Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
148 lines (117 loc) · 15 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

148 lines (117 loc) · 15 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for comfyanonymous/comfyui

Mitigation Strategy: Custom Node Vetting and Auditing

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Establish a ComfyUI custom node vetting policy. Define security criteria specific to ComfyUI nodes, such as allowed libraries, network access restrictions, and resource usage limits.
    • Step 2: Implement mandatory code review for all submitted ComfyUI custom nodes before application integration. Focus review on Python code within nodes, checking for malicious intent, vulnerabilities in image processing libraries, and insecure system calls.
    • Step 3: Utilize SAST tools configured for Python and image processing libraries to scan ComfyUI custom node code for vulnerabilities like injection flaws, path traversal, and insecure dependencies common in ComfyUI node development.
    • Step 4: Perform DAST in a sandboxed ComfyUI environment. Execute custom nodes with various inputs relevant to ComfyUI workflows (images, prompts, model paths) to observe behavior and identify runtime vulnerabilities specific to ComfyUI node interactions.
    • Step 5: Maintain a curated repository of vetted ComfyUI custom nodes. Only allow users to install and use nodes from this repository within the ComfyUI application.
    • Step 6: Regularly re-audit approved ComfyUI custom nodes, especially after updates or dependency changes, to ensure continued security within the ComfyUI ecosystem.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Node Execution in ComfyUI (High Severity): Execution of arbitrary code within a ComfyUI custom node, leading to data breaches (access to ComfyUI outputs/workflows), system compromise (if ComfyUI environment is not isolated), or denial of service within the ComfyUI application.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via ComfyUI Node Dependencies (Medium Severity): Compromise of a Python dependency used by a ComfyUI custom node, introducing vulnerabilities indirectly into the ComfyUI application environment.
    • Unintentional Vulnerabilities in ComfyUI Nodes (Medium Severity): Bugs or security flaws in custom node Python code due to developer error, leading to exploitable weaknesses within ComfyUI workflows.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Node Execution in ComfyUI: Significantly reduces risk by preventing the introduction of intentionally malicious code into the ComfyUI workflow environment.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via ComfyUI Node Dependencies: Moderately reduces risk by identifying vulnerable dependencies during vetting, specifically those used in the context of ComfyUI nodes.
    • Unintentional Vulnerabilities in ComfyUI Nodes: Moderately reduces risk by catching common coding errors and security flaws specific to ComfyUI node development through code review and automated testing.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially implemented. Informal code review for some frequently used ComfyUI custom nodes exists, but lacks formal process and tooling.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Formalized ComfyUI custom node vetting policy with documented criteria.
    • Automated SAST and DAST tools integrated into ComfyUI node approval process, specifically tailored for ComfyUI node vulnerabilities.
    • Centralized, curated repository for vetted ComfyUI nodes.
    • Regular re-auditing schedule for ComfyUI custom nodes.

Mitigation Strategy: Sandboxing Custom Node Execution within ComfyUI

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Utilize containerization (e.g., Docker) or virtualization to isolate the ComfyUI process and its custom node execution environment. This limits the impact of a compromised node to the sandbox, not the host system.
    • Step 2: Configure the sandbox specifically for ComfyUI node execution with minimal permissions. Restrict access to system resources, network (unless node requires controlled network access for specific ComfyUI functionalities), and file system, allowing only necessary ComfyUI directories and temporary storage.
    • Step 3: Implement resource limits (CPU, memory, GPU if applicable, disk I/O) within the sandbox for ComfyUI node processes. This prevents resource exhaustion attacks from resource-intensive or malicious ComfyUI nodes impacting the entire ComfyUI application or host.
    • Step 4: Employ security profiles (e.g., AppArmor, SELinux) within the ComfyUI sandbox to further restrict system calls and capabilities available to custom nodes, minimizing potential attack surface within the ComfyUI environment.
    • Step 5: Monitor the ComfyUI sandbox environment for suspicious activity, such as unauthorized network connections initiated by nodes, or attempts to access restricted resources outside of the intended ComfyUI workflow context.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Node Execution in ComfyUI (High Severity): Limits the impact of malicious code execution within a ComfyUI node by containing it within the sandbox, preventing broader compromise of the ComfyUI application or host system.
    • Resource Exhaustion via ComfyUI Nodes (Medium Severity): Prevents malicious or buggy ComfyUI nodes from consuming excessive system resources, leading to denial of service within the ComfyUI application and potentially impacting other ComfyUI workflows.
    • Privilege Escalation from ComfyUI Nodes (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of malicious ComfyUI nodes escalating privileges to gain unauthorized access to the host system or other parts of the ComfyUI application environment outside of their intended scope.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Node Execution in ComfyUI: Significantly reduces impact by containment, limiting damage to the sandbox even if a malicious ComfyUI node is executed.
    • Resource Exhaustion via ComfyUI Nodes: Significantly reduces risk by enforcing resource limits specifically for ComfyUI node execution, preventing runaway processes within ComfyUI workflows.
    • Privilege Escalation from ComfyUI Nodes: Moderately reduces risk by limiting capabilities within the ComfyUI sandbox, although sandbox escape vulnerabilities remain a concern requiring ongoing security updates of sandbox technology.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not implemented. ComfyUI custom nodes currently run directly within the main ComfyUI process without sandboxing.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Containerization or virtualization infrastructure for ComfyUI and custom node execution.
    • Configuration of ComfyUI-specific sandbox environments with restricted permissions and resource limits.
    • Integration of security profiles and monitoring within the ComfyUI sandbox.

Mitigation Strategy: Workflow Scanning and Analysis for ComfyUI

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Develop or integrate a workflow scanning tool specifically for ComfyUI workflow files. This tool should parse ComfyUI workflow JSON or similar formats.
    • Step 2: The scanning tool should identify suspicious components within ComfyUI workflows:
      • Usage of blacklisted ComfyUI custom nodes known to be malicious or vulnerable within the workflow.
      • Unusual ComfyUI node configurations or parameter values that could indicate malicious intent (e.g., excessive image resolutions in image processing nodes, suspicious file paths in file loading/saving nodes within ComfyUI workflows).
      • Embedded code or scripts within ComfyUI workflow descriptions or parameters (if ComfyUI allows and it's a risk).
    • Step 3: Implement a risk scoring system for ComfyUI workflows based on scan results. Consider ComfyUI-specific risk factors like usage of unvetted nodes or unusual workflow structures.
    • Step 4: Define actions based on ComfyUI workflow risk score:
      • Low Risk: Allow ComfyUI workflow execution without warnings.
      • Medium Risk: Warn user about potential risks in the ComfyUI workflow and require explicit confirmation.
      • High Risk: Block ComfyUI workflow execution and alert administrators for review.
    • Step 5: Regularly update the scanning tool's rules and blacklists, incorporating new threat intelligence and identified vulnerabilities specific to ComfyUI workflows and nodes.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Workflow Injection in ComfyUI (Medium Severity): Introduction of malicious ComfyUI workflows designed to exploit vulnerabilities within ComfyUI or perform unauthorized actions through the ComfyUI application.
    • Social Engineering Attacks via ComfyUI Workflows (Medium Severity): Users unknowingly executing malicious ComfyUI workflows shared from untrusted sources, potentially leading to harm within the ComfyUI application context.
    • Configuration Exploits in ComfyUI Workflows (Low to Medium Severity): Exploiting vulnerabilities in ComfyUI through specific workflow configurations or parameter manipulation within ComfyUI workflows.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Workflow Injection in ComfyUI: Moderately reduces risk by detecting and blocking or warning users about potentially malicious ComfyUI workflows before they are executed within the application.
    • Social Engineering Attacks via ComfyUI Workflows: Moderately reduces risk by providing warnings and raising user awareness about the security risks of untrusted ComfyUI workflows.
    • Configuration Exploits in ComfyUI Workflows: Minimally to Moderately reduces risk depending on the sophistication of the scanning tool and its ability to detect ComfyUI-specific exploit patterns in workflows.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not implemented. ComfyUI workflows are loaded and executed without automated security scanning.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Development or integration of a ComfyUI workflow scanning tool.
    • Definition of rules and blacklists for ComfyUI workflow scanning.
    • Integration of scanning into ComfyUI workflow loading and execution.
    • Risk scoring and action mechanisms based on ComfyUI workflow scan results.

Mitigation Strategy: Authentication and Authorization for ComfyUI Web UI Access

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Implement authentication for the ComfyUI web UI. Choose a method suitable for ComfyUI's typical deployment (often local or small teams), such as API keys, basic authentication, or OAuth 2.0 if integrated with a larger system.
    • Step 2: Enforce strong password policies if using password-based authentication for ComfyUI web UI access.
    • Step 3: Implement role-based access control (RBAC) for the ComfyUI application. Define roles relevant to ComfyUI usage, like "workflow user," "node administrator," etc.
    • Step 4: Restrict access to sensitive ComfyUI functionalities in the web UI based on roles. For example, custom node installation might be restricted to "node administrator" roles, while workflow execution is allowed for "workflow users."
    • Step 5: Log all authentication attempts and authorization decisions related to ComfyUI web UI access for auditing and security monitoring of ComfyUI usage.
    • Step 6: Regularly review and update user roles and permissions within the ComfyUI application context.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access to ComfyUI Web UI (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized users from accessing the ComfyUI web UI and its functionalities, protecting the ComfyUI application from external access.
    • Data Breaches via ComfyUI Web UI (Medium to High Severity): Reduces risk of data breaches by limiting access to ComfyUI workflows, outputs, and settings to authorized users through the web UI.
    • Account Takeover for ComfyUI Web UI (Medium Severity): Makes it harder for attackers to gain access to legitimate ComfyUI user accounts, securing access to the ComfyUI application.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access to ComfyUI Web UI: Significantly reduces risk by enforcing access control to the ComfyUI web interface.
    • Data Breaches via ComfyUI Web UI: Moderately to Significantly reduces risk depending on data sensitivity within the ComfyUI application and effectiveness of access control.
    • Account Takeover for ComfyUI Web UI: Moderately reduces risk by improving authentication security for ComfyUI web UI access.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not implemented. ComfyUI web UI is accessible without authentication by default.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Authentication mechanism for ComfyUI web UI.
    • Role-based access control for ComfyUI functionalities.
    • Integration of authentication and authorization into ComfyUI web UI and backend.
    • Logging and auditing of ComfyUI web UI access events.

Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting and Request Throttling for ComfyUI Web UI

  • Description:

    • Step 1: Identify critical API endpoints and web UI interactions in ComfyUI that are vulnerable to DoS or brute-force attacks (e.g., workflow execution endpoints, node parameter update endpoints).
    • Step 2: Implement rate limiting on these ComfyUI web UI endpoints to restrict requests from a single IP or user within a time window, protecting the ComfyUI server.
    • Step 3: Configure request throttling for ComfyUI web UI to gradually slow down exceeding requests, allowing legitimate users continued ComfyUI access at a reduced pace during high load.
    • Step 4: Customize rate limits based on the sensitivity of ComfyUI endpoints and expected legitimate ComfyUI web UI traffic.
    • Step 5: Monitor rate limiting metrics for ComfyUI web UI and adjust configurations to optimize ComfyUI performance and security.
    • Step 6: Implement blocking/banning for IPs or users exhibiting malicious ComfyUI web UI activity (e.g., repeated rate limit violations targeting ComfyUI).

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks on ComfyUI Web UI (High Severity): Prevents attackers from overwhelming the ComfyUI server via the web UI, ensuring ComfyUI application availability.
    • Brute-Force Attacks on ComfyUI Web UI (Medium Severity): Mitigates brute-force attacks against ComfyUI web UI authentication by limiting login attempts.

  • Impact:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks on ComfyUI Web UI: Significantly reduces risk by limiting DoS impact on ComfyUI web UI and server.
    • Brute-Force Attacks on ComfyUI Web UI: Moderately reduces risk by slowing down brute-force attempts against ComfyUI web UI.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not implemented. No rate limiting for ComfyUI web UI or API endpoints.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Identification of critical ComfyUI web UI endpoints for rate limiting.
    • Implementation of rate limiting and throttling for ComfyUI web UI.
    • Configuration of rate limits for different ComfyUI web UI endpoints.
    • Monitoring and alerting for rate limiting events on ComfyUI web UI.