Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
138 lines (123 loc) · 8.94 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

138 lines (123 loc) · 8.94 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dmlc/xgboost

Objective: To compromise the application using XGBoost by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities within the project itself, focusing on model poisoning/evasion, data exfiltration (via deserialization), denial of service (via deserialization), and remote code execution (via deserialization).

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application using XGBoost ├── 1. Model Poisoning/Evasion [HIGH RISK] │ ├── 1.1 Training Data Poisoning [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 1.1.1 Inject Malicious Data Points [CRITICAL] │ │ ├── 1.1.1.3 Bypass Data Validation/Sanitization [CRITICAL] │ │ │ ├── 1.1.1.3.1 Exploit Weak Input Validation [HIGH RISK] │ ├── 1.2 Inference-Time Evasion (Adversarial Examples) [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 1.2.1 Craft Adversarial Inputs [CRITICAL] │ │ │ ├── 1.2.1.2.2 Black-Box Attacks (query the model repeatedly to learn its behavior) [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 1.2.1.3 Bypass Input Validation/Sanitization [CRITICAL] ├── 2. Data Exfiltration (from Training Data) │ ├── 2.2 Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if loading models from untrusted sources) [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 2.2.1 Craft Malicious Serialized Model File [CRITICAL] │ │ ├── 2.2.2 Trigger Deserialization of Malicious File [CRITICAL] ├── 3. Denial of Service (DoS) │ ├── 3.2 Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if loading models from untrusted sources) [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 3.2.1 Craft Malicious Serialized Model [CRITICAL] │ │ ├── 3.2.2 Trigger Deserialization [CRITICAL] ├── 4. Code Execution (RCE) ├── 4.1 Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if loading models from untrusted sources) [HIGH RISK] ├── 4.1.1 Craft Malicious Serialized Model File [CRITICAL] ├── 4.1.2 Trigger Deserialization of Malicious File [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Model Poisoning/Evasion

  • 1.1 Training Data Poisoning [HIGH RISK]

    • Goal: To manipulate the model's learned decision boundaries during training, leading to incorrect predictions or biased outcomes.
    • 1.1.1 Inject Malicious Data Points [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker introduces carefully crafted data points into the training dataset. These points may have incorrect labels (label flipping) or modified feature values.
      • Likelihood: High (if input validation is weak)
      • Impact: High (can significantly degrade model performance or bias results)
      • Effort: Low (if input channels are easily accessible)
      • Skill Level: Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (requires monitoring data quality and model performance)
    • 1.1.1.3 Bypass Data Validation/Sanitization [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker circumvents the application's data validation and sanitization mechanisms to inject malicious data.
      • Likelihood: High (if validation is poorly implemented)
      • Impact: High
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy (with proper input validation logging)
      • 1.1.1.3.1 Exploit Weak Input Validation [HIGH RISK]
        • Description: The attacker leverages flaws in the input validation logic, such as insufficient checks on data types, ranges, or formats.
        • Likelihood: High (if validation is poorly implemented)
        • Impact: High
        • Effort: Low
        • Skill Level: Intermediate
        • Detection Difficulty: Easy (with proper input validation logging)

  • 1.2 Inference-Time Evasion (Adversarial Examples) [HIGH RISK]

    • Goal: To cause the model to make incorrect predictions at inference time by providing carefully crafted, but often imperceptibly different, input data.
    • 1.2.1 Craft Adversarial Inputs [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker generates input data that is specifically designed to mislead the model.
      • Likelihood: High (input features are usually known)
      • Impact: Medium (depends on the sensitivity of the application)
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (requires monitoring input data and model predictions)
    • 1.2.1.2.2 Black-Box Attacks (query the model repeatedly to learn its behavior) [HIGH RISK]
      • Description: The attacker interacts with the model as a black box, sending queries and observing the outputs to learn its vulnerabilities and craft adversarial examples. They don't need access to the model's internal parameters or gradients.
      • Likelihood: High
      • Impact: High
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard
    • 1.2.1.3 Bypass Input Validation/Sanitization [CRITICAL]
      • Description: Similar to training data poisoning, the attacker bypasses input validation to submit adversarial examples.
      • Likelihood: High (if validation is weak)
      • Impact: High
      • Effort: Low
      • Skill Level: Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy (with proper input validation)

Attack Tree Path: 2. Data Exfiltration (from Training Data)

  • 2.2 Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if loading models from untrusted sources) [HIGH RISK]
    • Goal: To extract sensitive information from the training data by exploiting vulnerabilities in the deserialization process.
    • 2.2.1 Craft Malicious Serialized Model File [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker creates a specially crafted, malicious model file that, when deserialized, executes code to extract data.
      • Likelihood: Medium (if untrusted models are loaded)
      • Impact: High
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Advanced
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (requires careful inspection of model files)
    • 2.2.2 Trigger Deserialization of Malicious File [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker tricks the application into loading and deserializing the malicious model file.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: High
      • Effort: Low to Medium
      • Skill Level: Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: 3. Denial of Service (DoS)

  • 3.2 Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if loading models from untrusted sources) [HIGH RISK]
    • Goal: To make the application or model unavailable by exploiting deserialization vulnerabilities.
    • 3.2.1 Craft Malicious Serialized Model [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker creates a malicious model file that, when deserialized, consumes excessive resources or causes the application to crash.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Medium
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Advanced
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium
    • 3.2.2 Trigger Deserialization [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker causes the application to deserialize the malicious model file.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Medium
      • Effort: Medium
      • Skill Level: Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: 4. Code Execution (RCE)

  • 4.1 Exploit Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if loading models from untrusted sources) [HIGH RISK]
    • Goal: To gain arbitrary code execution on the server hosting the XGBoost model.
    • 4.1.1 Craft Malicious Serialized Model File [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker creates a malicious model file containing arbitrary code that will be executed upon deserialization. This often leverages vulnerabilities in libraries like pickle or joblib.
      • Likelihood: Medium (if untrusted models are loaded and a vulnerable deserializer is used)
      • Impact: Very High (complete system compromise)
      • Effort: High
      • Skill Level: Expert
      • Detection Difficulty: Hard (requires advanced malware analysis)
    • 4.1.2 Trigger Deserialization of Malicious File [CRITICAL]
      • Description: The attacker induces the application to deserialize the malicious model file, leading to code execution.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Very High
      • Effort: Low to Medium
      • Skill Level: Intermediate
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium