Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
108 lines (89 loc) · 12.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

108 lines (89 loc) · 12.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for lllyasviel/fooocus

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize User Prompts (Fooocus Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Input Validation for Fooocus Prompts: Implement checks specifically tailored to the types of prompts Fooocus accepts. This includes:
      • Negative Prompt Handling: Pay special attention to negative prompts, as these might be used to bypass content filters or manipulate generation in unintended ways. Validate the structure and content of negative prompts.
      • Style and Aspect Ratio Constraints: If your application restricts or guides users on using specific styles or aspect ratios within Fooocus, validate user input against these constraints to prevent unexpected behavior or errors in Fooocus processing.
      • Parameter Validation (if exposed): If your application exposes Fooocus parameters (e.g., guidance_scale, steps) to users, validate these inputs to ensure they are within acceptable ranges and prevent resource exhaustion or unexpected outputs from extreme parameter values.
    2. Prompt Transformation for Fooocus (Optional but Recommended): Consider transforming user prompts to align with Fooocus's expected input format or to enforce safer generation patterns. This could involve:
      • Keyword Normalization: Standardize keywords used in prompts to ensure consistent interpretation by Fooocus.
      • Prompt Rewriting (with caution): If necessary, subtly rewrite prompts to remove potentially harmful or ambiguous phrasing before passing them to Fooocus, while being careful not to alter the user's intent significantly.
    3. Fooocus Error Handling for Prompts: Implement error handling specifically for prompt-related errors returned by Fooocus. Provide user-friendly error messages that guide users to create valid prompts without exposing internal Fooocus details.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Prompt Injection in Fooocus (Medium Severity): Malicious prompts could manipulate Fooocus to generate unintended or harmful content, bypass content filters (if any are applied post-generation), or cause unexpected behavior within Fooocus's generation process.
      • Fooocus Resource Exhaustion via Prompts (Medium Severity): Crafted prompts, especially with extreme or unusual parameter combinations (if exposed), could potentially cause Fooocus to consume excessive resources during image generation.
      • Bypassing Content Moderation (Medium Severity): Cleverly crafted prompts might be used to circumvent post-generation content filters by subtly influencing the generated image content.

    • Impact:

      • Prompt Injection in Fooocus: Medium risk reduction. Fooocus-specific prompt sanitization reduces the likelihood of users crafting prompts that lead to undesirable outputs or exploit potential vulnerabilities in Fooocus's prompt processing.
      • Fooocus Resource Exhaustion via Prompts: Medium risk reduction. Parameter validation and prompt complexity limits (if applicable) help prevent resource exhaustion within Fooocus itself.
      • Bypassing Content Moderation: Medium risk reduction. While not a complete solution, prompt sanitization can make it harder to intentionally generate content designed to bypass filters.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Likely partially implemented. Basic length limits on prompts might be present in applications using Fooocus.
      • Specific validation of negative prompts, styles, aspect ratios, or Fooocus parameters is likely not implemented.
      • Prompt transformation tailored for Fooocus is highly unlikely.
      • Fooocus-specific error handling for prompts might be basic or generic.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Validation of negative prompts for malicious content or structure (step 1a).
      • Validation of style and aspect ratio inputs against Fooocus constraints (step 1b).
      • Parameter validation for exposed Fooocus parameters (step 1c).
      • Consideration and potential implementation of Fooocus-specific prompt transformation (step 2).
      • Robust error handling for prompt-related errors from Fooocus (step 3).

Mitigation Strategy: Control Model and LoRA Loading (Fooocus Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Restrict Fooocus Model/LoRA Sources: Configure Fooocus to exclusively load models and LoRAs from trusted and controlled sources.
      • Fooocus Configuration Lockdown: Utilize Fooocus's configuration options to strictly define the directories or sources from which it can load models and LoRAs. Prevent users or external processes from modifying these settings easily.
      • Pre-approved Model/LoRA List: Maintain a curated list of approved models and LoRAs that are verified for security and suitability. Only allow Fooocus to load models from this pre-approved list.
    2. Fooocus Path Validation for Models/LoRAs: If your application indirectly allows users to influence model/LoRA selection (e.g., through a limited set of choices), ensure that the application code rigorously validates these choices before passing them to Fooocus for loading.
      • Internal Mapping: Use an internal mapping system where user selections are translated to predefined, validated model/LoRA paths within the trusted directories. Avoid directly using user-provided strings as file paths for Fooocus.
    3. Fooocus Model/LoRA Integrity Verification: Implement integrity checks specifically for models and LoRAs loaded by Fooocus.
      • Checksum Verification for Fooocus Files: Calculate and verify checksums (e.g., SHA256) of model and LoRA files before they are loaded by Fooocus. Store trusted checksums securely and compare against them.
      • Model Source Verification: If models are downloaded, verify the source of download against a list of trusted providers or repositories.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Malicious Model/LoRA Loading in Fooocus (High Severity): If Fooocus is allowed to load arbitrary models or LoRAs, attackers could potentially substitute them with malicious versions containing backdoors, data exfiltration code, or code designed to compromise the Fooocus application or server.
      • Fooocus Instability due to Corrupted Models (Medium Severity): Loading corrupted or improperly formatted models/LoRAs could cause Fooocus to crash, malfunction, or produce unpredictable and potentially harmful outputs.
      • Unauthorized Model/LoRA Access (Medium Severity): Loosely controlled model loading mechanisms might allow unauthorized users to access or manipulate sensitive model files if they are stored in accessible locations.

    • Impact:

      • Malicious Model/LoRA Loading in Fooocus: High risk reduction. Strict control over model sources and integrity verification are critical to prevent the execution of malicious code within the Fooocus environment.
      • Fooocus Instability due to Corrupted Models: Medium risk reduction. Integrity checks help ensure that Fooocus operates with valid and expected model files, reducing the risk of crashes or unexpected behavior.
      • Unauthorized Model/LoRA Access: Medium risk reduction. Restricting loading sources and controlling paths indirectly improves the security of model files by limiting potential access points.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Likely partially implemented. Fooocus itself has default model directories, offering some implicit source control.
      • Strict configuration lockdown of Fooocus model sources is likely not actively implemented in many integrations.
      • Path validation in application code before passing to Fooocus might be present if user choices are offered, but might not be robust.
      • Checksum verification and model source verification are likely not implemented for Fooocus model/LoRA loading.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Configuration lockdown of Fooocus model/LoRA sources using Fooocus's settings (step 1a).
      • Implementation of a pre-approved model/LoRA list and enforcement (step 1b).
      • Robust path validation in application code before model loading in Fooocus (step 2).
      • Checksum verification for Fooocus model and LoRA files (step 3a).
      • Verification of model download sources if external downloads are permitted (step 3b).
      • Clear documentation on secure model/LoRA management for Fooocus deployments.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Quotas and Limits for Fooocus Processes

  • Description:

    1. Identify Fooocus Resource Consumption: Specifically monitor and analyze the resource consumption patterns of Fooocus processes (CPU, GPU, memory) during image generation under various loads and prompt complexities.
    2. Define Fooocus-Specific Resource Limits: Set resource quotas and limits tailored to Fooocus's resource usage characteristics. This could include:
      • Fooocus Process Timeouts: Implement timeouts specifically for Fooocus image generation processes to prevent them from running indefinitely.
      • Fooocus Memory Limits: Limit the maximum memory that individual Fooocus processes can consume to prevent memory exhaustion and crashes.
      • GPU Resource Allocation (if applicable): If using GPUs, explore methods to control GPU resource allocation for Fooocus processes, potentially using containerization or GPU virtualization technologies.
    3. Implement Resource Control for Fooocus: Utilize operating system or containerization features to enforce these resource limits specifically on Fooocus processes.
      • Process Management Tools: Use process management tools or libraries within your application to monitor and control Fooocus process resource usage.
      • Containerization for Fooocus: If deploying in containers (Docker, Kubernetes), leverage container resource limits to restrict Fooocus process resources.
    4. Fooocus Resource Usage Monitoring: Implement monitoring specifically for Fooocus process resource consumption. Track metrics like CPU usage, GPU utilization, memory usage, and process execution times.
    5. Fooocus Error Handling for Resource Limits: Implement error handling to gracefully manage situations where Fooocus processes hit resource limits.
      • Informative Error Messages: Provide users with informative error messages if their image generation request is terminated due to resource limits, explaining the reason clearly.
      • Logging of Fooocus Resource Limit Events: Log instances where Fooocus processes exceed resource limits for monitoring, debugging, and capacity planning.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Fooocus Resource Exhaustion/DoS (High Severity): Uncontrolled Fooocus processes can consume excessive resources, leading to denial of service by making the application or server unresponsive to other users or requests.
      • Fooocus-Induced System Instability (Medium Severity): Runaway Fooocus processes can cause system instability, crashes, or performance degradation of the entire server or application environment.

    • Impact:

      • Fooocus Resource Exhaustion/DoS: High risk reduction. Fooocus-specific resource quotas are essential to prevent resource exhaustion caused by demanding image generation tasks or malicious attempts to overload the system via Fooocus.
      • Fooocus-Induced System Instability: Medium risk reduction. Limiting Fooocus process resources helps maintain overall system stability by preventing individual Fooocus instances from destabilizing the entire environment.

    • Currently Implemented:

      • Likely not implemented in basic Fooocus setups, especially local installations.
      • Resource limits for Fooocus processes are more relevant in server environments or multi-user deployments.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Detailed analysis of Fooocus resource consumption patterns (step 1).
      • Definition of Fooocus-specific resource quotas and limits (step 2).
      • Implementation of resource control mechanisms specifically for Fooocus processes (step 3).
      • Dedicated monitoring of Fooocus process resource usage (step 4).
      • Error handling and user feedback for Fooocus resource limit events (step 5).