Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (42 loc) · 4.84 KB

File metadata and controls

49 lines (42 loc) · 4.84 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for davidsandberg/facenet

Description: Crafted input images designed to fool the facenet model into misclassifying or misidentifying a face, even if the changes are imperceptible to humans. How Facenet Contributes: facenet's core functionality is a deep learning model, which is inherently vulnerable to adversarial examples. The library provides the model and embedding generation, making this attack directly targetable. Example: An attacker slightly modifies a photo of their face, causing facenet to identify them as a specific authorized user, granting them access to a restricted system. Impact: * Unauthorized access (false acceptance). * Denial of service (false rejection). * Impersonation of specific individuals. Risk Severity: Critical (if used for authentication/authorization) or High (if used for other purposes like identification). Mitigation Strategies: * Adversarial Training: Train the facenet model (or a fine-tuned version) with adversarial examples to increase its robustness. This is the most effective, but computationally expensive, approach. Developers should prioritize this. * Ensemble Methods: Use multiple face recognition models (potentially including non-facenet models) and compare their outputs. If the models disagree, it could indicate an adversarial attack. Developers should consider this if high security is required. * Gradient Masking/Obfuscation: Techniques to make it harder for attackers to calculate the gradients needed to craft adversarial examples. This is often a temporary measure.

Attack Surface: Model Inversion Attacks

Description: Attempts to reconstruct the original training images (faces) from the facenet model itself or its generated embeddings. How Facenet Contributes: facenet provides the model and the embedding generation process. The model's weights and the embeddings contain information about the training data. Example: An attacker gains access to the facenet model file and uses model inversion techniques to partially reconstruct faces from the original training dataset, revealing sensitive personal information. Impact: * Leakage of sensitive facial data used to train the model (privacy violation). * Potential for re-identification of individuals if the training data is not anonymized. Risk Severity: High (especially if the training data contains PII or is not publicly available). Mitigation Strategies: * Differential Privacy: Train the facenet model with differential privacy techniques. This adds noise during training to make it significantly harder to reconstruct individual data points. Developers should strongly consider this if using private training data. * Limit Model Access: Treat the facenet model file (e.g., .pb file) as a highly sensitive asset. Restrict access to it using file system permissions, encryption, and secure storage. Developers and system administrators must enforce this. * Minimize Embedding Size: Use the smallest embedding size that still provides acceptable accuracy for the application. Smaller embeddings leak less information. Developers should carefully evaluate the trade-off. * Federated Learning: If possible, use federated learning to train model without sharing training data.

Description: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in the libraries that facenet depends on (TensorFlow, NumPy, SciPy, etc.). How Facenet Contributes: facenet directly relies on these external libraries. A vulnerability in a dependency becomes a vulnerability in the facenet deployment. Example: A known vulnerability in an older version of TensorFlow allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server running facenet. Impact: * Remote code execution. * Denial of service. * Data exfiltration (including facial data and embeddings). * System compromise. Risk Severity: Critical (potential for complete system takeover). Mitigation Strategies: * Regular Dependency Updates: Use a package manager (like pip) to keep all dependencies up-to-date. Regularly check for and apply security updates. Developers are responsible for this. * Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Employ SCA tools to automatically identify and track dependencies and their associated vulnerabilities. * Pin Dependency Versions (with Caution): Specify exact versions or secure version ranges. Balance this with the need to apply security patches. * Virtual Environments: Use Python virtual environments to isolate dependencies.