Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
75 lines (63 loc) · 8.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

75 lines (63 loc) · 8.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for pallets/click

Objective: Compromise application using Click vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary commands and/or gain unauthorized access via High-Risk Paths.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Click Application
├───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Exploit Input Handling Vulnerabilities  [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Command Injection [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Application uses `os.system`, `subprocess`, or similar with user-provided input
│   │   └───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Input is not properly sanitized or escaped
│   │   └───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Inject malicious command
│   ├───[OR] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Path Traversal [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** File paths are used without proper validation or sanitization
│   │   └───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Inject malicious path
│   ├───[OR] Vulnerable Callback Functions
│   │   ├───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Callback functions perform insecure operations (e.g., shell commands, file access)
│   │   └───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Callback functions are not properly secured against input manipulation
│   │   └───[AND] **[CRITICAL NODE]** Trigger vulnerable callback function with malicious input

Attack Tree Path: 1. [CRITICAL NODE] Exploit Input Handling Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector Category: Input Validation Failures
  • Description: This path focuses on exploiting vulnerabilities arising from improper handling of user-provided input within the Click application. It encompasses several specific attack types that stem from inadequate input validation and sanitization.
  • Potential Impact: Ranges from Information Disclosure and Denial of Service to Arbitrary Code Execution and full system compromise, depending on the specific vulnerability exploited.
  • Mitigation Focus:
    • Implement robust input validation and sanitization for all user inputs received through Click arguments and options.
    • Adopt a "deny by default" approach to input validation, explicitly allowing only expected and safe input patterns.
    • Regularly review and test input handling logic for potential bypasses and vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 2. [CRITICAL NODE] Command Injection [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Command Injection
  • Description: Occurs when the application constructs shell commands using user-provided input without proper sanitization or escaping. An attacker can inject malicious shell commands into the input, which are then executed by the application.
  • Critical Nodes within Command Injection Path:
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Application uses os.system, subprocess, or similar with user-provided input: This highlights the dangerous practice of directly using shell commands with external input.
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Input is not properly sanitized or escaped: The core vulnerability – lack of protection against shell metacharacters in user input.
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Inject malicious command: The attacker's action of crafting and injecting malicious shell commands.
  • Potential Impact: Critical - Arbitrary command execution on the server, leading to full system compromise, data breach, denial of service, and other severe consequences.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strongly prefer using Python libraries over shell commands whenever possible. For tasks like file manipulation, process management, etc., use Python's built-in modules or well-vetted libraries.
    • If shell commands are absolutely necessary, use shlex.quote() or similar robust escaping mechanisms to sanitize user input before incorporating it into shell commands. This prevents shell metacharacters from being interpreted as commands.
    • Implement strict input validation to limit the allowed characters and patterns in user input intended for shell commands.

Attack Tree Path: 3. [CRITICAL NODE] Path Traversal [HIGH-RISK PATH]:

  • Attack Vector: Path Traversal (Directory Traversal)
  • Description: Arises when the application uses user-provided input to construct file paths without proper validation. An attacker can inject path traversal sequences (e.g., ../) to access files and directories outside the intended application directory.
  • Critical Nodes within Path Traversal Path:
    • [CRITICAL NODE] File paths are used without proper validation or sanitization: The fundamental flaw – lack of checks on user-provided file paths.
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Inject malicious path: The attacker's action of crafting and injecting path traversal sequences.
  • Potential Impact: Moderate to Major - Information disclosure by accessing sensitive files, potential for application logic bypass, and in some cases, ability to write or modify files outside the intended area, potentially leading to code execution or configuration manipulation.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use os.path.abspath() and os.path.normpath() to sanitize and normalize user-provided file paths. This helps resolve relative paths and remove path traversal sequences.
    • Restrict file access to a specific, well-defined directory (chroot-like behavior). Ensure the application only operates within this restricted directory.
    • Validate file paths against a whitelist of allowed directories or file patterns. Only allow access to files that match the whitelist.
    • Avoid directly using user input to construct file paths whenever possible. Use indirect references or mappings to files instead.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Vulnerable Callback Functions (Partial High-Risk Path):

  • Attack Vector Category: Logic and Implementation Flaws in Callback Functions
  • Description: Focuses on vulnerabilities introduced within the callback functions associated with Click commands and options. If callback functions perform insecure operations or are not properly secured against input manipulation, they become attack vectors. While not marked as a full "High-Risk Path" like Input Handling, vulnerable callbacks are critical nodes due to their potential for significant impact.
  • Critical Nodes within Vulnerable Callback Functions Path:
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Callback functions perform insecure operations (e.g., shell commands, file access): Highlights the risk of performing sensitive or potentially dangerous actions within callback functions without adequate security measures.
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Callback functions are not properly secured against input manipulation: Emphasizes the importance of applying input validation and sanitization within callback functions, especially if they process user-provided data.
    • [CRITICAL NODE] Trigger vulnerable callback function with malicious input: The attacker's action of exploiting vulnerabilities in callback functions by providing specific input.
  • Potential Impact: Moderate to Critical - Ranges from information disclosure and logic bypass to arbitrary code execution, depending on the nature of the vulnerable callback function and the operations it performs.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Thoroughly review and security test all callback functions. Treat them as critical components that require careful security consideration.
    • Apply secure coding practices within callback functions, including input validation, output encoding, and error handling.
    • Isolate sensitive operations within callback functions and implement strict access controls. Limit the privileges of callback functions to the minimum necessary.
    • Avoid performing insecure operations like shell commands or direct file system access within callback functions if possible. Delegate these tasks to more secure and controlled components.