Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
43 lines (36 loc) · 6.45 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

43 lines (36 loc) · 6.45 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for comfyanonymous/comfyui

Attack Surface: 1. Workflow Deserialization Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities during the loading and parsing of ComfyUI workflow files (.json, .ckpt, .safetensors if loaded via workflow), potentially leading to malicious code execution when ComfyUI processes these files.
  • ComfyUI Contribution: ComfyUI's core functionality relies on users loading and sharing workflows. The workflow loading process is a direct entry point for potentially malicious data.
  • Example: A user loads a seemingly harmless workflow from a community forum. This workflow is crafted to contain a malicious payload embedded within the JSON structure that, when deserialized by ComfyUI, executes arbitrary Python code on the server hosting ComfyUI.
  • Impact: Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE), Path Traversal, Denial of Service (DoS), potentially full server compromise.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Workflow Loading Library: Ensure ComfyUI utilizes secure and regularly updated JSON parsing libraries, hardened against known deserialization vulnerabilities.
    • Workflow Schema Validation: Implement strict schema validation for workflow files to enforce expected structure and data types, rejecting workflows that deviate from the defined schema.
    • Sandboxed Workflow Deserialization: Isolate the workflow deserialization process within a secure sandbox environment with limited system access to contain potential exploits.
    • User Education and Trust: Warn users against loading workflows from untrusted or unknown sources. Promote sharing workflows only through verified and reputable channels.
    • Workflow Integrity Checks (Future Enhancement): Explore implementing workflow signing or checksum mechanisms to verify the integrity and origin of workflow files.

Attack Surface: 2. Input Validation and Sanitization in Workflow Parameters

  • Description: Exploiting insufficient validation and sanitization of user-provided parameters within ComfyUI workflows, particularly in custom nodes or core nodes that handle user-defined inputs like file paths, URLs, or command arguments.
  • ComfyUI Contribution: ComfyUI workflows are highly configurable, allowing users to input parameters that control node behavior. This flexibility introduces risk if these parameters are not rigorously validated by node implementations within ComfyUI.
  • Example: A custom node in a ComfyUI workflow takes a "model path" parameter. An attacker crafts a workflow with a malicious path like /app/comfyui/../../../../etc/passwd. If the custom node (or ComfyUI core) doesn't properly sanitize this input before file access, it could lead to Path Traversal, allowing unauthorized file reads.
  • Impact: Command Injection, Path Traversal, potentially leading to arbitrary file access, data exfiltration, or server compromise.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation in Nodes: Developers of both core and custom ComfyUI nodes must implement robust input validation for all user-provided parameters. This includes whitelisting allowed characters, formats, and ranges, and rejecting invalid inputs.
    • Input Sanitization and Encoding: Sanitize user inputs by escaping or encoding potentially harmful characters before using them in file system operations, system commands, or external API calls within node logic.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for Nodes: Design nodes to operate with the minimum necessary file system and system privileges. Avoid running nodes with elevated permissions unless absolutely required and securely managed.
    • Secure Coding Guidelines for Custom Nodes: Provide clear and comprehensive secure coding guidelines and examples for custom node developers, emphasizing input validation and sanitization best practices within the ComfyUI development documentation.

Attack Surface: 3. Custom Nodes and Extensions

  • Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities introduced by the execution of arbitrary Python code within ComfyUI through custom nodes and extensions. Malicious or poorly written custom nodes can directly compromise the ComfyUI server.
  • ComfyUI Contribution: ComfyUI's extensibility through custom nodes is a fundamental feature, but it inherently creates a significant attack surface. Custom nodes run with the same privileges as the ComfyUI server process.
  • Example: A user installs a seemingly useful custom node for image processing from an untrusted GitHub repository. This node, when added to a workflow and executed by ComfyUI, contains malicious code that establishes a reverse shell back to the attacker, granting them full control of the ComfyUI server.
  • Impact: Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE), Data Exfiltration (including models, images, and potentially system data), Backdoors, Resource Exhaustion, complete server compromise.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Code Review and Security Auditing for Custom Nodes: Establish a process for community or maintainer-led code review and security auditing of popular or officially recommended custom nodes.
    • Sandboxed Custom Node Execution (Future Enhancement): Explore implementing a sandboxing mechanism to isolate the execution environment of custom nodes, limiting their access to system resources and preventing full server compromise in case of malicious code.
    • Permissions and Access Control for Custom Nodes (Future Enhancement): Investigate implementing a permission system that allows users to control what system resources and functionalities individual custom nodes can access, based on trust level or source.
    • Trusted Custom Node Repositories and Verification: Promote and curate trusted repositories for custom nodes. Implement a verification or rating system for nodes to help users assess the trustworthiness of custom nodes before installation.
    • User Awareness and Vigilance: Strongly emphasize to users the extreme risks associated with installing custom nodes from untrusted sources. Advise users to only install nodes from reputable developers and to carefully review node code before use if possible.