Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
127 lines (96 loc) · 11.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

127 lines (96 loc) · 11.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for encode/django-rest-framework

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Serializer Validation (DRF-Specific Aspects)

Description:

  1. Leverage DRF Serializers: Use DRF's Serializer classes as the primary mechanism for validating all incoming data to your API endpoints. Do not rely solely on Django model validation.
  2. Field-Level Validation (DRF-Specific): Utilize DRF's built-in field types and validators:
    • CharField, IntegerField, EmailField, DateTimeField, BooleanField, ChoiceField, FileField, ImageField, etc. These provide inherent type validation.
    • max_length, min_length, required, allow_null, allow_blank (use these DRF-specific options judiciously).
    • validators: Use DRF's built-in validators like UniqueValidator, RegexValidator, or create custom validator functions using DRF's validation framework.
  3. Object-Level Validation (DRF-Specific): Implement the validate() method within your DRF serializers to perform cross-field validation and enforce complex business rules that span multiple fields. This is a DRF-specific feature.
  4. read_only=True (DRF-Specific): Explicitly mark fields as read_only=True in your DRF serializers to prevent client modification. This is a core DRF feature for controlling data mutability.
  5. Nested Serializers (DRF-Specific): If using nested serializers (a key DRF feature), ensure thorough validation at every level of nesting. Each nested serializer should have its own complete set of validation rules.
  6. Serializer Meta Class: Use the Meta class within your serializer to define model association, fields, and other DRF-specific configurations.
  7. Test Serializers Directly: Write unit tests that specifically target your DRF serializers, testing both valid and invalid input scenarios, including edge cases.

Threats Mitigated (DRF-Specific Focus):

  • Mass Assignment (Severity: High): DRF's read_only=True and controlled field inclusion in serializers directly prevent mass assignment vulnerabilities.
  • Data Corruption (Severity: High): DRF's field types and validators ensure data conforms to expected formats, preventing invalid data from entering your application through the API.
  • Business Logic Bypass (Severity: Medium-High): DRF's validate() method allows for custom, API-specific business logic enforcement.
  • Injection Attacks (Severity: High/Critical): While general input validation helps, DRF's structured approach to serialization provides a strong layer of defense against various injection attacks by enforcing data types and formats before data interacts with other parts of the application.

Impact:

  • Mass Assignment: Risk significantly reduced (almost eliminated when used correctly).
  • Data Corruption: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Business Logic Bypass: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Injection Attacks: Risk significantly reduced (as part of a layered defense).

Currently Implemented: [Example: Implemented in UserSerializer and ProductSerializer. Field-level validation is present, but object-level validation is missing in ProductSerializer.]

Missing Implementation: [Example: Missing comprehensive validation in the CommentSerializer (no length limits). Object-level validation is missing in OrderSerializer.]

Mitigation Strategy: Granular Permissions (DRF-Specific)

Description:

  1. Utilize DRF Permission Classes: Use DRF's built-in permission classes (IsAuthenticated, IsAdminUser, IsAuthenticatedOrReadOnly) or create custom permission classes (subclassing BasePermission) to control access to your API endpoints. This is the core of DRF's permission system.
  2. DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES (DRF Setting): Set a restrictive default permission policy in your DRF settings using the DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES setting. This provides a baseline level of security.
  3. View-Level Permissions (DRF-Specific): Apply permission classes directly to your DRF views or viewsets using the permission_classes attribute. This allows for fine-grained control over access to specific endpoints.
  4. has_object_permission (DRF-Specific): Implement the has_object_permission method in your custom DRF permission classes to enforce object-level permissions. This is a key DRF feature for controlling access to individual objects.
  5. Test Permission Classes: Write unit tests specifically for your DRF permission classes, covering different user roles and access scenarios.

Threats Mitigated (DRF-Specific Focus):

  • Unauthorized Access (Severity: Critical): DRF's permission classes directly control access based on authentication status.
  • Privilege Escalation (Severity: Critical): DRF's permission system prevents users from exceeding their authorized privileges.
  • Horizontal Privilege Escalation (Severity: Critical): DRF's has_object_permission method is specifically designed to prevent this type of attack.

Impact:

  • Unauthorized Access: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Horizontal Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced.

Currently Implemented: [Example: IsAuthenticated is applied globally. Custom permission class IsOwnerOrReadOnly is implemented for the UserProfile viewset.]

Missing Implementation: [Example: Missing object-level permissions for the Order model. Any authenticated user can currently modify any order.]

Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting (Throttling) (DRF-Specific)

Description:

  1. Utilize DRF Throttling Classes: Use DRF's built-in throttling classes (AnonRateThrottle, UserRateThrottle) or create custom throttle classes (subclassing BaseThrottle) to limit the rate of API requests.
  2. DEFAULT_THROTTLE_CLASSES and DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES (DRF Settings): Configure default throttle classes and rates in your DRF settings using these settings.
  3. Throttle Scopes (DRF-Specific): Define throttle scopes in your DRF settings to apply different throttle rates to different groups of requests (e.g., anon, user).
  4. View-Level Throttling (DRF-Specific): Apply throttle classes directly to your DRF views or viewsets using the throttle_classes attribute for per-endpoint control.
  5. get_cache_key (DRF-Specific): If creating custom throttle classes, implement the get_cache_key method to define how requests are identified and tracked for throttling purposes. This is a key part of DRF's throttling mechanism.
  6. Test Throttling: Write tests that specifically target your DRF throttling configuration, ensuring it behaves as expected.

Threats Mitigated (DRF-Specific Focus):

  • Brute-Force Attacks (Severity: High): DRF's throttling limits the number of requests, making brute-force attacks much harder.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks (Severity: High): DRF's throttling protects against request floods.
  • API Abuse (Severity: Medium): DRF's throttling ensures fair usage of API resources.

Impact:

  • Brute-Force Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
  • DoS Attacks: Risk significantly reduced.
  • API Abuse: Risk significantly reduced.

Currently Implemented: [Example: AnonRateThrottle and UserRateThrottle are applied globally with default rates.]

Missing Implementation: [Example: No custom throttling based on request content or specific endpoints.]

Mitigation Strategy: Disable Browsable API in Production (DRF-Specific)

Description:

  1. DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES (DRF Setting): In your Django settings, modify the REST_FRAMEWORK dictionary's DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES setting.
  2. Remove BrowsableAPIRenderer: Remove 'rest_framework.renderers.BrowsableAPIRenderer' from the list of default renderers. This disables DRF's browsable API.
  3. Conditional Disabling (Recommended): Use a conditional statement (e.g., based on an environment variable or your DEBUG setting) to enable the browsable API only in development environments.

Threats Mitigated (DRF-Specific Focus):

  • Information Disclosure (Severity: Medium): The DRF browsable API provides a user-friendly interface that can reveal details about your API structure and data models.
  • Reconnaissance (Severity: Medium): Attackers can use the DRF browsable API to easily understand your API.
  • Simplified Exploitation (Severity: Medium): The DRF browsable API can make it easier to craft malicious requests.

Impact:

  • Information Disclosure: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Reconnaissance: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Simplified Exploitation: Risk significantly reduced.

Currently Implemented: [Example: Browsable API is currently enabled in both development and production.]

Missing Implementation: [Example: Browsable API needs to be disabled in production by modifying the DEFAULT_RENDERER_CLASSES setting.]

Mitigation Strategy: API Versioning (DRF-Specific)

Description:

  1. Choose a Versioning Scheme: DRF supports several versioning schemes:
    • URLPathVersioning: Include the version in the URL path (e.g., /api/v1/users).
    • NamespaceVersioning: Use Django URL namespaces (e.g., v1:users).
    • AcceptHeaderVersioning: Use the Accept header (e.g., Accept: application/json; version=1.0).
    • QueryParameterVersioning: Use a query parameter (e.g., /api/users?version=1.0).
    • HostNameVersioning: Use a different hostname or subdomain for each version (e.g., v1.api.example.com).
  2. Configure DEFAULT_VERSIONING_CLASS (DRF Setting): Set the default versioning scheme in your DRF settings.
  3. Configure ALLOWED_VERSIONS (DRF Setting): Specify the allowed API versions in your DRF settings.
  4. Configure VERSION_PARAM (DRF Setting): If using QueryParameterVersioning, set the name of the version parameter.
  5. Apply Versioning to Views: Use DRF's versioning mechanisms to associate different views or serializers with different API versions. This might involve using different URL patterns or conditional logic within your views.
  6. Test different versions: Ensure that every version works as expected.

Threats Mitigated (DRF-Specific Focus):

  • Breaking Changes (Severity: Medium): While not a direct security threat, versioning prevents breaking changes from affecting existing clients, which can indirectly lead to security issues if clients are forced to use older, potentially vulnerable versions.
  • Vulnerability Management (Severity: Medium): Versioning allows you to deprecate and eventually remove older API versions that may contain known vulnerabilities, forcing clients to upgrade to more secure versions.

Impact:

  • Breaking Changes: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Vulnerability Management: Improved ability to manage and mitigate vulnerabilities over time.

Currently Implemented: [Example: No API versioning is currently implemented.]

Missing Implementation: [Example: Need to choose a versioning scheme (e.g., URLPathVersioning) and configure it in the DRF settings. Need to update URL patterns and views to support versioning.]