Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
208 lines (144 loc) · 27.4 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

208 lines (144 loc) · 27.4 KB

Deep Security Analysis of Graphite-web

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

This deep security analysis aims to identify and evaluate potential security vulnerabilities and risks associated with the Graphite-web application, based on the provided security design review and inferred architecture. The analysis will focus on key components of Graphite-web, including its web interface, API, backend services, and deployment environment, to provide actionable and tailored security recommendations. The ultimate objective is to strengthen the security posture of Graphite-web, ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the monitoring system and the data it handles.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following key components of the Graphite monitoring stack, specifically focusing on Graphite-web:

  • Graphite-web Application: Web UI (Django Application), API (REST API), and Web Server (Nginx/Apache).
  • Graphite Carbon Components: Carbon Cache, Carbon Relay, and Carbon Aggregator (insofar as they interact with Graphite-web).
  • Graphite Database: Whisper (insofar as it relates to data access from Graphite-web).
  • Containerized Deployment on Kubernetes: Kubernetes Cluster, Nodes, Namespaces, Pods, Services, Persistent Volumes.
  • Build Process: Source Code Repository, CI/CD Pipeline, Build Environment, Security Scanners, Container Registry.

The analysis will consider the security controls already in place, accepted risks, and recommended security controls outlined in the security design review. It will also address the security requirements for authentication, authorization, input validation, and cryptography.

Methodology:

This deep security analysis will employ the following methodology:

  1. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams, descriptions, and the nature of Graphite-web as a monitoring visualization tool, infer the detailed architecture, component interactions, and data flow within the system. This will involve understanding how user requests are processed, how data is retrieved from the backend, and how metrics are ingested and stored.
  2. Threat Modeling: For each key component, identify potential security threats based on common web application vulnerabilities, container security risks, and infrastructure security concerns. This will consider the OWASP Top 10, container security best practices, and Kubernetes security guidelines.
  3. Security Control Analysis: Evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls and recommended security controls in mitigating the identified threats. Assess whether the security requirements are adequately addressed by the proposed design and controls.
  4. Vulnerability Analysis: Based on the component descriptions and common vulnerability patterns, analyze potential vulnerabilities in each component, considering aspects like input validation, authentication, authorization, session management, and cryptography.
  5. Risk Assessment: Evaluate the potential business impact of identified vulnerabilities, considering the business priorities and risks outlined in the security design review.
  6. Mitigation Strategy Development: For each identified threat and vulnerability, develop specific, actionable, and tailored mitigation strategies applicable to Graphite-web and its deployment environment. These strategies will be prioritized based on risk level and feasibility.
  7. Recommendation Generation: Formulate concrete security recommendations for the development team, focusing on practical steps to enhance the security posture of Graphite-web. These recommendations will be specific to Graphite-web and its context, avoiding generic security advice.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1 Graphite-web - Web UI (Django Application)

Security Implications:

  • Web Application Vulnerabilities: As a Django application, the Web UI is susceptible to common web vulnerabilities such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), SQL Injection (if direct SQL queries are used, though Django ORM mitigates this), and insecure session management.
  • Authentication and Authorization Flaws: Weak authentication mechanisms, insufficient authorization checks, or vulnerabilities in user management can lead to unauthorized access to dashboards, graphs, and sensitive monitoring data.
  • Input Validation Issues: Improper handling of user inputs in dashboard configurations, graph queries, or other user-provided data can lead to injection attacks (e.g., XSS in dashboard names, command injection if user input is used in system commands).
  • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Django and its dependencies may contain known vulnerabilities that could be exploited if not properly managed and patched.

Threats:

  • XSS Attacks: Malicious scripts injected into dashboards or graphs could be executed in users' browsers, potentially stealing session cookies, credentials, or performing actions on behalf of the user.
  • CSRF Attacks: Attackers could trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions, such as modifying dashboards or changing settings, without their knowledge.
  • Authentication Bypass: Vulnerabilities in the authentication mechanism could allow attackers to bypass login and gain unauthorized access to the Web UI.
  • Authorization Bypass: Flaws in authorization logic could allow users to access dashboards or data they are not permitted to view or modify.
  • Session Hijacking: Insecure session management could allow attackers to steal user sessions and impersonate legitimate users.
  • Denial of Service (DoS): Vulnerabilities in the application logic or resource management could be exploited to cause the Web UI to become unavailable.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Enforce Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strict CSP to mitigate XSS attacks by controlling the sources from which the browser is allowed to load resources. Specific Action: Configure Django-CSP middleware with a restrictive policy, explicitly whitelisting trusted sources for scripts, styles, images, and other resources. Regularly review and refine the CSP as the application evolves.
  • Strengthen CSRF Protection: Ensure Django's built-in CSRF protection is enabled and correctly configured. Specific Action: Verify CSRF_COOKIE_SECURE = True and CSRF_COOKIE_HTTPONLY = True settings in settings.py for production environments. Educate developers on proper CSRF token handling in forms and AJAX requests.
  • Implement Robust Input Validation and Sanitization: Validate all user inputs on both the client-side and server-side. Sanitize user-provided data before displaying it in the UI to prevent XSS. Specific Action: Utilize Django's form validation and sanitization features. For graph queries and dashboard configurations, implement specific validation rules to restrict allowed characters and formats. Use Django's template auto-escaping to prevent XSS in templates.
  • Regular Dependency Vulnerability Scanning and Management: Regularly scan Django and its dependencies for vulnerabilities using tools like pip-audit and safety. Implement a process for promptly patching or upgrading vulnerable dependencies. Specific Action: Integrate pip-audit and safety into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically check for vulnerabilities during builds. Establish a policy for addressing identified vulnerabilities within a defined timeframe based on severity.
  • Secure Session Management: Configure Django for secure session management. Specific Action: Set SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE = True, SESSION_COOKIE_HTTPONLY = True, and SESSION_COOKIE_SAMESITE = 'Strict' in settings.py for production environments. Consider using a secure session backend like Redis or database-backed sessions.
  • Implement Rate Limiting: Protect against brute-force attacks on login forms and DoS attempts by implementing rate limiting for authentication requests and API endpoints. Specific Action: Use Django rate limiting libraries or WAF features to limit the number of requests from a single IP address within a given timeframe for login attempts and critical API endpoints.

2.2 Graphite-web - API (REST API)

Security Implications:

  • API Authentication and Authorization: Securing the REST API is crucial to prevent unauthorized access to metrics data and management functionalities. Weak or missing authentication and authorization can lead to data breaches and unauthorized modifications.
  • API Input Validation: API endpoints that accept user inputs (e.g., for querying metrics, creating dashboards) are vulnerable to injection attacks if input validation is insufficient.
  • API Rate Limiting and DoS: Publicly accessible API endpoints can be targets for DoS attacks or abuse if not properly rate-limited.
  • API Security Best Practices: Failure to adhere to secure API design principles (e.g., proper error handling, data validation, secure communication) can introduce vulnerabilities.

Threats:

  • Unauthorized Data Access: Attackers could exploit API vulnerabilities or weak authentication to gain access to sensitive monitoring data without proper authorization.
  • Data Manipulation: Unauthorized API access could allow attackers to modify dashboards, delete data, or inject malicious data, compromising data integrity.
  • API Abuse and DoS: Attackers could flood the API with requests, causing performance degradation or denial of service.
  • Injection Attacks: API endpoints accepting user input could be vulnerable to injection attacks (e.g., command injection if user input is used to construct system commands on the backend).

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Implement Strong API Authentication and Authorization: Enforce robust authentication for all API endpoints. Use appropriate authorization mechanisms to control access based on user roles and permissions. Specific Action: Implement API key authentication or OAuth 2.0 for API access. Integrate Django REST Framework's authentication and permission classes to enforce API security policies. Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning API access permissions.
  • Strict API Input Validation: Thoroughly validate all inputs to API endpoints. Define and enforce input schemas and data type validation. Specific Action: Use Django REST Framework serializers for input validation and data sanitization. Implement specific validation rules for API parameters to prevent injection attacks and ensure data integrity.
  • API Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting for API endpoints to prevent abuse and DoS attacks. Specific Action: Utilize Django rate limiting libraries or WAF features to limit the number of requests to API endpoints based on IP address or API key. Configure rate limits based on expected API usage patterns and security considerations.
  • Secure API Design Principles: Follow secure API design principles, including proper error handling (avoiding exposing sensitive information in error messages), secure data serialization (using JSON or other secure formats), and secure communication (HTTPS). Specific Action: Review API design against OWASP API Security Top 10. Implement detailed API documentation that includes security considerations. Conduct API security testing as part of the development lifecycle.

2.3 Graphite-web - Web Server (Nginx/Apache)

Security Implications:

  • Web Server Misconfiguration: Misconfigured web servers can introduce vulnerabilities, such as exposing sensitive files, allowing directory listing, or using insecure TLS/SSL configurations.
  • Web Server Vulnerabilities: Web server software itself may contain vulnerabilities that need to be patched regularly.
  • DoS Attacks: Web servers are often the first point of contact for external requests and can be targets for DoS attacks.

Threats:

  • Information Disclosure: Web server misconfigurations could expose sensitive files (e.g., configuration files, source code) or directory listings, revealing information about the application and infrastructure.
  • Web Server Exploitation: Vulnerabilities in the web server software could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to the server or compromise the application.
  • DoS Attacks: Attackers could overwhelm the web server with requests, causing it to become unresponsive and denying service to legitimate users.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Web Server Hardening: Harden the web server configuration by disabling unnecessary modules, setting appropriate file permissions, and restricting access to sensitive files. Specific Action: Follow web server hardening guides (e.g., CIS benchmarks for Nginx/Apache). Disable directory listing, remove default pages, and restrict access to administrative interfaces.
  • Regular Web Server Patching: Keep the web server software up-to-date with the latest security patches to address known vulnerabilities. Specific Action: Implement a process for regularly patching the web server software. Automate patching where possible and monitor security advisories for the web server software.
  • Secure TLS/SSL Configuration: Ensure HTTPS is properly configured with strong TLS/SSL settings. Specific Action: Use strong cipher suites, disable insecure protocols (SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1), and enable HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security). Regularly renew TLS/SSL certificates and use tools like SSL Labs SSL Test to verify configuration.
  • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Implement a WAF in front of the web server to protect against common web attacks, such as SQL injection, XSS, and DDoS attacks. Specific Action: Deploy and configure a WAF (cloud-based or on-premise) to filter malicious traffic and protect against OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities. Regularly update WAF rules and monitor WAF logs for suspicious activity.

2.4 Graphite Carbon Components (Cache, Relay, Aggregator)

Security Implications:

  • Metrics Ingestion Access Control: Carbon components receive metrics data from external systems. Lack of access control on the metrics ingestion endpoints could allow unauthorized systems to send metrics, potentially leading to data pollution or DoS attacks.
  • Inter-Component Communication Security: Communication between Carbon components and between Carbon and Whisper should be secured to prevent eavesdropping or tampering.
  • Configuration Security: Insecure configuration of Carbon components could lead to vulnerabilities or misbehavior.

Threats:

  • Unauthorized Metrics Injection: Attackers could send malicious or spurious metrics data to Carbon components, polluting the monitoring data and potentially disrupting monitoring accuracy.
  • Metrics Data Tampering: If inter-component communication is not secured, attackers could intercept and modify metrics data in transit.
  • Configuration Exploitation: Misconfigurations in Carbon components could be exploited to gain unauthorized access or disrupt service.
  • DoS Attacks on Metrics Ingestion: Attackers could flood Carbon components with metrics data, causing performance degradation or denial of service.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Implement Access Control for Metrics Ingestion: Implement authentication and authorization for systems sending metrics to Carbon components. Specific Action: Configure Carbon to require authentication for metrics ingestion. Use API keys or mutual TLS authentication for external monitoring systems sending metrics. Implement IP address whitelisting if appropriate.
  • Secure Inter-Component Communication: Secure communication channels between Carbon components and between Carbon and Whisper. Specific Action: If possible, use TLS encryption for communication between Carbon components. Consider network segmentation and firewalls to restrict network access between components.
  • Secure Configuration Management: Securely manage the configuration of Carbon components. Specific Action: Store configuration files securely with appropriate access controls. Regularly review and audit Carbon configurations for security best practices. Use configuration management tools to ensure consistent and secure configurations across environments.
  • Rate Limiting for Metrics Ingestion: Implement rate limiting for metrics ingestion to protect against DoS attacks. Specific Action: Configure Carbon to limit the rate of incoming metrics from individual sources or in total. Monitor metrics ingestion rates and adjust rate limits as needed.

2.5 Graphite Database - Whisper

Security Implications:

  • Data at Rest Security: Whisper stores time-series data on disk. Lack of data at rest encryption could expose sensitive monitoring data if the storage is compromised.
  • Access Control to Data Files: Insufficient access control to Whisper data files could allow unauthorized access to the raw metrics data.
  • Data Integrity: Ensuring the integrity of the stored metrics data is crucial for reliable monitoring.

Threats:

  • Data Breach (Data at Rest): If the storage containing Whisper data files is compromised (e.g., physical theft, cloud storage breach), unencrypted data could be exposed.
  • Unauthorized Data Access (File System): Attackers gaining access to the file system could directly read Whisper data files if file permissions are not properly configured.
  • Data Corruption: Data corruption in Whisper files could lead to inaccurate monitoring data and flawed decision-making.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Data Encryption at Rest: Implement encryption for Whisper data at rest. Specific Action: Utilize disk encryption features provided by the underlying operating system or cloud storage provider to encrypt the volume containing Whisper data files. Evaluate performance impact of encryption and choose appropriate encryption methods.
  • File System Access Control: Configure file system permissions to restrict access to Whisper data files to only authorized processes and users. Specific Action: Ensure that only the Carbon components and necessary system processes have read and write access to Whisper data directories. Implement strict file permissions and ownership for Whisper data files and directories.
  • Data Integrity Monitoring: Implement mechanisms to monitor the integrity of Whisper data files. Specific Action: Consider using file integrity monitoring tools to detect unauthorized modifications to Whisper data files. Implement backup and recovery procedures to restore data in case of corruption or loss.

2.6 Kubernetes Deployment

Security Implications:

  • Kubernetes Cluster Security: The security of the underlying Kubernetes cluster is paramount. Misconfigured or vulnerable Kubernetes clusters can expose the entire application to risks.
  • Network Policies: Lack of network policies can allow unrestricted network traffic within the Kubernetes cluster, increasing the attack surface.
  • Pod Security Policies/Admission Controllers: Insufficiently restrictive pod security policies or admission controllers can allow containers to run with excessive privileges, increasing the risk of container breakouts.
  • Container Security: Vulnerabilities in container images or insecure container configurations can be exploited to compromise the application.
  • Secrets Management: Improper handling of secrets (e.g., API keys, database credentials) in Kubernetes can lead to credential leaks.

Threats:

  • Kubernetes Cluster Compromise: Attackers could exploit vulnerabilities in the Kubernetes control plane or worker nodes to gain control of the entire cluster and all deployed applications.
  • Lateral Movement: Lack of network policies could allow attackers to easily move laterally within the cluster if they compromise a single container.
  • Container Breakout: Vulnerable containers or misconfigurations could allow attackers to escape the container and gain access to the underlying node.
  • Credential Theft: Secrets stored insecurely in Kubernetes could be stolen by attackers, leading to unauthorized access to other systems.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Kubernetes Cluster Hardening: Harden the Kubernetes cluster by following security best practices. Specific Action: Implement Kubernetes security hardening guidelines (e.g., CIS Kubernetes Benchmark). Secure the API server, etcd, kubelet, and other Kubernetes components. Regularly update Kubernetes to the latest secure versions.
  • Implement Network Policies: Enforce network policies to restrict network traffic between pods and namespaces, implementing micro-segmentation. Specific Action: Define network policies to allow only necessary network communication between Graphite-web pods, Carbon pods, and Whisper storage. Deny all other network traffic by default.
  • Enforce Pod Security Policies/Admission Controllers: Use pod security policies or admission controllers to restrict container capabilities and enforce security best practices for pod deployments. Specific Action: Implement Pod Security Admission (or Pod Security Policies if still in use) to restrict container privileges, prevent privileged containers, and enforce security contexts.
  • Container Security Scanning and Hardening: Scan container images for vulnerabilities and harden container configurations. Specific Action: Integrate container image scanning into the CI/CD pipeline. Use minimal base images, remove unnecessary tools from containers, and run containers as non-root users.
  • Secure Secrets Management: Use Kubernetes Secrets to securely manage sensitive information. Specific Action: Use Kubernetes Secrets to store API keys, database credentials, and other sensitive data. Consider using external secrets management solutions (e.g., HashiCorp Vault) for enhanced secret security and rotation.
  • Regular Kubernetes Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the Kubernetes cluster configuration and deployments. Specific Action: Perform periodic security assessments of the Kubernetes cluster using security scanning tools and manual reviews. Review Kubernetes audit logs for suspicious activity.

2.7 Build Process

Security Implications:

  • Source Code Repository Security: Compromised source code repositories can lead to the injection of malicious code into the application.
  • CI/CD Pipeline Security: Insecure CI/CD pipelines can be exploited to inject vulnerabilities into the build process or deploy compromised code.
  • Build Environment Security: Vulnerable build environments can be compromised and used to inject malicious code or steal secrets.
  • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies can be introduced during the build process if not properly managed.
  • Container Image Security: Vulnerabilities in container images built during the build process can be deployed to production.

Threats:

  • Supply Chain Attacks: Attackers could compromise the build process to inject malicious code into the application or container images.
  • Credential Leaks in CI/CD: Secrets stored insecurely in the CI/CD pipeline could be leaked, leading to unauthorized access.
  • Compromised Build Environment: Attackers could compromise the build environment to inject malicious code or steal secrets.
  • Vulnerable Dependencies: The application could be built with vulnerable third-party dependencies if dependency scanning is not performed.
  • Vulnerable Container Images: Vulnerable container images could be deployed to production if container image scanning is not performed.

Mitigation Strategies:

  • Secure Source Code Repository: Secure the source code repository with access controls, branch protection, and audit logging. Specific Action: Enforce strong authentication and authorization for access to the source code repository. Enable branch protection rules to prevent unauthorized code changes. Enable audit logging and monitor repository activity.
  • CI/CD Pipeline Security Hardening: Harden the CI/CD pipeline by following security best practices. Specific Action: Secure CI/CD workflow definitions, use secure secret management practices within the CI/CD system, and restrict access to the CI/CD system. Implement principle of least privilege for CI/CD service accounts.
  • Secure Build Environment: Harden the build environment and minimize the tools installed. Specific Action: Use hardened build environments with minimal tools installed. Isolate build processes and restrict network access from the build environment. Regularly patch the build environment operating system and tools.
  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST): Integrate SAST tools into the build pipeline to automatically identify potential security vulnerabilities in the source code. Specific Action: Integrate a SAST tool (e.g., SonarQube, Bandit) into the CI/CD pipeline to perform static code analysis. Configure SAST tools to break the build on critical vulnerabilities.
  • Dependency Scanning: Integrate dependency scanning tools into the build pipeline to identify known vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies. Specific Action: Integrate pip-audit and safety into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically check for dependency vulnerabilities. Configure dependency scanning to break the build on critical vulnerabilities.
  • Container Image Scanning: Integrate container image scanning into the build pipeline to scan container images for vulnerabilities before publishing to the registry. Specific Action: Integrate a container image scanning tool (e.g., Trivy, Clair) into the CI/CD pipeline to scan container images for vulnerabilities. Configure image scanning to prevent vulnerable images from being published to the registry.
  • Secure Container Registry: Secure the container registry with access control and vulnerability scanning. Specific Action: Implement access control to the container registry to restrict who can push and pull images. Enable vulnerability scanning in the container registry to continuously monitor images for vulnerabilities.

3. Conclusion

This deep security analysis of Graphite-web, based on the provided security design review, has identified several key security considerations across its components, deployment environment, and build process. While Graphite-web benefits from the security features of the Django framework and the assumed use of HTTPS, there are still significant areas that require focused attention to enhance its security posture.

The analysis highlights the importance of implementing robust authentication and authorization mechanisms, rigorous input validation, and proactive vulnerability management throughout the application lifecycle. Securing the Kubernetes deployment environment and the CI/CD pipeline is also critical to prevent infrastructure-level attacks and supply chain compromises.

By implementing the tailored mitigation strategies outlined for each component, the development team can significantly reduce the identified risks and strengthen the overall security of the Graphite-web monitoring system. Continuous security monitoring, regular vulnerability assessments, and proactive security updates are essential to maintain a strong security posture over time and adapt to evolving threats. The recommendations provided are actionable and specific to Graphite-web, aiming to guide the development team in building and maintaining a secure and reliable monitoring solution.