Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
102 lines (80 loc) · 6.53 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

102 lines (80 loc) · 6.53 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for opencv/opencv-python

Mitigation Strategy: Keep opencv-python Updated

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly update the opencv-python package to the latest stable release.

  • Description:

    1. Check Current Version: Determine the currently installed version: pip show opencv-python.
    2. Check for Updates: Check for newer versions: pip install --upgrade opencv-python --dry-run.
    3. Update: Install updates: pip install --upgrade opencv-python.
    4. Automate: Integrate into CI/CD. Use pip-audit or safety for vulnerability checks and automated alerts/PRs. Consider Dependabot or Renovate.
    5. Test: Thoroughly test after updating for regressions.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Malformed Input (High Severity): Patches vulnerabilities in OpenCV's image/video processing.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium to High Severity): Fixes bugs causing crashes or resource exhaustion.
    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Addresses vulnerabilities leaking data.

  • Impact:

    • RCE: Reduces risk by 80-90%.
    • DoS: Reduces risk by 70-80%.
    • Information Disclosure: Reduces risk by 60-70%.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Manual monthly updates.
    • Basic version check in requirements.txt.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Automated CI/CD update checks.
    • Automated vulnerability scanning (pip-audit/safety).
    • Automated post-update testing.

Mitigation Strategy: Fuzz Testing (with atheris for Python-specific fuzzing)

Mitigation Strategy: Implement fuzz testing, specifically using a tool like atheris that can interface with native libraries called from Python.

  • Description:

    1. Identify Target Functions: Focus on opencv-python functions handling external input: cv2.imread, cv2.imdecode, cv2.VideoCapture, and image processing functions.
    2. Use atheris: Write Python scripts using the atheris library.
    3. Create Fuzzing Harness: Write a Python function (the "harness") that takes fuzzed data (bytes) as input. This harness should:
      • Validate the basic structure of the input (e.g., check for minimum size) before passing it to OpenCV. This prevents atheris from wasting time on completely invalid inputs that OpenCV would immediately reject.
      • Call the target opencv-python function (e.g., cv2.imdecode) with the (potentially modified) fuzzed data.
      • Handle any expected exceptions (e.g., cv2.error) gracefully within the harness, so the fuzzer doesn't treat them as crashes.
    4. Run the Fuzzer: Use atheris.FuzzedDataProvider to manage the fuzzed input. Run atheris.Setup and atheris.Fuzz to execute the fuzzer.
    5. Analyze Results: atheris will report crashes and hangs. Analyze these to identify vulnerabilities.
    6. Integrate into CI/CD: Ideally, run fuzzing regularly as part of your CI/CD pipeline.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) (High Severity): Uncovers vulnerabilities allowing code execution.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium to High Severity): Finds inputs causing crashes or excessive resource use.
    • Unexpected Behavior (Low to Medium Severity): Identifies inputs leading to incorrect behavior.

  • Impact:

    • RCE/DoS: Reduces risk by 30-60% (depends on harness quality and code coverage).
    • Unexpected Behavior: Reduces risk by 20-40%.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • None.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • atheris fuzzing harnesses for critical opencv-python functions.
    • CI/CD integration of fuzzing.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization (Specifically for OpenCV Functions)

Mitigation Strategy: Rigorously validate and sanitize all input before passing it to opencv-python functions.

  • Description:

    1. Image Dimensions:
      • Define maximum/minimum image dimensions (width, height).
      • Check dimensions before calling cv2.imread or cv2.imdecode. Reject out-of-bounds images.
    2. Data Types:
      • Verify expected pixel data types (e.g., uint8, float32). Reject unexpected types. This is especially important after using functions like cv2.imdecode where you have more control over the input data.
    3. File Sizes:
      • Enforce maximum file size limits before reading the file into memory for cv2.imdecode.
    4. Byte Buffers (cv2.imdecode):
      • If using cv2.imdecode, thoroughly validate the byte buffer:
        • Source: Ensure the buffer comes from a trusted source or is sanitized.
        • Length: Check the buffer length against expected limits.
        • Content (Heuristics): Consider basic heuristic checks before decoding (e.g., looking for common image file headers – but don't rely solely on this). This is a performance vs. security trade-off. The goal is to quickly reject obviously invalid data before it reaches the more complex (and potentially vulnerable) decoding logic.
    5. Avoid cv2.imread with Untrusted Paths: If possible, avoid directly using cv2.imread with file paths provided by users. Instead, read the file contents into a buffer (after size validation) and use cv2.imdecode.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Remote Code Execution (RCE) (High Severity): Reduces exploit likelihood by rejecting malformed input.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium to High Severity): Prevents resource exhaustion by limiting sizes.
    • Path Traversal (Medium Severity): Mitigated by avoiding direct use of user-provided paths with cv2.imread.

  • Impact:

    • RCE: Reduces risk by 40-60%.
    • DoS: Reduces risk by 60-80%.
    • Path Traversal: Reduces risk by 90-100% (by avoiding the vulnerable pattern).

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic file size limits.
    • Content-Type check (but this is not sufficient on its own).

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Comprehensive image dimension validation.
    • Pixel data type validation (especially after cv2.imdecode).
    • Robust byte buffer validation (for cv2.imdecode).
    • Avoiding cv2.imread with untrusted paths.