Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
220 lines (184 loc) · 18.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

220 lines (184 loc) · 18.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for prefecthq/prefect

Objective: To gain unauthorized access, control, or disrupt the application and its underlying infrastructure by exploiting vulnerabilities or misconfigurations within the Prefect orchestration platform.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application via Prefect Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[1.0] Compromise Prefect Control Plane (Server/Cloud) [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[1.1] Exploit Authentication/Authorization Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[1.1.1] Brute-force/Guess Weak Admin Credentials [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[1.1.2] Exploit API Key Leakage/Exposure [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[1.1.3] Bypass/Exploit RBAC Misconfigurations [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[1.2] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Prefect Server Software [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[1.2.1] Exploit Known CVEs in Prefect Server (Outdated Version) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[1.2.3] Dependency Vulnerabilities in Prefect Server [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   └───[1.3] Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Prefect Server Installation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       └───[1.3.1] Compromise Prefect Server Dependencies during Installation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
├───[2.0] Compromise Prefect Agents [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[2.1] Exploit Agent Authentication/Authorization Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[2.1.1] Steal/Compromise Agent API Keys/Credentials [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[2.2] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Agent Software [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[2.2.1] Exploit Known CVEs in Prefect Agent (Outdated Version) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[2.2.3] Dependency Vulnerabilities in Prefect Agent [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[2.3] Compromise Agent Execution Environment (Infrastructure) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[2.3.1] Exploit Vulnerabilities in Agent Host OS/Infrastructure [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   └───[2.4] Malicious Agent Deployment/Registration [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       └───[2.4.1] Deploy Rogue Agent to Execute Malicious Flows [HIGH-RISK PATH]
├───[3.0] Exploit Flow Execution Context [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[3.1] Flow Code Injection/Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[3.1.1] Inject Malicious Code into Flow Definitions [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   ├───[3.2] Data Exfiltration via Flow Execution [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[3.2.1] Modify Flows to Exfiltrate Sensitive Data [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[3.2.3] Leverage Integrations for Data Exfiltration [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│   └───[3.4] Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Flow Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH]
│       └───[3.4.1] Compromise Python Packages Used in Flows [HIGH-RISK PATH]
└───[4.0] Abuse Prefect Features/Functionality (Misconfiguration/Logical Exploitation) [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    ├───[4.1] Flow Scheduling Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├───[4.1.1] Modify Flow Schedules to Execute Malicious Flows [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    ├───[4.2] Work Pool/Queue Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├───[4.2.1] Starve Specific Work Pools/Queues to Delay Critical Tasks [HIGH-RISK PATH]
    │   ├───[4.2.2] Inject Malicious Tasks into Work Pools/Queues [HIGH-RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: 1.0 Compromise Prefect Control Plane (Server/Cloud) [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in the Prefect Server software itself.
    • Exploiting weaknesses in authentication and authorization mechanisms protecting the server.
    • Supply chain attacks targeting the server installation process.
    • Denial of Service attacks to disrupt server availability (though DoS is marked as medium impact, repeated success can lead to high impact over time).
  • Potential Impact: Complete compromise of the Prefect orchestration platform, allowing attackers to control all flows, access sensitive data, disrupt operations, and potentially pivot to other parts of the infrastructure.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Regularly update Prefect Server and dependencies.
    • Implement strong authentication (MFA, strong passwords) and robust authorization (RBAC).
    • Secure API key management.
    • Harden server infrastructure and monitor for intrusions.
    • Use trusted package repositories and verify package integrity during installation.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1 Exploit Authentication/Authorization Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 1.1.1 Brute-force/Guess Weak Admin Credentials [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Attempting to guess or brute-force administrator passwords to gain access to the Prefect Server admin interface.
    • 1.1.2 Exploit API Key Leakage/Exposure [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]: Finding exposed or leaked Prefect API keys (e.g., in code repositories, configuration files, public websites) which grant unauthorized access to the Prefect API.
    • 1.1.3 Bypass/Exploit RBAC Misconfigurations [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting misconfigured Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to gain elevated privileges or access resources beyond authorized scope.
  • Potential Impact: Unauthorized access to the Prefect Control Plane, leading to control over flows, data access, and potential system disruption.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Enforce strong password policies and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for admin accounts.
    • Implement secure API key management practices: use secrets management solutions, rotate keys regularly, restrict access to keys.
    • Regularly review and audit RBAC configurations, adhere to the principle of least privilege.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2 Exploit Vulnerabilities in Prefect Server Software [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 1.2.1 Exploit Known CVEs in Prefect Server (Outdated Version) [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in outdated versions of Prefect Server software.
    • 1.2.3 Dependency Vulnerabilities in Prefect Server [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting vulnerabilities in third-party libraries and dependencies used by Prefect Server.
  • Potential Impact: Remote code execution on the Prefect Server, leading to complete system compromise.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Maintain an up-to-date Prefect Server installation by regularly applying security patches and upgrading to the latest stable versions.
    • Implement dependency scanning to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in Prefect Server dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 1.3 Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Prefect Server Installation [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 1.3.1 Compromise Prefect Server Dependencies during Installation [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Compromising the integrity of Prefect Server dependencies during the installation process, for example, by injecting malicious code into downloaded packages.
  • Potential Impact: Installation of a compromised Prefect Server, leading to persistent backdoor access and control from the outset.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Use trusted and official package repositories for Prefect Server installation.
    • Verify checksums of downloaded packages to ensure integrity.
    • Consider using private package repositories to control and vet dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 2.0 Compromise Prefect Agents [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Exploiting vulnerabilities in the Prefect Agent software.
    • Exploiting weaknesses in agent authentication and authorization.
    • Compromising the infrastructure where agents are running.
    • Deploying rogue agents to execute malicious flows.
  • Potential Impact: Gaining control over flow execution, allowing attackers to run arbitrary code within the application's infrastructure, access data processed by flows, and potentially pivot to other systems.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Regularly update Prefect Agents and dependencies.
    • Secure agent API key management.
    • Harden agent host infrastructure (OS, containers, VMs).
    • Implement agent registration whitelisting and monitoring for unauthorized agents.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1 Exploit Agent Authentication/Authorization Weaknesses [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 2.1.1 Steal/Compromise Agent API Keys/Credentials [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]: Obtaining agent API keys, which are used for agents to authenticate with the Prefect Server. This could be through various means like accessing configuration files, environment variables, or intercepting network traffic (though less likely if HTTPS is used).
  • Potential Impact: Agent impersonation, allowing attackers to register rogue agents or take control of existing agents, leading to unauthorized flow execution.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Securely store agent API keys using secrets management solutions or dedicated vaults.
    • Rotate agent API keys regularly.
    • Restrict access to agent API keys to authorized personnel and systems.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2 Exploit Vulnerabilities in Agent Software [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 2.2.1 Exploit Known CVEs in Prefect Agent (Outdated Version) [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities in outdated Prefect Agent software.
    • 2.2.3 Dependency Vulnerabilities in Prefect Agent [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by Prefect Agents.
  • Potential Impact: Remote code execution on agent hosts, potentially leading to host compromise and lateral movement within the infrastructure.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Maintain up-to-date Prefect Agents by regularly patching and upgrading.
    • Implement dependency scanning for agent dependencies and remediate vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3 Compromise Agent Execution Environment (Infrastructure) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 2.3.1 Exploit Vulnerabilities in Agent Host OS/Infrastructure [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the operating system or infrastructure (servers, VMs, containers) where Prefect Agents are running.
  • Potential Impact: Host compromise, potentially leading to agent compromise, data access, and lateral movement.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Regularly patch and harden agent host operating systems and infrastructure.
    • Implement network segmentation to limit the impact of agent host compromise.

Attack Tree Path: 2.4 Malicious Agent Deployment/Registration [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 2.4.1 Deploy Rogue Agent to Execute Malicious Flows [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Deploying unauthorized, malicious Prefect Agents to the infrastructure to execute attacker-controlled flows.
  • Potential Impact: Execution of arbitrary code within the infrastructure, data theft, resource abuse, and disruption of operations.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Implement an agent registration whitelisting or approval process to prevent unauthorized agents from connecting.
    • Monitor for unauthorized agent registrations and investigate suspicious agent activity.

Attack Tree Path: 3.0 Exploit Flow Execution Context [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Manipulating flow code to inject malicious logic.
    • Exfiltrating data through flow execution.
    • Supply chain attacks targeting flow dependencies.
  • Potential Impact: Data breaches, unauthorized code execution, resource abuse, and disruption of application logic.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Validate and sanitize flow definitions.
    • Implement strict access control to flow definitions and execution.
    • Monitor flow execution for unusual activity.
    • Secure flow dependencies and use dependency scanning.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1 Flow Code Injection/Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 3.1.1 Inject Malicious Code into Flow Definitions [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Injecting malicious code directly into flow definitions, especially if flow definitions are dynamically generated or sourced from untrusted locations.
  • Potential Impact: Execution of arbitrary code within the flow execution environment, leading to data access, system compromise, or disruption.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Validate and sanitize flow definitions, especially if they are dynamically generated or sourced from external sources.
    • Use secure code repositories and implement code review processes for flow definitions.

Attack Tree Path: 3.2 Data Exfiltration via Flow Execution [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 3.2.1 Modify Flows to Exfiltrate Sensitive Data [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Modifying existing flows or creating new flows to intentionally exfiltrate sensitive data to attacker-controlled locations.
    • 3.2.3 Leverage Integrations for Data Exfiltration [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Abusing legitimate flow integrations (e.g., cloud storage, databases) to exfiltrate data to attacker-controlled external systems.
  • Potential Impact: Data breaches and loss of sensitive information.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Implement strict access control to flow definitions and modifications.
    • Monitor flow execution for unusual network activity and data transfer patterns.
    • Implement Data Loss Prevention (DLP) measures to detect and prevent sensitive data exfiltration.
    • Apply the principle of least privilege for flow integrations, granting only necessary permissions.

Attack Tree Path: 3.4 Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Flow Dependencies [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 3.4.1 Compromise Python Packages Used in Flows [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Compromising Python packages that are dependencies of Prefect flows, injecting malicious code into these packages.
  • Potential Impact: Execution of malicious code within the flow execution environment, data compromise, and system compromise.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Use dependency scanning tools to identify vulnerabilities in flow dependencies.
    • Verify the integrity of downloaded packages.
    • Consider using private package repositories to control and vet flow dependencies.
    • Consider vendoring dependencies to isolate flow environments.

Attack Tree Path: 4.0 Abuse Prefect Features/Functionality (Misconfiguration/Logical Exploitation) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • Manipulating flow schedules to execute malicious flows or disrupt operations.
    • Manipulating work pools/queues to delay critical tasks or inject malicious tasks.
  • Potential Impact: Disruption of application functionality, execution of malicious code, resource abuse.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Implement strict access control to flow scheduling and work pool configurations.
    • Validate flow parameters and enforce authorization for flow triggering.
    • Monitor flow execution status and work pool utilization for anomalies.

Attack Tree Path: 4.1 Flow Scheduling Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 4.1.1 Modify Flow Schedules to Execute Malicious Flows [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Modifying flow schedules to trigger malicious flows at specific times, potentially bypassing normal access controls or defenses.
  • Potential Impact: Execution of malicious flows, disruption of scheduled tasks, and potential system compromise.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Implement strict access control to flow scheduling configurations, limiting who can modify schedules.
    • Audit changes to flow schedules to detect unauthorized modifications.

Attack Tree Path: 4.2 Work Pool/Queue Manipulation [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vectors:
    • 4.2.1 Starve Specific Work Pools/Queues to Delay Critical Tasks [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Overloading or manipulating work pools/queues to delay or prevent the execution of critical flows, leading to denial of service or disruption of application functionality.
    • 4.2.2 Inject Malicious Tasks into Work Pools/Queues [HIGH-RISK PATH]: Injecting malicious tasks directly into work pools or queues, if allowed by the system, to execute arbitrary code.
  • Potential Impact: Disruption of critical tasks, denial of service, and potentially execution of malicious code if task injection is possible.
  • Key Mitigations:
    • Monitor work pool/queue utilization to detect starvation or unusual activity.
    • Implement fair scheduling algorithms to prevent resource starvation.
    • Ensure sufficient resources are allocated to work pools.
    • Validate tasks submitted to work pools and implement authorization for task submission to prevent malicious task injection.