Objective: Compromise Flask Application by Exploiting Flask Weaknesses
Compromise Flask Application ├───[AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Exploit Flask Configuration Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Debug Mode Enabled in Production [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └───[AND] Information Disclosure via Debugger │ ├───[OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Insecure Secret Key [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └───[AND] Session Hijacking │ ├───[OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Insecure Cookie Settings [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └───[AND] Session Hijacking via Insecure Cookies ├───[AND] Exploit Flask Core Vulnerabilities (Less Common, but Possible) │ ├───[OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Request Handling Vulnerabilities (Limited in Core Flask, more in extensions/application logic) │ │ └───[AND] Denial of Service via Request Flooding (Werkzeug level, but impacts Flask) [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Vulnerabilities in Jinja2 (Templating Engine) [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └───[AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Exploit Flask Extension Vulnerabilities (If Extensions are Used) [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Vulnerable Flask Extension [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └───[AND] Identify and Exploit Vulnerability in a specific Flask Extension │ ├───[OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Dependency Vulnerabilities in Extension Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ └───[AND] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Libraries Used by Flask Extensions └───[AND] [HIGH RISK PATH] Social Engineering or Physical Access (General Threats, but worth mentioning for completeness - less Flask specific) [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR] [HIGH RISK PATH] Phishing Attacks Targeting Developers/Operators [CRITICAL NODE] │ └───[AND] Gain Credentials or Access
Attack Tree Path: Exploit Flask Configuration Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE]
Description: This is a broad category encompassing vulnerabilities arising from insecure Flask application configuration. It's a critical node because misconfigurations are common and can lead to various severe attacks.
- High-Risk Paths within:
- Debug Mode Enabled in Production [CRITICAL NODE]
- Attack Vector: Information Disclosure via Debugger
- Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: Significant
- Effort: Minimal
- Skill Level: Novice
- Detection Difficulty: Easy
- Mitigation: Disable debug mode in production. Use environment variables for configuration.
- Insecure Secret Key [CRITICAL NODE]
- Attack Vector: Session Hijacking
- Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: Critical
- Effort: Moderate
- Skill Level: Intermediate
- Detection Difficulty: Difficult
- Mitigation: Use a strong, randomly generated secret key. Store it securely (environment variables, secrets management).
- Insecure Cookie Settings [CRITICAL NODE]
- Attack Vector: Session Hijacking via Insecure Cookies
- Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: Critical
- Effort: Minimal
- Skill Level: Beginner
- Detection Difficulty: Moderate
- Mitigation: Configure cookies with
HttpOnly=True
,Secure=True
, andSameSite
attributes.
- Debug Mode Enabled in Production [CRITICAL NODE]
Attack Tree Path: Request Handling Vulnerabilities (Limited in Core Flask, more in extensions/application logic)
- High-Risk Path: Denial of Service via Request Flooding (Werkzeug level, but impacts Flask) [CRITICAL NODE]
- Attack Vector: Denial of Service via Request Flooding
- Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: Significant
- Effort: Low
- Skill Level: Beginner
- Detection Difficulty: Moderate
- Mitigation: Implement rate limiting, use a Web Application Firewall (WAF), and consider load balancing.
Attack Tree Path: Vulnerabilities in Jinja2 (Templating Engine) [CRITICAL NODE]
- High-Risk Path: Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) [CRITICAL NODE]
- Attack Vector: Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI)
- Likelihood: Low to Medium
- Impact: Critical
- Effort: Moderate to High
- Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
- Detection Difficulty: Difficult to Very Difficult
- Mitigation: Avoid using user-controlled input directly in templates. Sanitize and escape user input if unavoidable. Use autoescaping features of Jinja2.
Description: Flask extensions, and their dependencies, can introduce vulnerabilities. This is a critical node because applications often rely on extensions.
- High-Risk Paths within:
- Vulnerable Flask Extension [CRITICAL NODE]
- Attack Vector: Exploiting Vulnerability in a specific Flask Extension
- Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: Varies
- Effort: Moderate to High
- Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
- Detection Difficulty: Moderate to Difficult
- Mitigation: Audit and select extensions carefully. Keep extensions updated. Monitor for security advisories.
- Dependency Vulnerabilities in Extension Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE]
- Attack Vector: Exploiting Vulnerabilities in Libraries Used by Flask Extensions
- Likelihood: Medium
- Impact: Varies
- Effort: Low to Moderate
- Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate
- Detection Difficulty: Moderate
- Mitigation: Use dependency scanning tools. Keep dependencies updated. Implement Software Composition Analysis (SCA).
- Vulnerable Flask Extension [CRITICAL NODE]
Attack Tree Path: Social Engineering or Physical Access (General Threats, but worth mentioning for completeness - less Flask specific) [CRITICAL NODE]
- High-Risk Path: Phishing Attacks Targeting Developers/Operators [CRITICAL NODE]
- Attack Vector: Phishing Attacks Targeting Developers/Operators
- Likelihood: High
- Impact: Critical
- Effort: Moderate
- Skill Level: Beginner to Intermediate
- Detection Difficulty: Moderate
- Mitigation: Security awareness training for developers and operators. Implement email security measures. Use multi-factor authentication.