Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
103 lines (94 loc) · 12.9 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

103 lines (94 loc) · 12.9 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for pandas-dev/pandas

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for Pandas Data

  • Description:
    1. Identify Input Points: Pinpoint all locations in your application where data is loaded into pandas DataFrames from external sources (files, APIs, databases).
    2. Validate Data Types: After loading data into a DataFrame, immediately check the data types of each column using df.dtypes. Ensure they match the expected types. Convert to expected types explicitly using astype() and handle potential errors during conversion.
    3. Validate Data Ranges and Formats: For each column, implement specific validation rules:
      • Numerical Columns: Check for minimum and maximum allowed values, ensure they are within acceptable ranges.
      • String Columns: Validate string lengths, allowed characters (e.g., using regular expressions), and sanitize special characters if necessary.
      • Date/Time Columns: Validate date formats and ranges, ensuring they are valid dates and within expected timeframes.
    4. Use Data Validation Libraries: Integrate data validation libraries like cerberus, jsonschema, or pandera to define schemas for your DataFrames and enforce validation rules programmatically on pandas DataFrames.
    5. Handle Validation Errors: Implement robust error handling for validation failures when working with pandas DataFrames. Decide how to respond to invalid data (reject, filter, replace).
    6. Logging: Log all validation attempts and failures related to pandas data for auditing and debugging.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Data Injection (High Severity): Prevents malicious data crafted to exploit vulnerabilities in downstream processes that use pandas DataFrames.
    • Denial of Service (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of DoS attacks caused by processing malformed data within pandas.
    • Logic Errors and Application Bugs (Medium Severity): Prevents unexpected data formats or values from causing application errors when using pandas.
  • Impact:
    • Data Injection: Significantly reduces the risk by acting as a strong barrier against malicious input into pandas DataFrames.
    • Denial of Service: Partially mitigates the risk by limiting the impact of malformed inputs processed by pandas.
    • Logic Errors and Application Bugs: Significantly reduces the risk by ensuring data within pandas DataFrames conforms to expectations.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • Basic data type checks are in place for some API endpoints that load data into pandas.
    • No comprehensive validation schemas are defined or enforced for pandas DataFrames across all data input points.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Missing comprehensive validation schemas for all data input points that feed data into pandas DataFrames.
    • Lack of robust error handling and logging for validation failures when working with pandas DataFrames in several modules.
    • No integration of data validation libraries like pandera for schema enforcement on pandas DataFrames.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure File Format Handling and Parsing (Pandas Specific)

  • Description:
    1. Minimize Supported Formats in Pandas Usage: Review the file formats your application uses with pandas. Disable or remove support for formats that are not strictly necessary for pandas data loading, especially complex or less secure formats like Excel if alternatives exist for pandas.
    2. Prefer Safer Formats with Pandas: When possible, encourage or default to using simpler and safer data formats like CSV or JSON over binary formats (like Excel or Pickle) or formats with complex parsing logic when loading data into pandas, especially from user-uploaded data or untrusted sources.
    3. Restrict Excel Processing with Pandas: If Excel support is required for pandas:
      • Use libraries known for better security and robustness (e.g., openpyxl is generally preferred over older libraries like xlrd which had known vulnerabilities) when used with pandas.
      • Consider disabling or restricting features like macro execution when processing Excel files from untrusted sources loaded by pandas.
      • If possible, convert Excel files to safer formats (like CSV) before processing with pandas, especially for user uploads intended for pandas.
    4. Resource Limits during Pandas Parsing: Implement resource limits (memory, CPU time) when pandas is parsing files, particularly from untrusted sources. This can be done using operating system limits, containerization features, or within the application code itself (e.g., setting timeouts for pandas file reading functions).
    5. File Size Limits for Pandas Input: Enforce maximum file size limits for uploaded files that will be processed by pandas to prevent denial-of-service attacks through excessively large files designed to exhaust server resources during pandas parsing.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Remote Code Execution (High Severity): Mitigates vulnerabilities in file parsing libraries used by pandas that could be exploited by malicious files to execute arbitrary code on the server.
    • Denial of Service (High Severity): Prevents DoS attacks caused by maliciously crafted files designed to consume excessive resources (CPU, memory, disk I/O) during pandas parsing, leading to application slowdown or crashes.
    • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of information leakage if file parsing libraries used by pandas have vulnerabilities that could be exploited to access sensitive data.
  • Impact:
    • Remote Code Execution: Significantly reduces the risk by limiting attack surface (fewer formats supported by pandas, safer libraries used by pandas) and isolating parsing processes.
    • Denial of Service: Significantly reduces the risk by implementing resource limits and file size restrictions for pandas input, preventing resource exhaustion from malicious files processed by pandas.
    • Information Disclosure: Partially mitigates the risk by using more secure libraries with pandas and potentially sandboxing parsing processes.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • File size limits are enforced for file uploads processed by pandas.
    • openpyxl is used for Excel processing with pandas.
    • Resource limits during pandas parsing are not explicitly configured.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • No explicit restriction on supported file formats used by pandas - all pandas-supported formats are currently enabled.
    • No sandboxing or isolation for file parsing processes involving pandas.
    • Missing explicit resource limits (CPU, memory, time) for pandas file parsing operations.

Mitigation Strategy: Mitigation of Deserialization Vulnerabilities (Pickle) - Pandas Specific

  • Description:
    1. Identify Pandas Pickle Usage: Thoroughly audit your codebase to identify all instances where pd.to_pickle() and pd.read_pickle() are used.
    2. Eliminate Pandas Pickle for Untrusted Data: Strongly discourage and ideally eliminate the use of pd.read_pickle() to load data from any untrusted or external sources (user uploads, data from external APIs, etc.). This is the most critical step for pandas-related pickle security.
    3. Replace Pandas Pickle with Safer Formats: For data exchange with external systems or when dealing with potentially untrusted data involving pandas DataFrames, replace pickle with safer serialization formats like CSV, JSON, Parquet, or Feather when working with pandas.
    4. Secure Pandas Pickle Usage (If Absolutely Necessary): If pickle must be used with pandas (e.g., for internal data persistence in a completely controlled and trusted environment):
      • Restrict Access: Ensure that pickled files created by pd.to_pickle() are stored in locations with strict access controls.
      • Code Review and Audits: Rigorously review and audit all code that handles pickled data using pandas to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced through improper usage of pd.read_pickle().
      • Consider Alternatives Even for Internal Pandas Use: Even for internal use with pandas, evaluate if safer alternatives like Parquet or Feather could be used instead of Pickle to reduce long-term security risks associated with pd.read_pickle().
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Remote Code Execution (Critical Severity): Directly mitigates the most severe threat associated with pd.read_pickle() deserialization - the ability for an attacker to execute arbitrary code by crafting a malicious pickled file intended for pd.read_pickle().
  • Impact:
    • Remote Code Execution: Completely eliminates the risk if pd.read_pickle() is entirely removed for untrusted data. Significantly reduces the risk if pd.read_pickle() usage is restricted to trusted internal environments and secured with access controls and code reviews.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • pd.read_pickle() is not used for handling user-uploaded data.
    • pd.to_pickle() and pd.read_pickle() are currently used for internal caching of processed DataFrames to improve performance.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Need to replace pickle-based caching using pandas with a safer alternative (e.g., in-memory caching, database caching, or serialization to safer formats like Parquet or Feather even for internal caching of pandas DataFrames).
    • No formal policy or guidelines against using pd.read_pickle() for untrusted data are documented or enforced.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Coding Practices When Using Pandas

  • Description:
    1. Avoid Dynamic Code Execution Based on Pandas Data: Absolutely avoid using data from pandas DataFrames to dynamically construct and execute code (e.g., using eval(), exec(), or os.system() with DataFrame content). This is a major code injection vulnerability risk specifically when working with pandas data.
    2. Secure Output Encoding for Pandas Data: When displaying data derived from pandas DataFrames in web applications or other contexts, ensure proper output encoding (e.g., HTML escaping, URL encoding) to prevent cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities if the DataFrame contains user-provided data. This is crucial when presenting data originating from pandas.
    3. Code Reviews Focused on Pandas Security: Conduct regular security code reviews of the application code that uses pandas. Focus specifically on identifying potential vulnerabilities related to data handling within pandas, input validation for pandas data, output encoding of pandas data, and any insecure pandas usage patterns.
    4. Security Training for Pandas Usage: Provide security awareness training to developers on common web application vulnerabilities, secure coding practices, and pandas-specific security considerations.
    5. Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) for Pandas Code: Integrate SAST tools into the development pipeline to automatically scan code for potential security vulnerabilities, including insecure pandas usage patterns.
  • List of Threats Mitigated:
    • Code Injection (High Severity): Prevents code injection vulnerabilities arising from dynamic code execution based on untrusted pandas data.
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (Medium Severity): Mitigates XSS vulnerabilities by ensuring proper output encoding of pandas data displayed in web contexts.
  • Impact:
    • Code Injection: Completely eliminates the risk if dynamic code execution based on pandas data is avoided.
    • Cross-Site Scripting: Significantly reduces the risk by ensuring proper output encoding of pandas data.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • Basic code reviews are conducted, but not specifically focused on pandas security.
    • Output encoding is generally applied in web templates, but not consistently verified for pandas-derived data.
    • No SAST tools are currently integrated to check pandas-specific code security.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • No formal secure coding guidelines specifically for pandas usage.
    • Lack of dedicated security code reviews focusing on pandas vulnerabilities and secure pandas coding practices.
    • No integration of SAST tools to automatically detect insecure pandas usage patterns.
    • No formal security training for developers on pandas-specific security considerations.