Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
119 lines (86 loc) · 10.6 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

119 lines (86 loc) · 10.6 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for pypa/pipenv

Objective: To execute arbitrary code within the application's environment by exploiting vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the Pipenv dependency management process or its managed dependencies (focusing on high-risk areas).

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Tree: High-Risk Paths - Compromise Application via Pipenv

Root Goal: Compromise Application via Pipenv (High-Risk Paths)

    ├── 1. Compromise Dependency Resolution Process **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   ├── 1.1. Malicious Pipfile/Pipfile.lock Injection **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   │   ├── 1.1.1. Direct Modification of Pipfile/Pipfile.lock (Local/Staging) **[HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 1.1.1 Direct Modification]**
    │   │   └── 1.1.3. Dependency Confusion Attack (Internal vs. Public PyPI) **[HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 1.1.3 Dependency Confusion]**
    │   ├── 1.2. Dependency Hijacking/Takeover **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   │   └── 1.2.1. Exploit Unmaintained/Abandoned Packages **[HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 1.2.1 Unmaintained Packages]**
    ├── 2.3. Local Package Cache Poisoning (if local system is weak) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   └── 2.3.1. Attacker Gains Access to Local Pipenv Cache and Replaces Packages **[HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 2.3.1 Local Cache Poisoning]**
    ├── 3. Vulnerabilities in Pipenv Tooling Itself **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   ├── 3.1. Exploiting Known Pipenv Vulnerabilities **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
    │   │   └── 3.1.1. Outdated Pipenv Version with Known Security Flaws **[HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 3.1.1 Outdated Pipenv]**
    └── 4. Post-Compromise Actions via Malicious Dependencies **[CRITICAL NODE: 4.1.1 Post-Compromise Actions]**
        └── 4.1. Execution of Malicious Code within Application Context
            └── 4.1.1. Backdoors, Data Exfiltration, Privilege Escalation

Attack Tree Path: 1. Compromise Dependency Resolution Process [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers target the core process of how Pipenv determines and selects dependencies to install. By manipulating this process, they can force the installation of malicious packages.
  • Breakdown:
    • This path encompasses attacks that aim to influence Pipenv's decision-making during dependency resolution, leading to the inclusion of attacker-controlled code.
    • It is a high-risk path because successful exploitation directly subverts the intended dependency management, making it a fundamental security weakness.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1. Malicious Pipfile/Pipfile.lock Injection [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers inject malicious content into the Pipfile or Pipfile.lock files, which Pipenv uses to define and lock dependencies.
  • Breakdown:
    • This path focuses on directly altering the configuration files that dictate which packages Pipenv installs.
    • Compromising these files gives attackers direct control over the application's dependencies.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1. Direct Modification of Pipfile/Pipfile.lock (Local/Staging) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 1.1.1 Direct Modification]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers with access to development or staging environments directly modify Pipfile or Pipfile.lock to add or replace dependencies with malicious ones.
  • Breakdown:
    • This is a critical node because it represents a direct and relatively easy way for attackers with environment access to inject malicious dependencies.
    • It is high-risk due to the potential for insider threats, compromised developer accounts, or insecure staging environments.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.3. Dependency Confusion Attack (Internal vs. Public PyPI) [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 1.1.3 Dependency Confusion]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers exploit naming similarities between internal and public packages. They upload a malicious package to public PyPI with the same name as an internal package, hoping Pipenv will resolve to the public, malicious one.
  • Breakdown:
    • This is a critical node because it exploits potential weaknesses in organizational package naming conventions and dependency resolution logic.
    • It is high-risk if internal package management practices are not robust and naming collisions are possible.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2. Dependency Hijacking/Takeover [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers take over control of existing package names on PyPI, often by targeting unmaintained or abandoned packages. They then release malicious versions of these hijacked packages.
  • Breakdown:
    • This path exploits the trust placed in package names and the potential for maintainership changes on public repositories.
    • It is high-risk because applications relying on unmaintained packages become vulnerable to this type of attack.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1. Exploit Unmaintained/Abandoned Packages [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 1.2.1 Unmaintained Packages]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers specifically target unmaintained packages that are still dependencies in applications. They hijack the package name and release malicious versions.
  • Breakdown:
    • This is a critical node because it directly targets a known weakness – the use of dependencies that are no longer actively maintained and secured.
    • It is high-risk as many projects may unknowingly rely on unmaintained packages, creating a broad attack surface.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3. Local Package Cache Poisoning (if local system is weak) [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers who gain access to a developer's local machine can poison Pipenv's local package cache by replacing cached packages with malicious versions.
  • Breakdown:
    • This path exploits vulnerabilities in local system security and the trust Pipenv places in its local cache.
    • It is high-risk if developer workstations are not adequately secured, as it can lead to widespread compromise starting from a single compromised machine.

Attack Tree Path: 2.3.1. Attacker Gains Access to Local Pipenv Cache and Replaces Packages [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 2.3.1 Local Cache Poisoning]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers with local system access directly manipulate the Pipenv package cache directory, replacing legitimate packages with malicious ones.
  • Breakdown:
    • This is a critical node because it represents a direct compromise of the local development environment's package storage.
    • It is high-risk if local system security is weak, as it can lead to persistent compromise and propagation of malicious packages.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Vulnerabilities in Pipenv Tooling Itself [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers exploit security vulnerabilities within the Pipenv tool itself. This could be known vulnerabilities in outdated versions or undiscovered zero-day vulnerabilities.
  • Breakdown:
    • This path targets the security of the dependency management tool itself, rather than the dependencies it manages.
    • It is high-risk because vulnerabilities in Pipenv can have a broad impact on all applications using it.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1. Exploiting Known Pipenv Vulnerabilities [HIGH-RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Attackers exploit publicly known security vulnerabilities in outdated versions of Pipenv.
  • Breakdown:
    • This path relies on organizations failing to keep their Pipenv installations up to date.
    • It is high-risk because known vulnerabilities are often easier to exploit, and readily available exploit code may exist.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1.1. Outdated Pipenv Version with Known Security Flaws [HIGH-RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE: 3.1.1 Outdated Pipenv]

  • Attack Vector: Applications using outdated versions of Pipenv are vulnerable to known security flaws in those versions.
  • Breakdown:
    • This is a critical node because it highlights the direct risk of using outdated software.
    • It is high-risk due to the ease of exploitation of known vulnerabilities and the potential for widespread impact across projects using the outdated version.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Post-Compromise Actions via Malicious Dependencies [CRITICAL NODE: 4.1.1 Post-Compromise Actions]

  • Attack Vector: Once a malicious dependency is successfully installed through any of the above paths, the attacker can execute arbitrary code within the application's context.
  • Breakdown:
    • This node represents the culmination of a successful dependency compromise. It describes the actions an attacker can take after gaining code execution within the application.
    • It is a critical node because it represents the ultimate impact of the attack – the ability to perform malicious actions within the compromised application environment.

Attack Tree Path: 4.1.1. Backdoors, Data Exfiltration, Privilege Escalation

  • Attack Vector: Malicious code within the dependency is executed, allowing the attacker to establish backdoors, steal data, escalate privileges, or perform other malicious actions.
  • Breakdown:
    • This is the final stage of the attack, where the attacker leverages the compromised dependency to achieve their objectives.
    • It is critical because it defines the potential damage and consequences of a successful dependency-based attack.