Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (42 loc) · 4.07 KB

File metadata and controls

49 lines (42 loc) · 4.07 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for google/jax

  • Description: Attackers exploit limitations of floating-point arithmetic within JAX computations to cause incorrect results, denial of service, or potentially (though less likely) information leakage.
    • JAX Contribution: JAX's core functionality is numerical computation, making it inherently susceptible. JAX's performance and ability to handle large computations can amplify the impact of these exploits.
    • Example: An attacker provides a carefully crafted, near-boundary input to a JAX-based function, causing a NaN to propagate and corrupt the output.
    • Impact:
      • Denial of Service (DoS)
      • Incorrect results/predictions
      • Potential (low probability) information leakage
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Input Validation: Rigorous checks on all inputs, rejecting values outside expected bounds or of incorrect data types. This is the most important mitigation.
      • NaN/Inf Checks: Explicitly check for and handle NaN and Inf values within the JAX code. Implement error handling or fallback mechanisms.
      • Higher Precision (where feasible): Use float64 instead of float32 when numerical stability is critical and performance allows.
      • Robustness Testing: Extensive testing with edge cases, boundary values, and potentially problematic inputs.

Attack Surface: Predictable Randomness

  • Description: Attackers exploit predictable pseudo-random number generation (PRNG) in JAX if the seed is not managed securely or is reused inappropriately.
    • JAX Contribution: JAX provides a deterministic PRNG. The vulnerability arises from misuse of this PRNG, not a flaw in the PRNG itself.
    • Example: An attacker discovers a predictable or reused seed in a JAX-based application, allowing them to predict the "random" numbers and compromise a security feature.
    • Impact:
      • Compromised security mechanisms relying on randomness.
      • Loss of confidentiality or integrity.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Cryptographically Secure Seed Generation: Use a CSPRNG (from a separate cryptographic library, not JAX) to generate the initial seed.
      • Secure Seed Storage: Protect the seed from unauthorized access. Never hardcode seeds.
      • jax.random.split: Use jax.random.split to generate independent PRNG keys for different computations and avoid seed reuse.
      • Avoid JAX PRNG for Critical Security: For high-security needs, use a dedicated cryptographic library's PRNG.
  • Description: Attackers craft inputs that cause JAX's automatic differentiation to produce manipulated gradients, disrupting training or leading to incorrect model updates in machine learning contexts.
    • JAX Contribution: JAX's automatic differentiation is a core feature, and this attack directly targets that functionality.
    • Example: An attacker adds a small, imperceptible perturbation to an input, causing the gradient during backpropagation to be significantly altered, leading to a poisoned model.
    • Impact:
      • Degraded model accuracy
      • Introduction of biases
      • Model poisoning
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Gradient Clipping: Limit the magnitude of gradients during training.
      • Robust Optimization: Use optimization algorithms less susceptible to noisy gradients (e.g., Adam with momentum).
      • Adversarial Training: Train the model on adversarial examples to improve robustness.
      • Input Sanitization: Preprocess inputs to remove or mitigate potential adversarial perturbations.