Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
141 lines (124 loc) · 14.7 KB

File metadata and controls

141 lines (124 loc) · 14.7 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for prefecthq/prefect

  • Mitigation Strategy: Network Access Restriction for Prefect Server/Cloud
  • Description:
    1. Identify Authorized Networks: Determine networks needing access to Prefect Server/Cloud (office, VPN, specific VPCs).
    2. Configure Firewalls/Network Security Groups:
      • Self-hosted Prefect Server: Firewall rules to allow inbound traffic only from authorized networks on necessary ports (HTTPS, HTTP redirect). Deny all other inbound traffic.
      • Prefect Cloud: Utilize IP allowlisting features if available to restrict access origins.
    3. Network Segmentation: Deploy self-hosted Prefect Server in a dedicated, more secure network segment.
    4. Regularly Review Rules: Periodically review and update firewall rules and network security group configurations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Access to Prefect Server/Cloud (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized network access to Prefect infrastructure, reducing risks of data breaches, manipulation, and disruption.
    • Lateral Movement (Medium Severity): Limits attacker's ability to access Prefect infrastructure after compromising another system.
  • Impact: High risk reduction for unauthorized access, Medium risk reduction for lateral movement.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Firewall rules for self-hosted Server are in place for office/VPN access.
  • Missing Implementation: IP allowlisting in Prefect Cloud is not configured. Network segmentation for Prefect Server is planned.
  • Mitigation Strategy: HTTPS/TLS Enforcement for Prefect
  • Description:
    1. Obtain TLS Certificate: Get a valid TLS certificate for Prefect Server/Cloud domain/hostname.
    2. Configure Prefect Server for HTTPS:
      • Self-hosted Prefect Server: Use a reverse proxy (Nginx, Traefik) for TLS termination and HTTPS redirection.
      • Prefect Cloud: Prefect Cloud uses HTTPS inherently. Ensure https:// URLs are used for all connections.
    3. Configure Prefect Agents for HTTPS: Agents must connect to Prefect Server/Cloud using https:// URLs.
    4. Verify HTTPS Configuration: Test HTTPS access to confirm valid TLS certificate and active encryption.
    5. Automated Certificate Renewal: Implement automated certificate renewal to prevent expiration.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Prevents eavesdropping and manipulation of communication between clients and Prefect Server/Cloud by encrypting data in transit.
    • Data Exposure in Transit (High Severity): Protects sensitive data (credentials, flow data, logs) from interception during transmission.
  • Impact: High risk reduction for MITM attacks and data exposure in transit.
  • Currently Implemented: Fully implemented for self-hosted Server (Nginx, Let's Encrypt) and Prefect Cloud. All communication is over HTTPS.
  • Missing Implementation: None.
  • Mitigation Strategy: Regular Prefect Component Updates
  • Description:
    1. Establish Update Monitoring: Monitor Prefect release notes, security advisories, and community channels for updates.
    2. Develop Update Procedure: Create a procedure for updating Prefect Server, Agents, UI, and Python library, including testing before production deployment.
    3. Schedule Regular Updates: Schedule maintenance windows for Prefect updates, prioritizing security patches.
    4. Automate Updates Where Possible: Automate updates for Agents and Python library in flow environments.
    5. Track Component Versions: Maintain a record of Prefect component versions in use.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Prefect (High Severity): Reduces risk of exploiting public vulnerabilities in outdated Prefect versions.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Patches may address DoS vulnerabilities in Prefect.
    • Data Breaches (Medium to High Severity): Security updates often address vulnerabilities that could lead to data breaches via Prefect.
  • Impact: High risk reduction for exploiting known vulnerabilities, Medium risk reduction for DoS and data breaches.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Prefect releases are monitored, and Python library/Agent updates are regular. Server updates are less frequent.
  • Missing Implementation: Automated updates for Agents and Server are not in place. Update procedure is documented but not strictly followed for every release.
  • Mitigation Strategy: Prefect Secrets Management
  • Description:
    1. Identify Secrets: Identify sensitive credentials used in Prefect flows and infrastructure (API keys, database passwords, etc.).
    2. Store Secrets in Prefect Secrets: Use Prefect's built-in Secrets system or integrate with external secret managers.
    3. Access Secrets in Flows: Modify flow code to retrieve secrets from prefect.context.secrets instead of hardcoding.
    4. Implement Access Control for Secrets: Configure access control policies for Prefect Secrets, following least privilege.
    5. Regularly Audit Secret Usage: Periodically audit secret usage in flows and infrastructure.
    6. Rotate Secrets Regularly: Implement regular secret rotation to limit impact of compromised credentials.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Credential Exposure (High Severity): Prevents exposure of sensitive credentials in code, config files, logs, or insecure locations related to Prefect.
    • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Limits unauthorized access by securely managing credentials within Prefect.
    • Privilege Escalation (Medium Severity): Reduces privilege escalation risk by controlling access to Prefect secrets.
  • Impact: High risk reduction for credential exposure and unauthorized access, Medium risk reduction for privilege escalation.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Prefect Secrets is used for database credentials and some API keys.
  • Missing Implementation: Not all secrets are migrated to Prefect Secrets. Access control for secrets needs refinement. Secret rotation is not implemented.
  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization in Flows
  • Description:
    1. Identify Input Sources in Flows: Identify all input sources to Prefect flows (APIs, user input, databases, files, external services).
    2. Define Input Validation Rules: Define validation rules for each input source (data types, formats, ranges, allowed characters).
    3. Implement Input Validation Logic in Flows: Implement validation logic in flow code to check inputs against rules. Reject invalid inputs with error messages.
    4. Sanitize Inputs in Flows: Sanitize inputs to remove/escape harmful characters before use in potentially vulnerable operations within flows (database queries, commands).
    5. Use Parameterized Queries/Prepared Statements in Flows: Use parameterized queries for database interactions in flows to prevent SQL injection.
    6. Regularly Review Validation Rules: Periodically review and update input validation rules in flows.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Injection Attacks via Flows (High Severity): Prevents injection attacks (SQL, command, XSS if flow outputs are rendered) through input validation and sanitization in flows.
    • Data Integrity Issues in Flows (Medium Severity): Ensures data integrity by rejecting invalid inputs in flows.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Flows (Low to Medium Severity): Prevents DoS attacks triggered by malicious inputs to flows.
  • Impact: High risk reduction for injection attacks, Medium risk reduction for data integrity issues and DoS.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic input validation exists in some flows, but inconsistently applied. Sanitization is not consistently implemented in flows.
  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive input validation and sanitization are missing in many flows. Standardized approach and reusable validation functions are needed for flows.
  • Mitigation Strategy: Prefect RBAC Implementation
  • Description:
    1. Define Roles and Permissions: Define roles based on job functions (e.g., Flow Developer, Flow Operator, Administrator) and assign appropriate permissions to each role within Prefect (access to flows, deployments, work pools, etc.).
    2. Enable RBAC in Prefect Server/Cloud: Enable and configure RBAC features in Prefect Server or Prefect Cloud.
    3. Assign Roles to Users and Teams: Assign defined roles to users and teams based on their responsibilities.
    4. Regularly Review RBAC Configuration: Periodically review and update RBAC configurations to ensure they remain aligned with organizational needs and security best practices.
    5. Audit RBAC Usage: Audit RBAC usage to monitor access patterns and identify any potential security violations or misconfigurations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized Access to Prefect Resources (Medium to High Severity): Prevents unauthorized users from accessing or modifying Prefect flows, deployments, and infrastructure components.
    • Privilege Escalation (Medium Severity): Limits the risk of users gaining elevated privileges within the Prefect environment.
    • Data Breaches (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of data breaches by controlling access to sensitive flow data and configurations within Prefect.
  • Impact: Medium to High risk reduction for unauthorized access, Medium risk reduction for privilege escalation and data breaches.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic user roles exist in Prefect Cloud, but fine-grained RBAC is not fully configured.
  • Missing Implementation: Detailed role definitions and permission assignments are needed. Regular RBAC review and auditing are not yet in place.

Mitigation Strategy: Security Monitoring for Prefect

  • Mitigation Strategy: Prefect Security Monitoring
  • Description:
    1. Collect Prefect Logs: Collect logs from Prefect Server/Cloud, Agents, and flow runs.
    2. Analyze Logs for Security Events: Analyze logs for suspicious activity, such as failed authentication, unauthorized access attempts, unexpected errors, or unusual flow behavior.
    3. Set Up Security Alerts: Configure alerts for critical security events detected in Prefect logs.
    4. Integrate with SIEM/Security Monitoring Tools: Integrate Prefect logs with a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system or other security monitoring tools for centralized security visibility and analysis.
    5. Regularly Review Monitoring Configuration: Periodically review and update security monitoring configurations to ensure they remain effective and comprehensive.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Delayed Incident Detection (Medium to High Severity): Enables faster detection of security incidents related to Prefect, reducing the window of opportunity for attackers.
    • Unauthorized Activity (Medium Severity): Helps identify and respond to unauthorized access or malicious activity within the Prefect environment.
    • Data Breaches (Medium Severity): Contributes to the early detection of data breach attempts or successful breaches via Prefect.
  • Impact: Medium to High risk reduction for delayed incident detection, Medium risk reduction for unauthorized activity and data breaches.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic logging is enabled for Prefect Server and Agents. Logs are collected but not actively analyzed for security events.
  • Missing Implementation: Security-focused log analysis, alerting, and integration with SIEM are not yet implemented.
  • Mitigation Strategy: Prefect Security Incident Response Plan
  • Description:
    1. Develop Incident Response Plan: Create a documented incident response plan specifically for security incidents related to Prefect.
    2. Define Incident Response Procedures: Define step-by-step procedures for handling Prefect security incidents, including detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident analysis.
    3. Assign Roles and Responsibilities: Clearly assign roles and responsibilities for incident response within the team.
    4. Test Incident Response Plan: Regularly test the incident response plan through simulations or tabletop exercises.
    5. Regularly Review and Update Plan: Periodically review and update the incident response plan to ensure it remains effective and relevant.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Ineffective Incident Handling (Medium to High Severity): Ensures a structured and effective approach to handling Prefect security incidents, minimizing damage and downtime.
    • Prolonged Downtime (Medium Severity): Reduces incident resolution time and minimizes service disruption caused by security incidents.
    • Data Loss (Medium Severity): Helps prevent or minimize data loss during security incidents.
  • Impact: Medium to High risk reduction for ineffective incident handling, Medium risk reduction for prolonged downtime and data loss.
  • Currently Implemented: No specific incident response plan exists for Prefect security incidents. General incident response procedures are in place but not tailored to Prefect.
  • Missing Implementation: A dedicated incident response plan for Prefect security incidents needs to be developed, documented, and tested.