Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
102 lines (92 loc) · 6.52 KB

File metadata and controls

102 lines (92 loc) · 6.52 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for nvlabs/stylegan

Objective: To compromise application that use given project by exploiting weaknesses or vulnerabilities within the project itself.

Attack Tree Visualization

  • AND: Exploit StyleGAN Functionality/Vulnerabilities
    • OR: [HIGH-RISK PATH] Generate Malicious/Unintended Content
      • AND: [CRITICAL NODE] Prompt Injection/Manipulation
        • Leaf: Craft prompts to generate NSFW, offensive, or harmful images [CRITICAL NODE]
        • Leaf: Bypass content filters through prompt engineering (e.g., subtle phrasing)
    • OR: [HIGH-RISK PATH] Gain Unauthorized Access/Control
      • AND: [CRITICAL NODE] Resource Exhaustion (DoS via StyleGAN) [CRITICAL NODE]
        • Leaf: Send excessive generation requests to overload GPU resources [CRITICAL NODE]
        • Leaf: Craft complex prompts or style vectors that require excessive computation
      • AND: API Abuse (if API exposed)
        • Leaf: Bypass rate limiting to flood the service with requests [CRITICAL NODE]
    • OR: [HIGH-RISK PATH] Exploit Infrastructure Supporting StyleGAN (Indirectly related to StyleGAN, but relevant)
      • OR: [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] Dependency Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
        • Leaf: Exploit vulnerabilities in underlying libraries (TensorFlow, PyTorch, CUDA, etc.) [CRITICAL NODE]
        • Leaf: Exploit vulnerabilities in OS or container environment [CRITICAL NODE]
      • OR: [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] Misconfiguration [CRITICAL NODE]
        • Leaf: Exploit insecure permissions on model files or data [CRITICAL NODE]
        • Leaf: Exploit misconfigured API endpoints or network settings [CRITICAL NODE]

Critical Node: Prompt Injection/Manipulation * Attack Vector: Craft prompts to generate NSFW, offensive, or harmful images * Description: Attackers directly instruct StyleGAN through text prompts to create undesirable content. * Likelihood: High * Impact: Moderate (Reputational damage, user offense, legal issues) * Effort: Very Low * Skill Level: Low * Detection Difficulty: Medium * Attack Vector: Bypass content filters through prompt engineering * Description: Attackers use subtle phrasing or encoding tricks in prompts to evade content filters and generate harmful content. * Likelihood: Medium * Impact: Moderate (Filter bypass, consistent generation of harmful content) * Effort: Low * Skill Level: Low-Medium * Detection Difficulty: Hard

Critical Node: Resource Exhaustion (DoS via StyleGAN) * Attack Vector: Send excessive generation requests to overload GPU resources * Description: Attackers flood the application with numerous image generation requests, overwhelming the GPU and causing service denial. * Likelihood: Medium-High * Impact: Significant (Service unavailability, financial loss) * Effort: Low * Skill Level: Low * Detection Difficulty: Easy * Attack Vector: Craft complex prompts or style vectors that require excessive computation * Description: Attackers design prompts or style vectors that are computationally expensive for StyleGAN to process, leading to resource exhaustion and slowdowns. * Likelihood: Medium * Impact: Significant (Service slowdown, resource exhaustion) * Effort: Medium * Skill Level: Medium * Detection Difficulty: Medium

  • Critical Node: API Abuse (if API exposed)
    • Attack Vector: Bypass rate limiting to flood the service with requests
      • Description: If an API is exposed, attackers attempt to circumvent rate limiting mechanisms to send a large volume of requests, leading to DoS.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Significant (Service unavailability, resource exhaustion)
      • Effort: Low-Medium
      • Skill Level: Low-Medium
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Critical Node: Dependency Vulnerabilities * Attack Vector: Exploit vulnerabilities in underlying libraries (TensorFlow, PyTorch, CUDA, etc.) * Description: Attackers exploit known security vulnerabilities in the libraries that StyleGAN depends on. * Likelihood: Medium * Impact: Critical (Full system compromise, data breaches, service disruption) * Effort: Low-Medium * Skill Level: Low-Medium * Detection Difficulty: Medium * Attack Vector: Exploit vulnerabilities in OS or container environment * Description: Attackers exploit vulnerabilities in the operating system or container environment where StyleGAN is running. * Likelihood: Medium * Impact: Critical (Full system compromise, container escape, data breaches) * Effort: Medium * Skill Level: Medium * Detection Difficulty: Medium

  • Critical Node: Misconfiguration
    • Attack Vector: Exploit insecure permissions on model files or data
      • Description: Attackers exploit misconfigured file permissions to gain unauthorized access to StyleGAN model files or sensitive data.
      • Likelihood: Low-Medium
      • Impact: Significant (Data breaches, model theft, unauthorized access)
      • Effort: Low-Medium
      • Skill Level: Low-Medium
      • Detection Difficulty: Easy-Medium
    • Attack Vector: Exploit misconfigured API endpoints or network settings
      • Description: Attackers exploit misconfigurations in API endpoints or network settings to gain unauthorized access or disrupt service.
      • Likelihood: Medium
      • Impact: Critical (Unauthorized access, data breaches, service disruption)
      • Effort: Low-Medium
      • Skill Level: Low-Medium
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium