Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
78 lines (59 loc) · 6.43 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

78 lines (59 loc) · 6.43 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for dmlc/dgl

Mitigation Strategy: Adversarial Training (DGL-Centric)

Description: 1. DGL Attack Implementation: Utilize DGL's graph manipulation capabilities to implement adversarial attacks. This involves: * Using dgl.add_edges() and dgl.remove_edges() to create structurally perturbed graphs. * Directly modifying node/edge features stored in dgl.ndata and dgl.edata using DGL's tensor operations. * Leveraging DGL's message passing framework (if applicable) to efficiently propagate perturbations through the graph. 2. DGL-Compatible Loss: Ensure the loss function used during adversarial training is compatible with DGL's graph objects and autograd system. This usually means using DGL's built-in loss functions or custom loss functions that operate on DGL tensors. 3. DGL Batching: Use DGL's dgl.batch() and dgl.unbatch() functions to efficiently handle batches of both clean and adversarially perturbed graphs during training. This is crucial for performance. 4. DGL-Specific Attack Libraries: If available, use libraries specifically designed for generating adversarial examples on DGL graphs. These libraries would likely provide optimized implementations of common attack methods.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Adversarial Attacks on Graph Structure/Features (High Severity): Reduces the model's sensitivity to small, malicious changes in the input graph, preventing incorrect predictions.

  • Impact:

    • Adversarial Attacks: Significantly reduces the success rate of adversarial attacks. The exact reduction depends on the strength of the attack and the training parameters.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially implemented in training.py. Adversarial examples are generated for node feature perturbations using a DGL-based FGSM implementation (modifying dgl.ndata). DGL batching is used.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Adversarial training is not implemented for edge addition/removal attacks using dgl.add_edges() and dgl.remove_edges(). This needs to be added to training.py.
    • No use of potential DGL-specific attack libraries (check for their existence and integrate if found).

Mitigation Strategy: Graph Regularization (DGL-Centric)

Description: 1. DGL-Based Smoothness: Implement smoothness regularization using DGL's message passing framework. This involves: * Defining message and reduce functions that calculate the difference between node representations. * Using dgl.apply_edges() or dgl.update_all() to efficiently compute the smoothness penalty over all edges in the graph. * The regularization term will operate directly on the node features stored in dgl.ndata. 2. DGL-Based Robustness (with Adversarial Component): Implement robustness regularization by: * Generating perturbed graphs using DGL's graph manipulation functions (as in adversarial training). * Calculating the difference in model predictions on the original and perturbed graphs using DGL's forward pass. * Adding this difference as a penalty term to the loss function. 3. DGL Tensor Operations: Ensure all regularization calculations are performed using DGL-compatible tensor operations to leverage DGL's autograd capabilities.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Adversarial Attacks on Graph Structure/Features (High Severity): Makes the model less sensitive to small changes in the input graph.
    • Overfitting (Medium Severity): Improves generalization.

  • Impact:

    • Adversarial Attacks: Reduces the impact of adversarial attacks.
    • Overfitting: Improves generalization to new data.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Smoothness regularization is implemented in model.py using DGL's message passing (dgl.update_all()).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Robustness regularization (which requires DGL-based graph perturbation) is not implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Differential Privacy (DGL-Centric)

Description: 1. DGL-Compatible DP Library: Use a differential privacy library that is compatible with DGL. This might be a specialized library for graph data or a general-purpose DP library that can handle DGL tensors. The key is that it must integrate with DGL's computation graph. 2. DGL-Based Gradient Clipping: If using gradient perturbation, implement gradient clipping using DGL's tensor operations. This ensures that the gradients of individual nodes or edges are bounded before noise is added. 3. DGL-Based Noise Addition: Add noise to the gradients or outputs using DGL-compatible random number generators and tensor operations. 4. Graph-Specific DP Mechanisms: Explore and implement DP mechanisms specifically designed for graph data, potentially leveraging DGL's graph structure representation. This is an advanced research area. Examples might include: * DP mechanisms that account for the sensitivity of graph statistics (e.g., degree distribution). * DP mechanisms that operate directly on graph embeddings generated by DGL. 5. DGL Federated Learning Integration: If using federated learning, integrate the DP mechanism with DGL's federated learning capabilities (if available). This would involve adding noise locally at each client before aggregating updates.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Model Extraction/Inversion Attacks (High Severity): Makes it harder to infer information about the training data or model parameters.
    • Membership Inference Attacks (High Severity): Protects against determining if a node/edge was in the training data.

  • Impact:

    • Privacy Attacks: Provides strong, quantifiable privacy guarantees.
    • Model Accuracy: Reduces accuracy; the trade-off is controlled by the privacy parameter.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Not implemented.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Differential privacy is entirely missing. This requires significant effort, including choosing a suitable DP library, integrating it with DGL's training and inference pipelines, and carefully evaluating the privacy-utility trade-off. The use of DGL-specific graph DP mechanisms is a research-level task.