Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
109 lines (96 loc) · 16.2 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

109 lines (96 loc) · 16.2 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for commaai/openpilot

Attack Surface: CAN Bus Injection

  • Description: The Controller Area Network (CAN) bus is the communication backbone of vehicles. Injection attacks involve sending malicious messages onto the CAN bus to disrupt or control vehicle functions.
  • Openpilot Contribution: Openpilot's core functionality relies on direct interaction with the CAN bus to read sensor data and send control commands (steering, acceleration, braking). This direct interface is a primary pathway for CAN bus injection attacks targeting openpilot's operation.
  • Example: An attacker injects a CAN message that spoofs steering wheel angle data, causing openpilot to misinterpret the vehicle's intended direction and potentially steer the vehicle into oncoming traffic.
  • Impact:
    • Unintended and dangerous vehicle behavior (e.g., sudden acceleration, braking, or steering).
    • Loss of driver control and potential accidents.
    • Complete compromise of vehicle operation through manipulated control commands.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Robust CAN Message Validation: Implement strict validation and sanitization of all incoming CAN messages within openpilot to ensure they adhere to expected formats, ranges, and protocols. Discard or flag any suspicious or malformed messages.
    • CAN Bus Firewalling and Filtering: Employ CAN bus firewalls or filters to restrict the types of CAN messages openpilot processes and transmits, limiting the attack surface and preventing injection of unexpected message types.
    • Secure CAN Communication Protocols: Investigate and implement secure CAN communication protocols (like CANcrypt or similar) to encrypt and authenticate CAN messages, making it significantly harder for attackers to inject valid, malicious messages.
    • CAN Bus Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): Integrate CAN bus intrusion detection systems to monitor CAN traffic for anomalous patterns and potential injection attempts, providing early warning and potential mitigation actions.

Attack Surface: Network Service Exploitation (Wi-Fi, Cellular, Ethernet)

  • Description: Network services running on the openpilot device or used for openpilot-related communication (updates, data logging, remote access) can be vulnerable to exploitation, allowing attackers to gain control or access.
  • Openpilot Contribution: If openpilot utilizes network interfaces for features like over-the-air (OTA) software updates, remote data logging, cloud connectivity, or debugging interfaces, it introduces network services that can become attack vectors if not properly secured.
  • Example: A vulnerability in the software update mechanism's network protocol allows an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack and inject a malicious software update package, compromising the openpilot system with malware.
  • Impact:
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the openpilot device, granting attackers full control.
    • Data breaches and exfiltration of sensitive driving data, user information, or system logs.
    • Installation of malware or persistent backdoors for long-term compromise.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks by disrupting network services essential for openpilot functionality.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the specific service and vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize Network Service Exposure: Reduce the number of network services running on the openpilot device to the absolute minimum necessary. Disable any unnecessary services or features that expose network interfaces.
    • Harden Network Services: Securely configure all necessary network services. Disable default accounts, enforce strong passwords or key-based authentication, and restrict access based on the principle of least privilege.
    • Regular Security Patching and Updates: Keep the operating system and all network service software components on the openpilot device rigorously updated with the latest security patches to address known vulnerabilities promptly.
    • Network Segmentation and Firewalling: Implement network segmentation to isolate the openpilot device from broader networks and use firewalls to strictly control network traffic to and from the device, allowing only essential communication.
    • Secure Communication Protocols: Enforce the use of secure communication protocols like HTTPS, SSH, and VPNs for all network communication related to openpilot to encrypt data in transit and prevent eavesdropping or manipulation.
    • Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS): Deploy network intrusion prevention systems to actively detect and block malicious network traffic and attack attempts targeting openpilot's network services.

Attack Surface: Physical Port Access (USB, OBD-II)

  • Description: Physical access to ports like USB and OBD-II on the openpilot device allows direct interaction, potentially bypassing software security measures and enabling malicious actions.
  • Openpilot Contribution: Openpilot devices often include USB and OBD-II ports for development, debugging, firmware flashing, and diagnostic access. These ports, if not properly secured, provide a direct physical attack vector.
  • Example: An attacker gains physical access to the vehicle and uses a USB drive to inject a modified and malicious openpilot firmware image directly onto the device, replacing the legitimate software and gaining persistent control.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious firmware or software installation, leading to complete system compromise.
    • Data exfiltration by directly accessing storage via physical ports.
    • Device tampering and physical manipulation to disable safety features or introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Bypassing all software-based security controls by directly interacting with the hardware.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Physical Security Measures: Implement robust physical security measures to prevent unauthorized physical access to the vehicle and the openpilot device itself. This includes secure parking, vehicle alarms, and tamper-evident measures for the device enclosure.
    • Port Disablement or Lockdown: Disable or physically lock down unused USB and OBD-II ports when they are not required for authorized maintenance or updates. Consider using port blockers or physically disabling ports in production deployments.
    • Secure Boot and Firmware Verification: Implement secure boot mechanisms and cryptographic firmware verification to ensure that only authorized and digitally signed firmware can be loaded and executed on the openpilot device, preventing malicious firmware injection.
    • Authentication and Authorization for Port Access: Require strong authentication and authorization for any operations performed through physical ports, such as firmware updates or diagnostic access. Implement access control mechanisms to restrict port usage to authorized personnel only.
    • Tamper Detection and Response: Implement hardware or software-based tamper detection mechanisms to alert users or administrators if physical tampering with the openpilot device is detected, enabling rapid response and mitigation.

Attack Surface: Software Vulnerabilities in Openpilot Components

  • Description: Bugs, flaws, and vulnerabilities within the openpilot codebase itself (C++, Python modules, algorithms) can be exploited to compromise the system's functionality and safety.
  • Openpilot Contribution: Openpilot is a complex and evolving software system. Inherent software vulnerabilities such as buffer overflows, memory corruption issues, logic flaws in algorithms, or injection vulnerabilities can exist within its various modules (perception, planning, control, etc.).
  • Example: A buffer overflow vulnerability in the camera processing module of openpilot is exploited by crafting a specific type of visual input (e.g., a manipulated image). When openpilot processes this input, the buffer overflow is triggered, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the openpilot process and potentially gain control of vehicle functions.
  • Impact:
    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) within the openpilot process, leading to potential vehicle control compromise.
    • System instability, crashes, and unpredictable behavior, potentially causing safety hazards.
    • Bypassing safety features and manipulating vehicle control algorithms to induce dangerous actions.
    • Data manipulation and corruption of sensor data or internal state, leading to incorrect decisions by openpilot.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Rigorous Secure Coding Practices: Enforce and adhere to strict secure coding practices throughout the openpilot development lifecycle, including thorough input validation, output encoding, memory safety techniques, and avoidance of common vulnerability patterns (e.g., CWE/SANS Top 25).
    • Comprehensive Code Reviews and Static Analysis: Conduct thorough peer code reviews and utilize static analysis security testing (SAST) tools to proactively identify potential vulnerabilities and security weaknesses in the codebase before deployment.
    • Dynamic Testing and Fuzzing: Employ dynamic application security testing (DAST) and fuzzing techniques to uncover runtime vulnerabilities, edge cases, and unexpected behavior in openpilot's software components under various input conditions.
    • Regular Vulnerability Scanning and Penetration Testing: Perform regular vulnerability scanning and penetration testing by security experts to identify and assess security weaknesses in deployed openpilot systems and infrastructure.
    • Bug Bounty Programs and Security Community Engagement: Implement bug bounty programs to incentivize external security researchers to find and responsibly report vulnerabilities in openpilot. Actively engage with the security community to leverage external expertise.
    • Rapid Patching and Security Update Process: Establish a well-defined and efficient process for rapidly patching, testing, and deploying security updates to address identified vulnerabilities in openpilot software components in a timely manner.

Attack Surface: Third-Party Library Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Openpilot relies on numerous third-party libraries and dependencies. Vulnerabilities in these libraries can be indirectly exploited through openpilot, introducing security risks.
  • Openpilot Contribution: Openpilot's architecture depends on various third-party libraries for core functionalities (e.g., OpenCV for computer vision, PyTorch for machine learning, operating system libraries). Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can directly impact openpilot's security posture.
  • Example: A critical vulnerability is discovered in a specific version of the OpenCV library that openpilot uses for image processing. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious input that triggers the vulnerable code path within OpenCV when processed by openpilot, potentially leading to code execution within openpilot's context.
  • Impact:
    • Inherited vulnerabilities from third-party libraries can lead to similar impacts as direct software vulnerabilities in openpilot (code execution, system instability, data breaches).
    • Supply chain risks if dependencies are compromised or malicious versions are introduced.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Comprehensive Dependency Management: Maintain a detailed and up-to-date inventory of all third-party libraries and dependencies used by openpilot, including their versions and sources.
    • Automated Vulnerability Scanning for Dependencies: Implement automated vulnerability scanning tools that continuously monitor dependencies for known vulnerabilities using vulnerability databases and security advisories (e.g., CVE databases, security feeds).
    • Proactive Dependency Updates and Patching: Establish a process for proactively updating and patching third-party libraries to the latest secure versions, addressing known vulnerabilities promptly. Prioritize security updates for critical dependencies.
    • Vendor Security Monitoring and Advisories: Actively monitor security advisories and vulnerability disclosures from the vendors and maintainers of all third-party libraries used by openpilot to stay informed about potential risks.
    • Dependency Pinning and Reproducible Builds: Utilize dependency pinning mechanisms to ensure consistent and reproducible builds and to control the specific versions of libraries used, facilitating vulnerability tracking and updates.
    • Regular Security Audits of Dependencies: Conduct periodic security audits of third-party dependencies to assess their security posture and identify potential risks beyond known vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Software Update Mechanism Compromise

  • Description: If the software update mechanism for openpilot is compromised, attackers can inject malicious updates, prevent legitimate updates, or downgrade to vulnerable versions, severely impacting security.
  • Openpilot Contribution: Openpilot, like most complex software, requires a software update mechanism for bug fixes, feature enhancements, and critical security patches. A compromised update process becomes a highly critical attack vector.
  • Example: An attacker compromises the openpilot software update server infrastructure. They then inject a malicious software update package that appears legitimate. When openpilot devices download and install this compromised update, they become infected with malware, potentially allowing for remote control of the vehicle or data theft.
  • Impact:
    • Malicious software installation across a fleet of openpilot devices via compromised updates, leading to widespread compromise.
    • Downgrade attacks, forcing devices back to older, vulnerable versions of openpilot, increasing attack surface.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) by disrupting the update process, preventing critical security patches from being applied and leaving systems vulnerable.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • End-to-End Secure Update Infrastructure: Design and implement a robust and secure software update infrastructure, including secure update servers, distribution channels, and client-side update processes.
    • Strong Authentication and Authorization for Updates: Implement strong authentication mechanisms to verify the identity of the update server and ensure that only authorized entities can publish and distribute software updates.
    • Cryptographically Signed Updates: Digitally sign all software updates using strong cryptographic keys to guarantee their integrity and authenticity. Implement rigorous signature verification on the openpilot device before applying any update.
    • Secure Communication Channels for Updates: Utilize secure communication channels (e.g., HTTPS with TLS 1.3 or higher) to transmit software updates between the update server and openpilot devices, preventing Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks and ensuring confidentiality and integrity during transmission.
    • Rollback and Recovery Mechanisms: Implement robust rollback mechanisms that allow devices to revert to a previous known-good software version in case of update failures, corrupted updates, or suspected malicious updates. Ensure a reliable recovery process in case of update-related issues.
    • Regular Security Audits of Update Infrastructure: Conduct regular and thorough security audits of the entire software update infrastructure, including servers, processes, and client-side update mechanisms, to identify and address potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses.