Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
81 lines (70 loc) · 14.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

81 lines (70 loc) · 14.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for keras-team/keras

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Model Storage and Access Control

  • Description:
    1. Dedicated Storage Location for Keras Models: Store serialized Keras model files (e.g., .h5, SavedModel format) in a dedicated directory or secure storage service, separate from publicly accessible web server directories. This prevents direct access via web URLs.
    2. Restrict File System Permissions for Keras Model Files: Configure file system permissions on the model storage location to restrict access to Keras model files. Only allow read access to the application service account that needs to load the Keras model and write access to authorized deployment processes. Use permissions like 600 or 640 to limit access.
    3. Principle of Least Privilege for Keras Model Access: Apply the principle of least privilege. Grant only the necessary permissions to users and services that interact with Keras model files. Avoid overly permissive permissions that could allow unauthorized modification or copying of Keras models.
    4. Access Control Lists (ACLs) or IAM for Keras Model Storage (Cloud Environments): Implement Access Control Lists (ACLs) or Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies if using cloud storage or network file systems to further control access to Keras models based on user roles or service accounts. This is especially important in shared cloud environments.
    5. Encryption at Rest for Keras Models (Optional but Recommended): Consider encrypting Keras model files at rest using disk encryption or storage service encryption features, especially if storing sensitive models or operating in a high-security environment. This protects Keras models even if storage is compromised.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Unauthorized Keras Model Access (Medium Severity) - Unauthorized access to Keras model files could lead to model theft, reverse engineering of the Keras model architecture and potentially sensitive training data insights, or malicious modification of the Keras model.
      • Keras Model Tampering (Medium to High Severity) - Malicious actors could modify serialized Keras model files to inject backdoors into the Keras model, alter its behavior, or compromise its integrity, leading to manipulated predictions or data breaches when the tampered Keras model is loaded and used.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized Keras Model Access: Medium - Reduces the risk of unauthorized access to Keras models by limiting who can read Keras model files.
      • Keras Model Tampering: Medium - Reduces the risk of tampering with Keras models by limiting who can write or modify Keras model files. Encryption at rest further enhances this for stored Keras models.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Keras models are stored in a dedicated directory outside the web root (/app/models). File system permissions are set to restrict access to the web server user for Keras model files.
    • Missing Implementation: More granular access control using ACLs or IAM for Keras model storage is not implemented. Encryption at rest for Keras model files is not currently enabled. Formal documentation of access control policies for Keras models is missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate Keras Model Input During Deserialization

  • Description:
    1. Checksum Generation for Keras Models: When saving a Keras model using Keras serialization methods (e.g., model.save()), generate a cryptographic checksum (e.g., SHA256 hash) of the serialized Keras model file and store it securely alongside the Keras model file (e.g., in a separate metadata file or database).
    2. Checksum Verification on Keras Model Load: Before loading a Keras model from a file using Keras loading functions (e.g., keras.models.load_model()), recalculate the checksum of the Keras model file and compare it to the stored checksum.
    3. Reject Invalid Keras Models Based on Checksum: If the calculated checksum does not match the stored checksum, reject loading the Keras model and log an error. This indicates potential tampering or corruption of the Keras model file after it was saved.
    4. Trusted Source Verification for Keras Models (If Applicable): If Keras models are loaded from external sources, verify the source's trustworthiness. Use secure channels (HTTPS) for downloading Keras models and, if possible, verify digital signatures provided by the Keras model source to ensure the Keras model's integrity and authenticity.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Malicious Keras Model Loading (High Severity) - Loading a tampered or malicious Keras model could lead to arbitrary code execution within the application if the Keras loading process itself has vulnerabilities (less likely in Keras itself, but possible in underlying libraries or custom loading code), data breaches if the Keras model is designed to exfiltrate data upon loading, or denial of service if the malicious Keras model is designed to crash the application upon loading. More commonly, a malicious Keras model would simply produce incorrect or biased predictions.
      • Keras Model Corruption (Low to Medium Severity) - Loading a corrupted Keras model file could lead to application errors when Keras attempts to interpret the corrupted data, unpredictable behavior of the Keras model, or incorrect predictions due to data loss within the Keras model structure.
    • Impact:
      • Malicious Keras Model Loading: High - Significantly reduces the risk of loading malicious Keras models by verifying integrity and detecting tampering before Keras processes the model file.
      • Keras Model Corruption: Medium - Reduces the risk of loading corrupted Keras models and ensures the integrity of the loaded Keras model structure.
    • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. Keras model loading currently directly reads the model file without any integrity checks.
    • Missing Implementation: Checksum generation and storage during Keras model saving, checksum verification before Keras model loading, and handling of checksum mismatch scenarios are all missing for Keras models.

Mitigation Strategy: Be Cautious with Untrusted Keras Model Sources

  • Description:
    1. Prioritize Trusted Keras Model Sources: Only use Keras models trained and provided by reputable and vetted sources that you trust. Avoid using pre-trained Keras models from unknown or untrusted online repositories or individuals.
    2. Verify Origin of Pre-trained Keras Models: If using pre-trained Keras models, rigorously verify their origin and the reputation of the source. Check for official sources from Keras, TensorFlow, or well-known research institutions.
    3. Retrain Pre-trained Keras Models on Trusted Data (If Feasible): If using pre-trained Keras models from external sources, consider retraining them on your own trusted and validated training data if computationally feasible. This reduces reliance on the original training process and potentially mitigates backdoors introduced during the original training.
    4. Code Review and Inspect Keras Model Architectures from Untrusted Sources: If you must use a Keras model from an untrusted source, carefully review the Keras model architecture definition and any associated code for suspicious layers, functions, or configurations that could indicate malicious intent.
    5. Sandboxed Environment for Untrusted Keras Model Evaluation (If Necessary): If you need to evaluate a Keras model from an untrusted source, consider doing so in a sandboxed or isolated environment to limit the potential impact of any malicious code embedded within the Keras model or its loading process.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Backdoored Keras Models (High Severity) - Untrusted Keras models could be intentionally backdoored during training or model creation to exhibit specific malicious behavior under certain conditions, potentially leading to targeted misclassification, data exfiltration, or unauthorized access when used in your application.
      • Malicious Code in Keras Models (Medium to High Severity) - While less common in standard Keras model serialization, there's a theoretical risk of malicious code being injected into custom Keras layers or functions if loading processes are not carefully controlled, potentially leading to code execution when the Keras model is loaded or used.
    • Impact:
      • Backdoored Keras Models: High - Significantly reduces the risk of using backdoored Keras models by emphasizing trusted sources and retraining options.
      • Malicious Code in Keras Models: Medium - Reduces the risk of malicious code execution by promoting source verification and code inspection, especially for custom Keras components.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Developers are generally advised to use models from trusted sources, but formal verification processes are not in place.
    • Missing Implementation: Formal policies and procedures for verifying the origin and trustworthiness of Keras models, especially pre-trained models, are missing. Code review processes specifically focused on inspecting Keras model architectures from external sources are not defined. Sandboxed evaluation environments for untrusted Keras models are not established.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Injection Prevention for Custom Keras Layers/Functions

  • Description:
    1. Minimize or Eliminate User-Provided Custom Keras Code: Minimize or completely eliminate the need for users to provide custom Keras layers, functions, or model definitions within your application. Rely on standard Keras layers and functionalities whenever possible.
    2. Strict Input Validation and Sanitization for Custom Keras Code Inputs (If Unavoidable): If accepting custom Keras code inputs is unavoidable, implement extremely strict input validation and sanitization. Treat all user-provided code as untrusted. Validate code syntax, restrict allowed Keras operations to a safe subset, and sanitize against code injection attempts.
    3. Sandboxed Execution Environment for Custom Keras Code (If Necessary): If you must execute user-provided custom Keras code, execute it within a securely sandboxed environment with limited privileges and restricted access to system resources and sensitive data. Use containerization or specialized sandboxing libraries to isolate the execution environment.
    4. Code Review and Static Analysis for Custom Keras Code: If custom Keras code is used, implement mandatory code review processes and utilize static analysis tools to identify potential vulnerabilities, backdoors, or malicious code patterns within the custom Keras layers or functions.
    5. Principle of Least Privilege for Custom Keras Code Execution: Apply the principle of least privilege to the execution environment for custom Keras code. Grant only the minimum necessary permissions required for the custom code to function, and restrict access to sensitive resources.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Code Injection through Custom Keras Layers/Functions (High Severity) - Allowing user-provided custom Keras layers or functions introduces a significant code injection risk. Malicious users could inject arbitrary code into custom Keras components, leading to remote code execution on the server, data breaches, or denial of service when the Keras model with the malicious custom code is loaded or used.
    • Impact:
      • Code Injection through Custom Keras Layers/Functions: High - Significantly reduces the risk of code injection by minimizing custom code usage and implementing strict security measures for unavoidable custom code.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. The application design currently minimizes the need for user-provided custom Keras code. Basic input validation is applied to any user-provided configuration that could indirectly influence Keras model behavior.
    • Missing Implementation: Formal policies strictly prohibiting or severely limiting user-provided custom Keras code are not fully enforced. Comprehensive input validation and sanitization specifically targeting custom Keras code inputs are not implemented. Sandboxed execution environments for custom Keras code are not in place. Dedicated code review and static analysis processes for custom Keras code are missing.

Mitigation Strategy: Maintain Up-to-Date Keras Version

  • Description:
    1. Regularly Check for Keras Updates: Periodically check for new releases of Keras on the official Keras GitHub repository, PyPI, or TensorFlow release notes.
    2. Monitor Keras Security Advisories: Subscribe to security mailing lists, monitor security advisory channels, or check the Keras GitHub repository's security policy (if any) to be informed about reported vulnerabilities in Keras.
    3. Planned Keras Updates and Patching: Schedule regular updates of Keras to the latest stable version as part of your application maintenance cycle. Prioritize updates that address known security vulnerabilities in Keras.
    4. Testing After Keras Updates: After updating Keras, thoroughly test your application, especially the Keras model loading, inference, and training functionalities, to ensure compatibility with the new Keras version and that no regressions are introduced.
    • Threats Mitigated:
      • Outdated Keras Vulnerabilities (Medium to High Severity) - Using an outdated version of Keras exposes the application to known vulnerabilities that have been patched in newer Keras versions. Exploiting these vulnerabilities could lead to various security risks, including denial of service, information disclosure, or potentially code execution, depending on the specific Keras vulnerability.
    • Impact:
      • Outdated Keras Vulnerabilities: High - Eliminates the risk of exploiting known vulnerabilities in outdated Keras versions by ensuring the library is up-to-date with security patches and bug fixes provided by the Keras development team.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. The project uses a relatively recent version of Keras. Developers are generally aware of the need to update dependencies, including Keras.
    • Missing Implementation: A formal process for regularly checking for Keras updates and security advisories is missing. A scheduled update cycle specifically for Keras is not in place. Testing procedures specifically after Keras updates are not formally defined and automated.