Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
82 lines (64 loc) · 6.02 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

82 lines (64 loc) · 6.02 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dmlc/dgl

Objective: Execute Arbitrary Code [CN]

Attack Tree Visualization

Execute Arbitrary Code [CN] |

| | Vulnerabilities in Vulnerabilities in DGL Core/API DGL Model Loading/Saving [HR] | | Buffer Overflow Model Deserialization in C++ Backend [HR] Vulnerabilities [CN] | | Craft Malicious Unsafe Pickle Input [CN] Deserialization [CN] [HR]

Attack Tree Path: Execute Arbitrary Code [CN]

  • Description: The ultimate objective of the attacker. Successful execution of arbitrary code grants the attacker complete control over the compromised system (server or client).
  • Impact: Very High - Complete system compromise, data exfiltration, denial of service, potential for lateral movement within the network.
  • Likelihood: Dependent on the success of lower-level attack steps.
  • Effort: Variable, depends on the exploited vulnerability.
  • Skill Level: Variable, depends on the exploited vulnerability.
  • Detection Difficulty: Variable, depends on the exploited vulnerability and the sophistication of the attacker's post-exploitation activities.

Attack Tree Path: Vulnerabilities in DGL Model Loading/Saving [HR]

  • Description: This branch represents vulnerabilities related to how DGL loads and saves trained models. The primary concern is unsafe deserialization.
  • Impact: Very High - Leads directly to arbitrary code execution.
  • Likelihood: High (if unsafe practices are used).
  • Effort: Generally low.
  • Skill Level: Can range from Novice to Advanced, depending on the specific vulnerability.
  • Detection Difficulty: Varies; unsafe deserialization is easy to detect, while subtle format manipulation is harder.

Attack Tree Path: Model Deserialization Vulnerabilities [CN]

  • Description: This node specifically focuses on vulnerabilities arising from the process of deserializing (loading) a model file.
  • Impact: Very High - Arbitrary code execution.
  • Likelihood: High (if unsafe practices are used).
  • Effort: Low to Medium.
  • Skill Level: Novice to Advanced.
  • Detection Difficulty: Easy to Very Hard.

Attack Tree Path: Unsafe Pickle Deserialization [CN] [HR]

  • Description: The most critical and easily exploitable vulnerability. If DGL uses Python's pickle module to load models from untrusted sources without proper sanitization or sandboxing, an attacker can craft a malicious pickle file that executes arbitrary code when loaded.
  • Impact: Very High - Immediate arbitrary code execution upon loading the malicious model file.
  • Likelihood: Very High (if pickle is used unsafely). This is a well-known and easily exploited vulnerability.
  • Effort: Very Low - Exploit code is readily available, and crafting a malicious pickle file is trivial.
  • Skill Level: Novice - Requires minimal technical expertise. Publicly available tools and tutorials make this attack accessible to almost anyone.
  • Detection Difficulty: Very Easy - Any use of pickle.load() on untrusted data should be flagged as a critical security vulnerability. Static analysis tools can easily detect this.

Attack Tree Path: Vulnerabilities in DGL Core/API

  • Description: This branch represents vulnerabilities within the core DGL library and its API, particularly focusing on the C++ backend.
  • Impact: Very High - Potential for arbitrary code execution.
  • Likelihood: Medium.
  • Effort: Medium to High.
  • Skill Level: Advanced to Expert.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard to Very Hard.

Attack Tree Path: Buffer Overflow in C++ Backend [HR]

  • Description: DGL relies on a C++ backend for performance. Buffer overflows in this code (especially in custom kernels or message passing functions) are a significant risk. A carefully crafted input graph could trigger a buffer overflow, leading to arbitrary code execution.
  • Impact: Very High - Arbitrary code execution.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Requires a vulnerability to exist in the C++ code, but C++ is prone to memory safety issues.
  • Effort: Medium to High - Requires understanding of C++ memory management, DGL's internal data structures, and potentially reverse engineering.
  • Skill Level: Advanced - Requires strong C++ skills and vulnerability analysis experience.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Buffer overflows can be subtle and difficult to detect without specialized tools (e.g., dynamic analysis, memory sanitizers).

Attack Tree Path: Craft Malicious Input (to Trigger BOF in DGL) [CN]

  • Description: This is the specific attack vector for exploiting a buffer overflow. The attacker provides a specially designed graph (e.g., with extremely long node/edge features, unusual graph structures) that, when processed by DGL, overwrites memory and allows the attacker to inject and execute their own code.
  • Impact: Very High - Arbitrary code execution.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Dependent on the existence of a buffer overflow vulnerability in DGL's C++ backend.
  • Effort: Medium - Requires understanding of the vulnerable code and how to craft input to trigger the overflow. Fuzzing can help reduce the effort.
  • Skill Level: Advanced - Requires expertise in C++, memory corruption vulnerabilities, and exploit development.
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard - Requires dynamic analysis, memory monitoring, and potentially reverse engineering to detect the crafted input and the resulting memory corruption.