Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
141 lines (130 loc) · 9.94 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

141 lines (130 loc) · 9.94 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for abi/screenshot-to-code

Objective: Compromise application using screenshot-to-code by exploiting vulnerabilities within the project itself.

Attack Tree Visualization

└── Compromise Application via Screenshot-to-Code (OR) ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Screenshot Processing (OR) [CRITICAL NODE: Image Processing Vulnerabilities] │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1. Image Processing Library Vulnerabilities (OR) [CRITICAL NODE: Vulnerable Libraries] │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1.1. Buffer Overflow in Image Parsing (AND) │ │ │ └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1.1.2. Trigger Vulnerable Image Processing Function in Screenshot-to-Code │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1.2. Arbitrary Code Execution via Image Format Exploits (AND) │ │ │ └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 1.1.2.2. Trigger Vulnerable Image Processing Function to Execute Malicious Code │ │ └── 1.1.3. Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (AND) [CRITICAL NODE: DoS Vector] │ └── 2.3. Denial of Service via Complex Screenshot Analysis (AND) [CRITICAL NODE: DoS Vector] ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3. Exploiting Dependencies of Screenshot-to-Code (OR) [CRITICAL NODE: Dependency Management] │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1. Vulnerable Libraries (OR) [CRITICAL NODE: Vulnerable Libraries - REITERATED] │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1.2. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Dependencies (AND) │ │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1.2.1. Trigger Vulnerable Functionality in Dependency via Screenshot-to-Code Application │ │ │ └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] 3.1.2.2. Achieve Compromise through Exploited Dependency (e.g., RCE, DoS) │ └── 3.2. Supply Chain Attacks (OR) [CRITICAL NODE: Supply Chain Security] │ ├── 3.2.1. Compromised Dependency Package (AND) [CRITICAL NODE: Supply Chain Security] │ └── 3.2.2. Malicious Code Injection during Build/Deployment (AND) [CRITICAL NODE: Build Pipeline Security]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Screenshot Processing (Critical Node: Image Processing Vulnerabilities, High-Risk Path)

  • Description: This path focuses on exploiting weaknesses in how the screenshot-to-code application processes the uploaded screenshot image. Image processing is complex and often relies on external libraries, which can be vulnerable.
  • Attack Vectors:

    • 1.1. Image Processing Library Vulnerabilities (Critical Node: Vulnerable Libraries, High-Risk Path):

      • Description: Targets vulnerabilities within the image processing libraries used by screenshot-to-code. Outdated or poorly maintained libraries are prime targets.
      • Attack Vectors:
        • 1.1.1. Buffer Overflow in Image Parsing (High-Risk Path):
          • Attack Vector: Trigger Vulnerable Image Processing Function in Screenshot-to-Code
            • Likelihood: High (if vulnerability exists in the library)
            • Impact: High (Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS))
            • Effort: Low (once a malicious image is crafted)
            • Skill Level: Low (using a crafted image is easy)
            • Detection Difficulty: Medium
        • 1.1.2. Arbitrary Code Execution via Image Format Exploits (High-Risk Path):
          • Attack Vector: Trigger Vulnerable Image Processing Function to Execute Malicious Code
            • Likelihood: High (if exploit image is crafted)
            • Impact: Critical (RCE)
            • Effort: Low (once exploit image is crafted)
            • Skill Level: Low
            • Detection Difficulty: High
      • Mitigation:
        • Rigorous dependency management and regular updates for image processing libraries.
        • Choose well-vetted and actively maintained libraries.
        • Consider sandboxing the image processing component.
        • Implement fuzz testing on image processing.

    • 1.1.3. Denial of Service via Resource Exhaustion (Critical Node: DoS Vector):

      • Description: Overloads the application by providing a specially crafted image that consumes excessive resources during processing.
      • Attack Vectors:
        • Attack Vector: Provide Extremely Large or Complex Image
          • Likelihood: High
          • Impact: Medium (Application unavailability)
          • Effort: Low
          • Skill Level: Low
          • Detection Difficulty: Low
        • Attack Vector: Cause Excessive Memory or CPU Usage during Image Processing
          • Likelihood: High
          • Impact: Medium (Application unavailability)
          • Effort: Low
          • Skill Level: Low
          • Detection Difficulty: Low
      • Mitigation:
        • Implement resource limits (CPU, memory, processing time).
        • Consider input complexity limits for screenshots.
        • Implement rate limiting.
        • Use asynchronous processing for image handling.

    • 2.3. Denial of Service via Complex Screenshot Analysis (Critical Node: DoS Vector):

      • Description: Similar to 1.1.3, but focuses on the complexity of the UI in the screenshot itself, causing excessive processing during the code generation phase.
      • Attack Vectors:
        • Attack Vector: Provide Highly Complex UI Screenshot
          • Likelihood: High
          • Impact: Medium (Application unavailability)
          • Effort: Low
          • Skill Level: Low
          • Detection Difficulty: Low
        • Attack Vector: Cause Excessive Processing Time or Resources during Code Generation
          • Likelihood: High
          • Impact: Medium (Application unavailability)
          • Effort: Low
          • Skill Level: Low
          • Detection Difficulty: Low
      • Mitigation:
        • Resource limits for code generation.
        • Input complexity limits for screenshots.
        • Rate limiting.
        • Asynchronous processing.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploiting Dependencies of Screenshot-to-Code (Critical Node: Dependency Management, High-Risk Path)

  • Description: This path targets vulnerabilities in the external libraries and dependencies used by the screenshot-to-code project itself, not just image processing libraries.
  • Attack Vectors:

    • 3.1. Vulnerable Libraries (Critical Node: Vulnerable Libraries - REITERATED, High-Risk Path):

      • Description: Exploits known vulnerabilities in any of the dependencies used by screenshot-to-code.
      • Attack Vectors:
        • 3.1.2. Exploit Vulnerabilities in Dependencies (High-Risk Path):
          • Attack Vector: Trigger Vulnerable Functionality in Dependency via Screenshot-to-Code Application
            • Likelihood: Medium (depends on specific vulnerabilities and usage)
            • Impact: High to Critical (RCE, DoS)
            • Effort: Medium (understanding dependency usage)
            • Skill Level: Medium
            • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High
          • Attack Vector: Achieve Compromise through Exploited Dependency (e.g., RCE, DoS)
            • Likelihood: Medium
            • Impact: High to Critical
            • Effort: Low (once exploit is known)
            • Skill Level: Low
            • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High
      • Mitigation:
        • Implement Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools.
        • Continuously monitor dependencies for vulnerabilities.
        • Update dependencies promptly.

    • 3.2. Supply Chain Attacks (Critical Node: Supply Chain Security):

      • Description: Compromises the application through manipulation of the software supply chain, either by injecting malicious code into dependencies or during the build/deployment process.
      • Attack Vectors:
        • 3.2.1. Compromised Dependency Package (Critical Node: Supply Chain Security):
          • Attack Vector: Dependency package on registry is compromised
            • Likelihood: Low (but increasing)
            • Impact: Critical (Full application compromise)
            • Effort: High (compromising package registry)
            • Skill Level: High
            • Detection Difficulty: High
        • 3.2.2. Malicious Code Injection during Build/Deployment (Critical Node: Build Pipeline Security):
          • Attack Vector: Injects malicious code during build/deployment
            • Likelihood: High (if build pipeline is compromised)
            • Impact: Critical (Full application compromise)
            • Effort: Low (once pipeline is compromised)
            • Skill Level: Low
            • Detection Difficulty: High
      • Mitigation:
        • Secure build pipeline.
        • Verify integrity of dependencies.
        • Use dependency pinning.
        • Regular security audits of build and deployment processes.