Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
258 lines (226 loc) · 34.3 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

258 lines (226 loc) · 34.3 KB

Okay, here's a deep analysis of the security considerations for Sentry, based on the provided design review and the GitHub repository (https://github.com/getsentry/sentry):

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of Sentry's key components, identifying potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses, and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on inferring the architecture, data flow, and security controls from the provided design review, codebase, and public documentation. The primary goal is to assess the effectiveness of Sentry's security posture in protecting sensitive data and ensuring service availability.
  • Scope: The analysis will cover the following key components identified in the design review:
    • Web Application (UI)
    • API
    • Relay
    • Ingest Consumer
    • Kafka (Event Bus)
    • Post-Process Workers
    • Snuba (Time-Series Database)
    • PostgreSQL (Primary Database)
    • Object Storage (e.g., S3, GCS)
    • SDKs (interaction with Sentry)
    • Build Process
    • Deployment Model (SaaS focus)
  • Methodology:
    1. Architecture and Data Flow Review: Analyze the C4 diagrams and component descriptions to understand the system's architecture, data flow, and interactions between components.
    2. Codebase Examination (Inferred): While we don't have direct access to execute code, we'll infer security practices based on the design document, common patterns in similar systems, and publicly available information about Sentry's codebase (e.g., file structure, libraries used, security blog posts).
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats and attack vectors targeting each component, considering the business risks and data sensitivity outlined in the design review.
    4. Security Control Analysis: Evaluate the effectiveness of the inferred security controls in mitigating the identified threats.
    5. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: Provide specific, actionable recommendations to address identified vulnerabilities and improve Sentry's overall security posture.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each component, considering potential threats and the effectiveness of inferred security controls:

  • Web Application (UI)

    • Threats:
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Attackers inject malicious scripts into the UI to steal user cookies, redirect users to phishing sites, or deface the application.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Attackers trick users into performing unintended actions on the Sentry UI.
      • Session Hijacking/Fixation: Attackers steal or manipulate user sessions to gain unauthorized access.
      • Broken Authentication/Authorization: Weak password policies, lack of MFA, or vulnerabilities in the authentication/authorization logic could allow attackers to gain access to user accounts.
      • Sensitive Data Exposure: Displaying sensitive data (e.g., API keys, error details) in the UI without proper authorization checks.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, session management, input validation, XSS protection (likely using a framework like React with built-in protection and Content Security Policy (CSP)).
    • Analysis: Sentry likely uses a modern front-end framework (React) that provides some built-in XSS protection. However, rigorous input validation and output encoding are crucial. CSP is essential to mitigate XSS and other injection attacks. Robust session management (secure cookies, short session timeouts, protection against fixation) is critical. MFA and strong password policies are essential for authentication.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Enforce a strict Content Security Policy (CSP): This is the most important mitigation for XSS. The CSP should be carefully configured to allow only necessary resources and prevent inline scripts.
      • Regularly audit the UI for XSS vulnerabilities: Use automated scanners and manual code review.
      • Implement robust CSRF protection: Use anti-CSRF tokens and ensure they are properly validated.
      • Ensure secure session management: Use HTTP-only and secure cookies, implement session timeouts, and protect against session fixation.
      • Enforce strong password policies and require MFA: This is crucial to prevent account compromise.
      • Implement least privilege access in the UI: Users should only see data and functionality they are authorized to access.

  • API

    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks (SQLi, NoSQLi, Command Injection): Attackers inject malicious code into API requests to gain unauthorized access to data or execute arbitrary commands.
      • Broken Authentication/Authorization: Weak API key management, lack of authentication, or vulnerabilities in the authorization logic could allow attackers to access the API without proper credentials.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Attackers flood the API with requests, making it unavailable to legitimate users.
      • Data Exposure: The API might expose sensitive data (e.g., error details, user information) without proper authorization checks.
      • Improper Input Validation: Lack of validation could lead to various vulnerabilities, including buffer overflows and data corruption.
      • Mass Assignment: If not properly handled, attackers could modify data they shouldn't have access to.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, API security best practices (likely using an API gateway and frameworks with built-in security features).
    • Analysis: The API is a critical entry point for attackers. Robust input validation is paramount to prevent injection attacks. Strong authentication (API keys, OAuth 2.0) and authorization (RBAC) are essential. Rate limiting is crucial to prevent DoS attacks. The API should follow the principle of least privilege, exposing only necessary data and functionality.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use parameterized queries or ORM to prevent SQL injection: Never construct SQL queries by concatenating user input.
      • Implement robust input validation for all API requests: Validate data types, lengths, formats, and ranges. Use a whitelist approach whenever possible.
      • Implement strong API key management: Use a secure storage mechanism for API keys, rotate keys regularly, and monitor API key usage.
      • Enforce rate limiting: Limit the number of requests per user/IP address to prevent DoS attacks.
      • Implement proper error handling: Avoid exposing sensitive information in error messages.
      • Use an API gateway: An API gateway can provide centralized security enforcement, including authentication, authorization, and rate limiting.
      • Regularly audit the API for vulnerabilities: Use automated scanners and manual code review.
      • Implement strict output encoding: Ensure data returned by the API is properly encoded to prevent XSS and other injection attacks.
      • Protect against Mass Assignment: Carefully control which fields can be updated through the API. Use DTOs (Data Transfer Objects) to limit exposure.

  • Relay

    • Threats:
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Attackers flood Relay with requests, preventing it from processing legitimate events.
      • Data Tampering: Attackers modify event data in transit, potentially corrupting data or injecting malicious payloads.
      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: Attackers intercept communication between SDKs and Relay to steal or modify data.
      • Resource Exhaustion: Relay could be overwhelmed by a large number of events or large event payloads.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Input validation, rate limiting, TLS encryption.
    • Analysis: Relay acts as a gatekeeper for incoming event data. Rate limiting is essential to prevent DoS attacks. TLS encryption is crucial to protect data in transit and prevent MitM attacks. Input validation is important to prevent data tampering and resource exhaustion.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement robust rate limiting: Limit the number of events per SDK/project/IP address.
      • Enforce TLS encryption for all communication with SDKs: Use strong TLS configurations and regularly update certificates.
      • Validate event data: Check data types, sizes, and formats to prevent data tampering and resource exhaustion.
      • Implement monitoring and alerting: Monitor Relay's performance and resource usage to detect and respond to potential issues.
      • Consider using a dedicated network for communication between SDKs and Relay: This can improve security and performance.

  • Ingest Consumer

    • Threats:
      • Authentication/Authorization Bypass: If the consumer doesn't properly authenticate with Kafka, unauthorized access to the event stream is possible.
      • Data Corruption: Bugs in the consumer could lead to data corruption in Kafka.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Authentication, authorization.
    • Analysis: The Ingest Consumer's primary responsibility is to write data to Kafka. Secure authentication and authorization with Kafka are essential.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use strong authentication and authorization mechanisms for Kafka: Use SASL/Kerberos or TLS client certificates.
      • Implement robust error handling: Ensure the consumer handles errors gracefully and doesn't corrupt data in Kafka.
      • Monitor the consumer's performance and resource usage: Detect and respond to potential issues.

  • Kafka (Event Bus)

    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access: Attackers gain access to the Kafka cluster and read or modify event data.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Attackers flood the Kafka cluster with messages, making it unavailable.
      • Data Corruption: Bugs in Kafka or its clients could lead to data corruption.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption.
    • Analysis: Kafka is a critical component for data storage and streaming. Strong authentication and authorization are essential to prevent unauthorized access. Encryption (both in transit and at rest) is important to protect data confidentiality.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Enable authentication and authorization: Use SASL/Kerberos or TLS client certificates.
      • Enable encryption in transit: Use TLS for all communication between Kafka clients and brokers.
      • Enable encryption at rest: Use disk encryption or Kafka's built-in encryption features.
      • Implement network security controls: Use firewalls and network segmentation to restrict access to the Kafka cluster.
      • Monitor Kafka's performance and resource usage: Detect and respond to potential issues.
      • Regularly back up Kafka data: Ensure data can be recovered in case of data loss.

  • Post-Process Workers

    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks: If the workers process data from Kafka without proper validation, they could be vulnerable to injection attacks.
      • Data Corruption: Bugs in the workers could lead to data corruption in the databases.
      • Unauthorized Access: If the workers don't properly authenticate with the databases, unauthorized access is possible.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, data sanitization.
    • Analysis: The Post-Process Workers are responsible for processing and storing event data. Input validation and data sanitization are crucial to prevent injection attacks. Secure authentication and authorization with the databases are essential.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement robust input validation and data sanitization: Validate all data received from Kafka before processing it.
      • Use parameterized queries or ORM to prevent SQL injection: Never construct SQL queries by concatenating user input.
      • Use strong authentication and authorization mechanisms for the databases: Use strong passwords, rotate credentials regularly, and implement least privilege access.
      • Monitor the workers' performance and resource usage: Detect and respond to potential issues.

  • Snuba (Time-Series Database)

    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access: Attackers gain access to Snuba and read or modify time-series data.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Attackers flood Snuba with queries, making it unavailable.
      • Data Corruption: Bugs in Snuba could lead to data corruption.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption at rest.
    • Analysis: Snuba stores aggregated time-series data. Strong authentication and authorization are essential to prevent unauthorized access. Encryption at rest protects data confidentiality.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement strong authentication and authorization: Use strong passwords, rotate credentials regularly, and implement least privilege access.
      • Enable encryption at rest: Use disk encryption or Snuba's built-in encryption features.
      • Implement network security controls: Use firewalls and network segmentation to restrict access to Snuba.
      • Monitor Snuba's performance and resource usage: Detect and respond to potential issues.
      • Regularly back up Snuba data: Ensure data can be recovered in case of data loss.

  • PostgreSQL (Primary Database)

    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection: Attackers inject malicious SQL code to gain unauthorized access to data or execute arbitrary commands.
      • Unauthorized Access: Attackers gain access to the database and read or modify data.
      • Data Breach: Attackers steal sensitive data from the database.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Attackers flood the database with requests, making it unavailable.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption at rest, access control.
    • Analysis: PostgreSQL stores critical data, including user information, project configuration, and other metadata. Strong authentication and authorization are essential. Encryption at rest protects data confidentiality. Access control lists (ACLs) and role-based access control (RBAC) should be implemented to restrict access to sensitive data.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use parameterized queries or ORM to prevent SQL injection: This is the most important mitigation for SQL injection.
      • Implement strong authentication and authorization: Use strong passwords, rotate credentials regularly, and implement least privilege access. Consider using a dedicated database user for each application component.
      • Enable encryption at rest: Use disk encryption or PostgreSQL's built-in encryption features.
      • Implement network security controls: Use firewalls and network segmentation to restrict access to the database.
      • Regularly audit database access logs: Detect and respond to suspicious activity.
      • Regularly back up database data: Ensure data can be recovered in case of data loss.
      • Implement a robust database monitoring and alerting system: Detect and respond to performance issues and potential security threats.
      • Harden the PostgreSQL server: Follow security best practices for PostgreSQL configuration.

  • Object Storage (e.g., S3, GCS)

    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access: Attackers gain access to the object storage and read or modify files.
      • Data Leakage: Misconfigured access controls could expose sensitive data to the public.
      • Data Loss: Accidental deletion or corruption of files.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Authentication, authorization, encryption at rest, access control.
    • Analysis: Object storage stores large files, such as source maps and debug symbols. Strong authentication and authorization are essential. Access control lists (ACLs) should be carefully configured to prevent unauthorized access. Encryption at rest protects data confidentiality.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement strong authentication and authorization: Use IAM roles and policies to control access to the object storage.
      • Use the principle of least privilege: Grant only the necessary permissions to each user/application.
      • Enable encryption at rest: Use server-side encryption provided by the cloud provider.
      • Regularly audit access logs: Detect and respond to suspicious activity.
      • Enable versioning: This allows you to recover previous versions of files in case of accidental deletion or corruption.
      • Implement object lifecycle management: Automatically delete or archive old files to reduce storage costs and minimize the risk of data exposure.

  • SDKs (interaction with Sentry)

    • Threats:
      • Data Tampering: Malicious SDKs or compromised SDK dependencies could send manipulated data to Sentry.
      • Sensitive Data Exposure: SDKs might inadvertently send sensitive data (e.g., PII, API keys) to Sentry.
      • Denial of Service: Malicious SDKs could flood Sentry with events.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Secure communication (TLS), data sanitization, minimal data collection.
    • Analysis: The SDKs are the primary source of data for Sentry. Secure communication (TLS) is essential. SDKs should be designed to minimize the collection of sensitive data. Data sanitization on the server-side (Relay and Post-Process Workers) is crucial.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Enforce TLS for all communication between SDKs and Sentry: Use strong TLS configurations.
      • Provide clear documentation and guidelines for SDK usage: Educate developers on how to avoid sending sensitive data.
      • Implement data scrubbing and filtering on the server-side: Remove or redact sensitive data before storing it.
      • Regularly update SDK dependencies: Address security vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
      • Monitor SDK usage and event volume: Detect and respond to potential abuse.
      • Provide mechanisms for users to control data collection: Allow users to opt-out of sending certain types of data.

  • Build Process

    • Threats:
      • Vulnerable Dependencies: Using outdated or vulnerable third-party libraries.
      • Compromised Build Tools: Attackers could compromise build tools to inject malicious code.
      • Insufficient Code Signing: Lack of code signing could allow attackers to distribute modified versions of Sentry.
    • Inferred Security Controls: SAST, SCA, container scanning, dependency management.
    • Analysis: A secure build process is crucial to prevent the introduction of vulnerabilities. SAST, SCA, and container scanning are essential. Dependency management tools should be used to track and update dependencies.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use SAST tools to scan the codebase for vulnerabilities: Integrate SAST into the CI/CD pipeline.
      • Use SCA tools to identify vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies: Regularly scan dependencies and update them as needed.
      • Scan container images for vulnerabilities: Use container scanning tools to identify and address vulnerabilities in container images.
      • Use a secure build environment: Protect build servers and tools from unauthorized access.
      • Implement code signing: Sign all released artifacts to ensure their integrity.
      • Regularly review and update the build process: Ensure it remains secure and efficient.

  • Deployment Model (SaaS focus)

    • Threats:
      • Cloud Provider Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in the underlying cloud infrastructure.
      • Misconfigured Cloud Resources: Misconfigured security groups, IAM policies, or other cloud resources could expose Sentry to attacks.
      • Insider Threats: Malicious or negligent employees with access to Sentry's infrastructure.
    • Inferred Security Controls: Cloud provider security controls, network security, access control, DDoS protection, WAF integration.
    • Analysis: Sentry's SaaS deployment relies heavily on the security of the underlying cloud provider. Proper configuration of cloud resources is crucial. Strong access control and monitoring are essential to mitigate insider threats.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Choose a reputable cloud provider with a strong security track record: Evaluate the provider's security certifications and compliance posture.
      • Follow the principle of least privilege when configuring cloud resources: Grant only the necessary permissions to each user/service.
      • Use infrastructure-as-code (IaC) to manage cloud resources: This ensures consistency and reduces the risk of misconfiguration.
      • Regularly audit cloud resource configurations: Use automated tools and manual reviews to identify and address misconfigurations.
      • Implement strong access control and monitoring: Restrict access to sensitive systems and monitor user activity.
      • Implement a robust incident response plan: Be prepared to respond to security incidents quickly and effectively.
      • Use a WAF to protect against web application attacks: Configure the WAF to block common attacks and malicious traffic.
      • Implement DDoS protection: Use cloud provider services or third-party solutions to mitigate DDoS attacks.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Summary and Prioritization)

The following table summarizes the key mitigation strategies, prioritized based on their impact and feasibility:

Priority Mitigation Strategy Component(s) Description
High Enforce a strict Content Security Policy (CSP) Web Application (UI) This is the most critical mitigation for XSS, a very common web vulnerability.
High Use parameterized queries or ORM to prevent SQL injection API, PostgreSQL, Post-Process Workers This is the most important mitigation for SQL injection, a critical vulnerability that can lead to data breaches.
High Implement robust input validation for all API requests API, Relay This is crucial to prevent a wide range of vulnerabilities, including injection attacks, buffer overflows, and data corruption.
High Implement strong API key management API Securely store, rotate, and monitor API keys to prevent unauthorized access to the API.
High Enforce rate limiting API, Relay Limit the number of requests per user/IP address to prevent DoS attacks.
High Enforce TLS encryption for all communication All components communicating over a network Protect data in transit and prevent MitM attacks. Use strong TLS configurations and regularly update certificates.
High Implement strong authentication and authorization All components Use strong passwords, rotate credentials regularly, and implement least privilege access. Consider using MFA for user accounts and service accounts.
High Use SAST, SCA, and container scanning tools Build Process Integrate these tools into the CI/CD pipeline to identify and address vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle.
High Follow the principle of least privilege when configuring cloud resources (SaaS) Deployment Model (SaaS) Grant only the necessary permissions to each user/service.
Medium Implement robust CSRF protection Web Application (UI) Use anti-CSRF tokens and ensure they are properly validated.
Medium Ensure secure session management Web Application (UI) Use HTTP-only and secure cookies, implement session timeouts, and protect against session fixation.
Medium Implement proper error handling API, Post-Process Workers Avoid exposing sensitive information in error messages.
Medium Use an API gateway API An API gateway can provide centralized security enforcement.
Medium Regularly audit the UI, API, and databases for vulnerabilities Web Application (UI), API, Databases Use automated scanners and manual code review.
Medium Implement data scrubbing and filtering on the server-side Relay, Post-Process Workers Remove or redact sensitive data before storing it.
Medium Regularly update SDK dependencies SDKs Address security vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
Medium Implement a robust database monitoring and alerting system Databases Detect and respond to performance issues and potential security threats.
Medium Use infrastructure-as-code (IaC) to manage cloud resources (SaaS) Deployment Model (SaaS) This ensures consistency and reduces the risk of misconfiguration.
Medium Implement a robust incident response plan All Be prepared to respond to security incidents quickly and effectively.
Low Consider using a dedicated network for communication between SDKs and Relay Relay This can improve security and performance.
Low Enable versioning for object storage Object Storage This allows you to recover previous versions of files in case of accidental deletion or corruption.
Low Implement object lifecycle management Object Storage Automatically delete or archive old files to reduce storage costs and minimize the risk of data exposure.
Low Implement code signing Build Process Sign all released artifacts to ensure their integrity.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of Sentry's security considerations, potential vulnerabilities, and actionable mitigation strategies. It addresses the questions and assumptions raised in the design review and offers concrete steps to enhance Sentry's security posture. The prioritization of mitigation strategies helps focus efforts on the most critical areas. This analysis is based on inferences and best practices; a direct code review and access to internal documentation would further refine these recommendations.