Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
225 lines (193 loc) · 19.9 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

225 lines (193 loc) · 19.9 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the key components of the Synapse homeserver implementation, identifying potential vulnerabilities and providing actionable mitigation strategies. This analysis will focus on inferring architectural details from the provided design document and publicly available information (codebase, documentation) to assess the security posture and recommend improvements. The primary goal is to minimize the risk of data breaches, denial of service, and other security incidents that could impact Synapse's operation and reputation.

  • Scope: This analysis covers the core components of Synapse as described in the design review, including:

    • Client-Server Communication (HTTPS, Web Server)
    • Synapse Application Server (Python/Twisted)
    • Database (PostgreSQL)
    • Federation API
    • Media Repository
    • Build and Deployment Processes (Docker, CI/CD)
    • Authentication and Authorization Mechanisms

    The analysis excludes the security of:

    • Matrix Clients (except where their interaction with Synapse creates vulnerabilities)
    • Third-party Identity Servers and Application Services (except where their interaction with Synapse creates vulnerabilities)
    • Other Matrix Homeservers (except for the Federation API interactions)

  • Methodology:

    1. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the C4 diagrams and descriptions, we'll infer the detailed architecture, data flow, and trust boundaries.
    2. Component-Specific Threat Modeling: For each key component, we'll identify potential threats based on its function, interactions, and known vulnerabilities in similar technologies. We'll use the STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) model as a guide.
    3. Security Control Analysis: We'll evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls and identify gaps.
    4. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: For each identified threat, we'll propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Synapse's architecture and technology stack. These will be prioritized based on impact and feasibility.
    5. Codebase and Documentation Review (Limited): We will refer to the Synapse codebase (https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse) and official documentation to corroborate inferences and identify specific implementation details relevant to security. This is not a full code audit, but a targeted review to support the threat modeling.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each component, applying STRIDE and considering the existing controls:

  • 2.1 Web Server (nginx/Apache)

    • Role: Reverse proxy, TLS termination, load balancing, static content serving.
    • Threats:
      • Denial of Service (DoS/DDoS): Overwhelming the server with requests, making it unavailable.
      • TLS Misconfiguration: Weak ciphers, expired certificates, improper certificate validation, leading to Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks.
      • HTTP Request Smuggling: Exploiting discrepancies in how the web server and Synapse handle HTTP requests.
      • Information Disclosure: Leaking server version information or internal IP addresses through HTTP headers.
    • Existing Controls: HTTPS (TLS).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • DoS/DDoS Protection: Implement robust DDoS mitigation techniques, potentially using a CDN or specialized DDoS protection service. Configure rate limiting at the web server level (in addition to Synapse's application-level rate limiting). Use connection limiting.
      • TLS Hardening: Configure TLS to use only strong ciphers (e.g., those supporting PFS), disable weak protocols (SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1), and ensure proper certificate validation. Use HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security). Regularly update TLS certificates.
      • Request Smuggling Prevention: Ensure consistent HTTP request parsing between the web server and Synapse. Use up-to-date versions of nginx/Apache and configure them securely to prevent request smuggling vulnerabilities.
      • Information Disclosure Prevention: Configure the web server to remove or obfuscate server version information and prevent leakage of internal IP addresses in HTTP headers.
      • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Consider deploying a WAF to filter malicious traffic and protect against common web attacks.

  • 2.2 Synapse Application Server (Python/Twisted)

    • Role: Core application logic, handling client requests, processing events, managing room state, database interaction.
    • Threats:
      • Injection Attacks (XSS, SQLi, etc.): Malicious input exploiting vulnerabilities in input validation.
      • Authentication Bypass: Exploiting flaws in authentication logic to gain unauthorized access.
      • Authorization Bypass: Exploiting flaws in access control to access data or perform actions without proper permissions.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Resource exhaustion attacks targeting the application server.
      • Business Logic Flaws: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the application's logic to achieve unintended behavior.
      • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Exploiting vulnerabilities in third-party Python libraries.
      • Improper Error Handling: Revealing sensitive information through error messages.
      • Session Management Vulnerabilities: Session fixation, hijacking, or prediction.
    • Existing Controls: Input validation, access control, authentication, rate limiting.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Robust Input Validation: Implement strict input validation using allow-lists (whitelisting) wherever possible. Validate all input from clients and other homeservers. Use a consistent validation approach across the application. Consider using a dedicated input validation library.
      • Parameterized Queries (SQLi Prevention): Use parameterized queries or an ORM (Object-Relational Mapper) to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities. Never construct SQL queries by concatenating user input.
      • Secure Authentication: Implement strong password policies, support multi-factor authentication (MFA), and use secure password hashing algorithms (e.g., bcrypt, Argon2). Protect against brute-force attacks with account lockout mechanisms. Securely manage sessions (using HttpOnly and Secure flags for cookies).
      • Strict Access Control: Enforce fine-grained access control based on the Matrix specification. Regularly review and audit access control policies. Implement least privilege principles.
      • DoS Protection: Enhance application-level rate limiting. Implement resource limits to prevent resource exhaustion. Monitor application performance and identify potential bottlenecks.
      • Dependency Management: Regularly update all third-party libraries to their latest secure versions. Use a dependency vulnerability scanner (e.g., pip-audit, Safety) as part of the CI/CD pipeline.
      • Secure Error Handling: Avoid revealing sensitive information in error messages. Log errors securely for debugging purposes.
      • Session Management Hardening: Use a secure session management library. Generate strong session IDs. Implement session timeouts. Protect against session fixation and hijacking.
      • Code Review and SAST: Conduct regular code reviews with a focus on security. Integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools (e.g., Bandit) into the CI/CD pipeline to automatically scan for vulnerabilities.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement to mitigate XSS.

  • 2.3 Database (PostgreSQL)

    • Role: Persistent data storage.
    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection: (See above - addressed in Synapse Application Server mitigations).
      • Unauthorized Access: Direct access to the database bypassing the application server.
      • Data Breach: Theft of sensitive data from the database.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the database with requests.
    • Existing Controls: Database access control.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Network Segmentation: Isolate the database server on a separate network segment from the application server and web server. Use a firewall to restrict access to the database port (5432 by default) to only the Synapse application server.
      • Database User Permissions: Create dedicated database users with the least necessary privileges. The Synapse application should not connect to the database as the postgres superuser.
      • Encryption at Rest: Implement database encryption at rest to protect data in case of physical server compromise or unauthorized access to the database files. Use PostgreSQL's built-in encryption features or a third-party encryption solution.
      • Regular Backups: Implement a robust backup and recovery plan. Store backups securely and test the recovery process regularly.
      • Auditing: Enable database auditing to track all database activity. Monitor audit logs for suspicious activity.
      • Connection Pooling: Use connection pooling to improve performance and prevent resource exhaustion.
      • Strong Passwords: Use strong, unique passwords for all database users.

  • 2.4 Federation API

    • Role: Communication with other Matrix homeservers.
    • Threats:
      • Spoofing: A malicious server impersonating another homeserver.
      • Tampering: Modification of messages or data in transit.
      • Information Disclosure: Leakage of sensitive information to unauthorized servers.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Attacks targeting the federation API.
      • Replay Attacks: Replaying previously sent messages.
    • Existing Controls: HTTPS, digital signatures, access control.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict TLS Verification: Ensure that Synapse properly verifies the TLS certificates of other homeservers. Use a trusted certificate authority (CA) and implement certificate pinning if appropriate.
      • Digital Signature Verification: Verify the digital signatures of all incoming events from other homeservers. Ensure that the signing keys are managed securely.
      • Input Validation (Federation): Validate all data received from other homeservers, even if it's digitally signed. This is crucial to prevent vulnerabilities in one homeserver from affecting others.
      • Rate Limiting (Federation): Implement rate limiting for incoming requests from other homeservers to prevent DoS attacks.
      • Replay Attack Prevention: Implement mechanisms to detect and prevent replay attacks. This might involve using nonces or timestamps.
      • Back-off Mechanisms: Implement back-off mechanisms for failed federation requests to prevent overwhelming other servers.
      • Blocklisting/Allowlisting: Consider implementing mechanisms to blocklist or allowlist specific homeservers based on their reputation or security posture.
      • Regular Security Audits of Federation Code: The federation code is a critical security boundary and should be subject to frequent and thorough security audits.

  • 2.5 Media Repository

    • Role: Storage and retrieval of media files.
    • Threats:
      • Unauthorized Access: Access to media files without proper authorization.
      • Malicious File Upload: Uploading of malware disguised as media files.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Overwhelming the media repository with requests or large files.
      • Path Traversal: Exploiting vulnerabilities to access files outside the intended media directory.
    • Existing Controls: Access control.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Access Control: Enforce strict access control to media files based on room permissions and user roles.
      • Virus Scanning: Integrate virus scanning into the media upload process. Use a reputable anti-malware solution and keep it up-to-date.
      • Content Type Validation: Validate the content type of uploaded files based on their content, not just their file extension. Use a library that can reliably detect the true content type (e.g., python-magic).
      • File Size Limits: Implement file size limits to prevent DoS attacks.
      • Path Traversal Prevention: Sanitize filenames and paths to prevent path traversal vulnerabilities. Avoid using user-provided input directly in file paths.
      • Secure Storage: Store media files securely, potentially using a dedicated object storage service (e.g., AWS S3, MinIO) with appropriate access controls.
      • Content Delivery Network (CDN): Consider using a CDN to improve performance and reduce the load on the media repository.

  • 2.6 Build and Deployment (Docker, CI/CD)

    • Role: Building, testing, and deploying Synapse.
    • Threats:
      • Supply Chain Attacks: Compromise of the build process or dependencies.
      • Vulnerable Base Images: Using Docker base images with known vulnerabilities.
      • Insecure Configuration: Deploying Synapse with insecure default configurations.
      • Insufficient Testing: Lack of adequate security testing in the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Existing Controls: Supply chain security measures (signed commits, dependency verification), build automation, linters, SAST, SCA.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Minimal Base Images: Use minimal Docker base images (e.g., Alpine Linux) to reduce the attack surface.
      • Regular Image Scanning: Scan Docker images for vulnerabilities as part of the CI/CD pipeline. Use a container image scanning tool (e.g., Trivy, Clair).
      • Secure Configuration Management: Use a secure configuration management system (e.g., Ansible, Chef, Puppet) to manage Synapse configurations. Avoid hardcoding secrets in Dockerfiles or configuration files.
      • Secret Management: Use a secure secret management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) to store and manage sensitive data (e.g., database passwords, API keys).
      • Least Privilege (Build): Ensure that the build process runs with the least necessary privileges.
      • Reproducible Builds: Strive for reproducible builds to ensure that the same source code always produces the same binary. This helps to verify the integrity of the build process.
      • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): Consider integrating DAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline to test the running application for vulnerabilities.

  • 2.7 Authentication and Authorization

    • Role: Verifying user identity and controlling access to resources.
    • Threats: (Covered in detail under Synapse Application Server)
    • Existing Controls: Authentication (passwords, tokens, SSO), access control.
    • Mitigation Strategies: (See Synapse Application Server mitigations) Key areas to emphasize:
      • Strong Password Policies: Enforce strong password policies.
      • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Support and encourage the use of MFA.
      • Secure Session Management: Implement secure session management practices.
      • Fine-Grained Access Control: Enforce fine-grained access control based on the Matrix specification.
      • Regular Audits of Authentication and Authorization Code: This code is critical for security and should be subject to frequent and thorough reviews.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies (Prioritized)

The following is a prioritized list of actionable mitigation strategies, combining the recommendations from above:

High Priority (Implement Immediately):

  1. Database Security:
    • Implement network segmentation for the database.
    • Ensure least privilege database user permissions.
    • Enable database encryption at rest.
    • Implement robust database backup and recovery.
  2. Federation Security:
    • Implement strict TLS verification for federation.
    • Thoroughly validate all data received from other homeservers.
    • Implement replay attack prevention.
  3. Input Validation (Synapse):
    • Implement strict, allow-list based input validation throughout the Synapse application server.
    • Use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.
  4. Dependency Management:
    • Implement automated dependency vulnerability scanning in the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Regularly update all dependencies.
  5. Web Server Hardening:
    • Configure TLS to use only strong ciphers and protocols.
    • Implement HSTS.
    • Prevent information disclosure in HTTP headers.
  6. Media Repository Security:
    • Implement virus scanning for uploaded media.
    • Validate content types based on content, not extensions.
    • Enforce strict access control to media files.

Medium Priority (Implement in the Near Term):

  1. Authentication and Authorization:
    • Implement strong password policies.
    • Support and encourage MFA.
    • Implement secure session management.
  2. Synapse Application Server Security:
    • Integrate SAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Conduct regular code reviews with a focus on security.
    • Implement secure error handling.
  3. Build and Deployment Security:
    • Use minimal Docker base images.
    • Implement automated container image scanning.
    • Use a secure configuration management system.
    • Implement a secure secret management solution.
  4. Rate Limiting:
    • Refine and strengthen rate limiting at both the web server and application server levels, including for federation.

Low Priority (Implement as Resources Allow):

  1. DoS/DDoS Protection:
    • Consider deploying a CDN or specialized DDoS protection service.
  2. Web Application Firewall (WAF):
    • Evaluate the need for a WAF.
  3. Database Auditing:
    • Enable and monitor database audit logs.
  4. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST):
    • Consider integrating DAST tools into the CI/CD pipeline.
  5. Blocklisting/Allowlisting (Federation):
    • Implement mechanisms to blocklist or allowlist homeservers.

4. Addressing Questions and Assumptions

  • Questions: The questions raised in the original design document are all highly relevant and should be addressed by the Synapse development team. Specifically, understanding their threat model, incident response procedures, and secret management practices is crucial.
  • Assumptions: The assumptions made in the design document are generally reasonable, but they need to be validated. For example, assuming that the development team follows secure coding practices is a good starting point, but it needs to be verified through code reviews and security testing. The assumption about Docker being the preferred deployment method is also reasonable, given its widespread use, but alternative deployment methods should also be considered for their security implications.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for the Synapse homeserver. By implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, the Synapse development team can significantly improve the security posture of the platform and protect it from a wide range of threats. Regular security audits, vulnerability disclosure programs, and continuous security monitoring are also essential for maintaining a strong security posture over time.