Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
92 lines (77 loc) · 7.25 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

92 lines (77 loc) · 7.25 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for google/jax

Attack Surface: JIT Compiler Vulnerabilities (XLA)

  • Description: Bugs or security flaws within the XLA compiler, which JAX uses for Just-In-Time compilation, can be exploited.
  • JAX Contribution: JAX relies on XLA for performance optimization, making XLA vulnerabilities directly impactful.
  • Example: A crafted JAX program with specific input data triggers a buffer overflow in XLA during compilation, leading to a crash or potentially code execution.
  • Impact: Denial of Service, Information Disclosure, Memory Corruption, Potential Code Execution.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep JAX and XLA updated to the latest versions to benefit from security patches.
    • Monitor security advisories related to JAX and XLA.
    • For advanced users/JAX developers: Employ fuzzing to identify potential XLA vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Resource Exhaustion during JIT Compilation

  • Description: Malicious inputs can cause excessively long or resource-intensive JIT compilation, leading to Denial of Service.
  • JAX Contribution: JAX's JIT compilation process can be computationally expensive, and user-controlled inputs triggering compilation can be exploited.
  • Example: An attacker sends a specially crafted input to a JAX application that triggers JIT compilation of a very large or complex function, consuming excessive server resources.
  • Impact: Denial of Service.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement strict input validation and sanitization before JAX computations. Limit input complexity.
    • Set timeouts for JIT compilation processes to prevent indefinite resource consumption.
    • Enforce resource limits (CPU, memory) for JAX application processes.
    • Pre-compile JAX functions ahead-of-time where possible to avoid runtime compilation overhead.

Attack Surface: Custom Operation Vulnerabilities (C++/CUDA)

  • Description: Security flaws in user-defined custom operations written in C++ or CUDA can introduce vulnerabilities.
  • JAX Contribution: JAX allows extending functionality with custom operations, and their security is the developer's responsibility.
  • Example: A custom C++ operation for data processing has a buffer overflow. Processing malicious data triggers the overflow, potentially leading to code execution.
  • Impact: Memory Corruption, Code Execution, Denial of Service, Information Disclosure.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Apply secure coding practices for custom C++/CUDA operations, including input validation and careful memory management.
    • Thoroughly test and code review custom operations for security vulnerabilities.
    • Consider sandboxing or isolating custom operations to limit the impact of vulnerabilities.
    • Conduct security audits of custom operations, especially those handling sensitive data.

Attack Surface: Insecure Deserialization of JAX Objects

  • Description: Deserializing JAX objects from untrusted sources using insecure methods (like pickle) can lead to arbitrary code execution.
  • JAX Contribution: While JAX doesn't enforce serialization, developers might use insecure Python methods like pickle.
  • Example: An attacker provides a serialized JAX model (using pickle) containing malicious code. Deserializing this model executes the malicious code.
  • Impact: Arbitrary Code Execution.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Absolutely avoid pickle for untrusted data.
    • Use secure serialization formats like Protocol Buffers or FlatBuffers with validation.
    • Implement digital signatures and integrity checks for serialized JAX objects.
    • Restrict deserialization to JAX objects from trusted and verified sources only.

Attack Surface: Model Poisoning via Deserialization

  • Description: Loading JAX models from untrusted sources can lead to "poisoned" models that behave maliciously.
  • JAX Contribution: JAX applications often load and use pre-trained models, making them vulnerable if model sources are untrusted.
  • Example: An attacker provides a seemingly legitimate JAX model that is poisoned to misclassify specific inputs or leak data when processing certain inputs.
  • Impact: Data Integrity Compromise, Information Disclosure, Backdoor Access, Application Malfunction.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Load JAX models only from trusted and reputable sources. Verify model provenance.
    • Thoroughly test loaded models with diverse inputs to detect malicious behavior.
    • Implement input sanitization and anomaly detection to mitigate attacks even with poisoned models.
    • Consider model sandboxing in highly sensitive environments.

Attack Surface: Distributed JAX Communication Channel Security

  • Description: In distributed JAX setups, insecure communication channels between processes or machines can be exploited.
  • JAX Contribution: Distributed JAX requires inter-node communication, which becomes an attack surface if not secured.
  • Example: In a distributed JAX training setup, unencrypted communication allows an attacker to intercept training data or modify computations.
  • Impact: Data Interception, Data Modification, Unauthorized Access, Man-in-the-Middle Attacks.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Encrypt communication channels between distributed JAX processes (e.g., using TLS/SSL).
    • Implement authentication and authorization for distributed JAX computations and nodes.
    • Use network segmentation to isolate distributed JAX components.
    • Follow secure network configuration best practices.

Attack Surface: Unsafe Use of jax.pure_callback and Similar APIs

  • Description: Misusing JAX APIs like jax.pure_callback to interact with Python code from JIT-compiled functions, especially with user-controlled data, can introduce vulnerabilities.
  • JAX Contribution: JAX provides jax.pure_callback for Python interoperability, but misuse can create security risks at the JIT boundary.
  • Example: A JAX application uses jax.pure_callback to execute a Python function processing user-provided strings without sanitization, potentially leading to command injection.
  • Impact: Code Execution, Data Manipulation, Denial of Service.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Minimize the use of jax.pure_callback with untrusted data.
    • Rigorous sanitize and validate any user-provided data passed to Python callback functions.
    • Ensure Python callback functions are secure and do not introduce vulnerabilities.
    • Run Python callback functions with the principle of least privilege.