Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
45 lines (38 loc) · 6.17 KB

File metadata and controls

45 lines (38 loc) · 6.17 KB

Threat Model Analysis for opencv/opencv-python

  • Description: An attacker crafts a malicious image file (e.g., JPEG, PNG, TIFF) that exploits a buffer overflow, format string vulnerability, or other memory corruption bug within OpenCV's image decoding libraries. The attacker uploads this image. When OpenCV attempts to decode the image via cv2.imread(), the vulnerability is triggered, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code within the application's context. This is a direct exploitation of a vulnerability within OpenCV or its bundled image libraries.
    • Impact: Complete system compromise. The attacker gains full control over the application and potentially the underlying server. Data theft, modification, and denial of service are all possible.
    • Affected OpenCV-Python Component:
      • cv2.imread() - The primary function for loading images.
      • Underlying image decoding libraries (e.g., libjpeg, libpng, libtiff) accessed through opencv-python. These are often bundled with OpenCV.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Update Regularly: Keep opencv-python and its underlying libraries (especially image format libraries) updated to the absolute latest versions. This is the primary defense against known vulnerabilities. OpenCV frequently releases updates to address security issues in its dependencies.
      • Sandboxing: Run the image processing component (where cv2.imread() is called) in a sandboxed environment (e.g., Docker container, separate process with severely limited privileges) to contain the impact of a successful exploit. Even if code execution occurs, the attacker's capabilities are restricted.
      • Fuzzing: Conduct fuzz testing specifically targeting cv2.imread() and the underlying image decoding libraries with malformed inputs. This helps discover unknown vulnerabilities.
      • Input Validation (Pre-OpenCV - Limited Effectiveness): While important for general security, basic input validation (size, dimensions) is less effective against expertly crafted exploits. It can mitigate some attacks, but not all. The core issue is the vulnerability within the decoding library.
  • Description: An attacker uploads a specially crafted video file (e.g., MP4, AVI) designed to cause excessive resource consumption (CPU, memory) during decoding or processing specifically within OpenCV's video handling or its underlying FFmpeg dependency. This exploits vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the video decoding process itself, not just general resource exhaustion. The attacker aims to crash the OpenCV component or make it unresponsive.
    • Impact: Denial of service. The application's video processing capabilities become unavailable, preventing legitimate users from using features that rely on video input.
    • Affected OpenCV-Python Component:
      • cv2.VideoCapture() - Used to open and read video files or streams.
      • cv2.VideoCapture.read() - Reads frames from the video.
      • Underlying video decoding libraries (specifically FFmpeg, often bundled with OpenCV) accessed through opencv-python.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Update Regularly: Keep opencv-python (and thus, its bundled FFmpeg) updated to the latest version. FFmpeg is a frequent target for vulnerability research, and updates are crucial.
      • Resource Limits (Process Level): Set strict resource limits (CPU, memory, file descriptors) on the process that handles video processing with OpenCV. This prevents a single malicious video from consuming all system resources.
      • Timeouts (OpenCV Level): Implement timeouts within the OpenCV video processing code. If cv2.VideoCapture.read() or other video-related functions take too long, terminate the operation.
      • Sandboxing: Similar to image parsing, sandboxing the video processing component is highly recommended to limit the impact of a successful DoS or potential code execution vulnerability.
      • Input Validation (Pre-OpenCV - Limited Effectiveness): Basic checks (file size, duration) are helpful but not sufficient against targeted attacks on the decoder.
  • Description: An attacker provides an image with dimensions or pixel values that, when processed by specific OpenCV functions, cause integer overflows within OpenCV's internal calculations. This is distinct from general application-level integer overflows. This exploits a vulnerability within OpenCV's image processing algorithms.
    • Impact: Denial of service (crash), potential code execution (if the overflow leads to a buffer overflow within OpenCV), unexpected behavior leading to incorrect results.
    • Affected OpenCV-Python Component:
      • Functions that perform arithmetic operations on image data internally (e.g., cv2.add(), cv2.subtract(), cv2.resize(), filtering functions like cv2.GaussianBlur(), cv2.filter2D()).
      • Functions that handle image dimensions internally.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Update Regularly: Keep opencv-python updated. This is crucial as integer overflow vulnerabilities are often found and patched in OpenCV's core image processing routines.
      • Input Validation (Pre-OpenCV - Helpful, but not a complete solution): Validate image dimensions and pixel value ranges before processing. Reject images with excessively large dimensions or out-of-range pixel values. This helps prevent some overflow scenarios, but doesn't address vulnerabilities in OpenCV's internal handling of valid ranges.
      • Sandboxing: Isolating the OpenCV processing component can limit the impact of a successful exploit resulting from an integer overflow.