Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
47 lines (40 loc) · 5.02 KB

File metadata and controls

47 lines (40 loc) · 5.02 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for walkor/workerman

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arising from the design and implementation of custom application-layer protocols within Workerman. This is the most significant Workerman-specific risk area.
    • How Workerman Contributes: Workerman provides the framework for defining and handling custom protocols. The security of the protocol logic is entirely the developer's responsibility, and Workerman's flexibility here creates a large potential attack surface.
    • Example: A custom protocol for a real-time game has an integer overflow vulnerability in the handling of player scores, allowing an attacker to manipulate scores and potentially gain unauthorized access. Or, a custom protocol uses unserialize() on data received from clients without proper validation, leading to arbitrary code execution.
    • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), Data Corruption, Information Disclosure.
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (RCE is a critical risk; other flaws are typically high).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Formal Protocol Specification: A detailed, unambiguous specification is essential.
      • Rigorous Input Validation: Validate all fields, checking types, lengths, and ranges. Use whitelists.
      • Fuzz Testing: Use fuzzing tools to test the protocol parser with malformed input.
      • Secure Coding Practices: Avoid dangerous functions (e.g., unserialize() on untrusted data). Use memory-safe string handling.
      • Code Reviews: Multiple developers should review the protocol implementation.
      • Static Analysis: Use static analysis tools to find potential vulnerabilities.
      • Limit Protocol Complexity: Simpler protocols are easier to secure.
  • Description: Attacks that consume server resources (CPU, memory, file descriptors, network bandwidth) by exploiting Workerman's connection handling capabilities.
    • How Workerman Contributes: Workerman's core design focuses on handling a large number of persistent connections, making it a prime target for DoS attacks that exploit this capability.
    • Example: An attacker opens thousands of connections to a Workerman server and either sends no data (holding connections open) or sends data very slowly ("slowloris" attack), exhausting server resources.
    • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), rendering the application unavailable.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Connection Limits: Implement per-IP and global connection limits.
      • Timeouts: Set appropriate read and write timeouts for idle connections (using Workerman's configuration).
      • Rate Limiting: Limit the rate of new connections from a single IP.
      • Resource Monitoring: Monitor server resources and set alerts for unusual activity.
      • Load Balancing: Distribute connections across multiple Workerman instances using a load balancer.
      • Reverse Proxy: Use a reverse proxy (Nginx, HAProxy) for connection management, rate limiting, and SSL termination.
  • Description: Security issues introduced by vulnerable Workerman extensions that have a direct, high or critical impact. This is distinct from general application dependencies.
    • How Workerman Contributes: Workerman's extensibility allows for custom functionality, but poorly written or malicious extensions can directly compromise the Workerman process.
    • Example: A custom Workerman extension designed to interact with a database has a SQL injection vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands through the Workerman process. Or, an extension that handles file uploads allows arbitrary file writes, leading to RCE.
    • Impact: Varies, but specifically includes vulnerabilities that directly impact the Workerman process itself, potentially leading to RCE, DoS, or data breaches within the context of Workerman's operation.
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the extension's functionality and the vulnerability).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Careful Selection: Only use extensions from trusted sources.
      • Code Review: Thoroughly review the code of any Workerman extension before deployment.
      • Security Audits: Conduct security audits of custom extensions.
      • Update Regularly: Keep extensions updated.
      • Least Privilege: Run extensions with minimal privileges. If the extension interacts with external services (database, etc.), use restricted credentials.