Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
110 lines (87 loc) · 10.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

110 lines (87 loc) · 10.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dmlc/dgl

Objective: Compromise DGL Application

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise DGL Application [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[OR] Exploit DGL Library Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR] Code Execution Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[AND] Input Injection via Graph Data [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   ├───[OR] Malicious Graph File Upload/Parsing
│   │   │   │   └───[Weakness] DGL parsing library vulnerable to injection (e.g., XML External Entity, Command Injection if parsing external entities) [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   └───[OR] Malicious Graph Data in API Request [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │       └───[Weakness] DGL API endpoint vulnerable to injection when processing graph data [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[AND] Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities
│   │   │   ├───[OR] Buffer Overflow in Graph Processing
│   │   │   │   └───[Weakness] DGL C++ backend or Python wrappers vulnerable to buffer overflows during graph operations (e.g., message passing, aggregation) [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   ├───[OR] Use-After-Free Vulnerabilities
│   │   │   │   └───[Weakness] DGL memory management issues leading to use-after-free in graph data structures or algorithm implementations [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[AND] Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if applicable)
│   │   │   ├───[OR] Insecure Deserialization of Graph Objects
│   │   │   │   └───[Weakness] DGL uses insecure deserialization mechanisms that allow code execution upon loading serialized graph data [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   └───[OR] Exploiting Vulnerabilities in Graph Format Deserialization
│   │   │       └───[Weakness] DGL's graph format parsing libraries (or underlying dependencies) are vulnerable to deserialization attacks [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├───[OR] Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[AND] Algorithmic Complexity Exploitation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   ├───[OR] Pathological Graph Input [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   └───[Weakness] DGL algorithms (e.g., graph traversal, message passing) exhibit exponential or high polynomial time complexity for certain graph structures, leading to resource exhaustion [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   ├───[OR] Resource Exhaustion via Large Graph Operations [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   └───[Weakness] DGL operations are not sufficiently resource-constrained, allowing for memory exhaustion or CPU overload [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[OR] Exploit Dependencies of DGL [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[AND] Vulnerabilities in Backend Frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, MXNet) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[OR] Exploit Known Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └───[Weakness] Application uses a vulnerable version of PyTorch, TensorFlow, or MXNet that DGL relies upon [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[OR] Trigger Backend Vulnerabilities via DGL API
│   │   │   └───[Weakness] DGL API usage can indirectly expose or trigger vulnerabilities in the backend framework [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├───[AND] Vulnerabilities in Supporting Libraries (NumPy, SciPy, etc.) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[OR] Exploit Known Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └───[Weakness] Application indirectly relies on vulnerable versions of supporting libraries through DGL [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[OR] Application-Specific Misuse of DGL API [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[AND] Incorrect Input Validation Before DGL [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[OR] Lack of Sanitization of Graph Data [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   └───[Weakness] Application fails to sanitize graph data, allowing injection attacks to reach DGL [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[OR] Insufficient Validation of Graph Structure [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └───[Weakness] Application does not validate graph structure, leading to DoS or unexpected behavior in DGL processing [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: Compromise DGL Application [CRITICAL NODE]:

Description: This is the ultimate goal of the attacker. Success means gaining unauthorized access, causing denial of service, or manipulating application data/behavior through exploiting weaknesses related to DGL.

Impact: Catastrophic - Full compromise of the application.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit DGL Library Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

Description: This path focuses on directly exploiting vulnerabilities within the DGL library code itself.

Attack Vectors:

  • Code Execution Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]:
    • Input Injection via Graph Data [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Weakness: DGL parsing library vulnerable to injection [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting vulnerabilities in how DGL parses graph file formats (e.g., XML External Entity injection in GraphML parsing, Command Injection if external entities are processed).
      • Weakness: DGL API endpoint vulnerable to injection when processing graph data [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting vulnerabilities in how DGL API endpoints process and handle graph data received in requests (e.g., SQL Injection if graph data is used in database queries, OS Command Injection if graph data is used in system calls).
    • Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Weakness: DGL C++ backend or Python wrappers vulnerable to buffer overflows [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting buffer overflows in DGL's C++ backend or Python wrappers during graph operations (e.g., message passing, aggregation) by providing oversized or specially crafted graph data.
      • Weakness: DGL memory management issues leading to use-after-free [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting use-after-free vulnerabilities due to memory management errors in DGL's graph data structures or algorithm implementations by triggering specific sequences of DGL operations.
    • Deserialization Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Weakness: DGL uses insecure deserialization mechanisms [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting insecure deserialization vulnerabilities if DGL uses mechanisms like Python's pickle to handle graph objects, allowing for code execution by providing malicious serialized graph data.
      • Weakness: DGL's graph format parsing libraries are vulnerable to deserialization attacks [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting deserialization vulnerabilities in libraries used by DGL to parse graph formats (e.g., vulnerabilities in XML or YAML parsers).

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:

Description: This path focuses on making the application unavailable by exhausting its resources or causing it to crash through DGL-related operations.

Attack Vectors:

  • Algorithmic Complexity Exploitation [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
    • Pathological Graph Input [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Weakness: DGL algorithms exhibit high time complexity for certain graph structures [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting the algorithmic complexity of DGL algorithms (e.g., graph traversal, message passing) by providing specially crafted graph structures (e.g., very dense, very large, specific topology) that cause excessive computation and resource consumption, leading to DoS.
    • Resource Exhaustion via Large Graph Operations [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Weakness: DGL operations are not sufficiently resource-constrained [CRITICAL NODE]: Overwhelming the application's resources (CPU, memory) by triggering DGL operations on extremely large graphs that exceed available capacity, leading to DoS.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Dependencies of DGL [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

Description: This path focuses on exploiting vulnerabilities in libraries that DGL depends on, including backend frameworks and supporting libraries.

Attack Vectors:

  • Vulnerabilities in Backend Frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, MXNet) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
    • Exploit Known Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Weakness: Application uses a vulnerable version of backend framework [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) in the specific version of the backend framework (PyTorch, TensorFlow, or MXNet) used by DGL.
    • Trigger Backend Vulnerabilities via DGL API:
      • Weakness: DGL API usage can trigger vulnerabilities in the backend framework [CRITICAL NODE]: Using the DGL API in a specific way that triggers underlying vulnerabilities in the backend framework (e.g., specific tensor operations, memory management issues in the backend).
  • Vulnerabilities in Supporting Libraries (NumPy, SciPy, etc.) [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
    • Exploit Known Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Weakness: Application indirectly relies on vulnerable versions of supporting libraries [CRITICAL NODE]: Exploiting known CVEs in supporting libraries (e.g., NumPy, SciPy, networkx) that DGL uses indirectly.

Attack Tree Path: Application-Specific Misuse of DGL API [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

Description: This path focuses on vulnerabilities arising from how the application integrates and uses the DGL API, specifically due to incorrect input handling.

Attack Vectors:

  • Incorrect Input Validation Before DGL [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:
    • Lack of Sanitization of Graph Data [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]:
      • Weakness: Application fails to sanitize graph data [CRITICAL NODE]: Failing to properly sanitize or escape graph data before passing it to DGL, allowing injection attacks to reach DGL components (which might then be vulnerable as described in "Exploit DGL Library Vulnerabilities").
    • Insufficient Validation of Graph Structure [HIGH-RISK PATH]:
      • Weakness: Application does not validate graph structure [CRITICAL NODE]: Failing to validate the structure of the graph data (e.g., node and edge counts, connectivity properties) before processing it with DGL, leading to Denial of Service or unexpected application behavior due to DGL's processing of malformed or excessively complex graphs.