Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
198 lines (149 loc) · 22.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

198 lines (149 loc) · 22.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for graphite-project/graphite-web

Mitigation Strategy: 1. Implement Strict Input Sanitization and Output Encoding for Graph Rendering within Graphite-web

  • Mitigation Strategy: Graphite-web Input Sanitization and Output Encoding for Graph Rendering

  • Description:

    1. Review Graphite-web rendering code: Developers need to audit the Python code within Graphite-web responsible for generating graphs (likely within modules handling graph requests and rendering logic).
    2. Identify vulnerable input points: Pinpoint all locations in the code where user-provided parameters (e.g., from URL parameters, API requests) are used to construct graph queries, rendering commands, or are directly reflected in the output (SVG, HTML).
    3. Implement sanitization functions within Graphite-web: Develop and integrate sanitization functions within the Graphite-web codebase to process user inputs before they are used in rendering or output generation. This should include:
      • Whitelisting within Graphite-web: In the Python code, implement checks to ensure input parameters conform to allowed patterns (e.g., metric names, function names). Reject invalid inputs within the application logic.
      • Escaping within Graphite-web: Use Python's built-in escaping functions or libraries (like html.escape or libraries for SVG/XML escaping if applicable) within the Graphite-web code to sanitize outputs before rendering.
    4. Context-aware output encoding in Graphite-web: Ensure that output encoding is context-aware. If generating HTML, use HTML encoding. If generating SVG, use appropriate SVG/XML encoding. This encoding should be applied within the Graphite-web rendering logic.
    5. Unit and integration testing: Write unit tests to verify sanitization and encoding functions. Perform integration tests to ensure that sanitization is applied correctly throughout the graph rendering process in Graphite-web.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - High Severity: Prevents XSS vulnerabilities arising from unsanitized user inputs used in graph rendering within Graphite-web.

  • Impact:

    • XSS - Significantly reduces risk: By sanitizing inputs and encoding outputs directly within Graphite-web, the application becomes much more resilient to XSS attacks related to graph rendering.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Assume partially implemented. Graphite-web likely has some basic input validation, but comprehensive sanitization and context-aware output encoding across all rendering paths might be lacking.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Likely requires a code audit of Graphite-web's rendering modules to identify all input points and ensure consistent and robust sanitization and encoding is implemented within the application code itself. May need development of new sanitization functions and integration into existing rendering workflows.

Mitigation Strategy: 2. Configure Content Security Policy (CSP) within Graphite-web or Web Server Configuration for Graphite-web

  • Mitigation Strategy: Graphite-web CSP Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Define a strict CSP policy relevant to Graphite-web: Create a CSP policy tailored to Graphite-web's resource loading requirements. Focus on restricting script sources, object sources, and other potentially dangerous resource types. Consider the specific origins Graphite-web needs to load resources from (e.g., 'self' for static assets, specific CDN for fonts if used).
    2. Implement CSP header sending:
      • Option 1: Graphite-web application level: If Graphite-web allows custom header configuration (check application settings or middleware capabilities), configure it to send the CSP header in HTTP responses. This would involve modifying Graphite-web's configuration files or potentially writing custom middleware if supported.
      • Option 2: Web server configuration (recommended): Configure the web server (e.g., Nginx, Apache) that serves Graphite-web to add the CSP header to all responses for Graphite-web's application paths. This is generally the more robust and recommended approach.
    3. Test and refine CSP for Graphite-web: Use browser developer tools and CSP reporting mechanisms to monitor CSP policy violations specifically within the context of Graphite-web. Adjust the policy to allow legitimate Graphite-web resources while maintaining security.
    4. Document CSP configuration for Graphite-web: Clearly document how to configure CSP for Graphite-web, whether at the application level or web server level, for deployment and maintenance.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) - High Severity: Reduces the impact of XSS attacks within Graphite-web by limiting the browser's ability to execute malicious scripts, even if injected.
    • Data Injection Attacks - Medium Severity: Can offer some mitigation against certain data injection attacks within the Graphite-web context.

  • Impact:

    • XSS - Significantly reduces impact: CSP provides a strong defense-in-depth layer against XSS in Graphite-web.
    • Data Injection Attacks - Moderately reduces impact: CSP can limit the scope of some data injection attacks within Graphite-web.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely not implemented by default in standard Graphite-web configurations. CSP implementation requires explicit configuration.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • CSP is likely missing. Needs to be configured either within Graphite-web's application settings (if possible) or, more commonly, at the web server level serving Graphite-web. Requires creating a suitable CSP policy for Graphite-web and documenting the configuration process.

Mitigation Strategy: 3. Control and Validate External Data Source Configurations within Graphite-web

  • Mitigation Strategy: Graphite-web External Data Source Configuration Control

  • Description:

    1. Identify Graphite-web features using external data: Determine which features or plugins within Graphite-web allow fetching data from external sources (e.g., remote Carbon instances, external APIs, databases).
    2. Implement whitelisting in Graphite-web configuration: If Graphite-web's configuration allows defining external data sources, ensure there is a mechanism to whitelist allowed domains, URLs, or source identifiers. Configure this whitelist to only include trusted and necessary external sources.
    3. Validate data source configurations in Graphite-web: Within Graphite-web's configuration parsing and data fetching logic, implement validation checks to ensure that configured external data sources are within the defined whitelist. Reject configurations pointing to unauthorized sources.
    4. Restrict features allowing arbitrary URL access in Graphite-web: If Graphite-web has features that allow users to specify arbitrary URLs for data fetching, disable these features if not essential. If required, implement strict URL validation and sanitization within Graphite-web's code to prevent manipulation.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) - High Severity: Prevents SSRF attacks originating from Graphite-web by controlling and validating external data source configurations within the application.

  • Impact:

    • SSRF - Significantly reduces risk: Whitelisting and validation of external data sources within Graphite-web are crucial for preventing SSRF vulnerabilities in the application.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely partially implemented. Graphite-web might have configuration options for data sources, but robust whitelisting and validation might be basic or missing.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • May lack comprehensive whitelisting and validation for all features in Graphite-web that interact with external data sources. Requires a review of Graphite-web's configuration and code related to external data and implementation of stricter controls within the application.

Mitigation Strategy: 4. Change Default Credentials and Harden Default Configurations of Graphite-web

  • Mitigation Strategy: Graphite-web Default Configuration Hardening

  • Description:

    1. Identify Graphite-web default accounts: Locate any default administrative accounts or user accounts created during Graphite-web installation or initial setup.
    2. Change default passwords immediately: Force users to change default passwords for all default accounts upon first login or during the installation process. Provide clear instructions on how to change passwords.
    3. Review Graphite-web default configuration files: Examine all default configuration files for Graphite-web (e.g., local_settings.py, configuration files for Carbonlink, etc.).
    4. Harden insecure default settings in Graphite-web: Modify default settings in Graphite-web to enhance security, focusing on:
      • Authentication settings: Ensure strong authentication methods are configured (if configurable within Graphite-web itself).
      • Authorization policies: Review and tighten default authorization policies within Graphite-web to follow the principle of least privilege.
      • Debug settings: Ensure debug mode is disabled by default in production configurations of Graphite-web.
      • Session security: Configure secure session management settings within Graphite-web (e.g., secure cookies, session timeouts).
    5. Provide secure default configuration templates: Create and distribute secure default configuration templates for Graphite-web to guide users towards secure deployments.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access - High Severity: Prevents unauthorized access to Graphite-web due to the use of default credentials.
    • Privilege Escalation - Medium Severity: Reduces the risk of privilege escalation through exploitation of insecure default configurations in Graphite-web.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access - Significantly reduces risk: Changing default credentials is a fundamental security step for Graphite-web.
    • Privilege Escalation - Moderately reduces risk: Hardening default configurations within Graphite-web reduces the attack surface and potential for exploitation.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Partially implemented. Users are generally expected to set up their own admin users. However, Graphite-web's default configuration files might still contain insecure default settings that need hardening.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • May lack automated enforcement of password changes for default accounts and comprehensive guidance on hardening all relevant default configurations within Graphite-web. Requires better documentation and potentially scripts or tools to assist with secure configuration.

Mitigation Strategy: 5. Disable Detailed Error Reporting in Production within Graphite-web Configuration

  • Mitigation Strategy: Graphite-web Production Error Reporting Minimization

  • Description:

    1. Configure Graphite-web error reporting level: Modify Graphite-web's configuration settings (e.g., in local_settings.py or similar) to control the level of error reporting in production environments. Set it to a minimal level that avoids exposing sensitive technical details.
    2. Disable debug mode in Graphite-web: Ensure that the debug mode setting in Graphite-web's configuration is explicitly disabled for production deployments.
    3. Implement custom error pages in Graphite-web (if feasible): If Graphite-web allows customization of error pages, create custom error pages that display generic, user-friendly messages instead of detailed technical error information.
    4. Configure secure logging in Graphite-web: Ensure Graphite-web is configured to log detailed errors securely to log files or a centralized logging system for administrator review. Restrict access to these logs through operating system permissions or access control mechanisms.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure - Medium Severity: Prevents information disclosure through verbose error messages generated by Graphite-web in production.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure - Moderately reduces risk: Minimizing error reporting in Graphite-web production environments significantly reduces the risk of information leakage.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely partially implemented. Standard production configurations might reduce verbosity, but explicit configuration to minimize error details and disable debug mode might be required.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • May require explicit configuration steps to fully minimize error reporting and ensure debug mode is disabled in Graphite-web production deployments. Needs clear documentation on how to configure error reporting levels within Graphite-web.

Mitigation Strategy: 6. Implement Rate Limiting within Graphite-web Application or Middleware

  • Mitigation Strategy: Graphite-web Application-Level Rate Limiting

  • Description:

    1. Identify resource-intensive Graphite-web endpoints: Pinpoint the specific Graphite-web endpoints (URLs, API paths) that are most resource-intensive and susceptible to DoS attacks (e.g., graph rendering endpoints, data query endpoints).
    2. Choose a rate limiting approach:
      • Option 1: Graphite-web middleware: If Graphite-web supports middleware (check its framework documentation), implement rate limiting middleware that can be applied to specific routes or globally.
      • Option 2: Application-level rate limiting: Modify Graphite-web's Python code to implement rate limiting logic directly within the application, potentially using libraries for rate limiting.
    3. Configure rate limiting rules: Define rate limiting rules based on IP address, user session, or other relevant criteria. Set appropriate limits for the number of requests allowed within a specific time window for the identified resource-intensive endpoints.
    4. Test and tune rate limiting: Test the rate limiting implementation to ensure it effectively prevents DoS attacks without impacting legitimate users. Tune the rate limits as needed based on performance testing and monitoring.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) - High Severity: Prevents DoS attacks targeting Graphite-web by limiting the rate of requests processed by the application itself.

  • Impact:

    • DoS - Significantly reduces risk: Application-level rate limiting in Graphite-web provides a defense against DoS attacks by controlling request volume at the application layer.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely not implemented by default in standard Graphite-web. Rate limiting usually requires custom implementation or integration of middleware.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Rate limiting is likely missing. Requires development and integration of rate limiting functionality into Graphite-web, either as middleware or directly within the application code.

Mitigation Strategy: 7. Enforce Strong Authentication and Robust Authorization within Graphite-web

  • Mitigation Strategy: Graphite-web Authentication and Authorization Hardening

  • Description:

    1. Review Graphite-web authentication mechanisms: Examine the authentication methods supported by Graphite-web (e.g., username/password, integration with external authentication providers).
    2. Enforce strong password policies in Graphite-web: If Graphite-web manages user accounts internally, enforce strong password complexity requirements and password rotation policies. Configure these policies within Graphite-web's settings if possible.
    3. Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for Graphite-web (if possible): Explore options for integrating MFA into Graphite-web. This might involve using plugins, extensions, or modifying the application to support MFA.
    4. Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) in Graphite-web: Ensure that Graphite-web's authorization system is based on RBAC. Define roles with specific permissions related to Graphite-web functionalities (e.g., admin, read-only user, graph editor). Assign users to roles based on their needs. Configure RBAC within Graphite-web's settings or through its user management interface.
    5. Enforce least privilege within Graphite-web: Configure Graphite-web's authorization policies to grant users only the minimum necessary permissions required for their roles.
    6. Regularly audit Graphite-web authorization policies: Periodically review and update Graphite-web's RBAC policies to ensure they remain effective and aligned with security requirements.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access - High Severity: Prevents unauthorized access to Graphite-web and its data through stronger authentication and authorization controls within the application.
    • Privilege Escalation - Medium Severity: Reduces the risk of privilege escalation within Graphite-web by enforcing RBAC and least privilege.
    • Data Breach - High Severity: Stronger authentication and authorization in Graphite-web are crucial for protecting data from unauthorized access and breaches.

  • Impact:

    • Unauthorized Access - Significantly reduces risk: Stronger authentication and authorization within Graphite-web are fundamental for access control.
    • Privilege Escalation - Moderately reduces risk: RBAC and least privilege in Graphite-web limit the impact of compromised accounts.
    • Data Breach - Significantly reduces risk: By controlling access within Graphite-web, the risk of data breaches is significantly reduced.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely partially implemented with basic username/password authentication and potentially some basic role-based access control. MFA and fine-grained RBAC might be missing or require configuration.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • MFA is likely missing. RBAC might need to be enhanced and made more granular within Graphite-web. Requires a review of Graphite-web's authentication and authorization features and implementation of stronger controls within the application.

Mitigation Strategy: 8. Regular Dependency Scanning and Vulnerability Management for Graphite-web Dependencies

  • Mitigation Strategy: Graphite-web Dependency Vulnerability Management

  • Description:

    1. Generate SBOM for Graphite-web: Create a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) specifically for Graphite-web, listing all Python dependencies (and any other dependencies) used by the application. Tools like pip freeze > requirements.txt and SCA tools can help generate this.
    2. Automate dependency scanning for Graphite-web: Integrate automated dependency scanning tools into the Graphite-web development and deployment pipeline. These tools should scan the Graphite-web SBOM and identify known vulnerabilities in its dependencies.
    3. Establish a vulnerability management process for Graphite-web dependencies: Define a process specifically for managing vulnerabilities found in Graphite-web's dependencies. This includes:
      • Vulnerability tracking for Graphite-web: Track identified vulnerabilities in Graphite-web's dependencies.
      • Prioritization for Graphite-web: Prioritize vulnerabilities based on severity and exploitability in the context of Graphite-web.
      • Remediation for Graphite-web: Apply patches, update Graphite-web dependencies, or implement workarounds to remediate vulnerabilities in Graphite-web.
      • Verification for Graphite-web: Verify that remediations are effective and do not break Graphite-web functionality.
    4. Regularly update Graphite-web dependencies: Establish a schedule for regularly updating Graphite-web's dependencies to the latest secure versions. Monitor security advisories related to Graphite-web's dependencies and apply patches promptly.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities - High Severity: Prevents attackers from exploiting known vulnerabilities in Graphite-web's Python dependencies to compromise the application or server.
    • Supply Chain Attacks - Medium Severity: Reduces the risk of supply chain attacks targeting Graphite-web through compromised dependencies.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities - Significantly reduces risk: Regular dependency scanning and patching for Graphite-web are essential for preventing exploitation of known vulnerabilities in its dependencies.
    • Supply Chain Attacks - Moderately reduces risk: Dependency management for Graphite-web helps mitigate some supply chain risks.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Likely not implemented as a standard practice for many Graphite-web deployments. Dependency scanning and vulnerability management are often security best practices that require proactive implementation for each project.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Dependency scanning, SBOM generation, and a formal vulnerability management process specifically for Graphite-web's dependencies are likely missing. Needs to be implemented by integrating SCA tools into the Graphite-web development workflow and establishing a vulnerability remediation process for Graphite-web dependencies.