Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update requests
and its Dependencies
- Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update
requests
and its Dependencies - Description:
- Identify Dependencies: Use dependency management tools (like
pipenv
,poetry
, orpip freeze
) to list project dependencies, includingrequests
. - Check for Updates: Regularly check for new versions of
requests
using tools likepip list --outdated
or vulnerability scanners. - Review Release Notes: Before updating, review release notes for security patches and bug fixes in
requests
. - Update Dependencies: Use dependency management tools to update to the latest stable
requests
version (e.g.,pip install --upgrade requests
). - Test Thoroughly: After updating, run tests to ensure no regressions are introduced.
- Identify Dependencies: Use dependency management tools (like
- Threats Mitigated:
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated
requests
versions may contain known security flaws.
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Outdated
- Impact:
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk by patching known vulnerabilities in
requests
.
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk by patching known vulnerabilities in
- Currently Implemented: Yes, using
requirements.txt
and manualpip install --upgrade
during development and deployment. - Missing Implementation: Automation of
requests
updates in CI/CD pipeline is missing.
Mitigation Strategy: Vulnerability Scanning of Dependencies
- Mitigation Strategy: Vulnerability Scanning of Dependencies
- Description:
- Choose a Scanner: Select a vulnerability scanning tool (e.g., Snyk, OWASP Dependency-Check, GitHub Dependency Scanning).
- Integrate Scanner: Integrate the scanner into the development pipeline (e.g., CI/CD).
- Configure Scanner: Configure the scanner to analyze project dependencies, including
requests
. - Run Scans Regularly: Schedule regular scans to detect vulnerabilities in
requests
and its dependencies. - Review Scan Results: Analyze scan results to identify reported vulnerabilities in
requests
. - Prioritize and Remediate: Prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities by updating
requests
or applying patches.
- Threats Mitigated:
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Proactively identifies vulnerabilities in
requests
before exploitation.
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Proactively identifies vulnerabilities in
- Impact:
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk by enabling proactive patching of
requests
vulnerabilities.
- Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk by enabling proactive patching of
- Currently Implemented: No, vulnerability scanning is not currently integrated into the project.
- Missing Implementation: Vulnerability scanning needs to be implemented in the CI/CD pipeline to scan
requests
dependencies.
Mitigation Strategy: Explicitly Set TLS Version in requests
- Mitigation Strategy: Explicitly Set TLS Version in
requests
- Description:
- Import Modules: Import necessary modules from
requests
andurllib3
for TLS configuration. - Create Session: Instantiate a
requests.Session
object. - Create SSL Context: Use
create_urllib3_context(ssl_version=PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2)
to create an SSL context enforcing TLSv1.2 (or higher). - Create HTTPAdapter with Context: Instantiate
HTTPAdapter
and pass the SSL context usingssl_context
parameter. - Mount Adapter to Session: Mount the
HTTPAdapter
to thehttps://
scheme usingsession.mount('https://', adapter)
. - Use Session for HTTPS: Use the configured
session
for all HTTPS requests in the application to enforce the TLS version.
- Import Modules: Import necessary modules from
- Threats Mitigated:
- Downgrade Attacks (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from forcing
requests
to use older, less secure TLS versions.
- Downgrade Attacks (Medium Severity): Prevents attackers from forcing
- Impact:
- Downgrade Attacks: Significantly reduces risk by enforcing a minimum secure TLS version for
requests
connections.
- Downgrade Attacks: Significantly reduces risk by enforcing a minimum secure TLS version for
- Currently Implemented: No, TLS version is not explicitly set in
requests
configuration. - Missing Implementation: TLS version enforcement needs to be implemented in the
requests
session configuration.
Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Certificate Verification in requests
- Mitigation Strategy: Enforce Certificate Verification in
requests
- Description:
- Ensure
verify=True
(Default): When usingrequests
, ensure theverify
parameter isTrue
(default) or not explicitly set. - Avoid
verify=False
: Never setverify=False
in production code when usingrequests
. - Optional: Specify CA Bundle: For stricter control, provide a CA bundle file path to the
verify
parameter (e.g.,verify='/path/to/ca_bundle.pem'
) when usingrequests
.
- Ensure
- Threats Mitigated:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Prevents MITM attacks by ensuring
requests
verifies server certificates.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Prevents MITM attacks by ensuring
- Impact:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring server identity is verified by
requests
.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring server identity is verified by
- Currently Implemented: Yes, certificate verification is enabled by default in
requests
. - Missing Implementation: N/A - Currently implemented by default behavior of
requests
.
Mitigation Strategy: Hostname Verification in requests
- Mitigation Strategy: Hostname Verification in
requests
- Description:
- Ensure
verify=True
(Default): Hostname verification is automatically enabled inrequests
whenverify=True
. - Do Not Disable
verify
: Avoid disablingverify=False
inrequests
as it disables hostname verification.
- Ensure
- Threats Mitigated:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Prevents MITM attacks by ensuring
requests
verifies certificate hostname.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks (High Severity): Prevents MITM attacks by ensuring
- Impact:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring certificate is valid for the requested hostname in
requests
.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring certificate is valid for the requested hostname in
- Currently Implemented: Yes, hostname verification is enabled by default in
requests
when certificate verification is enabled. - Missing Implementation: N/A - Currently implemented by default behavior of
requests
.
Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for URLs used in requests
- Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for URLs used in
requests
- Description:
- Identify User Input URLs: Locate code where URLs for
requests
are from user input. - URL Scheme Validation: Validate URL schemes are
https://
(orhttp://
if needed) before using inrequests
. - Domain Allowlisting (Recommended): Allowlist trusted domains for URLs used in
requests
. - Domain Denylisting (Alternative): Denylist malicious domains or internal ranges for URLs used in
requests
. - URL Sanitization: Sanitize URLs to remove malicious characters before using in
requests
. - Error Handling: Implement error handling for invalid URLs used in
requests
.
- Identify User Input URLs: Locate code where URLs for
- Threats Mitigated:
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High Severity): Prevents SSRF by validating URLs used in
requests
.
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High Severity): Prevents SSRF by validating URLs used in
- Impact:
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Significantly reduces risk by limiting URLs
requests
can access.
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Significantly reduces risk by limiting URLs
- Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic URL scheme validation exists for some inputs used with
requests
. - Missing Implementation: Domain allowlisting/denylisting and comprehensive sanitization are missing for URLs used in
requests
.
Mitigation Strategy: URL Allowlisting and Denylisting for requests
- Mitigation Strategy: URL Allowlisting and Denylisting for
requests
- Description:
- Define Lists: Create allowlist/denylist of domains/URL patterns for
requests
. - Implement Check Function: Create a function to check if a URL is allowed/denied for
requests
. - Integrate Check Before
requests
: Validate URLs using the check function before making requests withrequests
. - Enforce Policy: Reject requests and log attempts if URLs are not allowed/are denied for
requests
. - Regularly Update Lists: Regularly review and update allowlist/denylist for
requests
.
- Define Lists: Create allowlist/denylist of domains/URL patterns for
- Threats Mitigated:
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High Severity): Restricts SSRF attacks by controlling destinations accessible by
requests
.
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High Severity): Restricts SSRF attacks by controlling destinations accessible by
- Impact:
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Significantly reduces risk by controlling target URLs for
requests
.
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Significantly reduces risk by controlling target URLs for
- Currently Implemented: No, URL allowlisting or denylisting is not implemented for
requests
. - Missing Implementation: URL allowlisting or denylisting needs to be implemented and integrated before making requests with
requests
.
Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Directly Using User Input in URLs for requests
- Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Directly Using User Input in URLs for
requests
- Description:
- Identify User Input in URLs: Find code where user data is directly in URLs for
requests
. - Use Parameterized Queries in
requests
: Userequests
'sparams
for GET requests with user input. - Use Request Body in
requests
: Usedata
orjson
parameters for POST/PUT requests with user input inrequests
. - Templating (Carefully): If URL templating is needed for
requests
, use safe libraries and encode user input.
- Identify User Input in URLs: Find code where user data is directly in URLs for
- Threats Mitigated:
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High Severity): Reduces SSRF risk by making URL manipulation harder in
requests
. - URL Injection (Medium Severity): Prevents URL injection by avoiding direct user input in
requests
URLs.
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High Severity): Reduces SSRF risk by making URL manipulation harder in
- Impact:
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Partially reduces risk by making URL manipulation harder for
requests
. - URL Injection: Significantly reduces risk by preventing direct URL manipulation in
requests
.
- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Partially reduces risk by making URL manipulation harder for
- Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Parameterized queries are used in some cases with
requests
. - Missing Implementation: Refactor code to consistently use parameterized queries and request bodies for user input in
requests
.
Mitigation Strategy: Set Timeouts for requests
- Mitigation Strategy: Set Timeouts for
requests
- Description:
- Implement
timeout
Parameter: For everyrequests
call, explicitly set thetimeout
parameter. - Set Connect Timeout: Configure a connect timeout (e.g., 5-10 seconds) for
requests
. - Set Read Timeout: Configure a read timeout (e.g., 10-30 seconds) for
requests
. - Handle Timeout Exceptions: Handle
requests.exceptions.Timeout
exceptions gracefully.
- Implement
- Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Prevents application hangs due to slow servers when using
requests
. - Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Prevents resource exhaustion by timing out stalled
requests
.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Prevents application hangs due to slow servers when using
- Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS): Significantly reduces risk of application hangs when using
requests
. - Resource Exhaustion: Significantly reduces risk of resource exhaustion due to
requests
.
- Denial of Service (DoS): Significantly reduces risk of application hangs when using
- Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Timeouts are set in some critical
requests
calls. - Missing Implementation: Ensure timeouts are consistently set for all
requests
calls.
Mitigation Strategy: Limit Redirects in requests
- Mitigation Strategy: Limit Redirects in
requests
- Description:
- Set
max_redirects
Parameter: Setmax_redirects
parameter to a reasonable limit (e.g., 5) inrequests.Session
or individual requests. - Use Session for Limits: Configure
max_redirects
inrequests.Session
for consistent limits. - Handle Redirect Exceptions: Handle
requests.exceptions.TooManyRedirects
exceptions.
- Set
- Threats Mitigated:
- Open Redirect Attacks (Medium Severity): Reduces risk of redirects to malicious sites via
requests
. - Denial of Service (DoS) (Low Severity): Prevents DoS from redirect loops in
requests
.
- Open Redirect Attacks (Medium Severity): Reduces risk of redirects to malicious sites via
- Impact:
- Open Redirect Attacks: Partially reduces risk by limiting redirects followed by
requests
. - Denial of Service (DoS): Minimally reduces risk of redirect-based DoS via
requests
.
- Open Redirect Attacks: Partially reduces risk by limiting redirects followed by
- Currently Implemented: No,
max_redirects
is not explicitly set inrequests
configuration. - Missing Implementation:
max_redirects
should be configured inrequests.Session
to limit redirects.
Mitigation Strategy: Validate Redirect URLs in requests
- Mitigation Strategy: Validate Redirect URLs in
requests
- Description:
- Disable Automatic Redirects (Optional): Set
allow_redirects=False
inrequests
to disable automatic redirects. - Manually Handle Redirects: If disabled, manually handle redirects by checking
response.status_code
andresponse.headers['Location']
fromrequests
. - Validate Redirect URL: Validate redirect URLs before following: scheme, domain allow/denylist, sanitization.
- Follow Valid Redirects: Only follow redirects to validated URLs using
requests
.
- Disable Automatic Redirects (Optional): Set
- Threats Mitigated:
- Open Redirect Attacks (Medium Severity): Significantly reduces open redirect risk by validating redirect destinations in
requests
. - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (Medium Severity): Prevents SSRF via redirect manipulation in
requests
.
- Open Redirect Attacks (Medium Severity): Significantly reduces open redirect risk by validating redirect destinations in
- Impact:
- Open Redirect Attacks: Significantly reduces risk by controlling redirect destinations in
requests
. - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Partially reduces risk of SSRF via redirects in
requests
.
- Open Redirect Attacks: Significantly reduces risk by controlling redirect destinations in
- Currently Implemented: No, redirect URLs are not explicitly validated when using
requests
. - Missing Implementation: Redirect URL validation needs to be implemented, especially for user-controlled URLs or sensitive operations using
requests
redirects.