Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
155 lines (105 loc) · 13.3 KB

File metadata and controls

155 lines (105 loc) · 13.3 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for opencv/opencv-python

Objective: Compromise the application using opencv-python by exploiting vulnerabilities within opencv-python or its usage to gain unauthorized access, execute arbitrary code, cause denial of service, or exfiltrate sensitive data.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application Using opencv-python [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR]─ Exploit Vulnerabilities in opencv-python Library [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR]─ Exploit Input Processing Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├───[OR]─ Image Format Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├───[AND]─ Malicious Image Upload/Input [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ │ ├─── Exploit Buffer Overflow in Image Decoding (e.g., JPEG, PNG, TIFF) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ │ ├─── Exploit Heap Overflow in Image Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ │ └─── Crafted Image to Trigger Vulnerable Code Path [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ ├─── Crafted Image to Trigger Vulnerable Code Path (Redundant - Merged above) │ │ ├───[OR]─ Video Format Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├───[AND]─ Malicious Video Upload/Input [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ │ ├─── Exploit Container Format Vulnerabilities (e.g., MP4, AVI, MKV parsing) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ │ ├─── Exploit Codec Vulnerabilities (e.g., H.264, H.265, VP9 decoding) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ │ └─── Crafted Video to Trigger Vulnerable Code Path [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ ├─── Crafted Video to Trigger Vulnerable Code Path (Redundant - Merged above) │ │ ├───[OR]─ Vulnerabilities in OpenCV Core Algorithms │ │ │ ├─── Exploit Algorithmic Complexity Vulnerabilities (DoS) [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ └─── Vulnerabilities in External Libraries Used by OpenCV [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ ├─── Vulnerabilities in Image Codec Libraries [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ │ ├─── Vulnerabilities in Video Codec Libraries [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └───[OR]─ Exploit Memory Management Vulnerabilities in OpenCV Core [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├─── Buffer Overflows in Core C/C++ Code [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ ├─── Heap Overflows in Core C/C++ Code [HIGH-RISK PATH] ├───[OR]─ Exploit Application's Misuse of opencv-python [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR]─ Unsafe Input Handling by Application [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├─── Direct Exposure of OpenCV Input Functions to Untrusted Data [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ ├─── Insufficient Input Validation/Sanitization Before OpenCV Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH] │ │ └─── Lack of Resource Limits on OpenCV Processing [HIGH-RISK PATH]

This is the ultimate goal and encompasses all subsequent attack vectors. Successful exploitation at any lower node can lead to this goal.

Directly targeting vulnerabilities within the opencv-python library itself. This is a broad category covering various types of weaknesses in the library's code.

Focusing on vulnerabilities that arise when opencv-python processes external input, specifically images and videos. Input processing is a common source of security issues in media libraries.

Vulnerabilities specifically related to the handling of different image formats (JPEG, PNG, TIFF, etc.). These often stem from complex decoding logic and format parsing.

Vulnerabilities related to handling video formats (MP4, AVI, MKV, etc.), including container parsing and codec decoding. Video processing is generally more complex than image processing, increasing the potential for vulnerabilities.

OpenCV relies on external libraries for image and video codec support (e.g., libjpeg, libpng, FFmpeg). Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be exploited through OpenCV.

Vulnerabilities arising from improper memory management within OpenCV's core C/C++ codebase, such as buffer overflows and heap overflows.

Vulnerabilities introduced not by OpenCV itself, but by how the application integrates and uses opencv-python APIs insecurely.

A specific type of application misuse where the application fails to properly handle untrusted input before passing it to opencv-python.

  • Attack Vector: Attacker uploads or provides a specially crafted image file (JPEG, PNG, TIFF, etc.) designed to trigger a buffer overflow vulnerability in OpenCV's image decoding routines.
  • Mechanism: The malicious image exploits a flaw in how OpenCV parses the image format, causing it to write beyond the allocated buffer in memory.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Attack Vector: Similar to buffer overflow, but targets heap memory. A crafted image triggers a heap overflow during image processing operations within OpenCV.
  • Mechanism: The malicious image exploits a flaw in memory allocation or deallocation during image processing, leading to overwriting of heap memory.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Attack Vector: A more general approach where a crafted image is designed to trigger a specific vulnerable code path within OpenCV's image processing logic, not necessarily a direct buffer or heap overflow, but some other exploitable flaw.
  • Mechanism: The image exploits a logical vulnerability or unexpected behavior in OpenCV's algorithms when processing specific image data.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure.
  • Attack Vector: Attacker uploads or provides a malicious video file that exploits vulnerabilities in OpenCV's parsing of video container formats (MP4, AVI, MKV, etc.).
  • Mechanism: The malicious video exploits flaws in how OpenCV handles the structure and metadata of video container formats.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Attack Vector: Attacker uploads or provides a malicious video file that exploits vulnerabilities in the video codecs used by OpenCV (H.264, H.265, VP9, etc.).
  • Mechanism: The malicious video exploits flaws in the decoding process of video codecs, often within external libraries like FFmpeg used by OpenCV.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Attack Vector: Similar to crafted images, but for videos. A crafted video is designed to trigger a specific vulnerable code path within OpenCV's video processing logic.
  • Mechanism: The video exploits a logical vulnerability or unexpected behavior in OpenCV's algorithms when processing specific video data or sequences of frames.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure.
  • Attack Vector: Attacker provides input (image or video) that triggers computationally expensive OpenCV algorithms, leading to excessive resource consumption and Denial of Service.
  • Mechanism: Exploits the inherent complexity of certain OpenCV algorithms (e.g., specific filters, feature detectors) by providing inputs that maximize processing time and resource usage.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), Resource Exhaustion.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in external image codec libraries (libjpeg, libpng, libtiff, libwebp) that OpenCV uses for image decoding.
  • Mechanism: Vulnerabilities in these libraries are triggered when OpenCV calls them to decode images.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS) - originating from the dependency.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting known vulnerabilities in external video codec libraries (FFmpeg, libvpx) that OpenCV uses for video decoding.
  • Mechanism: Vulnerabilities in these libraries are triggered when OpenCV calls them to decode video streams.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS) - originating from the dependency.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting buffer overflow vulnerabilities directly within OpenCV's core C/C++ code, outside of input processing or codec handling.
  • Mechanism: Flaws in memory management within OpenCV's core logic lead to writing beyond buffer boundaries.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting heap overflow vulnerabilities directly within OpenCV's core C/C++ code.
  • Mechanism: Flaws in heap memory allocation or deallocation within OpenCV's core logic lead to overwriting heap memory.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS).
  • Attack Vector: Application directly passes untrusted user-supplied data (e.g., file paths, raw image/video data) to OpenCV input functions (like cv2.imread, cv2.VideoCapture) without any validation or sanitization.
  • Mechanism: Allows attackers to directly control the input to OpenCV, making it trivial to trigger any underlying OpenCV vulnerabilities by providing malicious files or data.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure - inherits all vulnerabilities of OpenCV input processing.
  • Attack Vector: Application attempts to validate input, but the validation is insufficient or flawed, allowing malicious input to bypass checks and reach OpenCV processing.
  • Mechanism: Weak or incomplete input validation logic fails to prevent malicious files or data from being processed by OpenCV.
  • Impact: Code execution, Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure - allows triggering of OpenCV vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vector: Application does not implement resource limits on OpenCV operations, allowing attackers to exhaust server resources by triggering computationally intensive OpenCV tasks.
  • Mechanism: Attacker sends requests that cause the application to perform resource-intensive OpenCV operations (e.g., complex image filtering, feature detection on large images/videos) without any limits, leading to resource exhaustion.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), Resource Exhaustion.