Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
132 lines (111 loc) · 12.4 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

132 lines (111 loc) · 12.4 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for walkor/workerman

Objective: Compromise Application Using Workerman

Attack Tree Visualization

Root: Compromise Application Using Workerman [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR]─ Exploit Workerman Core Vulnerabilities │ └───[OR]─ Socket Handling Vulnerabilities │ └───[AND]─ Connection Flooding (DoS) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └─── Exhaust Server Resources [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR]─ Vulnerabilities in Workerman Extensions/Dependencies (If used) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └───[AND]─ Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Used Extensions [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR]─ Exploit Application Logic Vulnerabilities (Exacerbated by Workerman's Nature) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ ├───[OR]─ State Management Issues in Persistent Connections [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └───[AND]─ Session Hijacking/Fixation in Persistent Connections [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └─── Capture Session Identifiers [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[AND]─ Data Leakage Due to Shared State Between Requests [HIGH RISK PATH] │ │ └─── Improperly Scoped Variables/Data [CRITICAL NODE] │ └───[OR]─ Denial of Service through Application Logic [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └───[AND]─ Resource Exhaustion via Malicious Requests [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ └─── Send Requests that Trigger CPU/Memory Intensive Operations [CRITICAL NODE] └───[OR]─ Insecure Configuration and Deployment of Workerman Application [HIGH RISK PATH] ├───[OR]─ Insufficient Resource Limits (OS/Container Level) [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └───[AND]─ Exploit Lack of Resource Limits [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR]─ Insecure File Permissions/Access Control [HIGH RISK PATH] │ └───[AND]─ Exploit Weak File Permissions [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├─── Read Sensitive Configuration Files [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├─── Modify Application Code [CRITICAL NODE] │ └─── Gain Persistence [CRITICAL NODE] └───[OR]─ Running Workerman as Root User [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] └───[AND]─ Exploit Any Vulnerability to Escalate to Root Privileges [CRITICAL NODE] └─── Full System Compromise [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Connection Flooding (DoS) [HIGH RISK PATH, Critical Node: Exhaust Server Resources]

  • Attack Vector: Attacker sends a large volume of connection requests to the Workerman application.
  • Mechanism: Exploits the server's capacity to handle new connections and process requests.
  • Impact: Exhausts server resources (CPU, memory, network bandwidth), leading to service unavailability for legitimate users.
  • Mitigation:
    • Implement connection rate limiting at the application or infrastructure level.
    • Utilize SYN cookies to mitigate SYN flood attacks.
    • Consider using a DDoS protection service to filter malicious traffic.
    • Monitor connection metrics and set alerts for unusual spikes in connection attempts.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Vulnerabilities in Workerman Extensions/Dependencies (If used) [HIGH RISK PATH, Critical Node: Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in Used Extensions]

  • Attack Vector: Attacker identifies and exploits known security vulnerabilities (CVEs) in Workerman extensions or other PHP libraries used by the application.
  • Mechanism: Leverages publicly disclosed vulnerabilities for which exploits may be readily available.
  • Impact: Can range from information disclosure and denial of service to remote code execution, depending on the specific vulnerability.
  • Mitigation:
    • Maintain a comprehensive inventory of all Workerman extensions and PHP dependencies.
    • Regularly audit and update all dependencies to the latest secure versions.
    • Utilize dependency vulnerability scanning tools to proactively identify and address known vulnerabilities.
    • Subscribe to security advisories for Workerman, PHP, and used libraries to stay informed about new vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 3. State Management Issues in Persistent Connections [HIGH RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Exploits weaknesses in how the application manages state and sessions within persistent connections (like WebSockets) in Workerman.

    • 3.1. Session Hijacking/Fixation in Persistent Connections [HIGH RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE: Session Hijacking/Fixation, Capture Session Identifiers]:

      • Attack Vector: Attacker attempts to steal or fixate session identifiers in persistent connections to impersonate legitimate users.
      • Mechanism: Can involve capturing session cookies/tokens, exploiting predictable session ID generation, or session fixation techniques.
      • Impact: Unauthorized access to user accounts and data, ability to perform actions as the compromised user.
      • Mitigation:
        • Implement robust session management practices specifically designed for persistent connections.
        • Use cryptographically secure and unpredictable session identifiers.
        • Regenerate session IDs regularly, especially after authentication.
        • Consider using secure session storage mechanisms (e.g., server-side storage).
        • Implement proper authentication and authorization checks for all requests within persistent connections.

    • 3.2. Data Leakage Due to Shared State Between Requests [HIGH RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE: Improperly Scoped Variables/Data]:

      • Attack Vector: Attacker exploits improper variable scoping or shared state within Workerman worker processes to access sensitive data from other connections.
      • Mechanism: Relies on coding errors where variables or data intended to be request-specific are inadvertently shared between different requests processed by the same worker.
      • Impact: Information disclosure, potential leakage of sensitive data belonging to other users or connections.
      • Mitigation:
        • Strictly adhere to proper variable scoping within Workerman worker processes.
        • Avoid sharing state between requests unless explicitly intended and carefully managed.
        • Use dependency injection or other techniques to manage state in a controlled and isolated manner.
        • Conduct thorough code reviews and testing specifically focused on data isolation in persistent connection contexts.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Denial of Service through Application Logic [HIGH RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Exploits vulnerabilities in the application's logic to cause a denial of service.

    • 4.1. Resource Exhaustion via Malicious Requests [HIGH RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE: Resource Exhaustion, Send Requests that Trigger CPU/Memory Intensive Operations]:
      • Attack Vector: Attacker sends specially crafted requests that trigger computationally expensive or memory-intensive operations within the application logic.
      • Mechanism: Targets inefficient algorithms, unoptimized database queries, or resource-intensive functionalities in the application code.
      • Impact: Overloads worker processes, exhausts server resources (CPU, memory), leading to service degradation or unavailability.
      • Mitigation:
        • Implement robust input validation and sanitization to prevent malicious inputs from triggering excessive resource consumption.
        • Optimize resource-intensive operations in the application code.
        • Implement rate limiting and request throttling to limit the impact of malicious requests.
        • Consider using caching mechanisms to reduce the load on backend resources.
        • Monitor resource usage of Workerman processes and set alerts for high CPU or memory consumption.

Attack Tree Path: 5. Insecure Configuration and Deployment of Workerman Application [HIGH RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Exploits vulnerabilities arising from insecure configuration and deployment practices.

    • 5.1. Insufficient Resource Limits (OS/Container Level) [HIGH RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE: Exploit Lack of Resource Limits]:

      • Attack Vector: Attacker leverages the absence of proper resource limits (e.g., memory limits, CPU limits) at the operating system or container level to launch resource exhaustion attacks.
      • Mechanism: By sending resource-intensive requests or exploiting application vulnerabilities, the attacker can consume excessive resources, potentially crashing the application or the entire server.
      • Impact: Service disruption, application instability, potential server compromise in extreme cases.
      • Mitigation:
        • Configure appropriate resource limits (memory, CPU, file descriptors, etc.) at the OS or container level for Workerman processes.
        • Monitor resource usage and adjust limits as needed based on application requirements and expected load.
        • Implement resource quotas and cgroups to enforce limits and prevent resource starvation.

    • 5.2. Insecure File Permissions/Access Control [HIGH RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE: Exploit Weak File Permissions, Read Sensitive Configuration Files, Modify Application Code, Gain Persistence]:

      • Attack Vector: Attacker exploits weak file permissions or access control configurations to gain unauthorized access to sensitive files or modify application code.
      • Mechanism: Leverages misconfigured file permissions that allow unauthorized users to read, write, or execute files within the application's deployment directory.
      • Impact:
        • Read Sensitive Configuration Files: Information disclosure of credentials, API keys, database connection strings, and other sensitive secrets.
        • Modify Application Code: Code injection, backdoors, defacement, and complete control over application functionality.
        • Gain Persistence: Ability to maintain unauthorized access to the system even after restarts or security patches.
      • Mitigation:
        • Implement the principle of least privilege for file permissions.
        • Ensure that sensitive configuration files are not world-readable and are only accessible to the Workerman process user and administrators.
        • Regularly audit file permissions and access control configurations.
        • Implement file integrity monitoring to detect unauthorized modifications to application code or configuration files.

    • 5.3. Running Workerman as Root User [HIGH RISK PATH, CRITICAL NODE: Running as Root User, Exploit Any Vulnerability to Escalate to Root Privileges, Full System Compromise]:

      • Attack Vector: Running Workerman processes as the root user creates a critical security vulnerability. Any vulnerability exploited in the Workerman application can lead to immediate root-level compromise of the entire system.
      • Mechanism: If a vulnerability (e.g., code execution, privilege escalation) is found in the Workerman application, and the process is running as root, the attacker automatically gains root privileges upon successful exploitation.
      • Impact: Critical - Full System Compromise. Complete control over the server, including data theft, system manipulation, installation of malware, and use of the server for further attacks.
      • Mitigation:
        • Never run Workerman processes as the root user.
        • Create a dedicated, low-privileged user account specifically for running Workerman processes.
        • Ensure proper process isolation and security hardening measures are in place to limit the impact of any potential compromise.