Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
186 lines (144 loc) · 14.3 KB

File metadata and controls

186 lines (144 loc) · 14.3 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for getsentry/sentry

Objective: Compromise application by exploiting vulnerabilities or weaknesses related to its Sentry integration.

Attack Tree Visualization

└── [CRITICAL NODE] Compromise Application via Sentry ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [2.0] Abuse Sentry Features/Functionality for Malicious Purposes │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [2.1] Data Injection/Poisoning via Sentry │ │ └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [2.1.1] Inject Malicious Data through Application Errors │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [2.3] Information Disclosure via Sentry Error Details │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [2.3.1] Leak Sensitive Data in Error Messages Captured by Sentry │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [2.3.2] Access Sensitive Data Stored in Sentry Platform │ │ └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [2.3.2.1] Compromise Sentry User Accounts ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [3.0] Compromise Sentry Infrastructure (Self-Hosted Sentry) │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [3.1] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Underlying Infrastructure │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [3.1.1] Exploit OS Vulnerabilities │ │ └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [3.1.4] Network Security Vulnerabilities │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [3.2] Misconfiguration of Sentry Infrastructure │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [3.2.1] Weak Access Controls to Sentry Server │ │ ├── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [3.2.2] Exposed Sentry Admin Interfaces │ │ └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [3.2.3] Default Credentials for Sentry or Infrastructure Components └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [4.0] Social Engineering/Phishing Targeting Sentry Users └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [4.1] Phishing for Sentry Credentials └── [HIGH-RISK PATH] [4.1.1] Target Sentry Users with Phishing Emails/Links

  • Description: This is the ultimate goal of the attacker. Success means the attacker has gained unauthorized access to the application, its data, or its functionality by exploiting weaknesses related to Sentry integration.
  • Likelihood: Overall likelihood depends on the cumulative likelihood of the sub-paths.
  • Impact: Critical - Full application compromise.
  • Effort: Variable, depends on the chosen attack path.
  • Skill Level: Variable, depends on the chosen attack path.
  • Detection Difficulty: Variable, depends on the chosen attack path.
  • Description: Attackers misuse intended features of Sentry to achieve malicious goals, rather than exploiting software vulnerabilities in Sentry itself.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Sentry features, if not carefully managed, can be susceptible to abuse.
  • Impact: Medium to High - Can lead to data injection, information disclosure, or resource exhaustion.
  • Effort: Low to Medium - Often relies on exploiting application-side weaknesses or misconfigurations.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium - Basic web application security knowledge.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Requires monitoring Sentry data and usage patterns.
  • Description: Attackers inject malicious data into Sentry, potentially corrupting error reports, misleading analysis, or even exploiting vulnerabilities in Sentry's data processing.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Web application vulnerabilities can lead to injection of malicious data that Sentry captures.
  • Impact: Medium - Data corruption in Sentry, misleading error analysis, potential for denial of service if used for spamming.
  • Effort: Low - Exploiting existing vulnerabilities in the application.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium - Basic web application exploitation skills.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Depends on monitoring of Sentry data and error patterns.
  • Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities in the application to trigger errors that contain malicious payloads. Sentry captures these errors, effectively injecting malicious data into the Sentry platform. This could be used for cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks within the Sentry interface, data corruption, or misleading error analysis.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Medium
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low-Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insight: Input validation, sanitization. Rate limiting.
  • Description: Sensitive information is unintentionally leaked in error messages that are captured and stored by Sentry. Attackers can then access this information by accessing Sentry.
  • Likelihood: High - Developers often unintentionally log sensitive data in errors.
  • Impact: Medium to High - Exposure of sensitive data, PII, secrets, internal paths.
  • Effort: Low - No direct attack on Sentry needed, relies on developer errors.
  • Skill Level: Low - Attacker just needs to trigger errors and access Sentry.
  • Detection Difficulty: Low to Medium - Reviewing Sentry error logs, data loss prevention tools.
  • Description: Developers inadvertently include sensitive data (like API keys, passwords, PII, internal file paths) in error messages that are then sent to Sentry. An attacker gaining access to Sentry can then view these error messages and extract the sensitive information.
  • Likelihood: High
  • Impact: Medium-High
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Low-Medium
  • Actionable Insight: Careful error handling. Sanitize error messages. Avoid logging sensitive data. Data scrubbing.
  • Description: Attackers directly target the Sentry platform to access sensitive data that is stored within it, such as error details, user information, or project settings.
  • Description: Attackers compromise legitimate Sentry user accounts through methods like phishing, credential stuffing, or password reuse. Once inside, they can access all data and settings within Sentry that the compromised user has permissions for, potentially including sensitive error information.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Low-Medium
  • Skill Level: Low-Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insight: Strong passwords, MFA. Audit user access. Account lockout.
  • Description: For self-hosted Sentry instances, attackers target the underlying infrastructure (servers, databases, network) to compromise the Sentry platform and gain access to its data and functionality.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Infrastructure vulnerabilities and misconfigurations are common attack vectors.
  • Impact: High to Critical - Full compromise of Sentry infrastructure, data breach, potential for lateral movement.
  • Effort: Medium - Requires infrastructure exploitation skills.
  • Skill Level: Medium to High - System administration, networking, and security expertise.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - Requires robust infrastructure security monitoring.
  • Description: Attackers exploit known or zero-day vulnerabilities in the operating system, database, containerization platform, or network infrastructure that hosts the self-hosted Sentry instance.
  • Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities in the operating system of the server hosting Sentry. This could allow them to gain root access, compromise the Sentry installation, and potentially pivot to other systems.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Critical
  • Effort: Low-Medium
  • Skill Level: Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insight: Patch OS. Harden server.
  • Description: Attackers exploit network misconfigurations or vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to the network segment where the Sentry server is located. This could allow them to intercept traffic, perform man-in-the-middle attacks, or directly access the Sentry server if it's exposed.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Medium
  • Skill Level: Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insight: Network segmentation. Firewall rules. HTTPS. IDS/IPS.
  • Description: Attackers exploit misconfigurations in the Sentry infrastructure, such as weak access controls, exposed admin interfaces, or default credentials, to gain unauthorized access.
  • Description: Weak or default passwords, overly permissive firewall rules, or lack of multi-factor authentication for accessing the Sentry server allow attackers to gain unauthorized access.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Low-Medium
  • Skill Level: Low-Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insight: Strong access control policies. SSH key-based auth. Limit access.
  • Description: The Sentry admin interface is unintentionally exposed to the public internet or an untrusted network. Attackers can then attempt to access it, potentially using default credentials or exploiting vulnerabilities in the admin interface itself.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low-Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insight: Secure admin interfaces. Restrict access. Strong authentication.
  • Description: Default usernames and passwords are left unchanged for Sentry itself or for underlying infrastructure components like the database or operating system. Attackers can easily find these default credentials and use them to gain full access.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: Critical
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Low
  • Detection Difficulty: Low
  • Actionable Insight: Change default passwords immediately. Password management policies.
  • Description: Attackers target human users of Sentry through social engineering tactics, primarily phishing, to steal their credentials and gain access to Sentry.
  • Likelihood: Medium - Phishing is a common and effective attack vector against human users.
  • Impact: High - Account compromise, access to Sentry data and settings.
  • Effort: Low to Medium - Phishing kits are readily available.
  • Skill Level: Low to Medium - Social engineering, basic phishing techniques.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium - User reporting, email security filters, but sophisticated phishing can be hard to detect.
  • Description: Attackers specifically craft phishing campaigns to target Sentry users, aiming to steal their usernames and passwords for the Sentry platform.
  • Description: Attackers send phishing emails or links that mimic legitimate Sentry login pages or communications. These emails trick users into entering their Sentry credentials on a fake page controlled by the attacker, allowing the attacker to steal the credentials.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Low-Medium
  • Skill Level: Low-Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insight: Security awareness training. Email security measures. Report suspicious emails.