Mitigation Strategy: Sanitize User Input from Click Options and Arguments
Description:
- Explicitly define input types using
click
's parameter types (click.INT
,click.FLOAT
,click.Path
,click.Choice
, etc.) in@click.option
and@click.argument
decorators. This provides initial type validation at theclick
level. - Utilize
click.Choice
for options that accept a limited set of valid values. This restricts user input to predefined choices directly withinclick
's parsing. - Implement custom validation logic within your Click command functions. After
click
parses the input, add Python code to further validate the data based on your application's specific requirements and security policies. This goes beyond basic type checking and allows for business rule validation. - For string inputs received via
click
options or arguments, apply sanitization techniques such as regular expressions or allowlists within your command functions to restrict characters and patterns. This is crucial for preventing injection attacks originating from user-provided command-line input.- Threats Mitigated:
- Command Injection (High Severity) - Through unsanitized input passed via
click
parameters. - Path Traversal (High Severity) - If file paths are accepted through
click.Path
without further validation. - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) if outputting to web (Medium Severity) - If
click
output is used in web context and input is not sanitized. - Data Integrity Issues (Medium Severity) - Invalid input from command-line arguments leading to application errors.
- Command Injection (High Severity) - Through unsanitized input passed via
- Impact:
- Command Injection: High reduction in risk. Directly sanitizing
click
input is key to preventing this. - Path Traversal: High reduction in risk. Validating
click.Path
input confines file access. - XSS: Medium reduction in risk. Sanitization of
click
output helps mitigate XSS if output is web-bound. - Data Integrity Issues: High reduction in risk.
click
type validation and custom checks ensure data validity.
- Command Injection: High reduction in risk. Directly sanitizing
- Currently Implemented: Partially implemented.
click
parameter types are used in some areas, andclick.Choice
might be used for specific options, but consistent custom validation and sanitization within command functions are lacking.- Location:
cli.py
- parameter definitions use some types andclick.Choice
in places, but validation logic in command functions is inconsistent.
- Location:
- Missing Implementation: Systematically implement custom validation functions and sanitization for all relevant
click
options and arguments, especially those handling strings and file paths, within the command functions incli.py
and related modules.
- Threats Mitigated:
Mitigation Strategy: Path Traversal Prevention using click.Path
Features
Description:
- Leverage
click.Path
withresolve_path=True
andpath_type=Path
for all file path parameters.resolve_path=True
withinclick.Path
resolves symbolic links and normalizes paths, whilepath_type=Path
ensures you work withpathlib.Path
objects directly fromclick
. - Utilize
click.Path
'sexists
,file_okay
,dir_okay
,readable
,writable
,executable
parameters to enforce basic file system checks directly withinclick
parameter definition. This validates file existence and permissions at theclick
parsing stage. - Combine
click.Path
with manual path confinement checks. Afterclick
processing, usepathlib.Path.resolve().is_relative_to(base_directory)
to verify that the resolved path fromclick.Path
is within an expected base directory. This adds an extra layer of security beyondclick
's built-in checks.- Threats Mitigated:
- Path Traversal (High Severity) - By misusing or bypassing
click.Path
's intended file path handling. - Unauthorized File Access (High Severity) - Gaining access to files outside the intended scope through
click.Path
parameters.
- Path Traversal (High Severity) - By misusing or bypassing
- Impact:
- Path Traversal: High reduction in risk. Properly using
click.Path
features and confinement checks is very effective. - Unauthorized File Access: Medium to High reduction in risk. Depends on the strictness of base directory definition and usage of
click.Path
parameters.
- Path Traversal: High reduction in risk. Properly using
- Currently Implemented: Partially implemented.
click.Path
is used, butresolve_path=True
,path_type=Path
, andis_relative_to
checks are not consistently applied. Built-inclick.Path
checks (exists
, etc.) might be underutilized.- Location:
cli.py
- some file path parameters useclick.Path
, but not always with recommended settings and confinement checks are missing.
- Location:
- Missing Implementation: Enforce
resolve_path=True
,path_type=Path
for allclick.Path
parameters. Consistently use built-inclick.Path
checks where applicable. Implementis_relative_to
checks in command functions handling file paths fromclick.Path
incli.py
and related modules.
- Threats Mitigated:
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Prompting with click.prompt
Description:
- Always use
hide_input=True
inclick.prompt
when prompting for sensitive information like passwords or API keys. This prevents the input from being echoed on the terminal, reducing the risk of shoulder surfing. - Apply input validation and sanitization to the input obtained from
click.prompt
just as you would forclick.option
andclick.argument
. Validate the format, length, and content of the prompted input within your command function. - Consider using
click.password_prompt()
as a more specialized alternative toclick.prompt(hide_input=True)
for password input.click.password_prompt()
is designed specifically for password prompting and may offer additional security considerations.- Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (Low Severity) - Passwords echoed on screen during
click.prompt
. - Input Validation Issues (Medium Severity) - Invalid or malicious input provided through
click.prompt
.
- Information Disclosure (Low Severity) - Passwords echoed on screen during
- Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Low reduction in risk (primarily cosmetic for password echoing).
hide_input=True
effectively addresses this. - Input Validation Issues: Medium to High reduction in risk. Validating
click.prompt
input ensures data integrity.
- Information Disclosure: Low reduction in risk (primarily cosmetic for password echoing).
- Currently Implemented: Partially implemented.
hide_input=True
might be used for password prompts, but consistent input validation for data fromclick.prompt
is not guaranteed.click.password_prompt()
might not be used.- Location: Command functions using
click.prompt
incli.py
.
- Location: Command functions using
- Missing Implementation: Ensure
hide_input=True
is consistently used for sensitive prompts. Implement input validation and sanitization for all data obtained fromclick.prompt
. Evaluate and potentially switch toclick.password_prompt()
for password inputs.
- Threats Mitigated:
Mitigation Strategy: Review Click Command Structure for Unintended Functionality and Authorization
Description:
- Carefully design your Click command structure (commands, subcommands, options, arguments) to reflect intended functionality and access control. Ensure that the command hierarchy logically represents the application's features and user roles.
- Implement authorization checks within your Click command functions. Based on user roles or permissions, verify if the current user is authorized to execute the requested command and access the specified resources (e.g., files, data) indicated by
click
parameters. - Test various combinations of Click commands, subcommands, options, and arguments to identify any unintended execution paths or authorization bypasses. Focus on testing edge cases and unexpected input combinations to uncover potential logical flaws in your command structure.
- Threats Mitigated:
- Authorization Bypass (Medium to High Severity) - Exploiting unintended command combinations in
click
to bypass access controls. - Logical Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity) - Flaws in
click
command structure leading to unexpected or insecure behavior.
- Authorization Bypass (Medium to High Severity) - Exploiting unintended command combinations in
- Impact:
- Authorization Bypass: Medium to High reduction in risk. Well-designed
click
structure and authorization checks are crucial. - Logical Vulnerabilities: Medium reduction in risk. Reduces the likelihood of logical flaws in command execution flow.
- Authorization Bypass: Medium to High reduction in risk. Well-designed
- Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Command structure is designed, but explicit authorization checks within command functions and dedicated security review of command combinations are likely missing.
- Location:
cli.py
- command and subcommand definitions and logic. Authorization logic might be present but not consistently applied or reviewed in the context ofclick
command structure.
- Location:
- Missing Implementation: Implement robust authorization checks within relevant command functions in
cli.py
. Conduct a security review specifically focused on theclick
command structure and potential authorization bypasses through command combinations.
- Threats Mitigated:
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Handling of Shell Completion Scripts Generated by Click
Description:
- Review the shell completion scripts generated by
click
(usingyour_cli --bash-completion
, etc.). Examine the scripts for any potential security vulnerabilities, such as unintended command execution or information leaks within the completion logic. - If distributing shell completion scripts, ensure they are served over secure channels (HTTPS) and integrity is verified (e.g., using checksums). Prevent modification of completion scripts during distribution.
- Consider the security implications of enabling shell completion, especially in shared or less trusted environments. In highly sensitive environments, disabling shell completion might be a more secure default.
- Regenerate and review shell completion scripts after any changes to the Click application's command structure. Ensure that updates to the CLI do not introduce new vulnerabilities in the completion scripts.
- Threats Mitigated:
- Information Disclosure (Low Severity) - Shell completion scripts potentially revealing internal paths or command structures.
- Minor Security Risks (Low Severity) - In rare cases, poorly designed completion scripts could introduce minor vulnerabilities.
- Impact:
- Information Disclosure: Low reduction in risk. Reviewing completion scripts minimizes information leakage.
- Minor Security Risks: Low reduction in risk. Mitigates potential minor security issues in completion script logic.
- Currently Implemented: Not implemented. Shell completion scripts are generated by
click
, but they are not actively reviewed for security implications, and distribution/handling is not secured.- Location: Shell completion script generation process (user-initiated). Distribution and usage are outside the application's direct control but need consideration.
- Missing Implementation: Implement a process to review generated shell completion scripts for security vulnerabilities. Define secure distribution and handling procedures for completion scripts if they are offered to users. Evaluate the necessity of enabling shell completion based on the application's security context.
- Threats Mitigated: