Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
119 lines (91 loc) · 15.4 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

119 lines (91 loc) · 15.4 KB

Okay, here's a deep dive security analysis of Snipe-IT, based on the provided design review and my expertise.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Snipe-IT's key components, identifying potential vulnerabilities and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on the application's architecture, data flow, and security controls, aiming to minimize the risks of data breaches, data loss, system downtime, compliance violations, and reputational damage. We will specifically look for vulnerabilities common in web applications and asset management systems.

  • Scope: This analysis covers the Snipe-IT application itself, its interactions with external systems (email, LDAP, database, backup storage), and the recommended Docker-based deployment model. It includes the build process and associated security scanning steps. It excludes the security of the underlying operating system, network infrastructure (beyond the load balancer), and the physical security of the servers. It also assumes that external services (Email Server, LDAP/AD Server) are configured securely, focusing on Snipe-IT's interaction with them.

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture Review: Analyze the C4 diagrams (Context, Container, Deployment, Build) to understand the system's components, data flow, and trust boundaries.
    2. Codebase Inference: Based on the provided information and knowledge of PHP/Laravel applications (and common Snipe-IT configurations), infer potential vulnerabilities in how the application might handle data, authentication, authorization, and other security-critical functions. This is not a full code review, but rather an informed inference based on the design.
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the business risks, data sensitivity, and identified vulnerabilities. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees to model potential attack vectors.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Snipe-IT and its deployment environment. These will be prioritized based on the severity of the threat and the feasibility of implementation.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each component, focusing on potential vulnerabilities and threats:

  • User (Person):

    • Threats: Phishing, credential stuffing, brute-force attacks, social engineering, weak passwords.
    • Vulnerabilities: Users are often the weakest link in security.
    • Mitigation: Strong password policies, mandatory 2FA (especially for admins), security awareness training, account lockout policies.

  • Web Server (Apache/Nginx):

    • Threats: Exploitation of web server vulnerabilities (e.g., known CVEs), misconfiguration (e.g., directory listing enabled, default credentials), DDoS attacks.
    • Vulnerabilities: Outdated software, insecure configurations.
    • Mitigation: Regular updates, hardening guides (e.g., OWASP, CIS Benchmarks), disabling unnecessary modules, using a WAF, rate limiting, proper TLS configuration (strong ciphers, HSTS). Specific to Snipe-IT: Ensure the web server is configured to only serve the intended Snipe-IT files and directories, preventing access to sensitive files like .env or configuration files.

  • Application (PHP/Laravel):

    • Threats: OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities (SQL Injection, XSS, Broken Authentication, Sensitive Data Exposure, etc.), business logic flaws, insecure deserialization, file upload vulnerabilities.
    • Vulnerabilities: Coding errors, inadequate input validation, improper use of Laravel's security features, reliance on vulnerable third-party libraries.
    • Mitigation:
      • SQL Injection: Strict use of Eloquent ORM (Laravel's ORM) or parameterized queries everywhere data is used in SQL queries. Avoid raw SQL queries whenever possible. Specific to Snipe-IT: Review database interactions related to asset searching, filtering, and reporting for potential injection points.
      • XSS: Consistent use of output encoding (e.g., Blade's {{ }} syntax) to escape user-provided data. Specific to Snipe-IT: Pay close attention to areas where asset details, custom fields, or user input is displayed. Consider using a Content Security Policy (CSP).
      • Broken Authentication: Enforce strong password policies, use secure session management (HTTP-only and secure cookies), implement 2FA, protect against brute-force attacks. Specific to Snipe-IT: Ensure proper session invalidation on logout and timeout. Review LDAP integration for secure handling of credentials.
      • Sensitive Data Exposure: Encrypt sensitive data at rest (database encryption) and in transit (HTTPS). Specific to Snipe-IT: Identify all sensitive data fields (e.g., serial numbers, purchase prices, user details) and ensure they are adequately protected. Consider data masking or tokenization for certain fields.
      • File Upload Vulnerabilities: Validate file types, sizes, and contents. Store uploaded files outside the web root. Use a virus scanner. Specific to Snipe-IT: Asset images and attachments are potential attack vectors. Ensure proper validation and storage.
      • CSRF: Laravel provides built-in CSRF protection; ensure it's enabled and used correctly for all state-changing requests.
      • Insecure Deserialization: Avoid using PHP's unserialize() function with untrusted data. If necessary, use a safer alternative or implement strict validation.
      • Dependency Management: Regularly update dependencies using Composer and use tools like Dependabot or Snyk to identify and address vulnerabilities.

  • Database (MySQL/MariaDB):

    • Threats: SQL injection (if the application layer fails), unauthorized access, data breaches, data corruption.
    • Vulnerabilities: Weak database credentials, unpatched database software, lack of encryption at rest.
    • Mitigation: Strong, unique database credentials, regular database updates, database firewall, encryption at rest (if sensitive data is stored), regular backups, least privilege principle for database users (the application should connect with a user that has only the necessary permissions). Specific to Snipe-IT: Ensure the database user used by Snipe-IT does not have administrative privileges on the database server.

  • Email API / Email Server:

    • Threats: Email spoofing, phishing attacks, interception of email communications.
    • Vulnerabilities: Misconfigured email server, lack of TLS encryption, sending sensitive information in plain text.
    • Mitigation: Use a reputable email service, configure TLS encryption, avoid sending sensitive information (e.g., passwords) in emails. Specific to Snipe-IT: Review email templates and ensure they don't expose sensitive information. Use email best practices (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) to prevent spoofing.

  • LDAP API / LDAP Server:

    • Threats: LDAP injection, credential theft, unauthorized access to directory information.
    • Vulnerabilities: Insecure LDAP connection (no LDAPS), weak LDAP credentials, lack of input validation in LDAP queries.
    • Mitigation: Use LDAPS (LDAP over SSL/TLS), strong LDAP credentials, validate and sanitize all input used in LDAP queries. Specific to Snipe-IT: Ensure that user input is properly escaped before being used in LDAP search filters to prevent LDAP injection attacks.

  • Backup Storage:

    • Threats: Unauthorized access to backups, data loss due to backup failure.
    • Vulnerabilities: Weak access controls, lack of encryption, insecure storage location.
    • Mitigation: Encrypt backups, store backups in a secure location (e.g., offsite, cloud storage with access controls), regularly test backup and restore procedures. Specific to Snipe-IT: Ensure backups include both the database and any uploaded files (e.g., asset images).

  • Docker Host / Containers:

    • Threats: Container escape, exploitation of vulnerabilities in the Docker engine or container images.
    • Vulnerabilities: Outdated Docker engine, insecure container configurations, running containers as root.
    • Mitigation: Regularly update the Docker engine, use official or trusted base images, follow Docker security best practices (e.g., least privilege, non-root user), use a container security scanner (e.g., Trivy, Clair). Specific to Snipe-IT: Ensure the Snipe-IT container is running as a non-root user. Use a minimal base image.

  • Load Balancer:

    • Threats: DDoS, SSL/TLS vulnerabilities
    • Mitigation: Configure DDoS protection, use strong ciphers and protocols, keep software updated.

  • Build Process (CI/SAST/Dependency Scanning):

    • Threats: Introduction of vulnerabilities during the development process.
    • Mitigation: Integrate SAST, DAST, and dependency scanning into the CI/CD pipeline. Address identified vulnerabilities promptly. Specific to Snipe-IT: Use PHP-specific SAST tools (e.g., PHPStan, Psalm) and dependency scanners (e.g., Dependabot, Snyk).

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferences)

Based on the C4 diagrams and common Laravel practices, we can infer the following:

  • Data Flow: User requests hit the Web Server (Apache/Nginx), which forwards them to the Application (PHP/Laravel). The Application interacts with the Database (MySQL/MariaDB) to retrieve and store data. The Application may also interact with the Email API and LDAP API for notifications and authentication, respectively.
  • Authentication: Snipe-IT likely uses a combination of session-based authentication (for web UI) and API keys (for API access). LDAP integration likely involves binding to the LDAP server with user-provided credentials or a service account.
  • Authorization: RBAC is implemented within the Application, likely using Laravel's built-in authorization features (e.g., Gates, Policies). Permissions are likely associated with user roles and checked before accessing resources or performing actions.
  • Data Storage: Asset data, user data, and configuration data are stored in the MySQL/MariaDB database. Uploaded files are likely stored on the filesystem (within the Docker container or a mounted volume).

4. Specific Security Considerations and Mitigation Strategies (Tailored to Snipe-IT)

Here are specific, actionable recommendations, prioritized by severity:

  • High Priority:

    • Mandatory 2FA for Administrative Accounts: This is a critical control to protect against compromised administrator credentials. Implement this using a time-based one-time password (TOTP) app or a hardware security key.
    • Database User Least Privilege: Ensure the database user used by Snipe-IT has only the necessary SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE privileges on the specific Snipe-IT database. It should not have any administrative privileges on the database server.
    • Regular Penetration Testing: Conduct regular penetration tests (at least annually) by a qualified third-party security firm. Focus on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities and asset management-specific attack vectors.
    • Input Validation and Output Encoding Review: Conduct a thorough review of all input validation and output encoding logic, paying particular attention to areas where user input is used in database queries, displayed on the screen, or used in LDAP queries.
    • File Upload Security: Implement strict file type validation (using a whitelist approach), limit file sizes, store uploaded files outside the web root, and scan uploaded files for malware. Consider using a dedicated file storage service (e.g., AWS S3) with appropriate security controls.
    • LDAP Injection Prevention: Ensure that all user input used in LDAP search filters is properly escaped using Laravel's escaping functions or a dedicated LDAP library.
    • Web Server Hardening: Implement a robust web server configuration, following OWASP or CIS Benchmarks guidelines. Disable unnecessary modules and features.

  • Medium Priority:

    • Data at Rest Encryption: Enable database encryption at rest to protect sensitive data in case of a database server compromise.
    • SIEM Integration: Integrate Snipe-IT with a SIEM system for centralized security monitoring and alerting. This will help detect and respond to security incidents more effectively.
    • WAF Implementation: Deploy a WAF to protect against common web attacks. Configure it with rules specific to Snipe-IT and Laravel applications.
    • Security Headers: Implement security headers (e.g., HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, Content-Security-Policy) to mitigate various web-based attacks.
    • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the Snipe-IT configuration and deployment environment.
    • Backup Encryption: Encrypt backups to protect them from unauthorized access.

  • Low Priority:

    • Consider a Hosted Version: Offering a hosted version of Snipe-IT with enhanced security features and support could be a valuable option for organizations with stricter security requirements.
    • Security Documentation: Provide detailed security documentation and best practices for administrators, covering topics such as secure configuration, user management, and incident response.

5. Addressing Questions and Assumptions

  • Compliance Requirements: The specific compliance requirements (GDPR, CCPA, SOX, etc.) will dictate the necessary data protection and privacy controls. Snipe-IT should provide features and documentation to help organizations meet these requirements (e.g., data anonymization, data export, audit logging).
  • Scale of Deployment: The expected scale will influence the choice of deployment architecture and the need for load balancing, clustering, and other scalability measures.
  • Existing Security Tools: Integration with existing security tools (WAF, SIEM) should be considered to leverage existing investments and improve overall security posture.
  • Vulnerability Handling Process: A clear process for handling security vulnerabilities reported by external researchers is essential. This should include a vulnerability disclosure policy, a process for verifying and fixing vulnerabilities, and a mechanism for notifying users of security updates.
  • Support and Maintenance: Providing adequate support and maintenance is crucial for ensuring the long-term security of Snipe-IT deployments.

The assumptions made (secure OS, secure database configuration, HTTPS usage) are critical. If these assumptions are not met, the security of Snipe-IT is significantly compromised. Administrators must be responsible for securing the underlying infrastructure.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for Snipe-IT. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, organizations can significantly reduce their risk and ensure the secure and reliable operation of their asset management system. Remember that security is an ongoing process, and regular reviews and updates are essential to maintain a strong security posture.