Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
160 lines (116 loc) · 16.6 KB

File metadata and controls

160 lines (116 loc) · 16.6 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for plotly/dash

Objective: Compromise Dash Application by Exploiting Dash-Specific Vulnerabilities

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Dash Application [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[AND] Exploit Dash Frontend Vulnerabilities
│   ├───[OR] Client-Side Injection Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[AND] Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Dash Components [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   ├───[OR] Stored XSS in User-Provided Data Displayed by Dash [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   └─── Inject malicious script into database/storage used by Dash app [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └───[OR] Reflected XSS via URL parameters or user input processed by Dash callbacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │       └─── Craft malicious URL or input that is not properly sanitized in Dash callback and rendered in a Dash component [HIGH-RISK PATH]
├───[AND] Exploit Dash Backend Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├───[OR] Server-Side Injection Attacks via Dash Callbacks [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   ├───[AND] Command Injection in Dash Callbacks [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   └─── Inject malicious commands into OS commands executed within Dash callbacks (e.g., using `os.system`, `subprocess`) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[AND] Code Injection in Dash Callbacks (Python) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └─── Inject malicious Python code into `exec` or `eval` functions within Dash callbacks (if used, highly discouraged) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └───[AND] SQL Injection in Dash Callbacks (if database interaction exists) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │       └─── Inject malicious SQL queries through user input processed in Dash callbacks interacting with a database [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR] Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks on Dash Backend [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[AND] Callback Function Overload [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └─── Send excessive requests to resource-intensive Dash callbacks to exhaust server resources (CPU, memory) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR] Authentication and Authorization Bypass in Dash Application Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[AND] Insecure Session Management in Dash (if implemented) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └─── Exploit weaknesses in custom session management implemented within the Dash application (e.g., predictable session IDs, insecure storage) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   └───[AND] Authorization Flaws in Dash Callback Logic [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │       └─── Bypass authorization checks in Dash callbacks to access restricted functionalities or data [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR] Dependency Vulnerabilities in Dash Backend [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   └─── Exploit known vulnerabilities in Dash itself, Flask, Werkzeug, or other Python libraries used by Dash [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │       └─── Identify and exploit outdated Dash or dependency versions with known security flaws (check `requirements.txt` or `Pipfile`) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   └───[OR] Insecure Configuration of Dash Application [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]
│       └─── Misconfigure Dash application or underlying server (Flask) leading to vulnerabilities (e.g., debug mode enabled in production, insecure CORS settings) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
└───[AND] Exploit Dash Communication Channel Vulnerabilities
    ├───[OR] Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   └─── Intercept and manipulate communication between client and server if HTTPS is not properly implemented or configured [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │       └─── Perform MitM attack on network traffic to eavesdrop or modify data exchanged between browser and Dash server [HIGH-RISK PATH]

This is the root goal of the attacker. Success means gaining unauthorized access and control over the Dash application and potentially the underlying server and data.

  • Attack Vector: Attackers inject malicious scripts into the frontend of the Dash application, which are then executed in users' browsers.
    • Impact: Can lead to data theft, session hijacking, defacement, redirection to malicious sites, and further compromise of user systems.
    • Dash Specific Relevance: Dash applications dynamically render content based on user interactions and data. If input handling is not secure, XSS vulnerabilities can easily arise.
  • Attack Vector: Exploits vulnerabilities in how Dash components handle and render user-provided data or URL parameters. * Impact: Same as general Client-Side Injection Attacks, but specifically targeting Dash component rendering. * Dash Specific Relevance: Dash components are the building blocks of the UI. Vulnerabilities here directly impact the application's security.
  • Attack Vector: Malicious scripts are injected into data stored by the application (e.g., database). When this data is later retrieved and displayed by Dash components without proper sanitization, the script executes in the browsers of users viewing the content. * Impact: Persistent compromise of users viewing affected data. * Dash Specific Relevance: Dash applications often display data from backend sources. If data handling is insecure, stored XSS is a significant risk.
  • Attack Vector: Malicious scripts are injected into URL parameters or user input that is processed by Dash callbacks and then directly rendered in Dash components without sanitization. The script executes immediately when the user accesses the crafted URL or submits the malicious input. * Impact: Immediate compromise of users clicking malicious links or submitting crafted input. * Dash Specific Relevance: Dash callbacks handle user interactions and can directly influence frontend rendering. Unsanitized input in callbacks is a direct path to reflected XSS.
  • Attack Vector: Attackers inject malicious code or commands into user input that is processed by Dash callbacks and used in server-side operations like system commands, code execution, or database queries.
    • Impact: Can lead to full server compromise, data breaches, data manipulation, and denial of service.
    • Dash Specific Relevance: Dash callbacks are Python functions executed on the server. They handle user interactions and backend logic. Injection vulnerabilities here can have severe consequences.
  • Attack Vector: Malicious commands are injected into user input that is used to construct and execute operating system commands within Dash callbacks (e.g., using os.system, subprocess). * Impact: Full control over the server operating system, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands, install malware, steal data, etc. * Dash Specific Relevance: If Dash applications need to interact with the OS (e.g., for system utilities, file operations), and user input is involved, command injection is a critical risk.
  • Attack Vector: Malicious Python code is injected into user input that is used with functions like exec or eval within Dash callbacks (highly discouraged practice). * Impact: Arbitrary Python code execution on the server, leading to full server compromise. * Dash Specific Relevance: While exec and eval should be avoided, if used carelessly in Dash callbacks, they create a direct code injection vulnerability.
  • Attack Vector: Malicious SQL queries are injected through user input that is processed in Dash callbacks and used to construct SQL queries interacting with a database. * Impact: Data breaches, data manipulation, unauthorized access to sensitive information, and potential database server compromise. * Dash Specific Relevance: Dash applications often visualize data from databases. If database interactions in callbacks are not secured against SQL injection, it's a major vulnerability.
  • Attack Vector: Attackers send a large number of requests to resource-intensive Dash callbacks, overwhelming the server with processing demands and exhausting resources (CPU, memory).
    • Impact: Application unavailability, server slowdown, and disruption of service for legitimate users.
    • Dash Specific Relevance: Dash applications rely on callbacks to handle user interactions and updates. Resource-intensive callbacks are potential DoS targets.
  • Attack Vector: Specifically targeting resource-intensive callbacks by sending excessive requests. * Impact: Application becomes unresponsive or crashes due to server overload. * Dash Specific Relevance: Dash applications with complex visualizations or data processing in callbacks are more susceptible to this type of DoS.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting weaknesses in custom authentication or authorization mechanisms implemented within the Dash application.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to restricted functionalities, data, or administrative areas of the application.
    • Dash Specific Relevance: If Dash applications require access control, poorly implemented authentication and authorization can negate security efforts.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in custom session management, such as predictable session IDs, insecure storage of session data, or lack of proper session invalidation. * Impact: Session hijacking, allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate users and gain unauthorized access. * Dash Specific Relevance: If Dash applications implement custom session handling, vulnerabilities here can directly bypass authentication.
  • Attack Vector: Bypassing authorization checks within Dash callbacks, allowing unauthorized users to access restricted functionalities or data by manipulating requests or exploiting logic flaws. * Impact: Unauthorized access to specific features or data, even if authentication is in place. * Dash Specific Relevance: Authorization must be enforced within Dash callbacks to protect sensitive operations and data access.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting known security vulnerabilities in Dash itself, Flask, Werkzeug, or other Python libraries used by the Dash application.
    • Impact: Can range from information disclosure to remote code execution, depending on the specific vulnerability.
    • Dash Specific Relevance: Dash relies on a stack of Python libraries. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can directly impact Dash applications.
  • Attack Vector: Identifying and exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities in outdated versions of Dash or its dependencies. * Impact: Depends on the vulnerability, but can be critical, including remote code execution. * Dash Specific Relevance: Keeping Dash and its dependencies updated is crucial for patching known vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting misconfigurations in the Dash application or the underlying Flask server, such as leaving debug mode enabled in production or having insecure CORS settings.
    • Impact: Information disclosure, increased attack surface, and potential for various attacks depending on the misconfiguration.
    • Dash Specific Relevance: Proper configuration of Dash and Flask is essential for security. Misconfigurations can easily introduce vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Vector: Exploiting common misconfigurations like debug mode enabled in production, insecure CORS, or weak security headers. * Impact: Information leakage (debug mode), cross-origin attacks (CORS), and reduced security posture. * Dash Specific Relevance: Default configurations or rushed deployments can easily lead to insecure configurations in Dash applications.
  • Attack Vector: Intercepting and manipulating communication between the client and server if HTTPS is not properly implemented or configured.
    • Impact: Eavesdropping on sensitive data, session hijacking, and manipulation of requests and responses.
    • Dash Specific Relevance: Dash applications often transmit data between client and server. Without HTTPS, this communication is vulnerable to MitM attacks.
  • Attack Vector: Performing a MitM attack on network traffic to intercept and potentially modify data exchanged between the browser and the Dash server when HTTPS is missing or misconfigured. * Impact: Loss of confidentiality and integrity of data transmitted between client and server. * Dash Specific Relevance: Ensuring HTTPS is correctly configured is fundamental for securing Dash application communication.