems on the network.
  • Impact:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Critical Risk Reduction
    • Data Breach due to Vulnerabilities: Critical Risk Reduction
    • System Compromise: High Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Snipe-IT releases updates periodically, including security patches.
    • The Snipe-IT community and developers generally announce security vulnerabilities and updates.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Automated update mechanisms within Snipe-IT itself are typically not provided. Updates are usually manual processes involving downloading new versions and migrating configurations.
    • Proactive dependency scanning and automated dependency updates are not built-in and require external tools and processes.
    • Organizations often lack a formal process for monitoring Snipe-IT releases and applying updates in a timely manner, leading to systems running outdated and vulnerable versions.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Output Encoding

7. Input Validation and Output Encoding

  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Output Encoding
  • Description:
    1. Review Custom Code/Extensions: If any custom code or extensions have been developed for Snipe-IT, thoroughly review them for proper input validation and output encoding practices.
    2. Validate User Inputs: Ensure that all user inputs accepted by Snipe-IT (e.g., form fields, API parameters) are validated on the server-side. Validation should include:
      • Type validation: Ensuring input is of the expected data type (e.g., integer, string, email).
      • Format validation: Checking input against expected formats (e.g., date format, phone number format).
      • Range validation: Ensuring input values are within acceptable ranges (e.g., maximum length, minimum value).
      • Sanitization: Sanitizing input to remove or escape potentially harmful characters.
    3. Output Encoding: Ensure that all data displayed to users in Snipe-IT (especially user-generated content or data retrieved from the database) is properly encoded before being output to the web browser. Use context-appropriate encoding methods (e.g., HTML encoding for HTML output, JavaScript encoding for JavaScript output) to prevent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. Laravel, the framework Snipe-IT uses, provides some built-in output encoding functions (e.g., {{ }}).
    4. Regularly Test for Injection Vulnerabilities: Conduct regular security testing, including penetration testing or vulnerability scanning, to identify potential input validation and output encoding flaws in Snipe-IT, especially in custom code or integrations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (High Severity): Lack of proper output encoding can lead to XSS vulnerabilities, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users, potentially leading to account hijacking, data theft, or malware distribution.
    • SQL Injection (High Severity): Insufficient input validation, especially in database queries, can lead to SQL injection vulnerabilities, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands, potentially gaining access to sensitive data, modifying data, or compromising the database server.
    • Other Injection Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Improper input handling can lead to other types of injection vulnerabilities, such as command injection or LDAP injection, depending on how Snipe-IT processes user input.
  • Impact:
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): High Risk Reduction
    • SQL Injection: High Risk Reduction
    • Other Injection Vulnerabilities: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Laravel, the framework Snipe-IT is built on, provides built-in features for input validation and output encoding.
    • Snipe-IT's core code likely utilizes these features to some extent.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • The effectiveness of input validation and output encoding depends on consistent and correct implementation throughout the entire application codebase, including any custom code or extensions.
    • Vulnerabilities can still exist if developers make mistakes or overlook certain input points or output contexts.
    • Regular security testing is crucial to verify the effectiveness of these mitigation measures and identify any missing or incomplete implementations.

Mitigation Strategy: Monitor Logs and Security Events (Within Snipe-IT)

8. Monitor Logs and Security Events (Within Snipe-IT)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Monitor Logs and Security Events (Within Snipe-IT)
  • Description:
    1. Enable Snipe-IT Application Logging: Ensure that Snipe-IT's application logging is enabled and configured to log relevant security events. This might include login attempts (successful and failed), permission changes, data modification events, and error messages. Check Snipe-IT's documentation for specific logging configuration options.
    2. Regularly Review Snipe-IT Logs: Establish a process for regularly reviewing Snipe-IT application logs. This can be done manually or using log analysis tools. Look for suspicious patterns or anomalies, such as:
      • Repeated failed login attempts from the same IP address.
      • Login attempts from unusual locations or at unusual times.
      • Unauthorized access attempts (e.g., attempts to access resources without proper permissions).
      • Unusual data modifications or deletions.
      • Error messages indicating potential security issues.
    3. Implement Security Alerting (If Possible): If Snipe-IT or external tools allow, configure security alerting to automatically notify administrators when suspicious events are detected in the logs.
    4. Centralized Log Management (Optional but Recommended): For larger deployments, consider integrating Snipe-IT logs with a centralized Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system. This allows for more efficient log analysis, correlation of events from multiple sources, and automated security monitoring.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Delayed Detection of Security Breaches (High Severity): Without proper logging and monitoring, security breaches might go undetected for extended periods, allowing attackers to cause more damage and exfiltrate more data.
    • Insider Threats (Medium Severity): Monitoring logs can help detect and investigate suspicious activities by insiders who might be abusing their access privileges.
    • Unauthorized Access Attempts (Medium Severity): Log monitoring can identify and alert on unauthorized access attempts, allowing for timely intervention and prevention of successful breaches.
  • Impact:
    • Delayed Detection of Security Breaches: High Risk Reduction
    • Insider Threats: Medium Risk Reduction
    • Unauthorized Access Attempts: Medium Risk Reduction
  • Currently Implemented:
    • Snipe-IT likely has built-in application logging capabilities.
    • The extent and configurability of logging may vary depending on the Snipe-IT version.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Proactive log review and security event monitoring are often missing processes in organizations using Snipe-IT. Simply having logs is not enough; they need to be actively analyzed.
    • Built-in security alerting within Snipe-IT itself might be limited or non-existent. Integration with external alerting systems or SIEM solutions is usually required for automated alerting.
    • Centralized log management is often not implemented, especially in smaller deployments, making log analysis more challenging.